Cirugía en horario extendido: una visión de los actores involucrados / Extended hours surgery: a vision of the actors involved

Introducción. Las listas de espera para cirugía de alta prevalencia son producto de una limitada oferta ante una elevada demanda de jornadas quirúrgicas. Tienen un impacto sobre las condiciones médicas de los pacientes y la consulta por urgencias. Como respuesta, se han incorporado los espacios quirúrgicos adicionales en horarios no convencionales. Su creciente implementación, aunque controversial, se reconoce cada vez más como una nueva normalidad en cirugía. Hay una limitada documentación de la efectividad de la medida, debido a la complejidad e intereses de los participantes. Métodos. Se analizó desde una posición crítica y reflexiva la perspectiva de los actores involucrados en un programa de cirugía en horario extendido, estableciendo las posibles barreras y los elementos facilitadores de una política enfocada a procedimientos en horario no convencional. Asimismo, se describen posibles oportunidades de investigación en el tema. Discusión. Los programas quirúrgicos en horarios no convencionales implican un análisis de los determinantes de su factibilidad y éxito para establecer la pertinencia de su implementación. La disponibilidad de las salas de cirugía, una estandarización de los procedimientos y una cultura de seguridad institucional implementada por la normativa vigente, favorecen estas acciones operacionales. Los aspectos económicos del prestador y del asegurador inciden en la planeación y ejecución de esta modalidad de trabajo. Conclusión. La realización segura y el éxito de un programa de cirugía en horario no convencional dependen de la posibilidad de alinear los intereses de los actores participantes en el proceso

Introduction. Waiting lists for high-prevalence surgeries are the product of limited supply due to a high demand for surgical days. They have an impact on patients' medical conditions and emergency consultation. In response, additional surgical spaces have been incorporated at unconventional times. Its growing implementation, although controversial, is increasingly recognized as a new normal in surgery. There is limited documentation of the effectiveness of the measure due to the complexity and interests of the participants. Methods. The perspective of the actors involved in an extended hours surgery program was analyzed from a critical and reflective position, establishing the possible barriers, and facilitating elements of a policy focused on procedures during unconventional hours. Possible research opportunities on the topic are also described. Discussion. Surgical programs at unconventional times involve an analysis of the determinants of their feasibility and success to establish the relevance of implementation. The availability of operating rooms, a standardization of procedures and a culture of institutional security implemented by current regulations, favor these operational actions. The economic aspects of the provider and the insurer affect the planning and execution of this type of work. Conclusion. The safe realization and success of a surgical program in unconventional hours depend on the possibility of aligning the interests of the actors involved in the process

Do it fast! Early access to specialized care improved long-term outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis: data from the REAL multicenter observational study

Abstract Background Early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) offers an opportunity for better treatment outcomes. In real-life settings, grasping this opportunity might depend on access to specialized care. We evaluated the effects of early versus late assessment by the rheumatologist on the diagnosis, treatment initiation and long-term outcomes of RA under real-life conditions. Methods Adults meeting the ACR/EULAR (2010) or ARA (1987) criteria for RA were included. Structured interviews were conducted. The specialized assessment was deemed "early" when the rheumatologist was the first or second physician consulted after symptoms onset, and "late" when performed afterwards. Delays in RA diagnosis and treatment were inquired. Disease activity (DAS28-CRP) and physical function (HAQ-DI) were evaluated. Student's t, Mann-Whitney U, chi-squared and correlation tests, and multiple linear regression were performed. For sensitivity analysis, a propensity score-matched subsample of early- vs. late-assessed participants was derived based on logistic regression. The study received ethical approval; all participants signed informed consent. Results We included 1057 participants (89.4% female, 56.5% white); mean (SD) age: 56.9 (11.5) years; disease duration: 173.1 (114.5) months. Median (IQR) delays from symptoms onset to both RA diagnosis and initial treatment coincided: 12 (6-36) months, with no significant delay between diagnosis and treatment. Most participants (64.6%) first sought a general practitioner. Notwithstanding, 80.7% had the diagnosis established only by the rheumatologist. Only a minority (28.7%) attained early RA treatment (≤ 6 months of symptoms). Diagnostic and treatment delays were strongly correlated (rho 0.816; p < 0.001). The chances of missing early treatment more than doubled when the assessment by the rheumatologist was belated (OR 2.77; 95% CI: 1.93, 3.97). After long disease duration, late-assessed participants still presented lower chances of remission/low disease activity (OR 0.74; 95% CI: 0.55, 0.99), while the early-assessed ones showed better DAS28-CRP and HAQ-DI scores (difference in means [95% CI]: −0.25 [−0.46, −0.04] and − 0.196 [−0.306, −0.087] respectively). The results in the propensity-score matched subsample confirmed those observed in the original (whole) sample. Conclusions Early diagnosis and treatment initiation in patients with RA was critically dependent on early access to the rheumatologist; late specialized assessment was associated with worse long-term clinical outcomes.