RESUMO
Objective:To explore the function of temperature difference stimulation oral nursing for the patients with mild to moderate dysphagia after oral cancer operation.Methods:A total of 64 patients with mild to moderate dysphagia after oral cancer surgery admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to June 2021 were selected as the research subjects by convenient sampling method, and divided into control group ( n=32) and observation group ( n=32) according to random number table method. The grouping method was random number table method. The control group was treated with traditional ice-water stimulation rehabilitation training, and the observation group was treated with temperature difference stimulation oral care. The degree of dysphagia, nutritional status, postoperative complications and quality of life were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results:After the intervention, the degree of dysphagia in the observation group (water swallow test) fromⅠto Ⅳ degree were 2, 11, 13 and 6 cases, while in the control group were 9, 17, 4 and 2 cases, the difference was significant ( Z=-3.41, P<0.05). After the intervention, the serum albumin of the observation group was (38.74 ± 4.87) g/L, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (35.81 ± 5.14) g/L. there was significant difference between the two groups ( t=2.34, P<0.05). After the intervention, the self scores of chewing, swallowing, anxiety, emotion and quality of life in the Chinese version of the University of Washington quality of life scale in the observation group were 70.28 ± 10.39, 68.20 ± 9.43, 72.39 ± 12.28, 65.30 ± 15.33 and 78.05 ± 9.47, which were significantly higher than those in the control group 64.29 ± 9.26, 61.42 ± 12.38, 64.50 ± 10.43, 58.08 ± 11.62 and 72.92 ± 10.40, The difference was statistically significant ( t values were 2.06-2.77, all P<0.05). Conclusions:Oral nursing with temperature difference stimulation can effectively improve the swallowing disorder of patients after oral cancer surgery, reduce the incidence of aspiration and malnutrition, and improve the quality of life of patients.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that if a fluoroscopic image of the lumbar sympathetic ganglion block (LSGB) showed the spread patterns of contrast at both the L2/3 and L4/5 disc areas, then this would demonstrate a more profound blockade effect because the spread patterns are close to sympathetic ganglia. In addition, we compared the effects of LSGB and transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) for the patients suffering with spinal stenosis. METHODS: Eighty patients were divided into two groups (Group S: the patients treated with TFESI, Group L: the patients treated with LSGB). The patients of group L were classified into three groups (groups A, B and, C) according to their contrast spread pattern. The preblock and postblock temperature difference between the ipsilateral and contralateral great toe (DT(pre), DT(post), degrees C), and the DTnet were calculated as follows. DT(net) = DT(post) - DT(pre). RESULTS: Both group showed a significant reduction of the visual analogue score (VAS) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) score. Only the patients of group L showed a significant increase of their walking distance (WD). Group A showed the most significant changes in the DT(post) (6.1 +/- 1.2degrees C, P = 0.021), and the DTnet (6.0 +/- 1.0degrees C, p = 0.023), as compared to group C. CONCLUSIONS: LSGB showed a similar effect on the VAS, and ODI, and a significant effect, on WD, compared with TFESI. Group A showed a significant sympatholytic effect, as compared to group C.