Efectividad de la profilaxis analgésica con clonixinato de lisina en exodoncias: ensayo clínico aleatorio / Effectiveness of preemptive lysine clonixinate in tooth extraction: a randomized controlled trial

Objetivo: Evaluar la efectividad de la profilaxis analgésica con dosis únicas de clonixinato de lisina (CL 125mg) en pacientes sometidos a extracciones dentales. Metodología: Ensayo clínico aleatorio, doble enmascaramiento placebo-controlado. Participaron pacientes ASA I y II con indicación de exodoncia dental de servicios públicos en la ciudad de Valdivia-Chile en el mes de octubre del 2012. Se asignó de manera aleatoria dos grupos: un grupo tratamiento quienes recibieron una dosis de 25mg de CL 15 minutos antes de la cirugía; y un grupo control quien recibió un placebo. A ambos grupos se indicó CL como analgésico de rescate. Mediante un cuestionario, los pacientes registraron el grado de dolor a través de una Escala Visual Análoga (EVA) durante primer día en las 7 primeras horas, después de 24 y a las 48 horas posterior a la cirugía. Además, se registró número de cápsulas de CL consumidos como rescate durante 3 días posteriores a la intervención. Se comparó el efecto analgésico observado (EVA) y el número de consumo de analgésicos adicionales entre ambos grupos mediante t-test (p<0,05). Resultados: Cincuenta y cuatro pacientes fueron intervenidos. No se encontró diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre las puntuaciones de dolor entre ambos grupos. Los pacientes con profilaxis de CL informaron similar consumo de números de cápsulas de rescate que el grupo control. Conclusión: La profilaxis analgésica con CL no demostró ser más efectiva en la reducción del dolor luego de extracciones dentales en comparación al uso de placebo y dosis postquirúrgicas.

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of prophylaxis with single-dose analgesic clonixinate lysine (CL 125 mg) in patients undergoing tooth extraction. Methods: A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Were included in the study patients ASA I and II with dental extraction indication in the city of Valdivia, Chile in October 2012. Were randomly assigned in two groups: the treatment group received a doses of 125mg of CL fifteen minutes before the surgery, and a control group who received placebo. Both groups used a CL as a rescue analgesic. Using a survey, patients reported the degree of pain via a visual analog scale (VAS) during the first day, at 24 and 48 hours after surgery. In addition, registered the number of CL capsules consumed as a ransom for 3 days after the surgery. We compared the analgesic effect observed in (VAS) and the number of additional analgesic consumption between the two groups using t-test (p <0,05). Results: Fifty-four patients were operated and there was no statistically significant difference between the pain scores between the two groups. Premedication patients reported the use of equal number of rescue capsules comparing with the control group. Conclusion: CL analgesic prophylaxis proved no more effective in reducing pain after tooth extraction when comparing to the use of placebo in a postoperative doses.

Lysine clonixinate versus dipyrone (metamizole) for the acute treatment of severe migraine attacks: a single-blind, randomized study / Clonixinato de lisina versus dipirona (metamizol) para o tratamento agudo de uma crise intensa de enxaqueca: estudo monocego e randomizado

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are effective to treat migraine attacks. Lysine clonixinate (LC) and dipyrone (metamizol) have been proven effective to treat acute migraine. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the intravenous formulations of LC and dipyrone in the treatment of severe migraine attacks. METHOD: Thirty patients (28 women, 2 men), aged 18 to 48 years with migraine according the International Headache Society (IHS) (2004) were studied. The patients were randomized into 2 groups when presenting to an emergency department with a severe migraine attack. The study was single-blind. Headache intensity, nausea, photophobia and side effects were evaluated at 0, 30, 60 and 90 minutes after the drug administration. Rectal indomethacin as rescue medication (RM) was available after 2 hours and its use compared between groups. RESULTS: All patients completed the study. At 30 minutes, 0 percent of the dipyrone group 13 percent of the LC group were pain free (p=0.46). At 60 and 90 minutes, 2 (13 percent) and 5 (33 percent) patients from the dipyrone group and 11 (73 percent) and 13 (86.7 percent) patients from the LC group were pain free (p<0.001). At 60 minutes, significantly more patients from the LC group were nausea-free (p<0.001). Regarding photophobia, there were no differences between groups at 60 minutes (p=0.11). The use of RM at 2 hours did not differ among groups (p=0.50). Pain in the site of the injection was reported by more patients of the LC group compared to the dipyrone group (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: LC is significantly superior to dipyrone in treating severe migraine attacks. LC promotes significantly more burning at the site of the injection.

CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO: Antiinflamatórios não esteroidais (AINE) são eficazes no tratamento de crises de enxaqueca. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a eficácia e a tolerabilidade das apresentações injetáveis do clonixinato de lisina (CL) e da dipirona no tratamento de crises intensas de enxaqueca. MÉTODO: Trinta pacientes (28 mulheres, 2 homens), com idades entre 18 e 48 anos e enxaqueca de acordo com a Classificação Internacional de Cefaléias (2004) foram estudados. Os pacientes foram randomizados em 2 grupos ao se apresentarem em uma unidade de emergência, com uma crise intensa de enxaqueca. O desenho do estudo foi monocego. A intensidade da cefaléia, a presença de náusea e fotofobia e os efeitos colaterais foram avaliados e comparados na administração das drogas e após 30, 60 e 90 minutos. Indometacina retal foi disponibilizada como droga de resgate (DR) e seu uso comparado entre os grupos. RESULTADOS: Todos os pacientes completaram o estudo. Após 30 minutos, 0 por cento do grupo da dipirona e 13 por cento do CL encontravam-se sem cefaléia (p=0,46). Após 60 e 90 minutos, 2 (13 por cento) e 5 (33 por cento) do grupo da dipirona e 11 (73 por cento) e 13 (86,7 por cento) do grupo do CL encontravam-se sem cefaléia (p<0,001). Após 60 minutos, o CL foi mais eficaz que a dipirona em eliminar a náusea (p<0,001), mas não houve diferença quanto à melhora da fotofobia entre os grupos (p=0,11). Não houve diferenças entre os grupos que utilizaram DR (p=0,50). Dor no local da injeção foi apresentada por mais pacientes que usaram CL comparados aos da dipirona (p<0,001). CONCLUSÃO: O CL é significativamente superior a dipirona no tratamento de uma crise intensa de enxaqueca, mas resulta em mais queimação no local da injeção.

[Impact of two selected non-steroidal anti-inflammation drugs flunixin and ketoprofen on peroxynitrite-induced inflammation and serum levels of cortisol and glucose]

Peroxynitrite, produced naturally in the body from a reaction between nitric oxide and superoxide anion, possess destructive effects against microorganisms. In excess concentrations, however, it may also lead to cellular damage and inflammatory reactions in the host. Non - sterodial anti inflammation drugs [NSAIDs] are used widely in therapy for their antiinflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic properties. Meanwhile, their adverse effects on endocrine functions should be taken into account. This project aims at the following goals: 1] establishing a new animal model of peroxynitrite-induced inflammation, 2] studying the effect of two selected NSAIDs on these parameters.3] investigating the possible effect of this oxidant on the blood levels of cortisol and glucose. 24 male guinea pigs were divided into 4 groups [6 animals in each group]. Three groups were injected peroxynitrite and the last group, control group, given physiological salt solution in the paw subcutaneously. Following induction of a local inflammatory response, flunixin meglumine and ketoprofen [0.5 mg/0.5 ml] were injected to second and third groups, 5 times with 12h intervals. First and fourth groups were injected saline solution with the same manner. Animals were anesthetized with thiopental [60 mg/kg, i.p.] and a blood sample was collected by heart puncture. The glucose and cortisol levels of blood were determined by routine laboratory techniques. Blood glucose concentration in the animals that only injected peroxynitrite was less than the control group. In addition, groups which were given drugs had statistically higher levels of glucose in their blood more than the others. Although, cortisol levels were lower in the test groups compared to the control group, these differences were not significant statistically. The results of current study showed that both peroxinitrite and NSAIDs decreasethe cortisol levels of blood. These findings can be a possible explanation for the lower levels of cortisol in the blood of patient who receive nitro glisirin as well as osteoarthritis patients that mainly take NSAIDs. In the study, the glucose levels of blood in animals given drugs were more than the control groups

