RESUMO
OBJECTIVE@#To summarize the application and recent development of orthognathic surgery in treating syndromic craniosynostosis.@*METHODS@#The related literature at home and abroad in recent years was extensively reviewed, and the indications, routine procedures, and protocols of orthognathic surgery in the treatment of syndromic craniosynostosis were summarized and analyzed.@*RESULTS@#Craniosynostosis is a common congenital craniofacial malformation. Syndromic craniosynostosis usually involves premature fusion of multiple cranial sutures and is associated with other deformities. Orthognathic surgery is the necessary and effective means to improve the midfacial hypoplasia and malocclusion. Le Fort I osteotomy combined with sagittal split ramus osteotomy are the common surgical options. Orthognathic surgery should combine with craniofacial surgery and neurosurgery, and a comprehensive long-term evaluation should be conducted to determine the best treatment plan.@*CONCLUSION@#Orthognathic surgery plays an important role in the comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of syndromic craniosynostosis. The development of digital technology will further promote the application and development of orthognathic surgery in the treatment of syndromic craniosynostosis.
Assuntos
Humanos , Cirurgia Ortognática , Craniossinostoses/cirurgia , Osteotomia , Osteotomia Sagital do Ramo MandibularRESUMO
Objective@# To establish a three-dimensional coordinate system that can accurately measure the recurrence rate after orthognathic surgery, and evaluate and analyze the degree of recurrence.@*Methods @#Data from patients who underwent orthognathic surgery in a hospital were selected to reconstruct three-dimensional images with spiral CT. The two researchers used the multiplane assisted positioning method to fix the points three times and screened them using intra-andintreclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Reproducible and accurate landmark points were drawn to establish different coordinate systems and calculate the facial asymmetry index (AI) to determine the coordinate system with the best mid-sagittal plane symmetry. This coordinate system and lateral radiographs were used to separately measure the recurrence rate, and evaluate and analyze the three-dimensional recurrence degree of orthognathic surgery.@*Results @#Ten landmark points that may be repeatedly fixed were obtained, including N (nasion), K (K point), ANS(anterior nasal spine), PNS (posterior nasal spine), Ptm(pterygomaxillary fissure), Gn (gnathion), IZ(IZ point), MZ (MZ point), Ms (mastoideale), Cor (coronion) and and Go (gonion). Three coordinate systems were established, and the most suitable coordinate system was the upper edge point of the left infraorbital foramen. The inner upper edge of the right infraorbital foramen and both sides of the midpoint of the ear points constituted the horizontal plane (HP), which passed through the outermost point of the left zygomatic frontal suture and the outermost point of the right zygomatic frontal suture and was perpendicular to the horizontal plane to constitute the coronal plane (CP). It was perpendicular to the two planes to form a sagittal plane (SP). Two-dimensional and three-dimensional measurements of recurrence were performed on 112 patients, and new three-dimensional recurrence evaluation results were obtained. Less than 40% had low recurrence, 40% to 61% had moderate recurrence, and greater than 61% had high recurrence.@*Conclusion@#This study established a three-dimensional coordinate system suitable for measuring the recurrence rate after orthognathic surgery, obtained a new three-dimensional recurrence evaluation result, and provided a clinical experimental basis for evaluating the effect of orthognathic surgery and improving stability.
RESUMO
RESUMEN: Introducción: La anomalía esqueletal clase II posee un 16 a 22,5% de prevalencia mundial. Cuando estos pacientes se someten al avance mandibular mediante osteotomía sagital de rama mandibular pueden presentar un grado de inestabilidad postoperatoria evidenciándose como recidiva de éste. Objetivo: Describir la estabilidad del avance mandibular mediante osteotomía sagital bilateral de rama mandibular en pacientes clase II esqueletal. Material y método: Se realizó una búsqueda electrónica en las bases de datos PubMed, EBSCO, The Cochrane Library, Tripdatabase y Scopus mediante las palabras clave "mandibular stability", "skeletal stability", "mandibular advancement", "sagittal split osteotomy", "sagittal split ramus osteotomy", "class II", "class III" y "distraction osteogenesis", relacionadas entre sí con los términos booleanos AND, OR y NOT. También se incluyeron los términos MeSH "mandibular advancement" y "Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy". Paralelamente se realizó una búsqueda manual en las revistas AJODO, BJOMS, JOMS y EJO. Resultados y discusión: Se seleccionaron 29 artículos: 24 estudios observacionales analíticos, 2 revisiones sistemáticas y 3 ensayos clínicos aleatorizados. El avance mandibular mediante osteotomía sagital de rama mandibular es estable. No obstante, se debe tener en cuenta la existencia de múltiples factores pre e intraquirúrgicos que podrían generar recidiva del tratamiento.
