Mastite subclínica causada por Staphylococcus aureus: custo-benefício da antibioticoterapia de vacas em lactação / Subclinical mastitis caused by Staphylococcus aureus: cost benefit analysis of antibiotic therapy in lactating cows

Avaliou-se a relação custo-benefício do tratamento da mastite subclínica bovina causada por Staphylococcus aureus. Foram selecionados 270 quartos mamários com mastite subclínica e sadios, divididos em quatro grupos de acordo com o estádio de lactação e o tratamento. O grupo 1 foi formado por animais entre 10 e 60 dias da lactação e tratados contra mastites; o grupo 2 incluiu animais entre 61 dias da lactação e dois meses antes da secagem e tratados contra mastite; o grupo 3 foi formado por animais entre 10 e 60 dias da lactação, não tratados contra mastite; e o grupo 4 foi formado por animais entre 61 dias em lactação e dois meses antes da secagem, não tratados. O tratamento foi realizado pela infusão intramamária de 150mg de gentamicina, uma vez ao dia. A reavaliação foi efetuada após 30 dias. Para os cálculos dos custos com o tratamento, foram considerados uma prevalência de S. aureus de 5 por cento e os gastos com medicamento, descarte do leite, antibiograma e mão-de-obra. Observou-se redução de 2 por cento e 14 por cento das receitas nos grupos 1 e 2, respectivamente, quando comparada com as receitas obtidas antes do tratamento, demonstrando ser economicamente inviável o tratamento da mastite subclínica bovina causada por S. aureus, durante a lactação.

Economic evaluation of the treatment bovine subclinical mastitis caused by S. aureus was evaluated. Two hundred and seventy udder quarters with or without subclinical mastitis were distributed into four groups, in conformity to lactational stage and treatments. Group 1 included animals treated between 10 and 60 days of lactation; group 2 included animals treated from 61 days of lactation to two months before drying; group 3 included animals no treated between 10 and 60 days of lactation; group 4 included animals no treated from 61 days of lactation to two months before drying. Treatment with gentamicin (150mg) was accomplished by intramammary doses, once a day, after performing sensitivity tests. The mammary quarters were re-evaluated after 30 days. The costs with the treatment were calculated considering a S. aureus prevalence of 5 percent as well as expenses with antibiotic, milk disposal, tests of drug sensitivity and workload. There was loss of income of 2 percent and 14 percent in the groups 1 and 2, respectively, when compared with the values before the treatment. In such case, the treatment of bovine subclinical mastitis caused by S. aureus in the lactation was economically unviable.

Antibiotics in febrile neutropenia: a randomized prospective comparison of two combinations.

BACKGROUND. Problems of initial empirical antibiotic therapy in febrile neutropenia are further complicated by other factors such as cost and the pattern of infective organisms in a particular institution. We, therefore, conducted a randomized study comparing the efficacy of two sets of antibiotics which differed in their spectrum of action, availability and price. METHODS. Sixty episodes of febrile neutropenia in 40 patients who were not on any prophylactic antibiotics were randomized into one of two arms--cefotaxime and gentamicin or ciprofloxacin and gentamicin. Depending upon the response by 72 hours, they were crossed over to the other arm or continued with the same combination. Empirical antifungal therapy was added in those who did not become afebrile. RESULTS. Infection was documented either clinically, bacteriologically or radiologically in 42% of the febrile episodes. The commonest organism isolated was Klebsiella and the commonest organism producing bacteraemia was the Staphylococcus. The temperature was reduced to normal without cross-over in 53% of the febrile episodes with cefotaxime and gentamicin and in 60% with ciprofloxacin and gentamicin (p > 0.05). After cross-over the temperature came down in 30% of the episodes with cefotaxime and gentamicin (initial combination) and 40% with ciprofloxacin and gentamicin (initial combination; p > 0.05). The overall response rate without empirical antifungal therapy was 83% in the patients on cefotaxime and gentamicin (initial combination; p > 0.05). While both the arms of the study had a 100% response rate, there was no significant difference between the efficacy of the antibiotic combinations. The ciprofloxacin-gentamicin combination is one-third as expensive as cefotaxime-gentamicin and is more readily available. CONCLUSION. We recommend the use of ciprofloxacin and gentamicin as the initial drug combination and cefotaxime and gentamicin only when the former is not effective.