Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
China Pharmacy ; (12): 607-612, 2023.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-964774

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE To indirectly compare and evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab, tocilizumab, eculizumab, inebilizumab and satralizumab in preventing the relapse of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, so as to provide reference for clinical drug use. METHODS Retrieved from Embase, Medline, PubMed, CNKI, ClinicalTrials. gov, UMIN Clinical Trials Registry and Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about five monoclonal antibodies (trial group) versus placebo or other therapeutic scheme (control group) were collected during the inception to Apr. 2022. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included literature with Cochrane risk bias assessment tool. OpenBUGS software was used for network meta-analysis. In terms of safety, Chi-square test was performed for adverse events (AEs) in trial group and control group. RESULTS A total of 7 RCTs were included, involving 793 patients. The results of surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) showed the order of capabilities decreasing relapse risk was: eculizumab> rituximab>inebilizumab>satralizumab; the order of capabilities reducing the annual recurrence rate was: eculizumab> satralizumab; the order of capabilities improving the progress of disability was: eculizumab>satralizumab>inebilizumab> rituximab>tocilizumab. In terms of safety, the results of χ2 test showed that there were no statistically significant differences in the risk of total AEs and serious AEs in each study between trial groups and control groups (P>0.05); the incidence of infusion reaction, nausea and vomiting in rituximab group, and that of upper respiratory tract infection in eculizumab group were significantly higher than placebo group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS The effect of eculizumab is more optimal in three outcomes; in terms of improving the progress of disability, eculizumab, satralizumab and inebilizumab are more effective than the other two drugs; in terms of safety, there are significant goldenmoonsp@163.com differences in some AEs with different grades and individual AEs, but it is not found that they are inconsistent with the 学。E-mail:liyingpds@126.com reported results of the existing literature and drug instructions.

2.
Chinese Journal of Ocular Fundus Diseases ; (6): 525-529, 2023.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-995661

RESUMO

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare debilitating autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. Three monoclonal antibodies were recently approved as maintenance therapies for aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG) seropositive NMOSD (eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab). Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm published international Delphi consensus on the management of AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD in May 31, 2023. Twenty-five statements reached consensus after two voting rounds by 24 Delphi panel experts. Inebilizumab and satralizumab have been listed in China, and off-label immunosuppressants and biologics are also used in clinical practice. However, there are no standard treatment recommendations in use of these biologics and maintenance therapy of NMOSD. Therefore, the interpretation of this consensus, focusing on the initial use of monoclonal drugs, the conversion between monoclonal drugs and immunosuppressants, as well as the application and safety of special populations, is conducive to improving the normative and effective use of of monoclonal drugs in NMOSD y ophthalmologists and neurologists

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA