Cost-Effectiveness of High, Moderate and Low-Dose Statins in the Prevention of Vascular Events in the Brazilian Public Health System / Efetividade de Estatinas em Dose Alta, Moderada e Baixa na Prevenção de Eventos Vasculares no SUS

Background: Statins have proven efficacy in the reduction of cardiovascular events, but the financial impact of its widespread use can be substantial. Objective: To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of three statin dosing schemes in the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS) perspective. Methods: We developed a Markov model to evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of low, intermediate and high intensity dose regimens in secondary and four primary scenarios (5%, 10%, 15% and 20% ten-year risk) of prevention of cardiovascular events. Regimens with expected low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction below 30% (e.g. simvastatin 10mg) were considered as low dose; between 30-40%, (atorvastatin 10mg, simvastatin 40mg), intermediate dose; and above 40% (atorvastatin 20-80mg, rosuvastatin 20mg), high-dose statins. Effectiveness data were obtained from a systematic review with 136,000 patients. National data were used to estimate utilities and costs (expressed as International Dollars - Int$). A willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold equal to the Brazilian gross domestic product per capita (circa Int$11,770) was applied. Results: Low dose was dominated by extension in the primary prevention scenarios. In the five scenarios, the ICER of intermediate dose was below Int$10,000 per QALY. The ICER of the high versus intermediate dose comparison was above Int$27,000 per QALY in all scenarios. In the cost-effectiveness acceptability curves, intermediate dose had a probability above 50% of being cost-effective with ICERs between Int$ 9,000-20,000 per QALY in all scenarios. Conclusions: Considering a reasonable WTP threshold, intermediate dose statin therapy is economically attractive, and should be a priority intervention in prevention of cardiovascular events in Brazil. .

Fundamento: Estatinas tem eficácia comprovada na redução de eventos cardiovasculares, mas o impacto financeiro de seu uso disseminado pode ser substancial. Objetivo: Conduzir análise de custo-efetividade de três esquemas de doses de estatinas na perspectiva do SUS. Métodos: Foi desenvolvido modelo de Markov para avaliar a razão de custo-efetividade incremental (RCEI) de regimes de dose baixa, intermediária e alta, em prevenção secundária e quatro cenários de prevenção primária (risco em 10 anos de 5%, 10%, 15% e 20%). Regimes com redução de LDL abaixo de 30% (ex: sinvastatina 10mg) foram considerados dose baixa; entre 30-40% (atorvastatina 10mg, sinvastatina 40mg), dose intermediária; e acima de 40% (atorvastatina 20-80 mg, rosuvastatina 20 mg), dose alta. Dados de efetividade foram obtidos de revisão sistemática com aproximadamente 136.000 pacientes. Dados nacionais foram usados para estimar utilidades e custos (expressos em dólares internacionais - Int$). Um limiar de disposição a pagar (LDP) igual ao produto interno bruto per capita nacional (aproximadamente Int$11.770) foi utilizado. Resultados: A dose baixa foi dominada por extensão nos cenários de prevenção primária. Nos cinco cenários, a RCEI da dose intermediária ficou abaixo de Int$10.000 por QALY. A RCEI de dose alta ficou acima de Int$27.000 por QALY em todos os cenários. Nas curvas de aceitabilidade de custo-efetividade, dose intermediária teve probabilidade de ser custo-efetiva acima de 50% com RCEIs entre Int$9.000-20.000 por QALY em todos os cenários. Conclusões: Considerando um LDP razoável, uso de estatinas em doses intermediárias é economicamente atrativo, e deveria ser intervenção prioritária na redução de eventos cardiovasculares no Brasil. .

La combinación de atorvastatina y meloxicam inhibe la neuroinflamación y atenúa el daño celular en la isquemia cerebral experimental por embolia arterial / Atorvastatin-meloxicam association inhibits neuroinflammation and attenuates the cellular damage in cerebral ischemia by arterial embolism.

Introducción. El accidente cerebrovascular es la segunda causa de muerte y la primera de discapacidad en el mundo, y más de 85 % es de origen isquémico. Objetivo. Evaluar en un modelo de infarto cerebral por embolia arterial el efecto de la atorvastatina y el meloxicam, administrados por separado y de forma conjunta, sobre la respuesta neuronal, los astrocitos y la microglia. Materiales y métodos. Se sometieron ratas Wistar a embolia de la arteria carótida y a tratamiento con meloxicam y atorvastatina, administrados por separado y conjuntamente, a las 6, 24, 48 y 72 horas. Se evaluó la reacción de las proteínas COX-2, GFAP y OX-42 en las neuronas, los astrocitos y la microglia mediante inmunohistoquímica y estudios morfológicos y de densitometría. Los datos obtenidos se evaluaron por medio de un análisis de varianza y de pruebas no paramétricas de comparación múltiple. Resultados. La isquemia cerebral por embolia arterial incrementó significativamente (p<0,001) la reacción de los astrocitos y la microglia, en tanto que la atorvastatina y el meloxicam, administrados por separado y de forma conjunta, la redujeron. La isquemia produjo acortamiento de las proyecciones de los astrocitos, engrosamiento celular, ruptura de las expansiones protoplásmicas (clasmatodendrosis) y cambios morfológicos en la microglia propios de diversas etapas de actividad. En las zonas circundantes del foco se incrementó la reacción inmunológica de la COX-2 y se redujo en el foco isquémico, en tanto que el meloxicam y la atorvastatina redujeron significativamente (p<0,001) la reacción inmunológica en la zona circundante del foco, restableciendo la marcación de la ciclooxigenasa en el foco isquémico. Conclusión. La combinación de meloxicam y atorvastatina atenúa la respuesta de los astrocitos y la microglia en el proceso inflamatorio posterior a la isquemia cerebral por embolia arterial, reduciendo la degeneración neuronal y restableciendo el equilibrio morfológico y funcional del tejido nervioso.

Introduction: Stroke is the second leading cause of death and the first cause of disability in the world, with more than 85% of the cases having ischemic origin. Objective: To evaluate in an embolism model of stroke the effect of atorvastatin and meloxicam on neurons, astrocytes and microglia. This evaluation was done administering each medication individually and in association. Materials and methods: Wistar rats were subjected to carotid arterial embolism and treatment with meloxicam and atorvastatin at 6, 24, 48 and 72 hours. Using immunohistochemistry, we evaluated the immunoreactivity of COX-2 protein, GFAP and OX-42 in neurons, astrocytes and microglia by densitometric and morphological studies. Data were evaluated by variance analysis and non-parametric multiple comparison. Results: Cerebral ischemia by arterial embolism increased significantly the reactivity of microglia and astrocytes (p<0.001), whereas it was reduced by atorvastatin, meloxicam and their association. Ischemia produced astrocytic shortening, cellular thickening, protoplasmic rupture expansions (clasmatodendrosis) and microglial morphological changes characteristic of various activity stages. In perifocal areas, immunoreactivity of COX-2 was increased and in the ischemic focus it was reduced, while meloxicam and atorvastatin significantly reduced (p<0.001) perifocal immunoreactivity, restoring the marking of cyclooxygenase in the ischemic focus. Conclusion: These results suggest that the meloxicam-atorvastatin association attenuates astrocytic and microglial response in the inflammatory process after cerebral ischemia by arterial embolism, reducing neurodegeneration and restoring the morphological and functional balance of nervous tissue .

Effects of single-dose atorvastatin on interleukin-6, interferon gamma, and myocardial no-reflow in a rabbit model of acute myocardial infarction and reperfusion

The mechanisms of statins relieving the no-reflow phenomenon and the effects of single-dose statins on it are not well known. This study sought to investigate the effects of inflammation on the no-reflow phenomenon in a rabbit model of acute myocardial infarction and reperfusion (AMI/R) and to evaluate the effects of single-dose atorvastatin on inflammation and myocardial no-reflow. Twenty-four New Zealand white male rabbits (5-6 months old) were randomized to three groups of eight: a sham-operated group, an AMI/R group, and an atorvastatin-treated group (10 mg/kg). Animals in the latter two groups were subjected to 4 h of coronary occlusion followed by 2 h of reperfusion. Serum levels of interleukin (IL)-6 were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The expression of interferon gamma (IFN-γ) in normal and infarcted (reflow and no-reflow) myocardial tissue was determined by immunohistochemical methods. The area of no-reflow and necrosis was evaluated pathologically. Levels of serum IL-6 were significantly lower in the atorvastatin group than in the AMI/R group (P<0.01). Expression of IFN-γ in infarcted reflow and no-reflow myocardial tissue was also significantly lower in the atorvastatin group than in the AMI/R group. The mean area of no-reflow [47.01% of ligation area (LA)] was significantly smaller in the atorvastatin group than in the AMI/R group (85.67% of LA; P<0.01). The necrosis area was also significantly smaller in the atorvastatin group (85.94% of LA) than in the AMI/R group (96.56% of LA; P<0.01). In a secondary analysis, rabbits in the atorvastatin and AMI/R groups were divided into two groups based on necrosis area (90% of LA): a small group (<90% of LA) and a large group (>90% of LA). There was no significant difference in the area of no-reflow between the small (61.40% of LA) and large groups (69.87% of LA; P>0.05). Single-dose atorvastatin protected against inflammation and myocardial no-reflow and reduced infarct size during AMI/R in rabbits. No-reflow was not dependent on the reduction of infarct size.

[ effects of different doses of atorvastatin on angiogenesis of chorioallantoic membrane of chick embryo]

Statins promote the proliferation, migration and survival of endothelial cells and bone marrow -derived endothelial progenitor cells [Angioblasts]. Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels, is a dynamic and complex activity which is needed for embryogenesis and other physiological processes. However, in many pathological conditions such as solid tumor progression, the disease appears to be associated with persistent upregulated angiogenesis. In this research we used atorvastatin [0.1microm] and [10 microm] on angiogenesis of chick embryo. In this experimental study 42 Ross fertilized eggs were randomly divided into 3groups as follows: 1] control group, 2] group treated with atorvastatin [0.1microm], 3] group treated with atorvastatin [10microm]. In day 2 a window was opened on eggs in sterile condition and In day 8 gelatin sponge was placed on chorioallantic membrane [CAM] and was soaked with 10 microliters atorvastatin [0.1microm] and [10 microm] in group 2 and group 3. In day12 CAMs were examined and photographed by research photo-stereomicroscope in all cases. Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey tests. The average number and length of vessels in control and the group treated with atorvastatin [0.1microm] showed a significant increase [P<0.05] and the average number and length of vessels in the group treated with atorvastatin [10 microm] showed a significant decrease compare to control group [P<0.05]. The results of this study showed that atorvastatin has a stimulatory effect on angiogenesis in CAM and atorvastatin [10 microm] has an inhibitory effect on angiogenesis in CAM. It is suggested that astatine can be used as a new medicine for angiogenesis balancing in treat ment of diseases related to angiogenesis

La atorvastatina no modifica el incremento agudo de los niveles de p-selectina y fibrinógeno inducido con esfuerzo físico máximo / Atovastatin does not modify the acutely increased levels of P-selectin and fibrinogen induced by maximal physical exercise

Introducción: Las estatinas han demostrado disminuir los eventos cardiovasculares en sujetos con y sin enfermedad aterosclerótica establecida. Se ha demostrado, que sus efectos benéficos no sólo dependen de la reducción del colesterol, sino que también podrían ser secundarios a otros efectos de las estatinas, como su efectos de reducción de inflamación y/ o trombogénesis entre otros. Sin embargo, no existen trabajos que demuestren que las estatinas sean capaces de frenarla activación de la cascada de inflamación y/o trombogénesis. Objetivos: Determinar el efecto de la administración oral de atorvastatina por 7 días sobre los niveles plasmáticos de proteína C- reactiva ultrasensible (PCR us), fibrinógeno y P-selectina, pre y post prueba de esfuerzo máximo inmediato y a las 24 horas de su ejecución. Métodos: Ensayo clínico en 50 hombres sanos (18 a 50 años), randomizado atorvastatina 80 mg/día - placebo por 7 días, doble ciego. Muestras tomadas en sangre para PCRus, fibrinógeno y P-selectina, perfil lipídico, creatin kinasa y transaminasas hepáticas, pre y post test de esfuerzo, y a las 24 horas. Los resultados para datos continuos se expresan como medias +/- desviación estándar, test de student para muestras independientes, ANOVA para muestras repetidas. Programa estadístico SPSS 14.0. Resultados: Un grupo de 44 sujetos completaron el estudio: atorvastatina 80 mg (n=24) o placebo (n=20). En el grupo atorvastatina, después de una semana de tratamiento, los niveles de LDLc disminuyeron en 38 por ciento (LDL basal: 97 +/- 27 mg/dL vs LDL post: 62 +/- 31 mg/dL, p < 0.001). Sin embargo, no se observaron cambios en ese mismo período en los niveles de PCRus, fibrinógeno y P-selectina con respecto a placebo. Los niveles de fibrinógeno se elevaron 8 por ciento entre la etapa pre y post ejercicio inmediato (341 +/- 56 mg/dL vs 368 +/- 65 mg/dL, p<0.001), retornando a los niveles basales a las 24 horas; no hubo diferencias entre atorvastatina - placebo...

