Management of the patient reporting an allergy to penicillin

Recent emphasis on the prevention of surgical wound infection has highlighted the role of the anesthesiologist as the physician responsible for administering appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis. Patients often report a distant or unclear history of penicillin allergy. Administering an antibiotic to which the patient has a true allergy can provoke a life threatening reaction. The anesthesiologist should be aware of the prevalence, severity, and manifestations of allergies to antibiotics, as well as the available alternatives. Unnecessary administration of more powerful broad-spectrum antibiotics leads to the development of antimicrobial resistance and should be avoided. It is the anesthesiologists' duty to balance these issues when selecting appropriate antibiosis

The role of probiotics and prebiotics in pediatric practice

OBJETIVO: Revisar os efeitos dos probióticos e prebióticos em situações clínicas da prática pediátrica. FONTES DOS DADOS: MEDLINE, preferencialmente os artigos que abordavam aspectos de aplicabilidade prática, na forma de revisões, ensaios clínicos e meta-análises. Artigos que já eram do conhecimento dos autores também foram utilizados. SíNTESE DOS DADOS: A literatura científica sobre probióticos e prebióticos apresentou crescimento expressivo nos últimos 10 anos. Seus mecanismos de ação vêm sendo investigados experimentalmente. Os estudos indicam que os probióticos podem exercer seus efeitos competindo com patógenos, modificando o ambiente intestinal pela redução do pH, em conseqüência dos produtos da fermentação, interagindo e modulando a resposta inflamatória e imunológica local e sistêmica, entre outros. Ensaios clínicos e meta-análises mostram que os probióticos parecem contribuir para a prevenção da diarréia aguda e da diarréia associada ao uso de antibióticos, além de encurtar a duração da diarréia aguda. No entanto, existem dados contraditórios, além de não existirem ainda estudos confirmando sua efetividade do ponto de vista da relação custo-benefício. Estudos preliminares mostram que probióticos no início da vida podem reduzir a ocorrência de dermatite atópica. A adição de prebióticos em fórmulas para lactentes associa-se com mudança do perfil da microbiota intestinal em relação aos lactentes que recebem fórmula láctea sem prebióticos. CONCLUSÕES: As evidências indicam que novos estudos devem ser realizados sobre probióticos, prebióticos e simbióticos. Um aspecto que deve ser reforçado é a especificidade dos efeitos que cada probiótico ou prebiótico pode apresentar do ponto de vista clínico.

OBJECTIVE: To review the effects of probiotics and prebiotics in clinical pediatric practice. SOURCES: MEDLINE was searched, especially for articles that addressed their practical application, in the form of reviews, clinical trials and meta-analyses. Articles that had already been analyzed by the authors were also included. SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS: Scientific literature on probiotics and prebiotics has remarkably increased in the last 10 years. Their mechanisms of action have been experimentally investigated. Studies indicate that probiotics can act by competing with pathogens, modifying the intestinal environment by reduction in pH, as a result of fermentation products, interacting and modulating local and systemic inflammatory and immune response, among others. Clinical trials and meta-analyses show that probiotics seem to contribute towards the prevention of acute diarrhea and of antibiotic-associated diarrhea, in addition to shortening the duration of acute diarrhea. However, the data are inconsistent and there are no studies confirming their efficacy in terms of cost-benefit ratio. Preliminary studies show that probiotics in early life can reduce the occurrence of atopic dermatitis. The addition of prebiotics to infant formulas is associated with the change in the profile of the intestinal microbiota compared to infants fed milk formulas without prebiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence indicates that new studies should be carried out about probiotics, prebiotics and symbiotics. The specific clinical effects that each probiotic or prebiotic may cause must be considered.

Antiallergic/antiasthmatic effect of novel antiallergic hexapeptide-95/220 in various experimental models.

The effects of newly synthesized antiallergic hexapeptide 95/220 was investigated on various allergic and asthmatic test models. This newly developed peptide was found to be more potent than clinically used drug disodium cromoglycate (DSCG). Hexapeptide 95/220 inhibited immediate hypersensitivity reactions such as passive cutaneous anaphylaxis (PCA) and mast cell degranulation in rats, antigen-induced bronchoconstriction in actively sensitized guinea pigs in dose dependent manner like DSCG. Antigen-induced contraction of guinea pig ileum was also markedly inhibited by this newly developed hexapeptide in the same fashion as ketotifen and DSCG did but at comparatively lower dose. Egg albumin-induced histamine release was also blocked by this hexapeptide from chopped lung tissues of sensitized guinea pigs. These results suggest that hexapeptide' 95/220 has potent inhibitory effect on immediate hypersensitivity reactions thereby inhibiting mediator release from mast cell. Moreover, this newly synthesized peptide is orally active and effective at lower doses as compared to standard drugs.