Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Chinese Journal of General Practitioners ; (6): 42-47, 2022.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-933695

RESUMO

Objective:To investigate the implementation status of sepsis hour-1 bundle strategy for patients with septic shock in emergency department.Methods:A total of 116 septic shock patients admitted to the emergency department from January 2020 to December 2020 were included in this prospective study, and the implementation of sepsis bundles and the clinical outcomes of patients were recorded.Results:Among 116 patients, 20 cases (17.2%) had lactic acid monitored within 1 h, 20 cases (17.2%) had blood culture before antibiotics, 82 cases (70.1%) received broad-spectrum antibiotics, 16 cases (13.8%) received fluid resuscitation ≥30 ml/kg, and 57 cases (49.1%) received vasoactive drugs during resuscitation. Finally, the sepsis hour-1 bundle strategy was fully implemented only in 13 cases (11.2%). Compared with the group with incomplete implementation of sepsis hour-1 bundle strategy, the volume of fluid recovery in the group with full implementation was significantly increased [33.7 (30.0,37.5) vs. 8.9(7.3,10.8) ml/kg, Z=-4.78, P<0.001], mean artery blood pressure significantly increased [70.0 (70.0,76.7) vs. 67.7 (61.7,76.7)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) , Z=-2.00, P<0.001], and lactic acid significantly decreased [3.0 (2.0,3.2) vs. 4.4 (3.7,7.2) mmol/L, Z=-2.76, P=0.006]. However, there were no significant differences in ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality and 28-day mortality between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusions:Septic shock patients in emergency department have poor compliance with the implementation of sepsis hour-1 bundle strategy, and relevant management training should be strengthened.

2.
Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine ; (12): 1457-1462, 2022.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-954565

RESUMO

Objective:To investigate the effect of septic shock rapid response team (SSRRT) on the compliance and prognosis of hour-1 bundle therapy strategy in emergency department patients with septic shock.Methods:This study was conducted on emergency patients with septic shock who were admitted to Huai’an First Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University from January 2020 to December 2021. The inclusion criteria were emergency patients with septic shock who met the international guideline for surviving sepsis campaigns (Sepsis 3.0). Exclusion criteria: age<18 years, pregnant patients, patients transferred from another hospital who had received fluid resuscitation and/or vasoactive drugs, patients requiring emergency surgery, patients with emergency detention time<1 h, patients who refused to place central venous catheterization or had contraindications for catheterization, and patients who refused to give informed consent. SSRRT was established in January 2021. According to the establishment of SSRRT, patients were divided into the pre-SSRRT intervention group and the post-SSRRT intervention group. The general clinical data of the enrolled patients were collected, including vital signs, lactate, fluid resuscitation volume, maximum vasoactive drug pumping rate at the diagnosis of septic shock, implementation of hour-1 bundle therapy strategies, and ICU and 28-day mortality. Statistical software SPSS 25.0 was used. Pearson chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables between groups, and Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables between groups.Results:A total of 289 emergency patients met the inclusion criteria, 115 patients were excluded, and 174 patients were eventually included, including 83 patients in the pre-SSRRT group and 91 patients in the post-SSRRT group. Compared with the pre-SSRRT group, the proportion of lactate monitoring (54.2% vs. 100.0%, P<0.001), blood culture (27.7% vs. 93.4%, P<0.001), antibiotics (57.8% vs. 97.8%, P<0.001), fluid resuscitation volume ≥ 30 mL/kg (4.8% vs. 34.1%, P<0.001), and mean arterial pressure ≥ 65 mmHg (49.4% vs. 68.1%, P<0.001) were significantly increased. There was no significant difference in ICU mortality (50.6% vs. 37.4%, P=0.079) or 28-day mortality (53.0% vs. 38.5%, P=0.054) between the two groups. Conclusions:SSRRT can significantly improve the compliance of hour-1 bundle therapy strategy implementation in patients with emergency septic shock, and has a trend of decreasing mortality.

3.
Journal of Medical Postgraduates ; (12): 9-13, 2019.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-818110

RESUMO

In these years, renewal of the concept of sepsis, application of qSOFA and proposal of hour-1 bundle for sepsis further suggested to diagnose and treatment of sepsis earlier and faster than before. It presents new challenges to current clinical practice and asks us to be more alert to forewarning symptoms of patients, optimize hospital management procedures, strengthen training exercises and multidisciplinary collaboration in order to achieve optimal treatment of sepsis.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA