RESUMO
Objective: To investigate and evaluate the effectiveness of the distal radius microplate locking plate for the treatment of displaced fracture of medial clavicle. Methods: Between January 2013 and June 2017, 18 cases of obvious displaced fracture of medial clavicle were treated with distal radius microlocking plate. There were 10 males and 8 females, with an average age of 51.4 years (range, 18-88 years). Causes of injury included traffic accident injury in 15 cases, heavy object injury in 3 cases; all of them were closed injury. According to Edinburgh classification, 15 cases were ⅠB1 type and 3 cases were ⅠB2 type. Fracture displacement was 12-21 mm (mean, 16.3 mm). The time from injury to operation was 3-7 days (mean, 4.3 days). After operation, the clinical healing and complications of fracture were observed, and shoulder function was evaluated according to Rockwood's scoring criteria. Results: No incisional infection, neurovascular injury, or other early complications occurred. All 18 patients were followed up 8-15 months (mean, 12 months). All fractures reached clinical osseous union, and the healing time was 8-24 weeks (mean, 16.6 weeks). Postoperative plate loosening occurred in 1 case, which was removed surgically, while other patients did not suffer from complications such as bone nonunion, displacement, internal fixator loosening, and loss of reduction. At last follow-up, according to Rockwood's scoring criteria, the results were excellent in 12 cases and good in 6 cases. Conclusion: The distal radius microplate locking plate is effective for the treatment of displaced medial clavicle fracture, which has few complications, and is feasible for early functional exercise, and is helpful for the recovery of shoulder joint function.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess the clinical features and the outcomes of conservative treatment of condensing osteitis of the medial end of the clavicle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 24 patients among 44 patients with pain and protrusion on the medial clavicle, who were diagnosed as condensing osteitis and followed over one year between April 2003 and August 2008. Plain radiograph and laboratory examination (24 cases), bone scan (12 cases), computed tomography (3 cases), MRI (1 case) and biopsy (1 case) were performed. Patients were followed with UCLA score, VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) and change of protrusion. RESULTS: In all cases, mild sclerosis and expansion were seen at the medial clavicle and sternoclavicular joint was preserved. Laboratory examination showed nonspecific results but various abnormal findings. Protrusion was not changed in 20 cases (83%) and decreased in 4 cases (17%). VAS for pain was improved from 3.4 to 1.2 and VAS for function was improved from 25.5 to 29.1. UCLA score was improved from 28.8 points to 33.7 points. CONCLUSION: Physical and radiologic examination was important for diagnosis of condensing osteitis and laboratory exmination was useful to differentiate it from other diseases. Conservative treatment with rest and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs showed satisfactory result.