Accion del Clonoxinato de lisina sobre la funcion plaquetaria comparacion con otras drogas antiinflamatorias no esteroideas / Effects of lysine clonixinate on platelet function. Comparison with other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents

El grupo de los antiinflamatorios no esteroideos (AINEs) posee como uno de sus mecanismos de acción la inhibición de la síntesis de prostaglandinas. Este efecto explica muchas de las acciones farmacológicas y de los eventos adversos observados en el uso clínico. La administración de AINEs a pacientes con trastornos de la hemostasia o en estados perioperatorios incrementan el riesgo de hemorragias por inhibición de las funciones plaquetarias. En este trabajo se estudian las modificaciones plaquetarias inducidas por el clonixinato de lisina comparadas con las del diclofenac, ibuprofeno y aspirina, mediante pruebas clásicas (recuento de plaquetas, producción de factor 3 plaquetario, agregación con diversos inductores) y procedimientos más recientes (medición de P-selectina por citometría de flujo). El clonixinato de lisina no produjo modificaciones en el número ni en la función plaquetaria cuando fue administrado a voluntarios sanos en las dosis terapéuticas usuales, cosa que sí ocurrió con las drogas control.

Efecto analgésico antiespasmódico y seguridad del clonixinato de lisina y bromuro de L-Butilhioscina en el tratamiento oral de la dismenorrea / Antispasmodic-analgesic effect and safety of Lysene clonixinate and Butylhioscine broide for dysmenorrhea oral treatment

Fue realizado un estudio clínico longitudinal abierto, no comparativo, en 30 mujeres con diagnóstico de dismenorrea primaria o secundaria a dispositivo intrauterino. El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar la eficacia y seguridad del compuesto terapéutico, Clonixinato de lisina y Bromuro de butihioscina 125 y 10 mg respectivamente, en cápsulas, durante un periodo de observación de tres ciclos menstruales. El tiempo de evolución de la dismenorrea primaria fue de 4.46 años; para la secundaria fue de 1.77 años. A la dismenorrea le acompañaron síntomas asociados como: náusea 92 por ciento, vómito 92 por ciento, malestar general 82.1 por ciento, pesantez abdominales 85.7 por ciento y cefalea 46.4 por ciento. Respecto a la intensidad del dolor menstrual, al inicio fue muy severo en el 10.7 por ciento, severo en 42.9 por ciento y moderado 46.4 por ciento. Al final del estudio sólo una paciente de las 28, presentó dolor menstrual de intensidad moderada. Encontramos sólo tres menciones de efectos secundarios de intensidad leve y que no requirieron tratamiento; que correspondieron a dos menciones de gastralgía y una de somnolencia. La conclusión del estudio es que la asociación analgésica espasmolítica del Clonixinato de lisina y Bromuro de butilhioscina en el tratamiento de la dismenorrea primaria o secundaria, reduce y previene el dolor menstrual, así como las manifestaciones asociadas con pocos efectos secundarios. Esta asociación analgésica espasmolítica, es eficaz y segura

Efeitos clínicos e anatomopatógicos do flunixin meglumine no tratamento de potros recém-nascidos / Clinical and anatomopathologic effects of flunixin meglumine on the treatment of new-born colts

O tratamento de potros recém-nascidos com flunixin meglumine na dose recomendada (1,1 mg/kg) näo provocou alteraçöes clínicas, paraclínicas ou histológicas comparativamente aos potros tratados com um placebo. Apenas a dose de 6,6 mg/kg é capaz de favorecer lesöes gastrintestinais