ABSTRACT: Introduction: The class II skeletal anomaly has a 16-22,5% prevalence worldwide. When class II patients undergo mandibular advancement through Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy (BSSO), they can present a postoperative instability, evidenced as a relapse. Objective: To describe the stability of mandibular advancement through BSSO in skeletal class II patients. Materials and method: An electronic search was performed in the databases PubMed, EBSCO, The Cochrane Library, Tripdatabase and Scopus using the keywords "mandibular stability", "skeletal stability", "mandibular advancement", "sagittal split osteotomy", "sagittal split ramus osteotomy", "class II", "class III" and "distraction osteogenesis", related to each other with the Boolean terms AND, OR and NOT. Also "mandibular advancement" and "Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy" MeSH terms were included. In parallel, a manual search in the journals AJODO, BJOMS, JOMS and EJO was performed. Results and discussion: 29 articles were selected: 24 analytic observational studies, 2 systematic reviews and 3 randomized clinical trials. Mandibular advancement through BSSO is stable. However, multiple pre and intraoperative factors that could cause a treatment relapse must be taken into account.
Assuntos
Humanos , Avanço Mandibular , Osteotomia Sagital do Ramo Mandibular , Má Oclusão Classe II de Angle/cirurgia , OrtodontiaRESUMO
Aims: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature on the different fixation methods available for sagittal ramus split osteotomyassociated with mandibular advancement testedin vitroto evaluate stability of each method.Study Design:Systematic review.Methodology:Following the PRISMA model for systematic reviews, a query was made in the PubMed, Bireme and Cochrane Library databases, identifying articles that reported the different fixation methods for sagittal ramus split osteotomyfor mandibular advancement. Results:A total of 352 articles were identified, 11 papers of which, after evaluation in relation to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, were systematically reviewed.
RESUMO
Objective@#To investigage the three-dimensional changes in condylar position after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) in skeletal class Ⅲpatients with mandibular deviation using cone-beam CT (CBCT).@*Methods@#Twenty-five skeletal class Ⅲ patients with mandibular deviation were included. The patients (12 males and 13 females, aged 19-25 years, average age 22.4 years) were treated in the Department of Orthodontics, Affiliated Stomatological Hospital, Nanchang University from October 2013 to March 2017. The patients were divided into T1, T2 and T3 groups (T1 group: CBCT taken within 1 week before operation; T2 group: CBCT taken within 1 week after operation; T3 group: CBCT taken 6-8 months after surgery). Three sets of image data of condyles on both sides (deviation side and contralateral side) were obtained. After the DICOM data collection, the software of Mimics 17.0 was used to perform three-dimensional reconstruction and condylar position measurements: the distance from the condylar top (CoT) to the standard horizontal plane (SHP), the middle sagittal plane (MSP) and the sella coronal plane (SCP) (CoT-SHP, CoT-MSP, CoT-SCP); the distance from the condylar center (CoC) to SHP, MSP and SCP (CoC-SHP, CoC-MSP, CoC-SCP); the angle from the condyle cella plane (CCP) to SHP, MSP and SCP (CCP-SHP, CCP-MSP, CCP-SCP); the angle from the condyle sagittal plane (CSP) to SHP, MSP and SCP (CSP-SHP, CSP-MSP, CSP-SCP) and the distance of the anterior, superior, posterior, medial, central and lateral joint space. One-way ANOVA and LSD-t test were used to compare the changes in condylar position at different periods (T1, T2, and T3).@*Results@#Within 1 week before operation on the deviation side, CoT-SHP [(2.5±1.3) mm], CSP-MSP (41.2°±8.4°) and the posterior joint space [(2.0±0.6) mm] were obviously increased (P<0.05), and CoT-SCP [(9.1±3.3) mm], CCP-MSP (78.2°±5.2°) were decreased significantly (P<0.05); on the contralateral side, CoT-MSP [(50.4±3.1) mm], CCP-MSP (80.6°±6.0°), the anterior joint space [(2.2±0.6) mm] and the medial joint space [(2.6±0.6) mm] were obviously increased (P<0.05), and CCP-SCP (11.4°±8.8°) were decreased significantly (P<0.05). Six to eight months after surgery, CoT-SHP [(2.2±1.0) mm] and the posterior joint space [(1.9±0.5) mm] on deviation side and CoT-SCP [(8.4±2.8) mm] on the contralateral side were increased significantly (P<0.05). No significant difference was found in other measurements (P>0.05).@*Conclusions@#The condylar position in skeletal class Ⅲ patients with mandibular deviation was asymmetrical. Within 1 week after the operation of BSSRO, the condyle on the deviation side was moved forward, downward and inward. Meanwhile, the condyle on the contralateral side was moved backward and outward. Six to eight months after surgery, the condylar position on both sides was gradually restored to the pre-operative condylar position.
RESUMO
ABSTRACT In the current era of expedited orthodontics, among many clinicians, tertiary care hospitals and patients, surgery first orthognathic approach (SFOA) has gained popularity. The advantages of SFOA (face first approach) are the reduced overall treatment duration and the early improvement in facial esthetics. In SFOA, the absence of a presurgical phase allows surgery to be performed first, followed by comprehensive orthodontic treatment to achieve the desired occlusion. The basic concepts of surgery early, surgery last, SFOA and Sendai SFOA technique along with its variations are reviewed in the present article. The recent advancement in SFOA in the context of preoperative preparation, surgical procedures and post-surgical orthodontics with pertinent literature survey are also discussed.
RESUMO Na presente era da Ortodontia de resultados acelerados, a cirurgia ortognática com benefício antecipado (COBA) ganhou popularidade entre muitos clínicos, hospitais terciários e pacientes. A vantagem da COBA é a redução da duração total do tratamento, juntamente com a melhora precoce da estética facial. Na COBA, a ausência de uma fase pré-cirúrgica permite que a cirurgia seja realizada antes e, só então, venha o tratamento ortodôntico abrangente para se alcançar a oclusão desejada. Os conceitos básicos de cirurgia primeiro, cirurgia por último, COBA e a técnica COBA de Sendai, bem como suas variações, são aqui revistos. Também são discutidos no presente artigo, junto com a revisão da literatura pertinente, os recentes avanços da COBA no contexto do preparo pré-cirúrgico, dos procedimentos cirúrgicos e da Ortodontia pós-cirúrgica.
