Clinical and pathological analysis of 345 cases of vulvar lichen sclerosus and a preliminary study on the frequency of maintenance treatment / 中华妇产科杂志

Objective: To analyze and summarize the clinical and pathological characteristics, management, and efficacy of patients with vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS) through a single center large sample study, and preliminarily to explore the frequency of maintenance treatment medication for VLS. Methods: The clinical data of VLS patients in Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University from 2018 to 2021 were retrospectively collected. The clinicopathological characteristics (patients' age, course of disease, complicated disease history, family history, symptoms, signs and pathology), treatment and effects were retrospectively analyzed. The patients in the maintenance treatment stage were followed up regularly to explore the minimum frequency of individual medication to maintain the stability of the disease. Results: (1) General situation: a total of 345 patients with VLS were included in this study. The average age was (50.4±14.7) years (ranged from 8 to 84 years old), prevalence was highest in the 50-59 years group (30.1%, 104/345). Immune diseases occurred in 18.6% (33/177) of patients, 24.3% (43/177) of patients had allergic skin diseases, and 5.6% (10/177) of the patients' immediate family members had chronic vulvar pruritus or vulvar hypopigmentation. (2) Clinical features: the most common symptom was vulvar pruritus (96.1%, 196/204) among 204 patients with recorded symptoms. The most common sign was hypopigmentation of the vulva (96.3%, 206/214). The most common involved sites were labia minora (70.3%, 142/202), labia majora (67.8%, 137/202), and labial sulcus (59.4%, 120/202). The cumulative number of sites involved in 62 vulvar atrophy patients (2.7±1.1) was significantly higher than that in 152 non-atrophy patients (2.2±1.0; t=3.48, P=0.001). The course of vulvar atrophy was (9.3±8.5) years, which was significantly longer than that of non-atrophy patients [(6.6±5.6) years; t=2.04, P=0.046]. (3) Pathological features: among the 286 patients with electronic pathological sections, the most common pathological feature in the epidermis was epithelial nail process passivation (71.3%, 204/286). The common pathological features in the dermis were interstitial collagenization (84.6%, 242/286), and inflammatory cell infiltration (73.8%, 211/286). (4) Treatment: 177 patients received standardized treatment after diagnosis and were followed up regularly in our hospital. In the initial treatment stage, 26.0% (46/177) of the patients were treated with 0.05% clobetasol propionate cream, and 74.0% (131/177) of the patients were treated with 0.1% mometasone furoate ointment. The complete remission rates of the two methods were respectively 80.4% (37/46) and 74.0% (97/131), and there was no statistically significant difference (χ²=0.76, P=0.385). During maintenance treatment, 27.1% (48/177) of the patients took the medication twice a week, 35.0% (62/177) took the medication once a week, and 37.9% (67/177) took the medication once every 10 days. During follow-up after 6 months of maintenance treatment, there were no patients with recurrence of pruritus or progression of vulvar signs. Conclusions: The majority of VLS patients have itching, hypopigmentation, involvement of labia minora and labia majora, progressive atrophy, and inflammatory infiltration of dermis. Local treatments of mometasone furoate and clobetasol propionate have good initial therapeutic effects. The frequency exploration of individualized maintenance treatment could minimize the occurrence of adverse reactions when ensuring the stability of the patients' condition.

Effect of topical corticosteroids on nasal patency after acute positive airway pressure exposure / Efeito dos corticosteroides tópicos na patência nasal após exposição aguda à pressão positiva nas vias aéreas

Abstract Introduction Nasal congestion and obstruction are reported in the majority of continuous positive airway pressure users and are frequently cited as reasons for noncompliance. Baseline inflammation due to allergic rhinitis could increase or exacerbate the inflammatory effect of high airflow in the nasal cavity as the result of continuous positive airway pressure and lead to greater continuous positive airway pressure intolerance. In this setting, intranasal steroids would be expected to counteract the nasal inflammation caused by allergic rhinitis and/or continuous positive airway pressure. Objective The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effects of topical corticosteroid use on nasal patency after acute exposure to positive pressure. Methods Ten individuals with allergic rhinitis were exposed to 1 h of continuous airway pressure (15 cm H2O) in the nasal cavity, delivered by a continuous positive airway pressure device. Visual analog scale, nasal obstruction symptom evaluation scale, acoustic rhinometry and peak nasal inspiratory flow were performed before and after the intervention. After 4 weeks topical nasal steroid (budesonide) application, positive pressure exposure was repeated as well as the first assessments. Results Patients reported a statistically significant improvement both on the visual analog (p = 0.013) and obstruction symptom evaluation scales (p < 0.01). Furthermore, objective measurements were improved as well, with increased nasal cavity volume on acoustic rhinometry (p = 0.02) and increased peak nasal inspiratory flow (p = 0.012), after corticosteroid treatment. Conclusion In patients with allergic rhinitis, intranasal corticosteroid therapy improved objective and subjective parameters of nasal patency after acute exposure of the nasal cavity to positive pressure.

