Effect of ibuprofen and low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on the reduction of pain after initial archwire placement: a double-blind randomized clinical trial / Efecto del ibuprofeno y el ultrasonido pulsado de baja intensidad en la reducción del dolor después de la colocación inicial del arco de ortodoncia: un ensayo clínico aleatorizado doble ciego

Objective: This study aimed to compare the effect of ibuprofen and low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) on the reduction of pain after the placement of initial archwire in orthodontic patients. Material and Methods: This double-blind clinical trial study was carried out on 60 female candidates for fixed orthodontic treatment referring to the Orthodontic Department of School of Dentistry in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran, during 2015-2016. The subjects were divided into four groups of ibuprofen, LIPUS, placebo, and mock LIPUS. A questionnaire and a rectangular and flexible cubic silicone were given to each patient to record the severity of pain based on the visual analog scale at specified time points (i.e., 2 h, 6 h, at bedtime, 2nd, 3rd, and 7th days after archwire placement) when biting the silicone block with the anterior and posterior teeth and without biting at all. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used in order to compare the pain severity at different time points. Results: The comparison of pain severity at various time points showed that the highest and lowest mean scores of pain were reported at bedtime and seven days after the intervention (p<0.001). In each of the three conditions (i.e., biting the silicone block with the anterior and posterior teeth and without biting the teeth) at six time points (i.e., 2 h, 6 h, at bedtime, 2nd, 3rd, and 7th days following archwire placement), no significant difference was observed in the severity of pain (p>0.05). Conclusion: In conclusion, LIPUS (with a frequency of 1 MHz and an intensity of 100 mW) and ibuprofen have no significant effects on reduction of the pain severity at different time points and various conditions in orthodontic patients.

Objetivo: Este estudio tuvo como objetivo comparar el efecto del ibuprofeno y el ultrasonido pulsado de baja intensidad (LIPUS) en la reducción del dolor después de la colocación del arco inicial en pacientes de ortodoncia. Material y Métodos: Este estudio de ensayo clínico doble ciego se llevó a cabo en 60 candidatas a tratamiento de ortodoncia fija referidas al Departamento de Ortodoncia de la Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de Mashhad, Mashhad, Irán, durante 2015-2016. Los sujetos se dividieron en cuatro grupos: ibuprofeno, LIPUS, placebo y LIPUS simulado. Se entregó un cuestionario y un bloque de silicona cúbica rectangular y flexible a cada paciente para registrar la intensidad del dolor según la escala analógica visual en puntos de tiempo específicos (es decir, 2 h, 6 h, hora de acostarse, 2do, 3er y 7mo día después de la colocación del arco) al morder el bloque de silicona con los dientes anteriores y posteriores, y sin morder en absoluto. Se utilizó el análisis de varianza de medidas repetidas para comparar la intensidad del dolor en diferentes momentos.Resultados: La comparación de la intensidad del dolor en varios puntos de tiempo mostró que las puntuaciones medias de dolor más altas y más bajas se informaron a la hora de acostarse y siete días después de la intervención (p<0,001). En cada una de las tres condiciones (es decir, al morder el bloque de silicona con los dientes anteriores y posteriores, y sin morder) en seis momentos (2 h, 6 h, antes de acostarse 2do, 3er y 7mo día después de la colocación del arco), no se observó diferencia significativa en la severidad del dolor (p>0.05).Conclusión: En conclusión, LIPUS (con una frecuencia de 1 MHz y una intensidad de 100 mW) y el ibuprofeno no tienen efectos significativos en la reducción de la severidad del dolor en diferentes puntos de tiempo y diversas condiciones en pacientes de ortodoncia.

Manejo farmacológico del sangrado irregular no menstrual asociado al uso de implantes anticonceptivos subdérmicos / Pharmacological management of irregular non-menstrual bleeding associated with the use of subdermal contraceptive implants

El spottingo sangrado irregular no menstrual es uno de los principales efectos secundarios de los implantes anticonceptivos, situación que se recomienda discutir con la usuaria previo a la colocación, para evitar falsas expectativas o temores que lleven a la extracción temprana del dispositivo. A propósito de una paciente sin antecedentes relevantes que consultó al centro de salud por spotting desde la colocación del implante cuatro meses antes, decidimos revisar la evidencia sobre la efectividad de los distintos esquemas farmacológicos disponibles para el manejo de este evento adverso. Luego de realizar una búsqueda bibliográfica concluimos que, si bien existe sustento para indicar algunos de los esquemas farmacológicos, este es aún débil y son necesarios estudios clínicos adicionales que brinden evidencia sólida sobre qué esquema en particular utilizar, evaluando sus riesgos y beneficios. (AU)