Assuntos
Humanos , Ortodontia Corretiva/métodos , Ortodontia Corretiva/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ortognáticos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ortognáticos/tendências , Má Oclusão/terapia , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente , Fatores de Tempo , Protocolos Clínicos , Estética DentáriaRESUMO
Objective@#The purpose of this study was to explore the surgery-first approach in sequential combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment to shorten total treatment duration and improve the clinical outcome.@*Methods@#This study included 185 patients with Angle classⅢ malocclusion. The patients were divided into 3 different types according to cephalometry analyses and facial features. ①Type Ⅰ: mandibular prognathism or asymmetry mandibular prognathism; ②Type Ⅱ: mandibular prognathism and maxillary retrusion; ③ Type Ⅲ: mild Angle′s Class Ⅲ malocclusion, cross bite in anterior teeth, or normal overlap and overbite relation with midfacial hypoplasia. All of patients received surgery first approach therapy. The surgical procedures were chosen according to different malformation types. Type Ⅰ was treated with the sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO). Type Ⅱ was treated by Le Fort Ⅰmaxillary osteotomy combined with SSRO. Type Ⅲ underwent anterior subapical osteotomy combined pyriform aperture augmentation with biomaterials as well as maxillary anterior orthodontics. All patients received postoperative rapid orthodontic treatment for 6-12 month after 2 weeks of operation. Using the straight arch wire techniques and the class Ⅲ intermaxillary traction, we removed the overcrowding upper and lower teeth, the compensatory axial tilt of teeth, and the deviation of the dental arch and maintained the neutral relationship of the molar. The mandible Hawley retaining devices were used during the maintaining stage.@*Results@#The cases in study acquired satisfactory clinical outcome, which included the shortened overall treatment duration, the significantly improved facial features, the corrected occlusion relationship, and the restored function of mastication and temporomandibular joint. There were some complications as follows: intraoperative fracture (6 cases, 3.24%), the inferior alveolar nerve bundle injury (2 cases, 1.1%), and temporary open-bite that diminished by inter-maxillary elastic distraction one month after operation (19 cases, 10%). All cases in this study accepted postoperative orthodontic treatment. Follow-up time ranged from 6 months to 5 years. The cephalometric analysis results of 126 cases who had complete image data and over 6 months of follow-up showed that hard and soft tissue indexes were restored to normal range after combined orthognathic-orthodontic treatment. The stability of the maxillary and occlusive relationship of SFA(surgery-first approach) was similar to that of the COS(conventional orthodontics-first system) [relapse ratio=(T2-T1)/(T1-T0)×100%]. Over six months of follow-up , SNB and ANB showed that the average relapse ratio were 22% and 19.8%, whereas the relapse angle are less than 2°.@*Conclusions@#The Surgery-first approach could be used to treat most patients with Angle skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion, but the indications and the surgical procedures should be noticed and chosen.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Numerous condylar repositioning methods have been reported. However, most of them are 2-dimensional or are complex procedures that require a longer operation time and a highly trained surgeon. This study aims to introduce a new technique using a condylar repositioning plate and a centric relation splint to achieve a centric relationship. METHODS: We evaluated 387 patients who had undergone surgery for skeletal jaw deformities. During the operation, a centric relation splint, intermediate splint, final centric occlusion splint, and condylar repositioning plate along with an L-type mini-plate for LeFort I osteotomy or a bicortical screw for bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy were utilized for rigid fixation. The evaluation included: a physical examination to detect preoperative and postoperative temporomandibular joint dysfunction, 3-dimensional computed tomography and oblique transcranial temporomandibular joint radiography to measure 3-dimensional condylar head movement, and posteroanterior and lateral cephalometric radiography to measure the preoperative and postoperative movement of the bony segment and relapse rate. RESULTS: A 0.3% relapse rate was observed in the coronal plane, and a 2.8% relapse rate in the sagittal plane, which is indistinguishable from the dental relapse rate in orthodontic treatment. The condylar repositioning plate could not fully prevent movement of the condylar head, but the relapse rate was minimal, implying that the movement of the condylar head was within tolerable limits. CONCLUSIONS: Our condylar repositioning method using a centric relation splint and mini-plate in orthognathic surgery was found to be simple and effective for patients suffering from skeletal jaw deformities.
Assuntos
Humanos , Relação Central , Anormalidades Congênitas , Cabeça , Movimentos da Cabeça , Arcada Osseodentária , Métodos , Cirurgia Ortognática , Osteotomia , Osteotomia de Le Fort , Osteotomia Sagital do Ramo Mandibular , Exame Físico , Radiografia , Recidiva , Contenções , Articulação TemporomandibularRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the mechanical resistance of four different osteosyntheses modeled in two different sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) designs and to determine the linear loading in a universal testing machine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An in vitro experiment was conducted with 40 polyurethane hemimandibles. The samples were divided into two groups based on osteotomy design; Group I, right angles between osteotomies and Group II, no right angles between osteotomies. In each group, the hemimandibles were distributed into four subgroups according to the osteosynthesis method, using one 4-hole 2.0 mm conventional or locking plate, with or without one bicortical screw with a length of 12.0 mm (hybrid technique). Each subgroup contained five samples and was subjected to a linear loading test in a universal testing machine. RESULTS: The peak load and peak displacement were compared for statistical significance using PASW Statistics 18.0 (IBM Co., USA). In general, there was no difference between the peak load and peak displacement related to osteotomy design. However, when the subgroups were compared, the osteotomy without right angles offered higher mechanical resistance when one conventional or locking 2.0 mm plate was used. One locking plate with one bicortical screw showed higher mechanical resistance (162.72±42.55 N), and these results were statistically significantly compared to one conventional plate with monocortical screws (P=0.016) and one locking plate with monocortical screws (P=0.012). The difference in peak displacement was not statistically significant based on osteotomy design or internal fixation system configuration. CONCLUSION: The placement of one bicortical screw in the distal region promoted better stabilization of SSRO. The osteotomy design did not influence the mechanical behavior of SSRO when the hybrid technique was applied.
