RESUMO
OBJECTIVE To investigate the preferences of patients who underwent solid organ transplantation regarding therapeutic drug monitoring （TDM） of mycophenolic acid （MPA） and explore the factors influencing patients’ decision-making process， so as to provide support for the development of individualized medication guidelines for MPA and improvement of clinical decision-making. METHODS The cross-sectional study was used to design the questionnaire on the patients’ preferences to accept MPA TDM， and involved patients who underwent solid organ transplantation and received MPA treatment at two tertiary hospitals in Beijing from April 14， 2022， to June 27， 2022. The Likert 5-level scoring method was used to score the patients’ preferences to accept MPA TDM， the influencing factors and their correlation of the patients’ preferences to accept MPA TDM were analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis and binary Logistic regression analysis， and the nonparametric test and chi-square test were used to rank and analyze the consistency of the factors affecting patients’ preference decision. RESULTS A total of 140 questionnaires were collected， and the effective recovery rate was 77.35%. The average preference score of 140 patients to receive MPA TDM was （4.01±0.65）， and the overall preference value was high. There were 116 （82.86%） patients agreed or strongly agreed with MPA TDM. Significant differences were observed in preference scores between patients who had previously undergone MPA TDM and those who had never undergone it （[ 4.30±0.53） scores vs. （3.80±0.65） scores， P＜0.001]. Additionally， patients’ preference scores were significantly influenced by their understanding level and attention level （P＜0.001）. The ranking of factors contributing to decision-making exhibited consistency （P＜0.001）. The factors were ranked in descending order of clinical efficacy， safety， comfortability， economy and time cost. CONCLUSIONS The patients who underwent solid organ transplantation hold high preferences towards MPA TDM. The primary factors influencing their decisions are their prior experience， understanding level， and attention level.
RESUMO
La enfermedad renal crónica (ERC) es un problema sanitario mundial que afecta al 10% de la población. Su prevalencia ha ido en aumento debido a factores relacionados con el estilo de vida y el envejecimiento de la población. Objetivo. Analizar la percepción de los pacientes receptores de trasplantes renales sobre su calidad de vida, y evaluar los factores que influyen en la calidad de vida post-trasplante renal. Metodología. Para ello, se llevó cabo un estudio bibliográfico considerando fuentes de bases de datos académicas como PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, entre otras. Donde se usaron como descriptores de búsqueda "trasplante renal", "calidad de vida", "percepción del paciente", "resultados post-trasplante". Además, la búsqueda se amplió en revistas especializadas, tesis, libros y conferencias relacionadas con el tema. como criterios de inclusión fueron considerados estudios originales, revisiones sistemáticas, metaanálisis, publicaciones en los últimos 10 años, etc. Y como exclusión fueron considerados estudios no relacionados, artículos de opinión, publicaciones en idiomas no accesibles. En cuanto al proceso extracción de la información, se usó la matriz de registro y las técnicas de observación y análisis documental, la matriz quedo constituida por Autor(es), año de publicación, país de origen, objetivos del estudio, metodología utilizada, variables analizadas, resultados principales, y conclusiones relevantes. Conclusión. Es esencial reconocer que la calidad de vida post-trasplante renal es una experiencia subjetiva que varía significativamente entre los pacientes y que está influenciada por una amplia gama de factores, que van desde la gestión de síntomas físicos hasta el manejo de desafíos psicológicos y sociales.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a worldwide health problem affecting 10% of the population. Its prevalence has been increasing due to factors related to lifestyle and population aging. Objective. To analyze the perception of renal transplant recipients on their quality of life, and to evaluate the factors that influence post renal transplant quality of life. Methodology. For this purpose, a bibliographic study was carried out considering sources of academic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, among others. The search descriptors used were "renal transplant", "quality of life", "patient perception", "post-transplant results". In addition, the search was extended to specialized journals, theses, books and conferences related to the subject. Inclusion criteria included original studies, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, publications in the last 10 years, etc. Unrelated studies, opinion articles, publications in non-accessible languages were considered as exclusion criteria. As for the information extraction process, the registration matrix and the techniques of observation and documentary analysis were used, the matrix was made up of author(s), year of publication, country of origin, objectives of the study, methodology used, variables analyzed, main results, and relevant conclusions. Conclusion. It is essential to recognize that post-renal transplant quality of life is a subjective experience that varies significantly among patients and is influenced by a wide range of factors, ranging from the management of physical symptoms to the management of psychological and social challenges.
A doença renal crônica (DRC) é um problema de saúde global que afeta 10% da população. Sua prevalência tem aumentado devido a fatores de estilo de vida e ao envelhecimento da população. Objetivo. Analisar a percepção dos receptores de transplante renal sobre sua qualidade de vida e avaliar os fatores que influenciam a qualidade de vida pós-transplante renal. Metodologia. Para isso, foi realizado um estudo bibliográfico considerando fontes de bancos de dados acadêmicos como PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, entre outros. Os descritores de busca utilizados foram "transplante renal", "qualidade de vida", "percepção do paciente", "resultados pós-transplante" Além disso, a busca foi estendida a periódicos especializados, teses, livros e congressos relacionados ao tema. Os critérios de inclusão incluíram estudos originais, revisões sistemáticas, meta-análises, publicações nos últimos 10 anos, etc. Estudos não relacionados, artigos de opinião e publicações em idiomas não acessíveis foram considerados como critérios de exclusão. Quanto ao processo de extração de informações, foram utilizadas a matriz de registro e as técnicas de observação e análise documental. A matriz foi composta por autor(es), ano de publicação, país de origem, objetivos do estudo, metodologia utilizada, variáveis analisadas, principais resultados e conclusões relevantes. Conclusões. É essencial reconhecer que a qualidade de vida pós-transplante renal é uma experiência subjetiva que varia significativamente entre os pacientes e é influenciada por uma ampla gama de fatores, que vão desde o controle dos sintomas físicos até o enfrentamento de desafios psicológicos e sociais.
