Optic nerve involvement in ocular toxoplasmosis: 12 year data from a tertiary referral center in Turkey / Acometimento de nervo óptico na toxoplasmose ocular: um relato de 12 anos de um centro de referência terciário na Turquia

ABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and types of optic nerve involvement in patients with ocular toxoplasmosis. Methods: For this retrospective cross-sectional study, we examined all patients with active ocular toxoplasmosis referred to our Uveitis Section during the last 12 years, and we included patients with optic nerve involvement in the study. The primary outcome was the prevalence of optic nerve involvement, and secondary outcomes included the types of optic nerve involvement and the final best-corrected visual acuity after treatment. Results: The prevalence of optic nerve involvement was 14.4%, with the leading cause being the activation of a juxtapapillary lesion (70.5%). We found papillitis in two eyes and neuroretinitis in two eyes (11.7% for each). We only detected one optic nerve involvement secondary to a distant active lesion (5.8%). Sixteen patients (94.1%) had unilateral ocular toxoplasmosis. The overall final best-corrected visual acuity after treatment was 10/10 (LogMAR = 0.0) excluding the three patients with a juxtapapillary scar involving the macula. Conclusions: Optic nerve involvement was common in patients with ocular toxoplasmosis. The main type of optic nerve involvement was caused by activation of an old juxtapapillary lesion. Treatment was quickly effective, but the best-corrected visual acuity was dependent on the presence of a scar in the papillomacular bundle.

RESUMO Objetivos: Avaliar a prevalência, características clínicas e tipos de acometimento do nervo óptico em pacientes com toxoplasmose ocular. Métodos: Para este estudo retrospectivo transversal, examinamos todos os pacientes com toxoplasmose ocular ativa encaminhados ao nosso Setor de Uveíte nos últimos 12 anos, e incluímos pacientes com comprometimento do nervo óptico no estudo. O resultado primário foi a prevalência do envolvimento do nervo óptico, e os resultados secundários incluíram os tipos de envolvimento do nervo óptico e a acuidade visual final melhor corrigida após o tratamento. Resultados: A prevalência de acometimento do nervo óptico foi 14,4%, sendo a principal causa a ativação de uma lesão justapapilar (70,5%). Encontramos papilite em dois olhos e neuroretinite em dois olhos (11,7% para cada um). Apenas detectamos um comprometimento do nervo óptico secundário a uma lesão ativa distante (5,8%). Dezesseis pacientes (94,1%) apresentavam toxoplasmose ocular unilateral. A acuidade visual final com melhor correção após o tratamento foi 10/10 (LogMAR= 0,0) excluindo os três pacientes com uma cicatriz justapapilar envolvendo a mácula. Conclusões: O comprometimento do nervo óptico foi comum em pacientes com toxoplasmose ocular. O principal tipo de comprometimento do nervo óptico foi causado pela ativação de uma lesão justapapilar antiga. O tratamento foi rapidamente eficaz, mas a acuidade visual final com melhor correção foi dependente da presença de uma cicatriz no feixe papilomacular.

Autoimmune optic neuropathy as the first manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus / Neuropatia óptica autoimune como primeira manifestação do lúpus eritematoso sistêmico

We described a 35 years old female patient with bilateral visual loss and pain on eye movement, mild papillary edema in acute phase, arcuate scotoma and complementary test positive for antinuclear antibodies that did not respond to corticosteroid therapy. The lack of clinical criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) didn't prevent the institution of the specific treatment with corticosteroids and azathioprine. After seven months the diagnosis was made after a skin manifestation of the disease. This case shows the value of the ocular complaints in systemic diseases. And how the ophthalmologic exam can help the clinician elaborating a diagnosis. It is also very important for ophthalmologists and rheumatologists due to the fact that it calls the attention to another diagnostic hypothesis in patients with nonspecific optic neuritis, even with inconclusive laboratory tests. Maybe some ocular findings deserve to be included to the diagnostic criteria already established for SLE.

Descrevemos caso de um paciente de 35 anos do sexo feminino, com perda visual bilateral associada à dor à movimentação ocular, edema papilar moderado na fase aguda, escotoma arqueado e exame complementar positivo para anticorpos antinucleares, que não responderam à terapia com corticosteróides. A falta de critérios clínicos para o lúpus eritematoso sistêmico (LES) não impediu a instituição do tratamento específico com corticosteróides e azatioprina. Depois de sete meses, o diagnóstico foi feito após uma manifestação da doença de pele. Este caso mostra o valor das queixas oculares em doenças sistêmicas e como o exame oftalmológico pode ajudar o clínico na elaboração de um diagnóstico. Também é muito importante para oftalmologistas e reumatologistas, devido ao fato de que chama a atenção para outra hipótese diagnóstica em pacientes com neurite óptica não-específica, mesmo com os testes laboratoriais conclusivos. Talvez alguns achados oculares merecem ser incluídos com os critérios de diagnóstico já estabelecido para o LES.