Assuntos
Técnicas In Vitro , Técnicas de Fixação da Arcada Osseodentária , Métodos , Cirurgia Ortognática , Osteotomia , Osteotomia Sagital do Ramo Mandibular , PoliuretanosRESUMO
Keratocystic odontogenic tumor (KCOT) is a common benign tumor of osseous lesions in dental and maxillofacial practice. We describe three cases of large KCOT located in the posterior part of the mandible extending to the angle and ramus region, which were enucleated via sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) of the mandible. There are cases in which a conventional enucleation procedure does not ensure complete excision of the entire lesion without damage to vital structures like the inferior alveolar nerve. In such cases, a SSO approach could be a better choice than conventional methods. The purpose of this article is to describe our experience using unilateral mandibular SSO for removal of a KCOT from the mandible.
Assuntos
Mandíbula , Nervo Mandibular , Cistos Odontogênicos , Tumores Odontogênicos , Osteotomia , Osteotomia Sagital do Ramo MandibularRESUMO
Osteomyelitis is classified into three groups according to its origin: osteomyelitis that originates from the blood supply, osteomyelitis related to bone disease or vascular disease, and osteomyelitis related to a local infection of dental or non-dental origin. The present case involved osteomyelitis related to a local infection of dental origin and was located in the rear area of the lingula of the mandible. We decided to use sagittal split ramus osteotomy to access the osteomyelitis area. Under general anesthesia, we successfully performed surgical sequestrectomy and curettage via sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Assuntos
Anestesia Geral , Doenças Ósseas , Curetagem , Mandíbula , Osteomielite , Osteotomia Sagital do Ramo Mandibular , Doenças VascularesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Orthognathic surgery is required in 25% to 35% of patients with a cleft lip and palate, for whom functional recovery and aesthetic improvement after surgery are important. The aim of this study was to examine maxillary and mandibular changes, along with concomitant soft tissue changes, in cleft patients who underwent LeFort I osteotomy and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (two-jaw surgery). METHODS: Twenty-eight cleft patients who underwent two-jaw surgery between August 2008 and November 2013 were included. Cephalometric analysis was conducted before and after surgery. Preoperative and postoperative measurements of the bone and soft tissue were compared. RESULTS: The mean horizontal advancement of the maxilla (point A) was 6.12 mm, while that of the mandible (point B) was -5.19 mm. The mean point A-nasion-point B angle was -4.1degrees before surgery, and increased to 2.5degrees after surgery. The mean nasolabial angle was 72.7degrees before surgery, and increased to 88.7degrees after surgery. The mean minimal distance between Rickett's E-line and the upper lip was 6.52 mm before surgery and 1.81 mm after surgery. The ratio of soft tissue change to bone change was 0.55 between point A and point A' and 0.93 between point B and point B'. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cleft lip and palate who underwent two-jaw surgery showed optimal soft tissue changes. The position of the soft tissue (point A') was shifted by a distance equal to 55% of the change in the maxillary bone. Therefore, bone surgery without soft tissue correction can achieve good aesthetic results.