Assuntos
Bibliografias como Assunto , PubMedRESUMO
Propósito del estudio: Explorar las preferencias educativas de los beneficiarios adultos de las Garantías Explicitas en Salud (GES) sometidos a una cirugía de endoprótesis total de cadera. Material y método: Estudio descriptivo de carácter mixto. Se diseñó una encuesta que exploró las preferencias educativas referentes a cada etapa del proceso quirúrgico de adultos mayores sometidos electivamente a endoprótesis total de cadera en un centro hospitalario universitario. La encuesta se aplicó retrospectivamente de manera telefónica por un encuestador entrenado. El tiempo transcurrido entre la aplicación de la encuesta y la cirugía fue entre 2 y 14 meses. Resultados: Se incluyeron 63 pacientes, cuya edad promedio fue 72,5 años y el 69,8% correspondía al sexo femenino. Con respecto a su previsión de salud el 57,2% era beneficiario de FONASA y el 42,7% de ISAPRE. Las preferencias de información descritas en nuestra muestra con respecto al proceso quirúrgico desde su inicio a fin, señalan a la cirugía propiamente tal (40,4%) y los cuidados post operatorios (29,3%) como los temas de más interés. Los temas de menor interés fueron los relacionados con cuidados preoperatorios (45,2%) y al proceso de hospitalización (31,7%). Los pacientes encuestados valoraron la información entregada previa a su cirugía como adecuada, útil y fácil de entender. Conclusiones: Los adultos mayores sometidos a endoprótesis señalaron la información específica referente a la cirugía y los cuidados post operatorios como los temas educativos de mayor interés. La información estándar entregada por los médicos tratantes fue bien recibida por los pacientes.
Purpose of the study: To explore the educational preferences of adults aged 65 years and older with hip osteoarthritis undergoing total hip replacement (THA). Methods: Mixed descriptive study. A survey was designed to explore the educational preferences regarding each stage of the surgical process in elderly patients undergoing electively THA for osteoarthritis in a university-affiliated hospital. The survey was applied retrospectively and telephonically by a trained interviewer between 2 and 14 months after the surgery.Results: Sixty-three patients were surveyed, whose average age was 72.5 years, and 69.8% corresponded to females. Regarding their health coverage, 57.2% were beneficiaries of FONASA and 42.7% of ISAPRE. The educational preferences described in our sample regarding the surgical process from its beginning to the end indicate that surgery (40.4%) and post-operative care (29.3%) as the most relevant topics. The topics of least interest were preoperative care (45.2%) and information related to hospitalization (31.7%). The surveyed pa-tients rated their treating physician's education as adequate, helpful, and easy to understand before their surgery. Conclusions: Elderly patients undergoing THA indicated that specific surgery and post-operative care information are the most relevant educational topics.
RESUMO
<b>Objectives</b> : To determine factors related to peoples' preference for visiting home-doctors when experiencing new health problems.<br><b>Method</b> : A questionnaire survey was conducted of people receiving annual health checkups in municipalities in the vicinity of Jichi Medical University Hospital. We surveyed personal characteristics, test equipment, having of a home-doctor, and answers to an assumed scenario (asking about willingness to visit a home-doctor in case of getting certain health problems).<br>According to the responses to the scenario, we divided the subjects into two groups (a home-doctor group: visiting a home-doctor; and a specialist group: not visiting a home-doctor) and statistically compared the two groups.<br><b>Results</b> : In the analytic sample of 1,829, the home-doctor group numbered 1,097 individuals (60%) and the specialist group numbered 732 individuals (40%). The home-doctor group statistically had more home-doctors than the specialist group (adjusted odds ratio, 95% confidence interval: 2.47, 2.00-3.05).<br>More home-doctors in the home-doctor group had test equipment than home-doctors in the specialist group: Gastrointestinal test equipment (gastroscopy, colonoscopy, or ultrasonography) (adjusted odds ratio, 95% confidence interval: 1.39, 1.06-1.83).<br><b>Conclusion</b> : We revealed two factors relating to the preference for visiting home-doctors: First, those people had home-doctors, and, second, the home-doctors had test equipment.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Healthcare quality can be improved by avoiding patient discomforts and customizing care to meet the needs of the patient. Therefore, the goal of this study was to quantify patients' discomfort for postoperative anesthesia outcomes for healthcare quality improvement. METHODS: One hundred orthopedic surgical patients were asked to tell possible undesirable postoperative outcomes preoperatively. In addition, they were also asked to tell undesirable postoperative outcomes from their most undesirable to least undesirable outcomes that they have experienced postoperatively. RESULTS: Patients expressed the following undesirable outcomes from most frequent to least frequent (in order); incisional pain, nausea/vomiting, shivering, headache, dizziness, sore throat, residual weakness, generalized myalgia, and somnolence. However, the severity of the symptoms were in the following order; nausea/vomiting, incisional pain, headache, dizziness, shivering, generalized myalgia residual weakness, sore throat, and somnolence. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is variability in how patients expressed postoperative outcomes, anesthesiologists can improve the quality of anesthesia by designing anesthesia regimens and methods that most closely meet each individual patient's preferences.