Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae ; (24): 74-79, 2021.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-906208

RESUMO

Objective:To explore the anti-hepatoma effect of compound <italic>Phylanthus urinaria</italic> Ⅱ ( CPU Ⅱ) by inhibiting the expression of the long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) colon cancer associated transcript-1 (CCAT1) and restoring the expression of microRNA let-7a. Method:Real-time fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to detect the expression of lncRNA CCAT1 in normal liver cells (LO2 cells) and hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells, and the differences in expression between these two types of cells were compared. The methylthiazolyl tetrazolium(MTT) assay was used to detect the proliferation of HepG2 cells after treatment with different concentrations of CPU Ⅱ and 5-fluorouracil(5-FU) for 24, 48 and 72 h. Hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells were cultured <italic>in vitro </italic>and set into three gropes: cell control group, CPU Ⅱ low-dose group (0.8 g·L<sup>-1</sup>) and high-dose group (1.6 g·L<sup>-1</sup>). Real-time PCR was used to detect the mRNA expression of lncRNA CCAT1, microRNA let-7a and its target genes high mobility group protein A2(HMGA2), and N-RAS in each grope. Western blot was used to detect the protein expression of HMGA2, and Cyclin D<sub>1</sub> in each grope. Result:As compared with LO2 cells, expression of lncRNA CCAT1 in HepG2 cells was significantly up-regulated (<italic>P</italic><0.05). Results of MTT assay showed that the 50% inhibiting concentration(IC<sub>50</sub>)<sub> </sub>of CPU Ⅱ and 5-FU on hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells was 1.649, 0.044 648 g·L<sup>-1 </sup>respectively. As compared with the control group, CPU Ⅱ high-and low-dose groups (1.6, 0.8 g·L<sup>-1</sup>) significantly inhibited the proliferation of HepG2 cells (<italic>P</italic><0.05), and the effect was most remarkable in CPU Ⅱ high-dose group (<italic>P</italic><0.05). The results of Real-time PCR showed that as compared with control group, the expression of lncRNA CCAT1 mRNA was significantly inhibited in CPU Ⅱ high-and low-dose groups (<italic>P</italic><0.05), and the expression of microRNA let-7a mRNA was obviously up-regulated in high-dose group (<italic>P</italic><0.05), but the expression of HMGA2 mRNA in CPU Ⅱ high-and low-dose groups as well as the expression of N-RAS mRNA in CPU Ⅱ low-dose group were down-regulated (<italic>P</italic><0.05). Western blot results showed that as compared with the cell control group, the protein expression of HMGA2 and Cyclin D<sub>1</sub> in CPU Ⅱ high-and low-dose groups (1.6, 0.8 g·L<sup>-1</sup>) was significantly down-regulated (<italic>P</italic><0.05). Conclusion:CPU Ⅱ can inhibit the expression of lncRNA CCAT1, recover the expression of microRNA let-7a, and suppress the mRNA and protein expression of related downstream target genes in hepatoma cells line HepG2, thereby inhibiting the proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma cells and exerting anti-hepatocellular carcinoma effect.

2.
Chinese Journal of Cancer Biotherapy ; (6): 1131-1137, 2020.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-829336

RESUMO

@#[Abstract] Objective: To investigate the effect of apatinib (APA) combined with cisplatin (DDP) on the proliferation, invasion and migration capacity of gastric carcinoma (GC) cells and its molecular mechanism. Methods: Cancer and para-cancerous tissue samples resected from 50 GC patients, who were surgically treated in Wuwei People's Hospital from January 2016 to June 2019, were collected for this study; in addition, GC cell lines MGC803 and SGC7901 were also collected. qPCR was used to detect the HMGA2 expression in tissues and mRNA expressions of molecules related to cell proliferation, migration and invasion in GC cell lines. MGC803 and SGC7901 cells were transfected with pcHMGA2 by liposome transfection technology. After treatment with DDP and APA at different concentrations, the cells were divided into NC, pcHMGA2, pcHMGA2+DDP and pcHMGA2+DDP+APA groups. Protein expression of HMGA2 in GC cells was detected by Western blotting, and proliferation, migration and invasion of the cells were detected by MTT and Transwell assay, respectively. Results: The mRNA expression of HMGA2 in GC tissues was higher than that in para-cancerous tissues (P<0.05), and the survival rate of GC patients in the high expression group was significantly reduced (P<0.01). DDP significantly inhibited the proliferation, invasion and migration of MGC803 and SGC7901 cells (all P<0.01); the proliferation, invasion and migration of MGC803 and SGC7901 cells in DDP+APA group significantly decreased (all P<0.01) as compared with DDP group; APA significantly enhanced the inhibitory effect of DDP on HMGA2 expression in GC cells (P<0.01); APA enhanced the anticancer activity of DDP against GC by down-regulating HMGA2 expression. Conclusion: APA promotes the anticancer activity of DDP against GC, and its molecular mechanism is the promotion of the inhibitory effect of DDP on HMGA2 expression.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA