RESUMO
As of April 2005, “Shihango-rinsyoushiken” defined in the GPMSP was renamed “Seizouhanbaigo-rinsyoushiken” in the revised regulations (GPSP). The relevant part of the GCP was also modified at the same time. Strictly speaking, therefore, post-approval clinical trials are not the same as postmarketing clinical trials. This report provides an explanation of post-approval clinical trials and the related regulations. It is generally considered that post-approval clinical trials, which help gather more clinical information, should be actively pursued for the further development of approved drugs in the post-marketing setting. However, the results of the questionnaire show that pharmaceutical companies are not willing to conduct them, mainly due to the high cost. To improve the economic efficiency of post-approval clinical trials, it is necessary to streamline monitoring activities that account for 40% of the cost.
RESUMO
Good Post-Marketing Surveillance Practice (GPMSP) defines “post-marketing clinical trials” as industry-initiated studies constituting a part of Post-Marketing Surveillance (PMS). Post-marketing clinical studies play the role of gathering further information on appropriate drug use. This is why the proper conduct of medically required post-marketing clinical trials would facilitate the proposal of new treatments with improved efficacy and/or safety over existing therapies, thereby contributing to the promotion of EBM and to the advance of healthcare. In the case of anticancer drugs, in particular, post-marketing clinical trials are of great importance, because they also serve as Phase III studies. In reality, however, pharmaceutical companies are not very active in conducting these studies because of the many issues involved. To solve or alleviate these problems, the Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association and COTEC are making aggressive efforts.