Spotting or irregular non-menstrual bleeding is one of the main side effects of contraceptive implants, a situation that health professionals must discuss with the user prior to its placement in order to avoid false expectations or fears that lead to early removal of the implant. Regarding a patient with no relevant history who consulted the health center due to spotting four months after implant placement, we decided to review the evidence onthe effectiveness on different pharmacological schemes available for the management of this adverse event. After performing a literature search, we concluded that, although there is support for indicating some of the pharmacological schemes, this is still weak, and further clinical studies are needed to provide solid evidence on which particular scheme touse, assessing its risks and benefits. (AU)

Síndrome de Bartter: una tubulopatía infrecuente de inicio antenatal / Bartter syndrome: an infrequent tubulopathy of prenatal onset

INTRODUCCIÓN: Síndrome de Bartter (SB) es una tubulopatía hereditaria, poco frecuente que tiene dos formas de presentación, forma grave de inicio antenatal (Bartter neonatal) y forma de aparición más tardía (Bartter clásico). En su forma antenatal se manifiesta con poliuria fetal, polihidroamnios de inicio precoz y severo, parto prematuro secundario y restricción de crecimiento intrauterino. La etapa postnatal presenta episodios recurrentes de deshidratación y desbalance electrolítico que pue den comprometer la sobrevida del paciente. OBJETIVO: Comunicar un caso de SB neonatal y presentar una revisión de la literatura en esta patología. CASO CLÍNICO: Prematuro 35 semanas, con antecedente de severo polihidroamnios diagnosticado a las 27 semanas de gestación, sin causa aparente. Desde su nacimiento evolucionó con poliuria y alcalosis metabólica hipokalémica haciendo plantear, en primera semana de vida, diagnóstico de Síndrome de Bartter neonatal. El laboratorio confirmó per didas urinarias de electrólitos. Fue manejado con balance hídrico estricto y suplementación de sodio y potasio, logrando estabilizar peso y desbalance electrolítico. Se mantiene en control nefrológico, con suplementación de gluconato de potasio y cloruro de sodio. Se agregó ibuprofeno al cuarto mes como parte del tratamiento. Al séptimo mes de vida, ecografía renal demostró nefrocalcinosis. Al año de vida se evidenció hipoacusia sensorioneural profunda requiriendo implante coclear. CONCLUSIÓN: Presencia de polihidroamnios severo de aparición temprana sin causa identificada debe hacer sospechar SB, que aun siendo infrecuente determina graves alteraciones hidroelectrolíticas y debe ser iniciado su tratamiento precozmente.

INTRODUCTION: Bartter syndrome (BS) is a rare inherited tubulopathy that has two presentation forms, the first one is a severe form of antenatal onset (neonatal Bartter) and the second one is a later on set form during the first years of life (classic Bartter). In the antenatal form, it manifests with fetal polyuria, polyhydramnios of early and severe onset, premature delivery, and intrauterine growth restriction. In the postnatal stage, it presents recurrent episodes of dehydration and electrolyte im balance that can compromise the survival of the patient. OBJECTIVE: To report a clinical case of neo natal BS and a review of the literature. CLINICAL CASE: Premature newborn of 35 weeks of gestation with history of severe polyhydramnios diagnosed at 27 weeks of gestation, without apparent cause. From birth, the patient presented polyuria and hypokalemic metabolic alkalosis making a diagnosis of Neonatal Bartter Syndrome in the first week of life. Laboratory tests confirmed urinary electrolyte losses. The patient was treated with strict water balance and sodium and potassium supplementa tion, achieving weight and electrolyte imbalance stabilization. The patient remains in control in the nephrology unit, with potassium gluconate and sodium chloride supplementation. At the fourth month, ibuprofen was added as part of treatment. At the seventh month of life, renal ultrasound showed nephrocalcinosis. At one year of life, profound sensorineural hearing loss was observed re quiring a cochlear implant. CONCLUSION: The presence of severe polyhydramnios of early onset with no identified cause should lead to suspicion of neonatal BS which even when infrequent determines severe hydroelectrolytic alterations and should be treated early.

Efectividad Analgésica de Naproxeno Sódico y Etoricoxib Post Extracción Dental Simple: Ensayo Clínico Aleatorizado Paralelo / Analgesic Effectiveness of Sodium Naproxen and Etoricoxib Post Simple Dental Extraction: Parallel Randomized Clinical Trial

RESUMEN: El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar la efectividad analgésica de naproxeno sódico y etoricoxib post extracción dental simple. El presente ensayo clínico, aleatorizado paralelo y ciego simple, se desarrolló en la Clínica Odontológica de la Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego. Los pacientes, quienes requerían exodoncia simple por caries dental en molar mandibular, fueron distribuidos aleatoriamente en tres grupos de 17 participantes cada uno, donde recibieron naproxeno sódico, etoricoxib o ibuprofeno (grupo testigo), según los criterios establecidos. El procedimiento fue estandarizado, evaluándose la eficacia analgésica mediante la escala visual analógica (EVA) a las 1, 8, 24 y 48 horas, después del inicio de la medicación. El análisis estadístico se realizó mediante la prueba de Kruskal-Wallis, considerándose un nivel de significancia del 5 %. No se evidenció diferencia en la efectividad analgésica entre naproxeno sódico y etoricoxib, post extracción dental simple. Este hallazgo se observó a las 1 (p=0,602), 8 (p=0,884), 24 (p=0,338) y 48 horas (p=0,189). No existe diferencia en la efectividad analgésica entre naproxeno sódico y etoricoxib, post extracción dental simple.

ABSTRACT: The aim of the study was to compare the analgesic effectiveness of naproxen sodium and etoricoxib after simple dental extraction. This randomized parallel and single blind clinical trial, was developed in the Clínica Odontológica of the Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego. The patients, who required simple exodontia for dental caries in the mandibular molar, were randomized into three groups of 17 participants each, where they received naproxen sodium, etoricoxib or ibuprofen (control group), according to established criteria. The procedure was standardized, evaluating the analgesic efficacy by means of the analog visual scale at 1, 8, 24 and 48 hours, after the start of the medication. The statistical analysis was carried out using the Kruskal-Wallis test, considering a level of significance of 5 %. There was no difference in the analgesic effectiveness between naproxen sodium and etoricoxib, after simple dental extraction. This finding was observed at 1 (p = 0.602), 8 (p = 0.884), 24 (p = 0.338) and 48 hours (p = 0.189). There is no difference in the analgesic effectiveness between naproxen sodium and etoricoxib, after simple dental extraction.

Effect of premedication with anti-inflammatory drugs on post-endodontic pain: a randomized clinical trial

Abstract In spite of advances in root canal therapy and better knowledge of pulpal and periapical inflammation, up 40% of endodontic patients report varying degrees of pain. The aim of this present study was to compare the effect of single preoperative dose of ibuprofen or dexamethasone on post-endodontic pain. Sixty volunteers were divided into three groups (n=20 per group): PL, placebo; IB, 400 mg of ibuprofen; and DE, 8 mg of dexamethasone. The primary outcome was the post-endodontic pain intensity measured with a numerical rating scale (4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h). Secondary outcomes included number of anesthetic cartridges used and consumption of rescue medication. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests. There was no significant difference among groups (p>0.05) considering the pain intensity. Only 37% of IB group patients and 28% of DE group patients used some rescue medication. On the other hand, 74% of PL group patients mentioned the consumption of rescue medication; PL group had a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) in comparison with IB and DE groups. The number of anesthetic cartridges used had no statistically significant difference among the groups (p>0.05). Significant differences were not found in the reduction of pain intensity and the number of anesthetic cartridges used. Considering the consumption of rescue medication (secondary outcome), preoperative administration of Ibuprofen or dexamethasone reduces post-endodontic pain and discomfort in comparison with a placebo. Premedication with anti-inflammatory drugs drugs could be contributed to control of the post-endodontic pain, mainly in patients more sensible for pain.

Resumo Apesar dos avanços no tratamento do canal radicular e melhor conhecimento da inflamação pulpar e periapical, 40% dos pacientes submetidos ao tratamento de endodôntico relatam diferentes graus de dor. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar o efeito pré-operatório (dose única) de ibuprofeno ou dexametasona na dor pós-endodôntica. Sessenta voluntários foram divididos em três grupos (n=20 por grupo): PL, placebo; IB, 400 mg de ibuprofeno; e DE, 8 mg de dexametasona. O desfecho primário foi a intensidade da dor pós-endodôntica medida com uma escala numérica (4, 8, 12, 24 e 48 h). Os desfechos secundários incluíram o número de tubetes anestésicos utilizados e o consumo de medicação resgate. Os dados foram analisados com os testes ANOVA, qui-quadrado e Kruskal-Wallis. Não houve diferença entre os grupos (p>0,05) considerando a intensidade da dor. Apenas 37% dos pacientes do grupo IB e 28% do grupo DE utilizaram alguma medicação resgate. Por outro lado, 74% dos pacientes do grupo PL mencionaram o consumo de medicação resgate; o grupo PL apresentou diferença significativa (p<0,05) em comparação com os grupos IB e DE. O número de tubetes anestésicos utilizados não apresentou diferença significativa entre os grupos (p>0,05). Não encontramos diferença significativa na redução da intensidade da dor e no número de tubetes anestésicos utilizados. Considerando o consumo de medicação resgate (desfecho secundário), a administração pré-operatória de ibuprofeno ou dexametasona reduz a dor pós-endodôntica e o desconforto em comparação com placebo. A pré-medicação com anti-inflamatórios poderia contribuir para o controle da dor pós-endodôntica, principalmente em pacientes mais sensíveis à dor.

Preemptive and Postoperative Medication Protocols for Root Coverage Combined with Connective Tissue Graft

Abstract This trial evaluated the preemptive and postoperative effect of dexamethasone and ibuprofen on prevention of pain/discomfort, edema and interference in daily life in patients undergoing root coverage combined with subepithelial connective tissue graft (CAF + CTG). Twenty patients were randomly assigned as follows: NSAID Group: 400mg Ibuprofen 60 min preemptive + 400mg Ibuprofen postoperative; or SAID Group: 4mg Dexamethasone 60 min preemptive + 4mg Dexamethasone postoperative. The postoperative medication was administered 8 and 16 h post-surgery. Each patient received questionnaires based on a numeric scale (101-point numeric scale rate [NRS-101]) and multiple choice questions (four-point verbal rating scale [VRS-4]) about trans-operative pain/discomfort, hourly for 8 h after surgery and once a day for three days. A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for edema and interference in daily life during the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 7th day was also answered. The degree of anxiety was rated statistically by the Chi-square test. The Mann-Whitney and Friedman tests were used for the other questionnaires. The surgery time and number of analgesic pills consumed were compared using Student's t-test. Patients who used dexamethasone presented a trend toward less pain when compared to individuals who ingested ibuprofen, with a significant difference observed 3 h after the procedure (p<0.05). The use of dexamethasone also promoted less edema until the 2nd day and lower interference in daily life on the third day when compared with ibuprofen (p<0.05). We concluded that the use of dexamethasone as a preemptive and postoperative medication was more suitable as a drug therapeutic protocol for CAF + CTG.

Resumo Este estudo avaliou o efeito preventivo e pós-operatório de dexametasona e ibuprofeno na prevenção da dor, desconforto, edema e interferência na vida diária, em pacientes submetidos ao recobrimento radicular associado a enxerto de tecido conjuntivo subepitelial (CAF + CTG). Vinte pacientes foram divididos aleatoriamente: Grupo AINES: Ibuprofeno 400 mg 60 min antes da cirurgia + Ibuprofeno 400 mg no período pós-operatório e Grupo AIES: 4 mg de dexametasona 60 min antes da cirurgia + Dexametasona 4mg no pós-operatório. A medicação pós-operatória foi administrada 8 e 16 horas pós-cirurgia. Cada paciente recebeu questionários com base na escala numérica NRS-101 (101 pontos numéricos) e perguntas de múltipla escolha (VRS-4) sobre dor / desconforto no período transoperatório, de hora em hora durante 8 h e uma vez por dia durante três dias após a cirurgia. A Escala Visual Analógica (VAS) para análise de edema e interferência na vida diária também foi respondida no 1º, 2º, 3º e 7º dia após a cirurgia. O grau de ansiedade foi estatisticamente avaliado pelo teste do Qui-quadrado. Mann-Whitney e Friedman foram utilizados para os demais questionários. Para o tempo de cirurgia e o número de analgésicos consumidos, o teste t de Student foi aplicado. Os pacientes que utilizaram dexametasona apresentaram uma tendência para menores níveis de dor quando comparados aos indivíduos que ingeriram ibuprofeno, com diferença significativa observada 3 h após o procedimento cirúrgico (p<0,05). A utilização de dexametasona também promoveu menores níveis de edema até ao segundo dia e menor interferência na vida diária no terceiro dia, quando comparada com o ibuprofeno (p<0,05). Concluiu-se que a utilização de dexametasona como medicamento preventivo e pós-operatório mostra ser mais adequado como protocolo medicamentosos para cirurgias de recobrimento radicular com associação de enxerto de tecido conjuntivo.

Impact of non-adherent Ibuprofen foam dressing in the lives of patients with venous ulcers / Impacto do curativo de espuma não aderente com Ibuprofeno na vida dos pacientes com úlcera venosa

ABSTRACT Objective : to evaluate pain in patients with lower limb venous ulcer who used non-adherent Ibuprofen foam dressing (IFD). Methods : we conducted a prospective study of patients with lower limb venous ulcers treated from April 2013 to August 2014. We used the Numerical Scale and McGill Pain Questionnaire, performing the assessments at the moment of inclusion of the patient in the study and every eight days thereafter, totaling five consultations. We divided the patients into two groups: 40 in the Study Group (SG), who were treated with IFD, and 40 in the Control Group (CG), treated with primary dressing, according to tissue type and exudate. Results : at the first consultation, patients from both groups reported intense pain. On the fifth day, SG patients reported no pain and the majority of CG reported moderate pain. Regarding the McGill Pain Questionnaire, most patients of both groups reported sensations related to sensory, affective, evaluative and miscellaneous descriptors at the beginning of data collection; after the second assessment, there was slight improvement among the patients in the SG. After the third consultation, they no longer reported the mentioned descriptors. CG patients displayed all the sensations of these descriptors until the fifth visit. Conclusion : non-adherent Ibuprofen foam dressing is effective in reducing the pain of patients with venous ulcers.

RESUMO Objetivo: avaliar a dor em pacientes portadores de úlcera venosa de membros inferiores que utilizaram curativo de espuma não aderente com Ibuprofeno (CEI). Métodos: estudo prospectivo de pacientes portadores de úlceras venosas de membros inferiores tratados no período de abril de 2013 a agosto de 2014. Foram utilizados os questionários Escala Numérica e Questionário de Dor de McGille, as avaliações eram feitas no momento da inclusão do paciente no estudo e a cada oito dias, totalizando cinco consultas. Os pacientes foram divididos em dois grupos: 40 no Grupo Estudo (GE), que foram tratados com CEI, e 40 no Grupo Controle (GC), tratados com curativo primário, conforme o tipo de tecido e exsudato. Resultados: na primeira consulta os pacientes de ambos os grupos relataram dor intensa. No quinto dia os pacientes do GE relataram ausência de dor e a maioria do GC relatou dor moderada. Com relação ao Questionário de Dor de McGill, a maioria dos pacientes de ambos os grupos, no início da coleta de dados, relataram sensações relacionadas aos descritores sensorial, afetivo, avaliativo e miscelânea, sendo que entre os pacientes do GE houve discreta melhora após a segunda consulta. Após a terceira consulta já não referiram os descritores citados. Os pacientes do GC manifestaram todas as sensações desses descritores até quinta a consulta. Conclusão: o curativo de espuma não aderente com Ibuprofeno é eficaz na redução da dor de pacientes portadores de úlceras venosas.

Complicaciones digestivas y renales por indometacina e ibuprofeno en prematuros extremos con ductus arterioso permeable / Digestive and Kidney Complications by indomethacin and ibuprofen in extreme preterm infants with patent ductus arteriosus

El ductus arterioso permeable sintomático (DAPs) es frecuente en prematuros extremos (PE), siendo importante su cierre para disminuir la repercusión hemodinámica. Para ello se usa indometacina o ibuprofeno con los riesgos subyacentes. OBJETIVO: Caracterizar las complicaciones digestivas y renales en PE tratados por DAPs. PACIENTES Y MÉTODO: Estudio retrospectivo en PE nacidos entre enero de 2004 y diciembre de 2013. Según diagnóstico se distribuyeron en 3 grupos: sin DAPs, con DAPs tratados con indometacina y con ibuprofeno. Se excluyeron PE con otras complicaciones graves. Se evaluaron complicaciones digestivas y renales graves. Se usó significación estadistica con p ≤ 0,05. RESULTADOS: Se enrolaron 599 PE; 33,1% recibió tratamiento por DAPs, 66,9% no lo requirió. Hubo asociación estadística entre DAPs y menor edad gestacional, depresión neonatal y distrés respiratorio. Del grupo no tratado, el 5% presentó enterocolitis y el 0,25% falla renal; entre los tratados el 2,5% presentó enterocolitis y el 1,0% falla renal. No hubo diferencias estadísticas significativas considerando ambas complicaciones (p = 0,17), sólo enterocolitis (p = 0,11) o sólo falla renal (p = 0,33) entre tratados y no tratados; tampoco las hubo al comparar complicaciones entre tratados con indometacina o ibuprofeno. CONCLUSIONES: Los resultados en nuestra población demuestran que el tratamiento médico del DAPs, en ausencia de otras complicaciones clínicas, no representa un mayor riesgo de complicaciones graves digestivas o renales. No se demostraron ventajas entre la indometacina e ibuprofeno.

The symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus (sPDA) is common in extremely premature infants (EPI). In order to decrease the hemodynamic repercussion and avoid complications it is necessary to close it. Indomethacin or ibuprofen are used for this purpose with its associated risks. OBJECTIVE: Characterize digestive and renal complications in EPI who received indomethacin or ibuprofen as sPDA treatment. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Retrospective study on EPI between January-2004 and December-2013. Three groups were compared: treated with indomethacin or ibuprofen and a non-treated group. EPI with other serious complications were excluded. The primary outcomes on each group were digestive and/or renal complications. Statistical significance was p < 0.05. RESULTS: 599 EPI were included, 33.1% with PDA received treatment and 66.9% did not need it. A statistical association was found between sPDA and lower gestational ages, neonatal depression and respiratory distress. In the non-treated group, 5% presented enterocolitis and 0.25% renal failure; on the treated group, 2.5% presented enterocolitis and 1.0% renal failure. No significant differences were found between the treated and non-treated groups in relation to complications considering enterocolitis (p = 0.11) or renal failure (p = 0.33) alone, or combined (p = 0.17). No difference were detected either between those treated with indomethacin or ibuprofen. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that in absence of other clinical complication, medical treatment of sPDA with indomethacin or ibuprofen, do not increase the risk of serious digestive or renal disorders. There were no advantages of using indomethacin or ibuprofen over the other.

Comparison of two dose regimens of ibuprofen for the closure of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm newborns / Comparação de dois esquemas posológicos de ibuprofeno para o fechamento do canal arterial em recém-nascidos pré-termo

Abstract Objective: To compare the efficacy of intravenous ibuprofen at high (20-10-10 mg/kg/dose) and low doses (10-5-5 mg/kg/dose) the closure of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm newborns. Methods: A cohort study with historical control of newborns that received high- and low-dose intravenous ibuprofen, from 2010 to 2013 in a neonatal intensive care unit, for closure of the patent ductus arteriosus, documented by echocardiography. Secondary outcomes included the number of ibuprofen cycles, incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis, changes in renal function, and death. Results: Seventy-seven patients received three doses of ibuprofen for the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus, with 33 receiving high-dose and 44 low-dose therapy. The ductus closed after the first cycle in 25 (56.8%) low-dose patients and in 17 (51.5%) high-dose patients (p > 0.99). Sixteen patients received a second cycle of ibuprofen, and the ductus closed in 50% after low-dose and in 60% after high-dose therapy (p > 0.99). Seven patients required surgery for ductus closure, 13.6% in the low-dose group and 3% in the high-dose group (p = 0.22). Thirty-nine patients developed bronchopulmonary dysplasia, 50% in the low-dose group and 51.5% in the high-dose group (p > 0.99). Twenty-two (50%) low-dose patients died vs. 15 (45.5%) high-dose patients (p = 0.86). Conclusions: There was no difference in closure of the ductus arteriosus or occurrence of adverse effects between the two dose regimens.

Resumo Objetivo: Comparar a eficácia do ibuprofeno endovenoso em doses altas (20, 10 e 10 mg/kg/dose) e em doses baixas (10, 5 e 5 mg/kg/dose) para o fechamento do canal arterial em recém-nascidos pré-termo. Métodos: Estudo de coorte com controle histórico que pesquisou recém-nascidos que receberam ibuprofeno endovenoso, de 2010 a 2013, na unidade de internação neonatal, em doses altas e baixas para o fechamento do canal arterial, documentado por ecocardiograma. Como desfechos secundários foram avaliados o número de ciclos de ibuprofeno feitos, a incidência de displasia broncopulmonar, enterocolite necrosante, alteração de função renal e óbito. Resultados: Receberam três doses de ibuprofeno para tratamento do canal arterial 77 pacientes, 33 dose alta e 44 dose baixa; 25 (56,8%) dos que receberam dose baixa fecharam o canal após o 1° ciclo e 17 (51,5%) fecharam após receberem dose alta (p > 0,99); 16 pacientes receberam o 2° ciclo e 50% fecharam o canal após uso de dose baixa e 60% após o uso de dose alta (p > 0.99); sete pacientes foram à cirurgia para fechamento do canal, 13,6% do grupo que recebeu dose baixa e 3% dose alta (p = 0,22); 39 pacientes desenvolveram displasia broncopulmonar, 50% do grupo de dose baixa e 51,5% do grupo de dose alta (p > 0,99); 22 (50%) dos pacientes do grupo dose baixa evoluíram a óbito versus 15 (45,5%) dos pacientes do grupo de dose alta (p = 0,86). Conclusão: Não encontramos diferença em relação ao fechamento do canal arterial, assim como ocorrência de efeitos adversos, quando comparamos os dois esquemas posológicos.

Ibuprofen and indomethacin for the closure of the patent ductus arteriosus / Ibuprofen, indometacina e fechamento do canal arterial

The ductus arteriosus connects the pulmonary artery with the aorta and allows right ventricular blood to bypass the unexpanded lungs. In mature infants, the ductus arteriosus closes after birth. Patent ductus arteriosus occurs in 70% of preterm infants with a birth weight < 1,000 grams. Failure of the ductus arteriosus to close has been associated with intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, periventricular leukomalacia, renal failure, and persistent pulmonary hypertension. The drugs used to treat the patent ductus arteriosus are ibuprofen and indomethacin which are potent non-selective inhibitors of cyclo-oxygenase (COX) and therefore inhibit prostaglandin E2 synthesis. Prostaglandin E2 relaxes smooth muscle and tends to inhibit the closure of the patent ductus arteriosus. Intravenous ibuprofen and indomethacin inhibit prostaglandin E2 synthesis and thereby close the patent ductus arteriosus with similar efficacy. Indomethacin reduces the blood flow velocity in kidneys, intestine and brain. Ibuprofen has less effect on blood flow velocity in these organs. There is a significant increase in serum creatinine after indomethacin administration but not after ibuprofen and infants treated with ibuprofen have higher creatinine clearance. Oliguria (urine output < 1 ml/kg/h) occurs more frequently with indomethacin than with ibuprofen. Indomethacin requires furosemide for urine output more often than ibuprofen. Ibuprofen reduces the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis and transient renal insufficiency and it is the drug of choice for closing the patent ductus arteriosus. Ibuprofen and indomethacin may be administered orally. In conclusion, intravenous ibuprofen and indomethacin close the patent ductus arteriosus at the same rate, but indomethacin is more toxic than ibuprofen.

O canal arterial conecta a artéria pulmonar com a aorta e permite que o sangue oriundo do ventrículo direito evite passar pelos pulmões fetais não expandidos. Em recém-nascidos maduros, o canal arterial se fecha após o nascimento. A persistência do canal arterial ocorre em 70% dos recém-nascidos prematuros com peso de nascimento < 1.000 gramas. O não fechamento do canal arterial associa-se a hemorragia intraventricular, enterocolite necrosante, displasia bronco-pulmonar, leucomalacia periventricular, insuficiência renal e hipertensão pulmonar persistente. Os medicamentos utilizados para tratar a persistência do canal arterial são o ibuprofeno e a indometacina. Ambos são potentes inibidores não seletivos da ciclo-oxigenase e inibem a síntese de prostaglandina E2. Esta relaxa a musculature vascular lisa e tende a inibir o fechamento do canal arterial. O ibuprofeno e a indometacina inibem a síntese de prostaglandina E2 e favorecem o fechamento do canal arterial. A indometacina reduz a velocidade do fluxo sanguíneo renal, intestinal e cerebral. O Ibuprofeno tem efeito menor sobre a velocidade do fluxo de sangue nesses órgãos. Há um aumento significativo da creatinina sérica após a administração de indometacina, mas não após o ibuprofeno; por isso, recém-nascidos tratados com ibuprofeno têm maior depuração da creatinina. A oligúria ocorre mais frequentemente com a indometacina vs. ibuprofeno. A indometacina requer furosemida para a produção de urina mais frequentemente do que o ibuprofeno. O ibuprofeno reduz o risco de enterocolite necrotizante e de insuficiência renal transitória e é a droga de escolha para o fechamento do canal arterial patente. O ibuprofeno e a indometacina podem ser ministrados por via oral. Em conclusão, o ibuprofeno e a indometacina fecham o canal arterial patente com a mesma velocidade, mas a indometacina é mais tóxica.