Assuntos
Humanos , Fenda Labial , Lábio , Mandíbula , Maxila , Cirurgia Ortognática , Osteotomia , Osteotomia de Le Fort , Osteotomia Sagital do Ramo Mandibular , PalatoRESUMO
Bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy is considered a standard technique in mandibular orthognathic surgeries to reduce unexpected bilateral stress in the temporomandibular joints. Unilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (USSO) was recently introduced to correct facial asymmetry caused by asymmetric mandibular prognathism and has shown favorable outcomes. If unilateral surgery could guarantee long-term postoperative stability as well as favorable results, operation time and the incidence of postoperative complications could be reduced compared to those in bilateral surgery. This report highlights three consecutive cases with long-term follow-up in which USSO was used to correct asymmetric mandibular prognathism. Long-term postoperative changes in the condylar contour and ramus and condylar head length were analyzed using routine radiography and computed tomography. In addition, prior USSO studies were reviewed to outline clear criteria for applying this technique. In conclusion, patients showing functional-type asymmetry with predicted unilateral mandibular movement of less than 7 mm can be considered suitable candidates for USSO-based correction of asymmetric mandibular prognathism with or without maxillary arch surgeries.
Assuntos
Humanos , Assimetria Facial , Seguimentos , Cabeça , Incidência , Cirurgia Ortognática , Osteotomia Sagital do Ramo Mandibular , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Prognatismo , Radiografia , Articulação TemporomandibularRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of the type of osteotomy in the inferior aspect of the mandible on the mechanical performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was performed on 20 polyurethane hemimandibles. A sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) was designed in 10 hemimandibles (group 1) with a vertical osteotomy in the buccal side (second molar level) and final osteotomy was performed horizontally on the lingual aspect, while the mandible body osteotomy was finalized as a straight osteotomy in the basilar area, perpendicular to the body. For group 2, the same osteotomy technique was used, but an oblique osteotomy was done in the basilar aspect of the mandibular body, forming continuity with the sagittal cut in the basilar area. Using a surgical guide, osteosynthesis was performed with bicortical screws using an inverted L scheme. In both groups vertical compression tests were performed with a linear load of 1 mm/min on the central fossa of the first molar and tests were done with models made from photoelastic resin. Data were analyzed using Student's t-test, establishing a statistical significance when P <0.05. RESULTS: A statistical difference was not observed in the maximum displacements obtained in the two osteotomies (P <0.05). In the extensiometric analysis, statistically significant differences were identified only in the middle screw of the fixation. The photoelastic resin models showed force dissipation towards the inferior aspect of the mandible in both SSRO models. CONCLUSION: We found that osteotomy of the inferior aspect did not influence the mechanical performance for osteosynthesis with an inverted L system.
Assuntos
Mandíbula , Osteotomia Mandibular , Dente Molar , Osteotomia , Osteotomia Sagital do Ramo Mandibular , PoliuretanosRESUMO
In surgery for facial asymmetry, mandibles can be classified into two types, rotational and translational, according to the required mandibular movements for surgery. During surgery for rotational mandibular asymmetry, a bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) may cause a large bone gap between the proximal and distal segments as well as condylar displacement, resulting in a relapse of the temporomandibular joint disorder, especially in severe cases. The intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy has an advantage, in this respect, because it causes less rotational displacement of the proximal segment on the deviated side and even displaced or rotated condylar segments may return to their original physiologic position. Unilateral intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (UIVRO) on the short side combined with contralateral SSRO was devised as an alternative technique to resolve the spatial problems caused by conventional SSRO in cases of severe rotational asymmetry. A series of three cases were treated with the previously suggested protocol and the follow-up period was analyzed. In serial cases, UIVRO combined with contralateral SSRO may avoid mediolateral flaring of the bone segments and condylar dislocation, and result in improved condition of the temporomandibular joint. UIVRO combined with contralateral SSRO is expected to be a useful technique for the treatment of rotational mandibular asymmetry.
