Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy ; (12): 901-906, 2021.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-912190

RESUMO

Objective:To evaluate the risks and benefits of endoscopic ligation and tissue adhesive injection for tortuous gastric varices.Methods:A total of 193 patients with esophagogastric varices, who underwent endoscopic variceal ligation or endoscopic tissue adhesive injection in Department of Gastroenterology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from June 2015 to June 2020, were included in the retrospective analysis. These cases were connected vessels (type Le and gf based on LDRf standard) of tortuous gastric varices (F1 in Hashizume standard). According to the treatment, the patients were divided into three groups: gastric fundus and esophageal ligation group (endoscopic ligation of gastric fundus and esophageal varices, 32 cases), tissue adhesive group (endoscopic tissue adhesive injection of gastric varices, endoscopic ligation of esophageal varices, 71 cases) and esophageal ligation group (endoscopic ligation of esophageal varices, 90 cases). The re-bleeding rate, the effectiveness rate, the significant effectiveness rate and complications of the three groups were compared.Results:The rates of re-bleeding in gastric fundus and esophageal ligation group, tissue adhesive group and esophageal ligation group were 18.75% (6/32), 12.68% (9/71) and 3.33% (3/90), respectively.There was significant difference only between gastric fundus and esophageal ligation group and esophageal ligation group ( χ2=6.110, P<0.016). The effectiveness rates of the three groups were all 100.00%. The significant effectiveness rates in gastric fundus and esophageal ligation group, tissue adhesive group and esophageal ligation group were 37.50% (12/32), 25.35% (18/71) and 14.44% (13/90), respectively. There was significant difference only between gastric fundus and esophageal ligation group and esophageal ligation group ( χ2=7.702, P<0.016). No pulmonary infection, hepatic encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis or perforation occurred in the three groups.The incidences of chest pain or abdominal pain in gastric fundus and esophageal ligation group, tissue adhesive group and esophageal ligation group were 18.75% (6/32), 11.27% (8/71) and 2.22% (2/90), respectively.There was significant difference only between gastric fundus and esophageal ligation group and esophageal ligation group ( χ2=10.524, P<0.016). There was no significant difference in the incidence of fever, nausea or vomiting among the three groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion:Simultaneous endoscopic ligation of gastric fundus and esophageal varices, and endoscopic tissue adhesive injection of gastric varices combined with endoscopic ligation of esophageal varices is of no benefit for patients with tortuous gastric varices, but endoscopic ligation of esophageal varices alone may yield more benefit.

2.
China Journal of Endoscopy ; (12): 81-86, 2017.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-612195

RESUMO

Astract: Objective To explore the efifcacy and safety of endoscopic tissue adhesive injection in treatment of gastric variceal bleeding from liver cirrhosis.Methods Object of study are 92 cirrhotic patients (72 male/20 female) in hospital, who had been diagnosed with gastric varices bleeding from June 2014 to May 2016. Child-Pugh score at presentation for cirrhotic patients was A-28; B-36; C-28. According to endoscopic classiifcation of gastric varices, GEV1 were detected in 80 patients, GEV2 in 12. All patients were treated with endoscopic hypertonic glucose tissue adhesive ‘sandwich’ injection.Result Successful injection rate was 100.0% in 92 patients, among which 40 patients had accepted emergency endoscopic treatment and the immediate hemostasis rate was 100.0%. 65 patients were Having gastroscope review after the injection six months, 22 patients were significantly effective, accounting for 33.8%; 38 patients were effective, accounting for 58.4%; 5 patients were invalid, accounting for 7.7%. All the patients were followed up in 1 to 24 months. The late-rebleeding rate was 2.2%. None of them were having early-rebleeding or dead; Complications the incidence of rebleeding rate which caused by removing the needles which trapped in the varices was 2.2%. The incidence of chest pain rate was 4.3%, the bloating rate was 6.5% and the ulceration rate was 15.2%. There was no complications like fever, infection, stomachache, embolism and so on.Conclusion With low rebleeding rate and light side-effect, endoscopic tissue adhesive injection in the treatment of gastric variceal bleeding caused by cirrhosis portal hypertension has really good effect.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA