Comparison of values of immunocytochemical P16/Ki-67 double staining, P16 INK4α single staining and high-risk human papillomavirus testing in screening of high-grade cervical lesions / 肿瘤研究与临床

Objective:To investigate the screening values of immunocytochemical P16/Ki-67 double staining, P16 INK4α single staining and high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) testing for high-grade cervical lesions. Methods:The clinical data of 622 patients who underwent cervical thin-layer liquid-based cytology (TCT) and HR-HPV testing in General Hospital of Taiyuan Iron and Steel (Group) Co., Ltd. from March 2019 to July 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The remaining cytological specimens were detected by P16/Ki-67 double staining and P16 INK4α single staining. Among them, 334 patients with TCT results suggesting atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and above and HPV-positive underwent colposcopy pathological biopsy. Using pathological results as reference, the positive predictive value, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of P16/Ki-67 double staining, P16 INK4α single staining and HR-HPV testing for screening of high-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia (HSIL) and cervical cancer were compared. Results:Taking the results of histopathology as references, combined with the results of TCT, 31 of 622 patients were HSIL, of which 22 (71.0%) were positive for P16/Ki-67 double staining, 23 (74.2%) were positive for P16 INK4α single staining, and 25 (80.6%) were positive for HR-HPV testing; 4 cases were cervical cancer, and the positive rates of the three detection methods were all 100.0% (4/4). Among 622 patients, the positive rates of P16/Ki-67 double staining, P16 INK4α single staining and HR-HPV testing for screening of HSIL and cervical cancer were 13.99% (87/622), 25.40% (158/622) and 21.38% (133/622); the positive predictive values were 29.89%, 17.09% and 21.08%; the accuracies were 91.19%, 78.94% and 83.28%; the specificities were 89.77%, 77.98% and 82.46%; the sensitivities were 74.29%, 77.14% and 82.86%. The positive rate, positive predictive value, specificity and accuracy of P16/Ki-67 double staining were higher than those of P16 INK4α single staining and HR-HPV testing, and the differences were statistically significant ( z values were -5.062 and -3.418, 2.328 and 2.450, 5.436 and 3.570, 6.043 and 4.161, all P < 0.05); the sensitivity of HR-HPV testing was higher than that of P16/Ki-67 double staining and P16 INK4α single staining, but the differences were not statistically significant ( z values were -0.890 and 1.017, both P > 0.05). Conclusions:HR-HPV testing is more suitable for primary cervical lesion screening; P16/Ki-67 double staining can be used as a potential combined cell screening tool or an effective triage tool; P16 INK4α single staining has certain limitations.

Detection of p16/Ki-67 in women with abnormal cytological results and its diagnostic value for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II+ grade / 国际生物医学工程杂志

Objective:To explore the detection capability of p16/Ki-67 double staining technique in women with various abnormal thinprep cytologic test (TCT) results and its diagnostic value for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Ⅱ+ grade (CIN2+).Methods:A total of 225 women with abnormal TCT results, i.e. the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance(ASC-US), in the Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics, Nankai University Affiliated Maternity Hospital from December 2018 to December 2019 were enrolled. p16/Ki-67 double staining were detected and compared with the high risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) and pathological results.Results:The positive rates of p16/Ki-67 double staining increased with cytologic and pathologic categories. For diagnosis of CIN2+, p16/Ki-67double staining (90.1%) was less sensitive than HR-HPV testing (98.2%)( P<0.05), but the specificity of p16/Ki-67 double staining (58.8%) was significantly higher than HR-HPV(21.6%) ( P<0.001). Conclusions:Compared with HR-HPV, p16/Ki-67 double staining has better effect on diagnosing CIN2+. p16/Ki-67 double staining can be considered as triaging method for management of ASC-US and LSIL patients, significantly reduce the colposcopy referral rate (nearly 50%), which has high clinical application value.

