RESUMO
Resumen El imatinib es un agente antineoplásico que actúa como inhibidor de la tirosina-cinasa. Los efectos adversos cutáneos son, en general, leves y autolimitados. Dentro de estos, la erupción liquenoide es infrecuente y suele mejorar sólo con tratamiento tópico. Presentamos el caso de una paciente con erupción liquenoide por imatinib refractaria al tratamiento con corticoides tópicos, con respuesta favorable a terapia de luz ultravioleta B de banda estrecha. No existen casos publicados a la fecha en la literatura de erupción liquenoide por imatinib tratada con fototerapia.
Abstract Imatinib is an antineoplastic agent that acts as a tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Cutaneous adverse effects are generally mild and self-limited. The lichenoid eruption due to imatinib is rare. It usually improves just with topical treatment. We present the case of a patient with a lichenoid reaction due to imatinib, refractory to treatment with topical corticosteroids, with a favorable response to narrow-band ultraviolet B phototherapy. There are no published cases to date in the literature of lichenoid eruption due to imatinib treated with phototherapy.
RESUMO
Background: Facial papules are a feature of several clinical conditions and may present both diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Aim: To describe a grouped papular eruption on the nose and adjoining cheeks that has not been well characterized previously. Materials and Methods: A series of consecutive patients with a papular eruption predominantly involving nose and cheeks were evaluated, treated and followed up prospectively at tertiary care centers. Demographic details, clinical features, histopathology and response to treatment were recorded. Results: There were five men and six women (mean age 29.9 ± 6.9 years) who had disease for a mean duration of 17.3 ± 11.1 months. All patients presented with a predominantly asymptomatic eruption of monomorphic, pseudovesicular, grouped, skin colored to slightly erythematous papules prominently involving the tip of nose, nasal alae, philtrum and the adjoining cheeks. A total of 15 biopsies from 11 patients were analyzed and the predominant finding was a dense, focal lymphoid infiltrate restricted to the upper dermis with basal cell damage and atrophy of the overlying epidermis. The eruption ran a chronic course from several months to years. Limitations: Direct immunofluorescence could not be performed except in one case. Immunohistochemical stains for CD4 and CD8 could not be done owing to nonavailability. Phototesting was undertaken in one patient only. Conclusion: Small grouped papules on the nose and adjoining skin with a lichenoid histopathology appear to represent a distinct clinicopathological entity. It may be related to actinic lichen nitidus/micropapular variant of polymorphous light eruption.
RESUMO
Background: A distinct morphological pattern of photodermatosis has been observed with shiny skin colored to hypopigmented tiny papules, discrete or coalescing to form plaques. Aims: To study the clinico-pathological features of patients presenting with these lesions. Methods: A total of 72 patients were recruited. Clinical examination and skin biopsy was carried out to evaluate the morphological patterns and the histopathological features. Results: In all patients, tiny discrete to coalescent papules were observed on sun-exposed sites but usually sparing the face. The condition occurred more commonly in women. Three specific histopathological patterns were observed : 0 spongiotic (43.7%), lichenoid (22.5%), psoriasiform (18.7%) and also perivascular pattern in 5%. Conclusion: Photosensitive lichenoid eruption is a morphologically distinct photodermatoses that is commonly seen in Indian patients with pathological features showing mostly spongiotic changes and in some cases lichenoid changes.