Background: Chronic statin therapy is known to decrease ínflammation and platelet aggregation. However, little data exist regarding acute effect of statins upon these variables. Exercise can be used to induce ínflammation and platelet aggregation. Aim: to determine the acute effect of atorvastatin upon plasma levels of ultra sensitive C reactive protein (US-PCR), fibrinogen and P selectin before, immediately after and 24 hr following a maximal exercise test in healthy subjects. Methods: This was a double blind, randomized prospective study Fifty healthy male subjects (aged 18to 50years) received atorvastatin 80 mg or placebo daily for 7 days. US-PCR, fibrinogen, P-selectin, blood lipids, total creatin-kinase (CK) and transaminases were determined pre and immediately after maximal treadmill exercise. Repeat determinations were performed 24 following the test. Results were analyzed using the SPSS statistical package, and are expressed as mean +/- SD. Student's t and repeated measures ANOVA were used as appropriate. Results: 44 subjects completed the study (atorvastatin =24; placebo= 20). LDL cholesterol decreased from 97 +/- 27 to 62 +/- 31 mg/dl in the atorvastatin group (p<0.001). US-PCR, After 1 week, Fibrinogen and P-selectin were not significantly modified from baseline, and no differences were observed between groups (atorvastatin vs. control). However, fibrinogen increased 8 percent from baseline to immediately post exercise (341 +/- 6 vs. 368 +/- 65mg/dl (95 percent CI. 21/.3 - 33.6). 24hr after exercise, fibrinogen levels returned to baseline. Similar changes were observed for P-selectin (25 +/- 5, 28 +/- 1.7 ng/dl, baseline and post exercise respectively p<0.01), again returning to baseline 24hr after exercise. No significant changes were observed for US-PCR after exercise in neither group. CK increased 43 percent in the atorvastatin group and 12 percent in controls (NS). Conclusion: Atorvastatin...

Comparative Study of Low Doses of Rosuvastatin and Atorvastatin on Lipid and Glycemic Control in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome and Hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This multicenter, open-labeled, randomized trial was performed to compare the effects of rosuvastatin 10 mg and atorvastatin 10 mg on lipid and glycemic control in Korean patients with nondiabetic metabolic syndrome. METHODS: In total, 351 patients who met the modified National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) criteria for metabolic syndrome with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels > or = 130 mg/dL were randomized to receive either rosuvastatin 10 mg (n = 173) or atorvastatin 10 mg (n = 178) for over 6 weeks. RESULTS: After 6 weeks of treatment, greater reductions in total cholesterol (- 35.94 +/- 11.38 vs. - 30.07 +/- 10.46%, p < 0.001), LDL-C (48.04 +/- 14.45 vs. 39.52 +/- 14.42%, p < 0.001), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (- 42.93 +/- 13.15 vs. - 35.52 +/- 11.76%, p < 0.001), and apolipoprotein-B (- 38.7 +/- 18.85 vs. - 32.57 +/- 17.56%, p = 0.002) levels were observed in the rosuvastatin group as compared to the atorvastatin group. Overall, the percentage of patients attaining the NCEP ATP III goal was higher with rosuvastatin as compared to atorvastatin (87.64 vs. 69.88%, p < 0.001). Changes in glucose and insulin levels, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance index were not significantly different between the two groups. The safety and tolerability of the two agents were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Rosuvastatin 10 mg was more effective than atorvastatin 10 mg in achieving NCEP ATP III LDL-C goals in patients with nondiabetic metabolic syndrome, especially in those with lower NCEP ATP III target level goals.

Unexpected and abnormally low HDL cholesterol levels on combination hypolipidemic therapy.

In general, Indians have low HDL cholesterol levels. Fenofibrate, a drug widely used in the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia, usually also increases HDL cholesterol. There have been a few reports in the literature of a paradoxical decrease in serum HDL-cholesterol in patients treated with fenofibrate, either alone or in combination with a statin. We report three cases of paradoxical decrease in serum HDL- cholesterol in type 2 diabetic patients treated with a statin-fenofibrate combination. ©

Atorvastatin improves arterial stiffness in normotensive normolipidaemic persons with type 2 diabetes.

Increased arterial stiffness is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease and mortality in middle-aged and olderadults. We measured arterial stiffness by pulse wave velocity (PWV)in brachial-ankle segments by automated oscillometry in 71 normotensive and normolipidaemic subjects with type 2 diabetes (40 males and 31 females). 57 patients (whose baPWV was more than 1400 cm/second) were randomised into two groups, group A (n=29) were given 10 mg atorvastatin daily for 6 months and group B (n=28) were given placebo. After 6 months, atorvastatin group had significant improvement in brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) (1712.03 +/- 349.9 cm/second versus 1558.81 +/- 303.26 cm/ second, p< 0.05). Though the placebo group showed some improvement (1692.03 +/- 425.15 cm/second versus 1636.78 +/- 425.1 cm/second) it was not statistically significant. Despite correlation was noted between baPWV and systolic blood pressure (SBP), there was no significant correlation between the mean baPWV and duration of diabetes, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, waist-hip ratio (WHR), waist to height ratio (WHtR), glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), LDL, HDL cholesterol and spot urine albumin creatinine ratio (ACR) at the baseline. The decrement of LDL-cholesterol is correlated with the decrement of the baPWV in the atorvastatin group only (p<0.01).

Anti-atherosclerotic effect of atorvastatin and clopidogrel alone and in combination in rats.

Atherosclerosis is a disease affecting arterial blood vessels due to the accumulation of macrophage white blood cells and low density lipoproteins. Effects of atorvastatin, a recently introduced lipid lowering statin was studied alone and in combination with clopidogrel in high fat diet fed atherosclerotic rats orally. Results showed significant reduction in total serum cholesterol and malondialdehyde levels and significant improvement in urine creatinine levels. Aortic cross sections of rats treated with clopidogrel alone showed reversal of atherosclerotic calcification. The same effect was observed with the combined treatment of clopidogrel and atorvastatin. Only atorvastatin treatment did not show any histological atheroprotective effect. Atorvastatin and clopidogrel alone and in combination have offered significant atheroprotective effect. No specific advantage was seen with combined treatment of atorvastatin and clopidogrel, moreover the advantages seen with independent drug administration also reduced with combined treatment.

Efficacy and safety of combination of extended release niacin and atorvastatin in patients with low levels of high density lipoprotein cholesterol.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the safety and efficacy of combination therapy of extended release (ER) niacin and atorvastatin in patients with low HDL-C and compared the results with atorvastatin monotherapy. METHODS: This open label study recruited consecutive men and women who had coronary artery disease with HDL-C levels <35 mg/dL. These patients were already on atorvastatin therapy targeted to lower low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), for a minimum period of 6 months. Group 1, n = 104 (mean age 52.7 years) received ER niacin in addition to atorvastatin and group 2 (n = 106) continued on atorvastatin (mean age 52.3 years). ER niacin dose was built up to a maximum of 1.5 g and atorvastatin dose titrated according to LDL levels in both the groups. The lipoprotein levels at baseline were similar (p = NS). RESULTS: At 9 +/- 1.8 months of follow-up, the mean dose of ER niacin was 1.3 g and atorvastatin 13.2 mg in group 1. In comparison, group 2 patients had mean atorvastatin dose of 15.9 mg. Patients in group 1 had significant elevation in HDL-C cholesterol (39.5 +/- 5.5 vs 35.7 +/- 4.5 mg/dL), reduction in total cholesterol (156.4 +/- 31 vs 164.5 +/- 39.3 mg/dL) and also LDL-C (88.9 +/- 28.3 vs 99.8 +/- 35.4 mg/dL) compared to group 2 (all p < 0.05). The magnitude of reduction in triglyceride levels was not significant between the groups (140.1 +/- 40.4 vs 145.2 +/- 46.5 mg/dL) (p = NS). No major adverse events or clinical myopathy occurred in either groups. Four patients (4%) discontinued ER niacin (2 due to gastro-intestinal symptoms and 2 due to worsening of diabetes). Flushing occurred in 3% patients, but none felt it to be troublesome. CONCLUSION: Adding ER niacin to atorvastatin exhibited beneficial effects on lipid profile with significant elevation of HDL-C cholesterol and further lowering of LDL-C compared to monotherapy. This treatment offered better targeted therapy and was well tolerated with proper monitoring in Indian patients.

Eficácia da atorvastatina sem administração diária / Efficacy of atorvastatin when not administered daily

FUNDAMENTO: As estatinas têm larga utilização por reduzirem eventos cardíacos. Indicadas para uso diário, no entanto alguns a utilizam em dias alternados, principalmente visando diminuição de custos. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a eficácia da atorvastatina sem administração diária sobre os níveis de LDL-colesterol (LDL-C) e a redução dos custos. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados 100 pacientes (P) hipercolesterolêmicos em prevenção primária (PP) e secundária (PS). Após período de dieta de 12 semanas iniciou-se atorvastatina 10 mg por dia. Após seis semanas foi dosado o LDL-C, e se níveis <80 ou <104 mg/dl conforme PS e PP, respectivamente, foi feita subtração de duas tomadas de atorvastatina da semana. Caso LDL-C continuasse <80 ou <104 mg/dl permitiria novo ajuste para três vezes na semana, sendo feita última dosagem após seis semanas. A variação porcentual de custos foi a forma de apreciar a economia. RESULTADOS: Em 47 P, dos 52 desse grupo, observou-se redução de LDL-C de 32 por cento, permanecendo com atorvastatina diária. Quarenta e um ficaram até o final do estudo e tiveram redução da posologia semanal. Em 25 P, a medicação foi administrada três vezes por semana e, em 16, cinco vezes por semana, exibindo redução de LDL-C de 42,4 por cento e 46,1 por cento, respectivamente. Sobre custos, um dos grupos teve despesa mensal de R$ 106,65 reduzido para R$ 74,65, e outro grupo, o gasto de R$ 106,65 foi reduzido a R$ 53,33. CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados sugerem que é possível administrar a atorvastatina de forma não-diária e observou-se redução dos custos entre 30 por cento e 50 por cento.

BACKGROUND: Statins are widely used because they reduce cardiac events. Although they are indicated for daily use, some doctorsgive prescriptions for every other day, mainly with the purpose of reducing costs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of atorvastatin, when not administered everyday, on LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, and also to evaluate cost reduction. METHODS: A total of 100 patients with hypercholesterolemia in primary (PP) and secondary prevention (SP) were assessed. After a 12-week diet period, atorvastatin was initiated at a dose of 10 mg per day. After six weeks, LDL-C was determined, and if the levels were <80 or <104 mg/dL for SP and PP, respectively, two atorvastatin doses were subtracted per week. If LDL-C remained <80 or <104 mg/dL, a further reduction to three times a week was allowed, and the last determination was performed after six more weeks. The percentage variation in costs was the parameter to evaluate the saving. RESULTS: In 47 out of the 52 patients of this group, a reduction by 32 percent in LDL-C was observed, and daily atorvastatin was maintained. Forty one patients remained throughout the study and had their weekly dosage reduced. In 25 patients the medication was administered three times a week, and in 16, five times a week, with reductions of 42.4 percent and 46.1 percent in LDL-C, respectively. As regards costs, one of the groups had their monthly expense reduced from R$ 106.65 to R$ 74.65, and the other group from R$ 106.65 to R$ 53.33. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that atorvastatin may be administered on a non-daily basis. A cost reduction between 30 percent and 50 percent was also observed.