Resumo Introdução Congestão e obstrução nasais são relatadas na maioria dos usuários de pressão positiva contínua nas vias aéreas e são frequentemente mencionadas como razões para a falta de aderência. A inflamação basal devida à rinite alérgica pode aumentar ou agravar o efeito inflamatório do alto fluxo de ar na cavidade nasal como resultado da pressão positiva contínua nas vias aéreas e aumentar a intolerância à mesma. Nesse cenário, espera-se que os esteróides intranasais neutralizem a inflamação nasal causada pela rinite alérgica e/ou pela pressão positiva contínua nas vias aéreas. Objetivo Avaliar os efeitos do uso tópico de corticosteroides na patência nasal após exposição aguda à pressão positiva. Métodos Dez indivíduos com rinite alérgica foram expostos a uma hora de pressão contínua nas vias aéreas (15 cm H2O) na cavidade nasal, fornecida por um dispositivo de pressão positiva contínua nas vias aéreas. A escala visual analógica, a escala Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation, rinometria acústica e pico de fluxo inspiratório nasal foram aplicados antes e após a intervenção. Após 4 semanas de aplicação tópica de esteroide nasal (budesonida), a exposição positiva à pressão foi repetida, bem como as primeiras avaliações. Resultados Os pacientes relataram uma melhoria estatisticamente significante tanto na escala visual analógica (p = 0,013) quanto na escala Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (p < 0,01). Além disso, as medidas objetivas também foram melhoradas, com aumento do volume da cavidade nasal na rinometria acústica (p = 0,02) e aumento do pico de fluxo inspiratório nasal (p = 0,012), após o tratamento com corticosteroide. Conclusão Em pacientes com rinite alérgica, a terapia com corticosteroide intranasal melhorou os parâmetros objetivos e subjetivos da patência nasal após exposição aguda da cavidade nasal à pressão positiva.

Individualized treatment for allergic rhinitis based on key nasal clinical manifestations combined with histamine and leukotriene D4 levels / Tratamento individualizado para a rinite alérgica baseado nas principais manifestações clínicas nasais e dos níveis de histamina e leucotrieno D4

Abstract Introduction The types of allergic rhinitis are roughly classified based on the causative antigens, disease types, predilection time, and symptom severity. Objective To examine the clinical typing and individualized treatment approach for allergic rhinitis and to determine the optimal treatment method for this disease using various drug combination therapies. Methods A total of 108 participants with allergic rhinitis were divided into three groups based on symptoms. Subsequently, each group was further categorized into four subgroups based on the medications received. The efficacy of the treatments was evaluated using the visual analog scale VAS scores of the total and individual nasal symptoms, decline index of the symptom score, histamine and leukotriene levels, and mRNA and protein expression levels of histamine 1 and cysteinyl leukotriene 1 receptors. Results Loratadine + mometasone furoate and loratadine + mometasone furoate + montelukast significantly improved the sneezing symptom and reduced the histamine levels compared with the other combination therapies (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, montelukast + mometasone furoate and montelukast + mometasone furoate + loratadine considerably improved the nasal obstruction symptom and decreased the leukotriene D4 levels compared with the other combination therapies (p < 0.05). Conclusion Clinical symptom evaluation combined with experimental detection of histamine and leukotriene levels can be an objective and accurate method to clinically classify the allergic rhinitis types. Furthermore, individualized treatment based on allergic rhinitis classification can result in a good treatment efficacy.

Resumo Introdução A rinite alérgica é basicamente classificada de acordo com os antígenos causadores, tipos de doença, peridiocidade e gravidade dos sintomas. Objetivo Avaliar os tipos clínicos e a abordagem terapêutica individualizada para cada tipo de rinite alérgica e determinar o método de tratamento ideal utilizando várias terapias de combinação de fármacos. Método Um total de 108 participantes com rinite alérgica foram divididos em três grupos com base nos sintomas. Posteriormente, cada grupo foi subsequentemente categorizado em quatro subgrupos com base nos medicamentos recebidos. A eficácia dos tratamentos foi avaliada utilizando os escores da escala visual analógica EVA dos sintomas nasais totais e individualmente, índice de declínio do escore de sintomas, níveis de histamina e leucotrienos e níveis de expressão de mRNA e proteína dos receptores de histamina 1 e cisteinil-leucotrieno 1. Resultados As associações entre loratadina + furoato de mometasona, assim como a de loratadina + furoato de mometasona + montelucaste melhoraram significativamente o sintoma de espirros e reduziram os níveis de histamina em comparação às outras terapias combinadas (p < 0,05). Por outro lado, a associação montelucaste + furoato de mometasona, assim como a associação montelucaste + furoato de mometasone + loratadina melhoraram consideravelmente o sintoma de obstrução nasal e diminuíram os níveis de leucotrieno D4 em comparação com as outras combinações (p < 0,05). Conclusão A avaliação clínica dos sintomas combinada com a detecção experimental dos níveis de histamina e leucotrieno pode ser um método objetivo e preciso para classificar clinicamente os tipos de rinite alérgica. Além disso, o tratamento individualizado baseado na classificação da rinite alérgica pode resultar no aumento da eficácia do tratamento.

