Incidental finding of thoracic outlet syndrome in a case of right tubal ruptured ectopic pregnancy

A 30-year-old woman, (multigravida) suffering from lower abdominal pain and slight vaginal bleeding was transferred to our hospital. She came with a pelvic ultrasound report. The provisional diagnosis of right tubal ectopic pregnancy was made. A laparotomy was carried out. Intraoperatively, blood pressure in both the arms were taken which revealed different blood pressure in different arms. A diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome was made. No postoperative complications were observed.

Study of diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy

Background: Diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy was frequently missed. Aim of the study was to determine the clinical presentation, and treatment associated with ectopic pregnancy.Methods: This is a prospective study which was carried out at Obstetrics and Gynaecology department, GMERS SOLA civil hospital from August 2017 to October 2018. Total 416 patients were admitted during study period out of them 50 patients diagnosed with ectopic pregnancy were enrolled in the study and information was collected and analysed.Results: 80% patients were between the age group of 21-30 years. 56% patients were nulliparous. Amenorrhea (92%) with lower abdominal pain (94%) is the most common presenting symptom. 26% of patients show typical triad of amenorrhea, abdominal pain and bleeding per vagina. UPT and USG were most commonly performed investigations. 96% cases showed UPT positive. 100% USG showed adnexal pathology. Serum beta-hCG was done in 37 patients as an aid for diagnosis and to decide the line of management. Conservative medical management with Injection MTX was done in 4 patients of which 1 patients required laparotomy later on. Surgical management was done in 90% of patients. Laparoscopic management was done in 54% of cases.Conclusions: Early diagnosis and timely intervention in the form of conservative or surgical treatment will help in reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with ectopic pregnancy.

Cornual Pregnancy: A Case Report.

Ectopic pregnancy is a condition where gestation sac is located outside the uterine cavity; it is a major life threatening situation in early pregnancy. A cornual pregnancy is an ectopic pregnancy that develops in the interstitial portion of the fallopian tube invading through the uterine wall. As myometrium is more distensible fallopian tube cornual pregnancies often rupture later than other tubal pregnancies. Cornual pregnancy is rare and carries grave consequences to both mother and fetus. Here a case report has been presented where the patient was admitted in Faridpur Medical College Hospital. The case was presented with intra-abdominal haemorrhage at second trimester. In this cases investigation missed the diagnosis, final diagnosis was only made after laparotomy. The need for clinical suspicion and role of ultrasonography, resuscitation and laparotomy is necessary to prevent catastrophe

Pregnancy Following Laparotomy for Ruptured Interstitial Pregnancy.

An interstitial pregnancy is an uncommon type of ectopic pregnancy, accounting for 2-4% of all ectopic pregnancies. We present a patient with history of ruptured interstitial pregnancy who had been managed successfully at our hospital. The patient had refused tubectomy and conceived against medical advice within six months after laparotomy. She was counseled for risk of rupture of uterus and admitted to the hospital at the beginning of 9th month. She underwent an elective cesarean section and a male baby was delivered. Palpation of the uterine scar revealed that it was papery thin. Had there been any delay, the uterus would have ruptured with resultant maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality.

Death due to ruptured ectopic pregnancy natural death or negligence.

A young adult female of low socio-economic status, and a labourer by profession, was brought dead to the Government Medical College & hospital, Chandigarh. History provided by her husband revealed that she had pain abdomen for the last five days for which she was getting treatment from a private practitioner. She had been prescribed NSAIDs and antispasmodics for the same. However, she was not investigated upon and no attempt was made by the practitioner to arrive at any diagnosis. The autopsy was conducted on the next day and at autopsy, about two-and-a-half liters of blood was present in the abdomen and pelvic cavity. Careful internal examination revealed a ruptured ectopic pregnancy as the source of bleeding. The case is discussed with regard to establishing whether the death could have been natural, due to the negligence of the treating doctor or due to contributory negligence. However, even in cases of contributory negligence, the “last chance doctrine” may not save the physician.