The combination of atorvastatin and ethanol is not more hepatotoxic to rats than the administration of each drug alone

Animal studies and premarketing clinical trials have revealed hepatotoxicity of statins, primarily minor elevations in serum alanine aminotransferase levels. The combined chronic use of medicines and eventual ethanol abuse are common and may present a synergistic action regarding liver injury. Our objective was to study the effect of the chronic use of atorvastatin associated with acute ethanol administration on the liver in a rat model. One group of rats was treated daily for 5 days a week for 2 months with 0.8 mg/kg atorvastatin by gavage. At the end of the treatment the livers were perfused with 72 mM ethanol for 60 min. Control groups (at least 4 animals in each group) consisted of a group of 2-month-old male Wistar EPM-1 rats exposed to 10 percent ethanol (v/v) ad libitum replacing water for 2 months, followed by perfusion of the liver with 61 nM atorvastatin for 60 min, and a group of animals without chronic ethanol treatment whose livers were perfused with atorvastatin and/or ethanol. The combination of atorvastatin with ethanol did not increase the release of injury marker enzymes (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and lactic dehydrogenase) from the liver and no change in liver function markers (bromosulfophthalein clearance, and oxygen consumption) was observed. Our results suggest that the combination of atorvastatin with ethanol is not more hepatotoxic than the separate use of each substance.

Randomised study to compare the efficacy and safety of isapgol plus atorvastatin versus atorvastatin alone in subjects with hypercholesterolaemia.

Soluble fibre has been shown to augment the cholesterol-lowering effects of low-fat diets in individuals with mild to moderate hypercholesterolaemia. Combination therapy with a statin poses advantages in certain settings and may allow use of lower doses of multiple drugs rather than maximum doses of a single drug. The primary objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of combination of isapgol and atorvastatin versus atorvastatin alone, in the same dose, in reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total-cholesterol levels in hypercholesterolaemic patients after 12 weeks of therapy. In a 12-week study, 100 subjects from both sexes and of > 20 years having hyperlipidaemia, with LDL-C level > 130 mg/dl and total cholesterol > 220 mg/dl were included, and were randomised to receive either a combination of isapgol powder (Naturolax) 5.6 g twice daily and atorvastatin 10 mg once daily or atorvastatin 10 mg once daily alone orally. Serum levels of total cholesterol, LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglyceride were assessed at 8 and 12 weeks. Ninety-seven patients completed the study. At the end of the 8th week, both the groups had a significant reduction in mean LDL-C (20.5% in isapgol + atorvastatin group and 16.0% among atorvastatin alone group) as compared to baseline. But between the groups, however, the difference was not significant. At the end of the 12th week fall in LDL-C at 31.4% for isapgol + atorvastatin was significantly greater than 22.8% among the atorvastatin group (p < 0.05). Serum total cholesterol, HDL-C and triglyceride were significantly lowered within the groups at 8th and 12th weeks but between groups, the difference was not significant. Comparison of adverse events profile in both the groups shows that more number of patients from atorvastatin alone group (n = 14, 28%) had adverse reactions than the number of patients from the combination group (n = 4, 8%; p < 005).

The Atorvastatin Goal Achievement Across Risk Levels: (ATGOAL) study in Thailand.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin at the starting doses of 10, 20, 40 mg and evaluate the effectiveness of 1 step titrate up regimen. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Two hundred and forty two subjects with dyslipidemia were enrolled and assigned the appropriate dose in relation to their individual cardiovascular risk status and baseline LDL-C levels. If the NCEP targets were not achieved, the doses were titrated up at week 4 and the primary efficacy was evaluated at week 8. RESULTS: A majority of subjects (88.8%) achieved their LDL-C goals at week 8. Almost all of the subject's LDL-C levels reached their goals by week 2 and 4 (81.6% and 87.1%, respectively). Only 10.7% (n = 25) required the sole titration. Each dose provided significant decreases in LDL-C (average -46.4%). Only 36 subjects experienced treatment related adverse events, the majority of these were in the high-risk group (n = 22) with only one subject registering a serious adverse event. CONCLUSION: Atorvastatin is effective and safe for Thai patients with dyslipidemia. The appropriate starting dose has contributed in the achievement of cholesterol reduction.

Apolipoprotein modifying effects of statins and fibrate in various age groups of coronary artery disease patients.