Prescription Profile and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Allergic Rhinitis Treated with Oral Antihistamines or Nasal Corticosteroids

Abstract Introduction Oral antihistamines and intranasal corticosteroids have been shown to be effective and safe for the treatment of allergic rhinitis; however, the evidence suggests a level of superiority of corticosteroids, so they should be preferred over the former. Objective To know the prescription profile of two second generation antihistamines (cetirizine and levocetirizine) and two nasal corticosteroids (mometasone and furoateciclesonide) in a cohort of patients with allergic rhinitis, and to compare the clinical outcomes obtained. Methods A cohort study was carried including patients with allergic rhinitis treated with cetirizine, levocetirizine, mometasone furoate or ciclesonide. The improvement was evaluated with the total nasal symptoms score (TNSS). This scale yields results between 0 and 12. Zero indicates absence of symptoms. Results A total of 314 patients completed 12 weeks of follow-up. Seventy-five percent were treated with antihistamines, 20% with corticosteroids, and 5% with a combination of the above. The TNSS median for corticosteroid was 2.5 points; for antihistamines, its was 5 points, and for combination, it was 4 points. We found differences between corticosteroids and antihistamines. Conclusion The prescription percentage of second generation oral antihistamines is higher than that of intranasal corticosteroids. However, patients with allergic rhinitis treated with the second option obtained better control of symptoms.

Efecto de los corticoesteroides intranasales tópicos en los valores de eosinófilos en mucosa nasal en pacientes adultos con rinitis alérgica / Effect of topical intranasal corticosteroids on eosinophil values in nasal mucosa in adult patients with allergic rhinitis / Efeito dos corticosteróides intranasais tópicos nos valores de eosinófilos na mucosa nasal em pacientes adultos com rinite alérgica

INTRODUCCIÓN: La citología nasal es utilizada como método complementario diagnóstico de la rinitis y el hallazgo de eosinófilos; en la misma aumenta la sensibilidad para confirmar una alergia a casi el 80%. Los corticoesteroides intranasales tópicos se utilizan actualmente como primera línea de tratamiento de la rinitis porque reducen la inflamación de la mucosa que subyace a los signos y síntomas de la enfermedad. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional, retrospectivo y analítico. Se incluyeron pacientes entre 16 a 65 años edad inclusive, que consultaron al Servicio de Otorrinolaringología y Alergia e Inmunología de la Clínica Universitaria Reina Fabiola entre agosto de 2016 y julio de 2017 con diagnóstico de rinitis alérgica. La información de las variables cuantitativas se sometió a una comprobación estadística realizada mediante el test de Wilcoxon apareado. Se consideró significativo un valor de p<0,05…

INTRODUCTION: Nasal cytology is used as a complementary diagnostic method of rhinitis and the finding of eosinophils in it increases the sensitivity to confirm an allergy to almost 80%. Topical intranasal corticosteroids are currently used as the first line of treatment for rhinitis because they reduce the inflammation of the mucosa that underlies the signs and symptoms of the disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational, retrospective and analytical study. Patients between the ages of 16 and 65 years were included, who consulted the Otorhinolaryngology and Allergy and Immunology Department of the Reina Fabiola University Clinic between August 2016 and July 2017 with a diagnosis of allergic rhinitis. The information of the quantitative variables was subjected to a statistical check carried out by means of the paired Wilcoxon test. A value of p...

