Factors associated with Clostridium difficile diarrhea in a hospital in Beijing, China

Clostridium difficile is the most common cause of hospital-acquired diarrhea in patients treated with antibiotics, chemotherapeutic agents, and other drugs that alter the normal equilibrium of the intestinal flora. A better understanding of the risk factors for C. difficile-associated disease (CDAD) could be used to reduce the incidence of CDAD and the costs associated with its treatment. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for CDAD in a cohort of Chinese patients in a Beijing hospital. Medical charts of a total of 130 inpatients (62 males and 68 females) with hospital-acquired diarrhea (45 with CDAD; 85 without CDAD) were retrospectively reviewed. C. difficile toxins A and B were detected in fecal samples using enzyme-linked fluorescence assays. The drugs used by patients with and without CDAD before the onset of diarrhea were compared. Factors that differed significantly between the two groups by univariate analysis were analyzed by multivariate analysis using a logistic regression model. Multivariate analysis showed that cephalosporin treatment was associated with a significantly higher risk of CDAD in hospitalized patients, while treatment with glycopeptides was significantly associated with a reduction in CDAD (P<0.001 for cephalosporin; P=0.013 for glycopeptides). Our data confirmed previous findings that empirical treatment with cephalosporins is positively associated with CDAD compared to individuals using other CDAD-related drugs. Additionally, we showed that treatment with glycopeptides was negatively associated with CDAD, compared to individuals using other CDAD-related drugs.

Evaluación de la susceptibilidad a glicopéptidos en cepas de Staphylococcus aureus resistentes a oxacilina / Evaluation of susceptibility to glycopeptides in oxacillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains

Candida albicans y Candida dubliniensis presentan una estrecha relación filogenética. La similitud de estas especies puede hacer que en un laboratorio microbiológico se identifique en forma errónea C. dubliniensis como C. albicans. El objetivo de esta investigación fue evaluar diversos métodos fenotípicos para la diferenciación entre Candida dubliniensis y Candida albicans. Se utilizaron 6 cepas control de C. dubliniensis y una de C. albicans, provenientes de colecciones reconocidas y sometidas a genotipificación. También se utilizaron 70 aislados identificados como posibles C. albicans utilizando el medio CHROMagar Candida y el medio de bilis agar Feo. Los métodos evaluados fueron: agar Sabouraud dextrosa a 45°C, agar Sabouraud con NaCl al 6,5%, agar Tween 80, agar tabaco, agar Pal’s, agar tomate-zanahoria y aglutinación con partículas de látex (Bichro-Dubli Fumouze®). Encontramos que las técnicas más confiables para realizar la diferenciación fenotípica entre estas dos especies fueron: el agar tomate-zanahoria, el agar Pal’s, el agar tabaco y la aglutinación con partículas de látex (Bichro-Dubli Fumouze®). Además en este estudio, de los 70 aislados considerados como C. albicans, encontramos 1 (1.4%) posible Candida dubliniensis. Sin embargo, las pruebas de biología molecular son las más adecuadas para el diagnóstico certero de estas dos especies.

Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis have a close phylogenetic relationship. The similarity between these species can cause a microbiology laboratory to identify C. dubliniensis erroneously as C. albicans. The objective of this research was to evaluate diverse phenotypic methods for differentiating between Candida dubliniensis and Candida albicans. Six control strains of C. dubliniensis and one of C. albicans from recognized collections were used and submitted to genotypification. Also, 70 isolates were used, identified as possible C. albicans utilizing CHROMagar Candida and bilis agar Feo mediums. The methods evaluated were: Sabouraud dextrosa agar at 45°C, Sabouraud agar with NaCl at 6.5%, Tween 80 agar, tobacco agar, Pal’s agar, tomato-carrot agar and agglutination with latex particles (Bichro-Dubli Fumouze®). It was found that the most reliable techniques for performing phenotype differentiation between these two species were tomato-carrot agar, Pal’s agar, tobacco agar and agglutination with latex particles (Bichro-Dubli Fumouze®). Of the 70 isolates considered to be C. albicans, one (1.4%) possible Candida dubliniensis was found. Nevertheless, molecular biology tests are the most appropriate means for achieving an accurate diagnosis of these two species.