Actualización en el tratamiento de la neuropatía óptica inflamatoria desmielinizante / Updating on the treatment of the demyelinating inflammatory optical neuropathy

Se realizó una revisión bibliográfica con el objetivo de proporcionar una actualización de las drogas que se emplean para retrasar la aparición de esclerosis múltiple en el manejo de la neuropatía óptica inflamatoria desmielinizante. El artículo presenta el origen y la justificación de la terapia esteroidea en este grupo de enfermedad, así como los mecanismos de acción y beneficios de tratamientos más modernos como los inmunomoduladores e inmunosupresores. El trabajo también introduce muchas de las drogas con efectos neuroprotectores que se encuentran en fases experimentales, cuyo uso prevendría la neurodegeneración que se produce a nivel de las células ganglionares retinianas en esta enfermedad neurológica. Las opciones terapéuticas actuales ofrecen variantes de tratamiento adicionales a pacientes con mayores probabilidades de desarrollo de esclerosis múltiple y retrasan la aparición de un segundo brote, así como las secuelas invalidantes que esta suele originar

A bibliographic review was conducted to provide an updating of drugs used to retard the appearance of multiple sclerosis in the management of the demyelinating inflammatory optical neuropathy. Present paper shows the origin and the justification of the steroid therapy in this disease, as well as the mechanisms of action and benefits of more recent treatments, e.g. the ongoing immunomodulations and immunosuppressive ones and also to introduce many drugs in experimental phase having neuroprotection effects whose use will prevent the neurodegenerative effect produced at level of the retinal ganglion cells in this neurologic disease. The current therapeutical options offer variants of additional treatment to those patients with greater possibilities to development multiple sclerosis and retarding the appearance of a second outbreak, as well as its disabling sequelae

Neuropatía óptica distiroidea como manifestación de orbitopatía de Graves / Dysthyroid optic neuropathy: report of one case

Dysthyroid optic neuropathy is an uncommon and severe form of presentation of Graves ophtalmopathy, caused by compression and elongation of the optic nerve. Use of high dose steroids is the treatment of choice. Decompressive surgery is reserved for refractory cases. We report a 41 years old female with a dysthyroid optic neuropathy that appeared 18 years after the diagnosis of Graves disease, manifested by a marked reduction in visual acuity. Orbit CAT scan did not show compression or elongation of optic nerve. She was treated with prednisone 60 mg per day, obtaining a complete remission after 19 days of treatment. After 90 days of follow up with low doses of steroids, the patient remains asymptomatic.

Efficacy of memantine in acute non-arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy

Evaluation of efficacy of Memantine [N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Antagonist] on visual function of patients with acute non-arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy [NAION]. The study was conducted as interventional case series from November 2005 through November 2006 in Farabi Eye Hospital. Twenty-two patients with acute NAION of less than 8 weeks duration entered the study. Memantine was prescribed with a dose of 5 mg per day for the first week and 10 mg per day for the following two weeks. Baseline best corrected visual acuity [BCVA]; visual evoked potential [VEP] and visual field was done for all patients. BCVA recording repeated 3 weeks, 3 and 6 months later. VEP and perimetry repeated 3 months after treatment. After 3 weeks, 3 and 6 months, BCVA improved -0.32 +/- 0.40 LogMAR, -0.51 +/- 0.49 and -0.51 +/- 0.49, respectively [P=0.005, P=0.001 and P=0.001, respectively]. VEP recordings after 3 months, demonstrated -8.61 +/- 14.51 db mean decrease in implicit time [P=0.019]. Amplitude of voltage did not show significant difference with baseline [P=0.10]. Perimetry results after 3 months showed that mean deviation [MD] improved 2.77 +/- 3.94 db [P=0.016]. Memantine resulted in significant improvement of BCVA 3 weeks, 3 and 6 months after treatment of acute NAION. Memantine also resulted in significant decrease of implicit time and significant improvement of mean deviation in VEP and perimetry after 3 months

A prospective randomized trial of megadose methylprednisolone and high dose dexamethasone for traumatic optic neuropathy.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the improvement in visual acuity obtained when using high dose dexamethasone in the treatment of traumatic optic neuropathy was comparable to that of megadose methylprednisolone. METHOD: A total of forty-four patients with traumatic optic neuropathy were prospectively randomized and selected to receive intravenous high dose dexamethasone or megadose methylprednisolone within 2 weeks of injury. Age, gender, cause of injury, interval from injury to treatment, initial, post-pulse, and final visual acuity were analysed statistically to compare the dexamethasone and methylprednisolone groups. RESULTS: The mean interval to treatment was not significantly different (p=0.28) for the dexamethasone group at 5.5 days compared to the methylprednisolone group at 4.1 days. Visual improvement of at least two lines of the Snellen chart or two levels of unmeasured visual acuity was shown in 9 patients (37.5%) of the dexamethasone group and 10 patients (50%) of the methylprednisolone group. There was no statistically significant difference between the initial and post-pulse visual acuity (p=1.0) and the initial and final visual outcome (p=0.60) in the dexamethasone group compared with the methylprednisolone group. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in the visual acuity obtained after treatment with intravenous dexamethasone or methylprednisolone for traumatic optic neuropathy.

Does optic nerve injury require decompression?

Forty patients with indirect optic nerve injury were prospectively analysed. Ultimate outcome on conservative management were correlated to their visual evoked potential (VEP) finding and the need for optic nerve decompression was questioned. An associated indirect optic nerve injury was observed in 2% of all head injuries. Ethmoid fracture was recorded in 2 patients and optic canal fracture was recorded in one patient. CT scanning for optic canal and for the orbit revealed abnormality in none of these patients. All the patients were managed conservatively and received intravenous dexamethasone for 48 hours followed by oral prednisolone therapy. Optic nerve decompression was not undertaken. VEPs were present in 18 patients of whom 4 had normal VEPs. Twenty patients had visual improvement. Amongst the patients with positive VEPs 89% had visual improvement. It is concluded that VEP study may help in avoiding unnecessary decompression of the optic nerve.