RESUMO
By collecting 475 protocol violation reports of pediatric clinical trials accepted by the ethics committee of a grade A tertiary hospital from January 2016 to December 2022, and conducting classification statistics of the responsible body, types of violation, and natures of violation, this paper analyzed and discussed the specific reasons and response measures for protocol violation. The results showed that the most common types of protocol violation included missed medication and incorrect medication dosage for pediatric research participants, missed laboratory inspection, over-windowed follow-up, and non-compliance with inclusion/exclusion criteria. And the responsibility bodies were pediatric research participants and/or their guardians, followed by the researchers. Besides, the sponsor, clinical trial coordinator, and other factors also contributed to protocol violation. Establishing awareness of responsible body, emphasizing subject management, building sound quality control system, and strengthening ethical supervision are the main countermeasures to prevent and reduce protocol violation in pediatric clinical trials, which helps to protect the safety and rights of pediatric research participants and promote standardized research in pediatric clinical trials.
RESUMO
Abstract: In the process of clinical trials, after ascertaining the safety of drugs or other therapeutic interventions in animals or in vivo, phase I clinical trials are conducted as initial step on healthy human volunteers (or patients with specific disease) to observe pharmacokinetics, safety and side effects associated with escalating doses of the drugs. Participation of human subjects having different biological system than animals is not without risks in these trials; this fact raises some important ethical issues. In the light of international research ethics guidelines, this paper analyses moral justification of use of humans as research subjects in phase I clinical trials, discusses what groups of participants should be involved, their economic status, questionable coercive effect of monetary remuneration on the subjects and soundness of informed consent obtained for the trials. These issues are also discussed in the perspective of four founding principles of bioethics i.e. autonomy, justice, beneficence and non-maleficence.