Assuntos
Luxações Articulares , Assimetria Facial , Seguimentos , Mandíbula , Osteotomia , Osteotomia Sagital do Ramo Mandibular , Recidiva , Articulação Temporomandibular , Transtornos da Articulação TemporomandibularRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the amount of postoperative drainage via closed suction drainage system after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We planned a retrospective cohort study of 40 patients selected from a larger group who underwent orthognathic surgery from 2007 to 2013. Mean age (range) was 23.95 (16 to 35) years. Patients who underwent bilateral IVRO or SSRO were categorized into group I or group II, respectively, and each group consisted of 20 patients. Closed suction drainage system was inserted in mandibular osteotomy sites to decrease swelling and dead space, and records of drainage amount were collected. The data were compared and analyzed with independent t-test. RESULTS: The closed suction drainage system was removed at 32 hours postoperatively, and the amount of drainage was recorded every 8 hours. In group I, the mean amount of drainage was 79.42 mL in total, with 31.20 mL, 19.90 mL, 13.90 mL, 9.47 mL, and 4.95 mL measured at 0, 8, 16, 24, and 32 hours postoperatively, respectively. In group II, the mean total amount of drainage was 90.11 mL, with 30.25 mL, 25.75 mL, 19.70 mL, 8.50 mL, and 5.91 mL measured at 0, 8, 16, 24, and 32 hours postoperatively, respectively. Total amount of drainage from group I was less than group II, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P=0.338). There was a significant difference in drainage between group I and group II only at 16 hours postoperatively (P=0.029). CONCLUSION: IVRO and SSRO have different osteotomy design and different extent of medullary exposure; however, our results reveal that there is no remarkable difference in postoperative drainage of blood and exudate.
Assuntos
Humanos , Estudos de Coortes , Drenagem , Exsudatos e Transudatos , Osteotomia Mandibular , Cirurgia Ortognática , Osteotomia , Osteotomia Sagital do Ramo Mandibular , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Retrospectivos , SucçãoRESUMO
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Cefalometria , Seguimentos , Mentoplastia , Osso Hioide , Má Oclusão , Cirurgia Ortognática , Osteotomia , Osteotomia Sagital do Ramo Mandibular , Prognatismo , Língua , Filme para Raios XRESUMO
Indivíduos adultos de Padrão II com deficiência mandibular e má oclusão de Classe II, divisão 1 possuem duas opções de tratamento: preparo ortodôntico com vistas à cirurgia de avanço mandibular ou aparelhos protratores mandibulares. O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar os efeitos de duas modalidades terapêuticas no tratamento da má oclusão de Classe II com deficiência mandibular. Dois indivíduos distintos com má oclusão de Classe II, divisão 1 e deficiência mandibular sagital foram tratados após o surto de crescimento. O primeiro indivíduo utilizou o aparelho Herbst como opção terapêutica e o outro foi tratado com osteotomia mandibular sagital bilateral. Foram avaliados os resultados cefalométricos, oclusão e face desses indivíduos. A correção da Classe II para uma oclusão normal tratada com sobressaliência horizontal e vertical corretas ocorreu tanto no caso tratado com aparelho Herbst quanto no associado à cirurgia de avanço mandibular. Assim, conclui-se que o aparelho Herbst pode ser uma alternativa para correção da má oclusão em casos limítrofes do Padrão II deficiência mandibular, Classe II, divisão 1, em adultos.