These days apolipoproteins especially apo B and apo A I are thought to be better predictors of risk of coronary artery disease as compared to lipids and lipoprotein cholesterol. Lifestyle modification and use of lipid modifying drugs such as statins and fibrates have proven effective in reducing the risk of coronary artery disease. Statins and fibrates are known to possess anti-atherosclerotic properties in addition to lipid modifying effects. Extensive data is available regarding lipid modification especially lowering of low density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels by these drugs. But the data regarding the effect of statins and fibrates, on apolipoprotein levels is scanty. Hence the present study was aimed at assessing the effect of statins (atorvastatin, simvastatin) and fenofibrate on serum apo B and apo A I levels in addition to their lipid modifying effects in various age groups of coronary artery disease patients. One hundred patients suffering from coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to 10 mg atorvastatin, 10 mg simvastatin and 200 mg fenofibrate, separately (without any combination). All the patients were divided into three age groups; group I (35-45 years), group II (46-55 years) and group III (> 55 years). Significant modification was observed in lipid and lipoprotein profile of coronary artery disease patients when treated with these drugs (statins and fibrates). A significant increase in serum apo A I (p < 0.01) and decline in serum apo B levels (p < 0.01) was observed in case of coronary artery disease patients after 16 weeks treatment, though the effect started after 1 month. All the three drugs reduced serum apo B levels in a comparable manner. Fenofibrate increased serum high density lipoprotein-cholesterol and apo A I levels more as compared to statins. It had nearly, proportionate effect in increasing high density lipoprotein-cholesterol and apo A I levels and reducing serum low density lipoprotein-cholesterol and apo B levels while the effect was disproportionate in case of atorvastatin and simvastatin. All the three drugs not only corrected lipid and lipoprotein cholesterol levels but also modified, apolipoprotein levels in a positive direction in coronary artery disease patients. Advancing age had no appreciable effect on the efficacy of these drugs.

Efficacy of omega-3 fatty acids, atorvastatin and orlistat in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with dyslipidemia.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of three hypolipidemic agents in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease associated with hyperlipidemia. METHODS: Patients with dyslipidemia (Fredrickson type IIb), asymptomatic persistent transaminasemia lasting 24 weeks, and evidence of hepatic fat infiltration on ultrasonography and liver biopsy were studied. Those with predominant hypertriglyceridemia received omega-3 fatty acids (5 mL thrice daily) (Group A), those with predominant hypercholesterolemia received atorvastatin 20 mg/daily (Group B), and overweight patients received orlistat 120 mg thrice daily before meals (Group C). After 24 weeks of treatment, serum transaminase and lipid levels and liver ultrasonography were repeated. RESULTS: Serum transaminase levels decreased significantly (p< 0.001) in all groups but the decrease was more marked in Group C (AST 75 [16] to 31 [7] IU/L; ALT 120 [38] to 41 [10] IU/L) than in Group A (AST 70 [14] to 41 [6]; ALT 110 [20] to 68 [12]) or Group B (AST 68 [13] to 46 [9]; ALT 115 [22] to 76.6 [13]). After treatment, ultrasonography showed resolution of fatty liver in 35% of patients in Group A, 61% in Group B, and in 86% in Group C (p< 0.001, Group C vs. A). CONCLUSIONS: A decline in transaminase levels and normalization of ultrasonographic evidence of fatty liver were observed on treatment with omega-3 fatty acids in patients with hypertriglyceridemia, with atorvastatin in those with hypercholesterolemia, and orlistat in overweight patients with hyperlipidemia.

Efficacy and safety of atorvastatin 10 mg every other day in hypercholesterolemia.

OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of atorvastatin administered every other day in patients with hypercholesterolemia. BACKGROUND: Statins have efficacy in lowering cholesterol and reducing cardiovascular events but their cost is a major disadvantage. Atorvastatin is the most potent statin and has a long half-life. Therefore, atorvastatin given on alternate days may be reasonable and cost effective, particularly in hypercholesterolemia patients. METHOD AND RESULT: Sixty patients with hypercholesterolemia despite diet therapy were enrolled into the study. They received atorvastatin 10 mg every other day before bedtime. Duration of treatment was 8 weeks. A lipid profile was determined as baseline, at 4 weeks and again at 8 weeks. Atorvastatin every other day significantly reduced total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), and LDL-c versus baseline. The TC, TG, and LDL-c levels were lower by 23 per cent, 8 per cent, and 30 per cent. Increase in HDL-c level was not statistically significant. Three patients had drug side effects. One patient had increased serum transaminase and one patient had increased serum muscle enzyme. The other one had somnolence. CONCLUSIONS: In hypercholesterolemia patients, atorvastatin 10 mg every other day is safe and effective in lowering TC, TG, with LDL-c and a slight increase in HDL-c.