Evaluation the triage performance of p16/Ki-67 dual staining for HR-HPV positive women / 中华预防医学杂志

Objective@#This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of p16/Ki-67 dual staining for triage high risk HPV (HR-HPV) infected women.@*Method@#Target objects were women who infected HR-HPV and received colposcopy examination between April and December of 2016 at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. Gynecologists collected the cervical exfoliated cells from eligible women for p16/Ki-67 dual staining, LBC testing and HPV DNA testing. Histology diagnosis were used as gold standard. Sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPVs), negative predictive values (NPVs) of p16/Ki-67 dual staining, LBC testing and HPV16/18 testing for triage of HR-HPV positive population were calculated and compared.@*Results@#A total of 295 HR-HPV infected women were selected, and the mean age was (44.29±11.48) years old. Positive rates of p16/Ki-67 dual staining, HPV16/18 testing and LBC testing were 70.17% (207), 56.95% (168) and 85.76% (253), respectively. When CIN2+as the endpoint, among the three triage methods, sensitivity of p16/Ki-67 dual staining was 90.00% (95%CI: 85.06%-93.43%), higher than the value of HPV 16/18 testing, but lower than the value of LBC testing. Specificity, PPV and NPV of p16/Ki-67 dual staining were the highest [71.58% (95%CI: 61.81%-79.67%), 86.96% (95%CI:81.69%-90.88%) and 77.27% (95%CI: 67.49%-84.78%)]. When detection for CIN3+, sensitivity of p16/Ki-67 dual staining was 92.90% (95%CI: 87.74%-95.99%), lower than the value of LBC testing, but higher than the value of HPV16/18 testing. Specificity of p16/Ki-67 dual staining was 55.00% (95%CI: 46.74%-63.00%), lower than the value of HPV16/18 testing, but higher than the value of LBC testing. PPV of p16/Ki-67 dual staining was 69.57% (95%CI: 62.99%-75.43%), lower than the value of HPV 16/18 testing, but higher than the value of LBC testing. NPV of p16/Ki-67 dual staining was 87.50% (95%CI: 78.99%-92.87%), higher than value of HPV 16/18 testing, but lower than the value of LBC testing.@*Conclusion@#p16/Ki-67 dual staining has better clinical effects than HPV 16/18 testing and LBC testing for triage women with HR-HPV infection.

Evaluation the triage performance of p16/Ki-67 dual staining for HR-HPV positive women / 中华预防医学杂志

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of p16/Ki-67 dual staining for triage high risk HPV (HR-HPV) infected women. Target objects were women who infected HR-HPV and received colposcopy examination between April and December of 2016 at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. Gynecologists collected the cervical exfoliated cells from eligible women for p16/Ki-67 dual staining, LBC testing and HPV DNA testing. Histology diagnosis were used as gold standard. Sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPVs), negative predictive values (NPVs) of p16/Ki-67 dual staining, LBC testing and HPV16/18 testing for triage of HR-HPV positive population were calculated and compared. A total of 295 HR-HPV infected women were selected, and the mean age was (44.29±11.48) years old. Positive rates of p16/Ki-67 dual staining, HPV16/18 testing and LBC testing were 70.17% (207), 56.95% (168) and 85.76% (253), respectively. When CIN2+as the endpoint, among the three triage methods, sensitivity of p16/Ki-67 dual staining was 90.00% (95: 85.06%-93.43%), higher than the value of HPV 16/18 testing, but lower than the value of LBC testing. Specificity, PPV and NPV of p16/Ki-67 dual staining were the highest [71.58% (95: 61.81%-79.67%), 86.96% (95:81.69%-90.88%) and 77.27% (95: 67.49%-84.78%)]. When detection for CIN3+, sensitivity of p16/Ki-67 dual staining was 92.90% (95: 87.74%-95.99%), lower than the value of LBC testing, but higher than the value of HPV16/18 testing. Specificity of p16/Ki-67 dual staining was 55.00% (95: 46.74%-63.00%), lower than the value of HPV16/18 testing, but higher than the value of LBC testing. PPV of p16/Ki-67 dual staining was 69.57% (95: 62.99%-75.43%), lower than the value of HPV 16/18 testing, but higher than the value of LBC testing. NPV of p16/Ki-67 dual staining was 87.50% (95: 78.99%-92.87%), higher than value of HPV 16/18 testing, but lower than the value of LBC testing. p16/Ki-67 dual staining has better clinical effects than HPV 16/18 testing and LBC testing for triage women with HR-HPV infection.

Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of p16/Ki-67 dual staining and HPV DNA testing of abnormal cervical cytology in the detection of histology proven cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and above (CIN 2+)

Introduction: Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is used as a means of triaging cervico-vaginalsmears with low grade squamous abnormalities or as part of co-testing with cytology. While HPVtesting has a high sensitivity, it has a low specificity in detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasiagrade 2 and above (CIN 2+) leading to unnecessary colposcopy referrals. We investigate the accuracyof the p16/Ki-67 dual immunocytochemical stain in determining the presence of CIN 2+ lesions onhistology and its potential as a superior biomarker for triage. Methods: Liquid based cervico-vaginalcytology specimens with squamous abnormalities and corresponding histology from 97 women withsubsequent colposcopy and biopsy were included. The specimens were then subjected to the dual stainand Roche Cobas 4800 multiplex real time PCR HPV DNA testing. The sensitivity and specificity ofthe dual stain and HPV testing were calculated using CIN 2+ on histology as a reference standard.Results: The sensitivity and specificity of the dual stain in detecting histology proven CIN 2+ was93.7% and 76.5% while HPV testing was 85.7% and 14.7% respectively. Of the 44 women withASCUS or LSIL on cytology, the dual stain also reduced the number of unnecessary colposcopyreferrals from 27 to 7 when used as a triage marker compared to HPV testing. Conclusion: p16/Ki-67dual stain was more sensitive and specific than HPV testing in determining the presence of CIN 2+on histology. It could triage low grade cervico-vaginal specimens more effectively and potentiallyhelp women avoid unnecessary colposcopies. Future studies are needed to further evaluate its rolein cervical cancer screening programmes.

Clinical value of p16/Ki-67 immunocytochemical dual staining in cervical cancer screening / 中华肿瘤杂志

Objective@#to investigate the clinical value of p16/Ki-67 immunocytochemical dual staining (abbreviated as p16/Ki-67 dual staining) in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cervical cancer screening.@*Methods@#From July to November 2015, a total of 980 women attending cervical cancer screening and receiving high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) test and thinprep cytologic test (TCT) were included in the study. p16/Ki-67 immunocytochemical dual staining was performed on residual cytologic specimens and compared with histopathology results.@*Results@#The expression risks of p16/Ki-67 in HPV16/18 group and another HR-HPV group were higher than HPV negative group, with an odds ratio of 10.64 (95%CI: 5.66~20.02) and 5.40 (95%CI: 3.62~8.04), respectively. The positive rate of p16/Ki-67 increased with the grade of TCT and histologic diagnosis, and was higher in both CIN2 and CIN3 groups than normal group (P<0.05). The sensitivity of p16/Ki-67 to detect CIN2+ and CIN3+ lesions was 89.3% and 94.1%, respectively, and the specificity was 69.3% and 66.8%, respectively. The sensitivity of TCT to detect CIN2+ and CIN3+ lesions was 60.7% and 64.7%, respectively, and the specificity was 49.3% and 49.1%, respectively.@*Conclusions@#Compared with TCT, p16/Ki-67 dual staining has higher sensitivity and specificity. It can identify high-grade cervical lesions and guide the classification of CIN. p16/Ki-67 dual staining in conjunction with HPV test may be considered as an efficient method for cervical cancer screening.

Study on immunocytochemistry p16/Ki-67 double staining combined with DNA ploidy analysis for analyzing and predicting cervical high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion / 重庆医学

Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of DNA ploidy analysis combined with immunocytochemistry p16/ki-67 double staining in cervical high grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia(HSIL) and cervical squamous cell carcinoma(SCC).Methods A total of 73 cases of cytological tests were randomly collected.Among them,53 cases were small DNA ploidy abnormal cells and 20 cases were DNA ploidy negative.The p16/Ki-67 results were detected by immunocytochemistry double staining.With the pathological results as the golden standard,the diagnostic values of DNA ploidy analysis and DNA ploidy analysis combined with p16/Ki-67 double staining in HSIL + was contrastively analyzed by pathologic results.Results Among 20 samples of DNA ploidy negative,the p16/Ki-67 double staining results all were negative.The positive predictive value of DNA ploidy analysis for HSIL + was 34.62％.The sensitivity of DNA ploidy analysis combined with p16/Ki-67 double staining for HSIL + was 84.62％,and its specificity was 92.31％,the positive predictive value was 78.57％ and the negative predictive value was 94.74％,which were significantly higher than those of DNA ploidy analysis(P＜0.05).Conclusion p16/Ki-67 double staining can significantly im prove the prediction value of HSIL.The DNA ploidy analysis combined with p16/Ki-67 double staining is an effective method for predicting HSIL +,which is suitable for the implementation in the areas with lack of medical resources.

Diagnostic value of p16/Ki-67 dual stain cytology for detection of cervical precancerous lesions / 临床与实验病理学杂志

Purpose To investigate the diagnostic value of p16/Ki-67 dual stain cytology for detection of cervical precancerous lesions as a novel option for cervical lesions screening.Methods A total of 295 cases diagnosed as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) from thinprep cytologic test (TCT) were selected.Double staining of p16/Ki-67 cytology,vaginal biopsy,biopsy and pathological examination were applicated,p16/Ki-67 dual stain cytology was compared with that of biopsy and pathological examination.At the same time,The sensitivity and specificity of p16/Ki-67 dual stain cytology between ASC-US and LSIL was analyzed.Results The positive rate of p16/Ki-67 dual stain cytology were 37.42％ and 36.36％ in ASC-US and LSIL,respectively.The positive rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3 (CIN2/3) were 25.77％ and 25.76％.The sensitivity and specificity of the p16/Ki-67 test for detecting CIN2/3 was 83.33％ and 78.51％.The sensitivity and the specificity of the p16/Ki-67 test for detecting CIN2/3 was 85.30％ and 80.61％ in LSIL group.Conclusion p16/Ki-67 double stain cytology detection can improve the sensitivity of CIN2/3 and the specificity of human papilloma virus (HPV).p16/Ki-67 double stain detection can effectively triage the high grade cervical lesions in TCT and improve the accuracy of cervical cancer screening.

Study of predictive value for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by p16/Ki-67 dual-stained liquid-based cytology / 临床与实验病理学杂志

Purpose To study of predictive value for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2 +) by p16/Ki-67 dual-stained liquid-based cytology.Methods Random collection of 123 women including 103 samples of atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and above with results of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV)testing and cervical biopsy,20 samples of negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM) by using immunocytochemical p16/Ki-67 dual-stained and the morphology assessment.Results In normal control group,the expression of p16/Ki-67 dual-stained in squamous epithelial cells were negative.Sensitivity of p16/Ki-67 dual-staind cytology for biopsy-confirmed CIN2 + was 66.67％ (ASC-US),91.67％ (LSIL) and 92.86％ (HSIL),specificity rates were 95.92％ (ASC-US),95.00％ (LSIL) and 0 (HSIL),positive predictive value were 50.00％ (ASC-US),91.67％ (LSIL) and 92.86％ (HSIL),negative predictive value were 97.92％ (ASC-US),95.00％(LSIL) and 0 (HSIL),respectively.Condusion p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology are improved obviously the predictive value for detection of CIN2 +,p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology may efficiently complement HPV-based screening programs to prevent cervical cancer.