RESUMO
@#During chemotherapy of malignant tumors,neutropenia is the most important adverse event caused by myelosuppressive chemotherapeutics,of which the degree and duration are closely related to the risk of infection and even death.Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor(G-CSF) is an endogenous hematopoietic growth factor that can stimulate the proliferation and differentiation of neutrophil precursors,and increase the survival rate and activity of mature neutrophils.Recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor(rhG-CSF) is an artificially synthesized cytokine with G-CSF biological activity.It is used clinically for the prevention and treatment of neutropenia after treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapeutics,requiring multiple medications and repeated injections during application for its short half-life.Pegylated recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor(PEG-rhG-CSF) is its long-acting dosage form,and patients only need to be administered once per cycle of chemotherapy,which has been widely used in clinical practice because of its stability and convenience.This paper systematically described the clinical application value of PEG-rhG-CSF in neutropenia after chemotherapy,aiming to provide a reference for its further clinical application.
RESUMO
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PEG-rhG-CSF therapy in the primary and secondary prevention of chemo-therapy-induced neutropenia . Methods: This single-center, one-arm, and open-label clinical study involved 217 patients with non-my-eloid malignant tumors. These patients included 18 gynecologic oncology (3 endometrial and 15 ovarian cancer), 50 breast cancer, 30 bone tumor, and 119 lymphoma patients who underwent a total of 774 cycles of chemotherapy, comprising 146 primary and 71 sec-ondary prevention patients. The patients ≥45 kg and those <45 kg received a single subcutaneous injection of 6 mg and 3 mg PEG-rhG-CSF, respectively, 24-48 h after the chemotherapy was completed. All patients received only one dose of PEG-rhG-CSF admin-istration per chemotherapy cycle. Results: The overall incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) was found to be 5.7%, with rates of 4.9% and 7.2% in the primary and secondary prevention groups, respectively. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses re-vealed that the longer PEG-rhG-CSF was sustained in the treatment cycle, the lower the incidence of FN was. The incidence of FN was significantly lower in the second cycle of the treatment than in the first in both the primary and secondary prevention groups (cycle 1 vs. cycle 2: 11.6% vs. 4.4%, respectively, P=0.039, in the primary group; 16.9% vs. 5.6%, respectively, P=0.034, in the secondary group). The overall incidence of gradeⅣneutropenia was 10.3% (80/774), with rates of 6.7% (34/510) and 17.4% (46/264) in the primary and secondary prevention groups, respectively (P<0.001). The incidence of gradeⅣneutropenia was significantly lower in the second cy-cle of the treatment than in the first (cycle 1 vs. cycle 2: 17.1% vs. 5.3%, respectively, P=0.004, in the primary group; 46.5% vs. 11.3%, respectively, P<0.001, in the secondary group). The treatment-induced toxicity mainly involved bone pain, with 3.7% (8/217) and 1.8% (4/217) incidence rates for grade 1-2 and 3-4 bone pain, respectively. Conclusions: PEG-rhG-CSF administration can effectively reduce the incidence of FN (5.7%) when prophylactically applied to patients with non-myeloid malignant tumors. Primary prevention can sig- nificantly reduce the risk of grade IV neutropenia in all chemotherapy cycles relative to the secondary prevention.