Macular thickness and retinal nerve fiber thickness analysis in ocular dominance / Espessura macular e fibra nervosa da retina análise de espessura no domínio ocular

Abstract Objective: To compare macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses of dominant eye and non-dominant eye using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods: 104 eyes of 52 healthy young adults were included. Ophthalmological examinations; including measuring refraction, best corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, slit-lamb biomicroscopy, dilated fundus examination, measuring of central macular thickness (CMT), and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (PRNFL) thickness were performed on each subject. Hole-in-the-card test was used to detect the ocular dominance. Results: There were 25 females (48%) and 27 males (52%) in the study. Eight participants had left eye dominance (15%), forty-four participants had right eye dominance (85%). Mean CMT was 192.5µm in dominant group and 191.9 µm in non-dominant group. There was no statistically significant difference between dominant eye group and non-dominant eye group in either macular thickness or peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Conclusions: No difference between macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses were detected in dominant and non-dominant groups. Further evaluation is needed.

Resumo Objetivo: Comparar as espessuras da camada de fibras nervosas da retina macular e peripapilar do olho dominante e não dominante usando a tomografia de coerência óptica (OCT). Métodos: 104 olhos de 52 adultos jovens saudáveis foram incluídos. Exames oftalmológicos; incluindo medidas de refração, melhor acuidade visual corrigida, medição da pressão intraocular (PIO), biomicroscopia de fenda-cordeiro, exame do fundo dilatado, medição da espessura macular central (CMT) e espessura da camada de fibras nervosas da retina peripapilar (PRNFL) foram realizadas em cada sujeito. O teste Hole-in-the-card foi usado para detectar a dominância ocular. Resultados: houve 25 mulheres (48%) e 27 homens (52%) no estudo. Oito participantes tinham deixado a dominância do olho (15%), quarenta e quatro participantes tinham dominância do olho direito (85%). A CMT média foi de 192,5 µm no grupo dominante e 191,9 µm no grupo não dominante. Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa entre o grupo dominante de olho e o grupo de olho não dominante tanto na espessura macular quanto na espessura da camada de fibras nervosas da retina peripapilar. Conclusões: Não houve diferença entre as espessuras das camadas de fibras nervosas da retina macular e peripapilar nos grupos dominante e não dominante. Mais avaliações são necessárias.

Monovisión con lente intraocular monofocal en pacientes présbitas / Monovision with monofocal intraocular lens in prebyopic patients

OBJETIVO: Describir los resultados refractivos obtenidos mediante la cirugía del cristalino en pacientes présbitas hipermétropes y miopes con monovisión. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo, prospectivo, longitudinal con 21 pacientes, 13 miopes y 8 hipermétropes sometidos a cirugía del cristalino para corregir la presbicia con el método de la monovisión en el Servicio de Microcirugía del Instituto Cubano de Oftalmología Ramón Pando Ferrer entre febrero del 2009 y febrero del 2010. Las variables utilizadas fueron: agudeza visual con corrección preoperatoria y posoperatoria y sin ella, lejos y cerca, y equivalentes esféricos. Se utilizó la media y desviación estándar para presentar la información. RESULTADOS: En el preoperatorio la agudeza visual promedio mejoraba de un valor de 0,7 y 0,9 corregida para miopes e hipermétropes respectivamente a 0,88 y 0,94 de agudeza visual binocular sin corrección para estos mismos grupos en el posoperatorio, corrigiendo de esta manera equivalentes esféricos promedios de -8,27 D y +6,26 D en cada grupo. La agudeza visual cercana promedio para ambos grupos fue de Jeager 2 y los equivalentes esféricos promedios alcanzados para visi¾n lejana fueron de -0,32 D para miopes y +0,26 D para hipermétropes; en visión cercana, o sea, en el ojo no dominante es de -1,6 D para el primer grupo y -1,3 D para el segundo grupo. CONCLUSIONES: Se halló mejoría indudable de la agudeza visual sin corrección tanto para la visión lejana como para la cercana después de la cirugía. Los equivalentes esféricos fueron ampliamente modificados para ambos grupos tanto en los ojos dominantes como en los no dominantes para facilitar el resultado visual en ambas distancias. Los resultados obtenidos corroboran que la monovisión produce un mayor beneficio en la visión cercana que el perjuicio que provoca en la visión lejana lo que la hace muy exitosa para cierto grupo de pacientes

OBJECTIVES: To describe the refractive results achieved in presbyopic patients, both hyperopic and myopic, with monovision METHODS: A prospective, longitudinal and descriptive study was carried out in 21 patients, 13 myopic and 8 hyperopic, who underwent lens surgery to correct presbyopia based on the monovision procedure at the Microsurgery Service of the Ramón Pando Ferrer Cuban Institute of Ophthalmology from February 2009 to February 2010. The variables were pre and postoperative visual acuity with/without correction, both near and distant, and spheral equivalents. Mean and standard deviation values were used to present all variables. RESULTS: It was found that average visual acuity with correction improved from 0,7 and 0,9 in myopic and hyperopic patients respectively to 0,88 and 0,94 of binocular visual acuity without correction in the postoperative phase, thus correcting their average spheral equivalents of 8,27 diopters (D) and +6,26 D in each group. The average visual acuity for near vision for both groups was Jeager (J) 2 and the average spheral equivalents reached for distant vision were -0,32 D for myopic and +0,26 D for hyperopic patients. For near vision, i.e. in the non- dominant eye, the spheral equivalent values were 1,6 D for the first group and 1,3 D for the second group. CONCLUSIONS: After surgery there was an undoubted improvement in visual acuity without correction, in near as well as in distant vision. Spherical equivalents were widely modified for both groups in both the dominant and the non-dominant eye, improving vision at both distances. The achieved results corroborate that the benefits brought about by monovision in near vision are more important than the damages it causes in distant vision, making it very successful for certain groups of patients