RESUMO
Objective:To research the quality of postoperative recovery of patients with lung cancer through the(PQRS),and compare the recovery quality after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or traditional open lobectomy.Method:PQRS scale was used to evaluate the recovery of 140 patients with lung lesions preoperatively and postoperative 1 day,3 days,7 days,14 days and 1 month.95 patients who met the set standard and complete the PQRS scales were enrolled and divided into video-assisted thoracoscope group or traditional thoracotomy group.This article mainly compared and analysied the quality of postoperative recovery of patients in both groups.Result:Except the anesthesia time,other general datum showed no statistical difference.In total recovery rate,the video-assisted thoracoscope group has significant difference when compared with the traditional thoracotomy group(P ＜ 0.05).The recovery rates of VATS group in feeling of the harmful factors,emotional factors and the daily life are higher than that of the traditional thoracotomy group,with statistically significant differences(P ＜0.05).However,the recovery rates in the physiological factors and cognitive factors had no statistical difference between two groups(P＞ 0.05).Conclusion:PQRS can effectively evaluate the quality of postoperative recovery in patients with lung cancer,and VATS is helpful to quick recovery postoperatively.