Two treatment options are available for adult patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion caused by mandibular deficiency: combined mandibular advancement surgery and orthodontic treatment or mandibular advancement appliance. This study aimed to analyze the effects of two therapeutic modalities of Class II malocclusion treatment with mandibular deficiency. Two distinct individuals with Class II malocclusion division 1 and mandibular deficiency were treated after growth spurt. The first individual used the Herbst appliance as a therapeutic option and the second individual was treated with bilateral sagittal osteotomy. The cephalometric, occlusion and face results were evaluated for both individuals. Correction of Class II malocclusion was observed on both Herbst and surgery patients resulting on a normal occlusal relationship with normal overjet and overbite. Therefore it was concluded that Herbst appliance can be used to treat borderline skeletal Class II in adult patients.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Má Oclusão Classe II de Angle , Ortodontia , OsteotomiaRESUMO
La osteotomía sagital de la rama mandibular (SSRO) es una de las técnicas quirúrgicas más frecuentes para corregir las deformidades de la mandíbula. Con el fin de prevenir problemas anatómicos y quirúrgicos, los cirujanos requieren una mayor investigación sobre las estructuras anatómicas relacionadas con la SSRO. El objetivo de este estudio fue investigar las posiciones de la antilingula (AL), la entrada al nervio alveolar inferior (NAI) en la mandíbula y otros puntos de referencia anatómicos en relación con la língula mandibular (L). Fueron estudiadas 70 hemimandíbulas secas. La AL y los demás puntos de referencia y, la posición correspondiente de la L se marcaron en la cara medial y lateral de la rama mandibular respectivamente. Fueron medidas las distancias de la AL, NAI y L en los planos anterior-posterior y superior-inferior con un caliper, y se estableció su relación geométrica. Los resultados mostraron que la AL era perceptible en el 100 por ciento de las caras laterales mandibulares. La mayoría de las ALs se encuentran anterior a la L, con una distancia media de 0,66+/-2,43mm y 0,92+/-2,56 mm y, 4,23+/-2,97 mm y 3,62 +/- 3,14 mm superior a ella (lados derecho-izquierdo respectivamente) (ambos con un valor de p <0,001). Valores similares se observaron en relación con el NAI. No se encontraron diferencias significativas entre los lados derecho e izquierdo, para la mayoría de los parámetros. Los parámetros estudiados pueden asistir a los cirujanos maxilofaciales a determinar la proximidad anatómica del NAI, y reducir al mínimo el riesgo de dañar el nervio y vasos sanguíneos. No recomendamos el uso de la AL como única referencia anatómica cuando se realiza un procedimiento de SSRO.
Sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) of the mandible is one of the most common surgical techniques to correct mandibular deformities. In order to prevent many surgical anatomical problems, surgeons have found that further investigation of the anatomical structures related to SSRO is needed. This study aims to investigate positions of the antilingula (AL), inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) and other anatomic landmarks in relation to the lingula of dried mandibles. 70 Chilean dried hemimandibles were studied. The AL, others landmarks and the corresponding position of the L were marked on the internal and external aspect of the mandibular ramus respectively. The distances from the AL, IAN and L were measured in the anteriorposterior and the superiorinferior planes using a digital caliper and geometric relationship was established. The results showed the AL was discernible in 100 percent of lateral mandibular rami studied. The most of the AL was found anteriorly to the L with a mean distance of 0.66+/-2.43mm and 0.92+/-2.56mm, and 4.23 +/- 2.97mm and 3.62+/-3.14mm superiorly (right-left sides respectively) (both with p value <0.001). Similar values were seen in relation with IAN. No significant differences were found between the right and left sides, for the majority of parameters. The studied parameters will assist clinicians to determine the anatomical proximity to the IAN, and, minimize the risk of damaging nerver and vessels. We do not recommend the use of antilingula as only anatomical landmark when performing a SSRO procedure.
Assuntos
Feminino , Mandíbula/anatomia & histologia , Mandíbula/ultraestrutura , Nervo Mandibular/anatomia & histologia , Nervo Mandibular/ultraestrutura , Osteotomia Sagital do Ramo Mandibular/métodos , Prognatismo/diagnóstico , Retrognatismo/diagnósticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated a range of fixation methods to determine which is best for the postoperative stabilization of a mandibular osteotomy using three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution on the plate, screw and surrounding bone and displacement of the lower incisors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The model was generated using the synthetic skull scan data, and the surface model was changed to a solid model using software. Bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy was performed using the program, and 8 different types of fixation methods were evaluated. A vertical load of 10 N was applied to the occlusal surface of the first molar. RESULTS: In the case of bicortical screws, von-Mises stress on the screws and screw hole and deflection of the lower central incisor were minimal in type 2 (inverted L pattern with 3 bicortical repositioning screws). In the case of plates, von-Mises stress was minimal in type 8 (fixation 5 mm above the inferior border of the mandible with 1 metal plate and 4 monocortical screws), and deflection of the lower central incisor was minimal in types 6 (fixation 5 mm below the superior border of the mandible with 1 metal plate and 4 monocortical screws) and 7 (fixation 12 mm below the superior border of the mandible with 1 metal plate and 4 monocortical screws). CONCLUSION: Types 2 and 6 fixation methods provide better stability than the others.