RESUMO
La introducción de la vacunación sistemática contra la tos ferina determinó un descenso drástico en la incidencia de esta patología, aunque todavía representa un problema de salud pública, incluso en los países con alta cobertura de vacunación. Sin embargo, además de la disminución de los casos por la proflaxis activa, se ha observado la emergencia de efectos adversos neurológicos graves, como los denominados "episodios de hipotonía-hiporreactividad" (HHE), caracterizados por una pérdida súbita del tono muscular asociada a escasa respuesta a los estímulos y palidez cutánea o cianosis. Los HHE son un fenómeno infrecuente después de la administración de la vacuna con un componente antitosferínico, pero es fundamental que el personal sanitario sepa reconocerlos, sobre todo en las siguientes 48 horas de la vacunación. Aunque en ocasiones es difícil establecer una relación causal entre la administración de la vacuna y un efecto adverso, debe comunicarse cualquier evento sospechoso.
The introduction of routine vaccination against whooping cough caused a drastic decline in the incidence of this disease, but remains today a public health problem even in countries with high vaccination coverage. However, with this decrease in cases, there were an emergence of neurological severe adverse events such as the "hypotonic-hyporesponsive episodes" (HHE), characterized by sudden loss of muscle tone associated with poor response to stimuli and skin pallor or cyanosis. The HHE is a rare phenomenon after administration of pertussis vaccine, but it is essential for health workers recognition of such reactions, especially in the 48 hours following vaccination. Although sometimes can become diffcult to attribute a causal relationship between vaccine administration and an adverse effect, any suspicious events should be reported.
Assuntos
Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Hipotonia Muscular/induzido quimicamente , Vacina contra Coqueluche/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Various methods of induction of labour may be associated with risk and complications. Therefore, this study has been undertaken to compare the safety and efficacy of intra-vaginal misoprostol (PGE1 analogue) with intra-cervical dinoprostone (PGE2) in progress and induction of labour, the maternal side effects and the foetal outcome. 40 pregnant women aged between 16-35 years with indication of induction of labour participated in the study. Twenty patients (control) were administered 0.5 mg dinoprostone intra-cervically, 12 hourly while 20 patients (study group) were given misoprostol 100 microg, 4 hourly, intravaginally. The mean induction of labour initiation interval was 2.08 +/- 1.46 hours in study group and 2.21 +/- 1.20 hours in dinoprostone group. The Induction delivery interval was 6.92 +/- 4.01 hours in misoprostol group and 12.54 +/- 7.73 in dinoprostone group, whereas vaginal route of delivery was 95% in misoprostol group and 85% in dinoprostone group. Average dosages required were 1.55 +/- 1.02 in misoprostol group and 1.30 +/- 0.46 in dinoprostone group. All these result were statistically significant. Very few maternal side effects were reported in study group. There was no significant difference in foetal out come in either group. Therefore, it can be concluded that misoprostol is easy to administer and is cheap, effective, safe and convenient drug for induction of labour.