Mometasone furoate in the treatment of mild, moderate, or severe persistent allergic rhinitis: a non-inferiority study (PUMA) / Furoato de mometasona no tratamento de rinite alérgica persistente leve, moderada ou grave: estudo de não inferioridade (PUMA)

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: Allergic rhinitis is considered the most prevalent respiratory disease in Brazil and worldwide, with great impact on quality of life, affecting social life, sleep, and also performance at school and at work. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of two formulations containing mometasone furoate in the treatment of mild, moderate, or severe persistent allergic rhinitis after four weeks of treatment. METHODS: Phase III, randomized, non-inferiority, national, open study comparing mometasone furoate in two presentations (control drug and investigational drug). The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with reduction of at least 0.55 in nasal index score (NIS) after four weeks of treatment. Secondary outcomes included total nasal index score score after four and 12 weeks of treatment; individual scores for symptoms of nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, sneezing, and nasal pruritus; as well as score for pruritus, lacrimation, and ocular redness after four and 12 weeks of treatment. The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov with the reference number NCT01372865. RESULTS: The efficacy primary analysis demonstrated non-inferiority of the investigational drug in relation to the control drug, since the upper limit of the confidence interval (CI) of 95% for the difference between the success rates after four weeks of treatment (12.6%) was below the non-inferiority margin provided during the determination of the sample size (13.7%). Adverse events were infrequent and with mild intensity in most cases. CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety of investigational drug in the treatment of persistent allergic rhinitis were similar to the reference product, demonstrating its non-inferiority.

Resumo Introdução: A rinite alérgica é considerada a doença respiratória mais prevalente no Brasil e em todo o mundo, com grande impacto na qualidade de vida; além de, afetar a vida social, o sono e também o desempenho na escola e no trabalho. Objetivo: Comparar a eficácia e segurança de duas formulações contendo furoato de mometasona no tratamento da rinite alérgica persistente leve, moderada ou grave por um período de quatro semanas. Método: Trata-se de um estudo nacional aberto de fase III, randomizado, de não inferioridade de comparação do furoato de mometasona em duas apresentações (medicação de controle e fármaco sob investigação). O ponto final primário foi o percentual de pacientes com redução mínima de 0,55 no escore de índice nasal (EIN) após quatro semanas de tratamento. Os desfechos secundários foram: escore NIS total após 4 e 12 semanas de tratamento; escores individuais para sintomas de obstrução nasal, rinorréia, espirros e prurido nasal, bem como escores para prurido, lacrimejamento e hiperemia conjuntival após 4 e 12 semanas de tratamento. O estudo foi registrado em clinicaltrials.gov com o número de referência NCT01372865. Resultados: A análise de eficácia primária demonstrou não inferioridade do fármaco sob investigação em relação à medicação de controle, visto que o limite superior do intervalo de confiança (IC) de 95% para a diferença entre os percentuais de sucesso após quatro semanas de tratamento (12,6%) situava-se abaixo da margem de não inferioridade proporcionada durante a determinação do tamanho da amostra (13,7%). Eventos adversos foram pouco frequentes e de leve intensidade na maioria dos casos. Conclusão: A eficácia e a segurança de um fármaco experimental no tratamento da rinite alérgica persistente foram similares às do produto de referência, o que demonstrou sua não inferioridade.

Reacción a un tatuaje de henna negra tratado con furoato de mometasona y gel de silicona: Caso clínico / Reaction to a black henna tattoo treated with mometasone furoate and silicone gel: case report

Black henna tattoos have paraphenylenediamine (PPD), which contains a product of herbal origin, which due to its molecular characteristics is capable of inducing, in susceptible individuals, a type IV hypersensitivity reaction. It clinically manifests as a contact dermatitis that usually when it disappears, scarring and hypopigmentation are left in the injured area. Objective: To describe the case of a patient with hypersensitivity to henna tattoo and to present the most relevant phenomena associated with this condition. Case report: The case of a 6 year-old patient with a black henna tattoo on his right leg, who was diagnosed with contact dermatitis probably attributed to PPD, is presented. Mometasone furoate and topical silicone gel treatment was started with good response. Conclusion: Mometasone furoate and silicone gel are a good possible therapeutic option for treating contact dermatitis caused by PPD as the dermatosis was resolved without residual lesions.

Los tatuajes de henna negra son aquellos que contienen parafenilendiamina (PPD), que contienen un producto de origen herbal, que por sus características moleculares es capaz de inducir, en individuos susceptibles, una reacción de hipersensibilidad tipo IV. Se manifiesta clínicamente como una dermatitis de contacto, que generalmente al desaparecer, persiste de manera residual una cicatriz hipertrófica e hipopigmentación en la zona lesionada. Objetivo: Describir el caso de un paciente con hipersensibilidad al tatuaje de henna, y presentar los fenómenos más relevantes asociados a esta patología. Caso clínico: Paciente de 6 años de edad, que se realizó un tatuaje con henna negra en la pierna derecha, en quien se diagnosticó posteriormente una dermatitis de contacto atribuida probablemente a la PPD. Se comenzó tratamiento con furoato de mometasona y gel de silicona con buena respuesta por vía tópica. Conclusión: El furoato de mometasona y gel de silicona son una posible opción terapéutica de utilidad para tratar la dermatitis de contacto causada por el PPD, debido a que la dermatosis se resolvió sin lesiones residuales.