Comparative study of laparoscopic Keyhole and Sugarbaker technique in the treatment of terminal paracolostomy hernia / 中华外科杂志

Objective: To compare laparoscopic Keyhole repair with Sugarbaker repair in consecutive patients with parastomal hernia. Methods: From January 2015 to December 2021, 117 patients with parastomal hernia were treated with Keyhole or Sugarbaker laparoscopy repairs in the Department of Hernia and Bariatrci Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. There were 45 males and 72 females, aged (68.6±8.6) years (range: 44 to 84 years). Laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair was performed in 89 cases, and Keyhole repair was performed in 28 cases. The t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, χ2 test and Fisher exact test were used to compare the observation indicators between the two groups, such as operation time, incidence of operation-related complications, and postoperative recurrence rate. Results: The follow-up period was (M(IQR)) 33 (36) months (range: 12 to 84 months). Compared to the Sugarbaker group, the hernia ring area of the Keyhole group was bigger (35 (26) cm2 vs. 25 (16) cm2, Z=1.974, P=0.048), length of stay was longer ((22.0±8.0) d vs. (14.1±6.2) d, t=5.485, P<0.01), and the postoperative rate of recurrence was higher (28.6% (8/28) vs. 6.7% (6/89), χ2=7.675, P=0.006). There was no difference in operation time and postoperative complications between the two groups. Conclusions: Laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair is superior to Keyhole repair in the recurrence rate of parastomal hernia treated with compsite mesh (not funnel-shaped mesh). There are no differences in operation time and postoperative complications between the two groups.

Incisional hernia, a rare complication of the anterolateral transpsoas approach / Hernia incisional, una complicación poco frecuente del abordaje transpsoas anterolateral

Abstract: Introduction: Anterolateral transpsoas approach is considered as safe access to the retroperitoneum with low risk of complications. The most frequent described complications due to this approach were nerve, bowel, urethral and kidney injury. An incisional hernia is a rare complication in anterolateral approach, as a result of a nonhealing surgical wound or late disruption of the fascia; it occurs in 1% of the incisions after primary closure. Case description: We report a 75-year-old woman who underwent spinal surgery with a double approach, consisting of an anterolateral transpsoas approach and posterior lumbar approach. Two months post-surgery, the patient developed a lateral abdominal tumor at the surgical site. Conclusion: To prevent incisional hernia, a meticulous dissection must be performed to avoid muscle denervation and weakening of the abdominal wall, as well as proper repair of the fascia its critical to ensure an adequate closure of the wound.

Resumen: Introducción: El Abordaje anterolateral transpsoas se considera como un acceso seguro al retroperitoneo con bajo riesgo de complicaciones. Las complicaciones descritas más frecuentes debido a este abordaje fueron lesiones nerviosas, intestinales, uretrales y renales. Una hernia incisional es una complicación poco frecuente en el abordaje anterolateral, como resultado de una herida quirúrgica no cicatrizada o una ruptura tardía de la fascia; ocurre en 1% de las incisiones después del cierre primario. Caso clínico: Informamos de una mujer de 75 años que se sometió a una cirugía de columna vertebral con un doble abordaje quirúrgico, que consiste en un abordaje anterolateral transpsoas y un abordaje lumbar posterior. Dos meses después de la cirugía, el paciente desarrolló un tumor abdominal lateral en el sitio quirúrgico. Conclusión: Para prevenir la hernia incisional, se debe realizar una disección meticulosa para evitar la denervación muscular y el debilitamiento de la pared abdominal, así como la correcta reparación de la fascia es crítico para asegurar un cierre adecuado de la herida.