Interpretations of the NCCN guidelines for breast cancer risk reduction (version 2023) / 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志

@#Breast cancer, the most common malignancy in the world, also causes the most death cases of women among malignancies. Breast cancer risk reduction guidelines (version 2023) was updated by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Based on high-level evidences from evidence-based medicine and the latest research progress, the guidelines provided standardized guidance for breast cancer risk assessment and risk reduction strategies for individuals without a history of invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ, which has attracted widespread attention from clinicians worldwide. Breast cancer is also the most common malignancy in Chinese women, and the number of newly diagnosed breast cancer cases each year in China ranks first in the world due to the large population, so the breast cancer prevention has become a major public health challenge in China. Aimed to provide reference for breast cancer prevention in China, this article interpreted the guidelines (the new version) based on the characteristics of breast structure in Asian women and the epidemiological characteristics of breast cancer in China.

Interpretation of Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Male Osteoporosis / 中华内分泌代谢杂志

In October 2020, Chinese Society of Osteoporosis and Bone Mineral Research issued the Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Male Osteoporosis. Taken together with the Guideline for Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Osteoporosis (2017), this article interprets guideline for male osteoporosis from the aspects of osteoporosis epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and treatment.

An interpretation of 2017 EASL clinical practice guidelines: the diagnosis and management of patients with primary biliary cholangitis / 中华肝脏病杂志

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic autoimmune cholestatic disease and may progress to liver fibrosis, liver cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, and even end-stage liver disease without effective treatment. The diagnosis of PBC is mainly based on the biochemical parameters indicating cholestatic hepatitis and the presence of specific autoantibody in circulation. The goals of the treatment and management of PBC are to prevent the development of end-stage liver disease, to improve related clinical symptoms, and to improve patients’ quality of life. Since PBC has relatively strong heterogeneity and the clinical manifestations and course of PBC can be diverse, it is necessary to provide long-term individualized treatment and follow-up for such patients. Here we provide an interpretation of the 2017 EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with PBC, in order to better understand recent clinical research evidence and updated recommendations. In particular, we focus on the key points in the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up strategies of PBC and emphasizing that timely and accurate risk stratification and proper clinical research enrollment may bring benefits to patients with refractory PBC.

An interpretation of the AASLD practice guideline on the diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in 2017 / 中华肝脏病杂志

The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) updated and published the Practice Guidance for the Diagnosis and Management of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) in July 2017, which provides recommendations for the accurate diagnosis, treatment, and effective prevention of NAFLD. Related metabolic diseases should be considered during the initial evaluation of patients suspected of NAFLD. Noninvasive diagnostic techniques including transient elastography, magnetic resonance elastography, and serum biochemical models should be used to evaluate the development and progression of liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. Clinical liver pathology report should clearly differentiate between nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL), NAFL with inflammation, and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and identify the presence or absence of liver fibrosis and its degree. Early medication for NAFLD can only be used in patients with pathologically confirmed NASH and liver fibrosis, and it is not recommended to use pioglitazone and vitamin E as the first-line drugs for patients with NASH which has not been proven by biopsy or non-diabetic NASH patients. Foregut bariatric surgery can be considered for obese patients with NAFLD/NASH who meet related indications. It is emphasized that the risk factors for cardiovascular disease should be eliminated for NAFLD patients. Statins can be used for the treatment of dyslipidemia in patients with NAFLD/NASH, but they cannot be used in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. Routine screening or hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance is not recommended for NASH patients without liver cirrhosis. Cardiovascular disease should be taken seriously during liver transplantation evaluation. There is still no adequate clinical evidence for the treatment of NAFLD in children and adolescents, and intensive lifestyle intervention is recommended as the first-line therapy for such patients.