Analgesic effectiveness of prophylactic therapy and continued therapy with naproxen sodium post simple extraction / Efectividad analgésica post exodoncia simple de la terapia profiláctica y la terapia continuada con naproxeno sódico

To compare the analgesic effectiveness of the prophylactic therapy and continued therapy with naproxen sodium after a simple dental extraction. Material and methods: This prospective randomized, parallel, single blind clinical trial was developed in the Dental Clinic of the Universidad Alas Peruanas in Trujillo (Peru). The patients, who required simple extraction due to dental caries, were randomly distributed into three groups: 30 of them took 550mg naproxen sodium in the preoperative period and then every 12 hours, other 30 took 550mg naproxen sodium in the postoperative period and then every 12 hours, and 30(control group), received 400mg ibuprofen in the postoperative period and then every 8 hours, depending on the established criteria. The procedure was standardized, analgesic effectiveness was assessed by visual analog scale and the presence of adverse drug reactions was evaluated as well. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Duncan’s test using IBM SPSS 22 with a significance level of 5 percent. Results: Continued therapy with naproxen sodium showed greater analgesic effectiveness after a simple extraction at 1, 8 and 24 hours (p<0.005). Conclusion: Continued therapy with naproxen sodium presented greater effectiveness than prophylactic therapy with naproxen sodium after a simple extraction...

Comparar la efectividad analgésica post exodoncia simple entre la terapia profiláctica y la terapia continuada con naproxeno sódico. Material y métodos: Ensayo clínico, prospectivo aleatorizado, paralelo y simple ciego, se desarrolló en la Clínica Estomatológica de la Universidad Alas Peruanas Filial Trujillo (Perú). Los pacientes, quienes requerían exodoncia simple por caries dental, fueron distribuidos aleatoriamente en tres grupos: 30 recibieron naproxeno sódico 550 mg en el preoperatorio y luego cada 12 horas, 30 recibieron naproxeno sódico de 550 mg en el postoperatorio y luego cada 12 horas y, 30, ibuprofeno (grupo testigo) de 400 mg en el posoperatorio y luego cada 8 horas, según los criterios establecidos. El procedimiento fue estandarizado, evaluándose la eficacia analgésica, mediante la escala visual analógica, y la presencia de reacciones adversas medicamentosas. Los datos fueron analizados mediante el ANOVA y el test de Duncan empleando IBM SPSS Statistics 22. Resultado: La terapia continuada con naproxeno sódico presentó mayor efectividad analgésica post exodoncia simple a las 1, 8 y 24 horas (p<0,005). Conclusión: la terapia continuada con naproxeno sódicopresentó mayor efectividad que la terapia profiláctica con naproxeno sódico post exodoncia simple...

Estudo comparativo da atividade antiinflamatória, ulcerogênica e citotóxica do S-ibuprofeno e ibuprofeno racêmico / Comparative study of anti-inflammatory, ulcerogenic and cytotoxic activities of racemate and S-ibuprofen

Ibuprofen is widely commercialized in racemic form. Although metabolic chiral inversion occurs through the conversion of R(-)-ibuprofen to S(+)-ibuprofen and the latter enantiomer is considered the active form, clinical trials involving the administration of a racemate to S-enantiomer dosage ratio of 1:0.5 have demonstrated that S(+)-ibuprofen is as efficacious as the racemic formulation. Moreover, the R(-)-enantiomer has been implicated in adverse gastrointestinal effects found with the racemic form, but the mechanisms involved in this process are not yet fully understood. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the anti-inflammatory activity of a racemate to S(+)-ibuprofen dosage ratio of 1:0.5 using the carrageenan air pouch model of inflammation and determine both ulcerogenic activity and the chiral conversion rate in rats. An in vitro study of the cytotoxicity of racemate and S(+)-ibuprofen in gastric cells was also performed. Although the plasma level of S(+)-ibuprofen was raised after racemate administration, no significant difference was found in anti-inflammatory activity, as assessed by exudate formation, PGE2 production and leukocyte migration to the air pouches. Fewer gastric lesions were found after S(+)-ibuprofen administration, despite the low gastric PGE2 content. In the in vitro study, the racemic compound proved more cytotoxic than S(+)-ibuprofen. The present findings suggest that the S-enantiomer of ibuprofen could be considered a therapeutic alternative to minimize gastrointestinal side effects, since the chiral inversion of R(-)-ibuprofen to S(+)-ibuprofen did not result in an improved anti-inflammatory response.

O Ibuprofeno é normalmente comercializado na forma racêmica. Embora ocorra inversão quiral convertendo a forma R(-)- em S(+)-ibuprofeno e, a última seja considerada a forma ativa, a administração da proporção 1:0,5 (racemato: S-enantiômero) demonstrou que o S(+)-ibuprofeno é mais eficaz que a formulação racêmica. Adicionalmente, o R(-)-enantiômero está envolvido nos efeitos adversos gastrintestinais descritos para a formulação racêmica, embora os mecanismos não sejam complemente compreendidos. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a atividade antiinflamatória da proporção 1:0,5 (racemato:S-ibuprofeno) utilizando o modelo experimental de bolsa de ar, a atividade ulcerogênica e a taxa de conversão quiral em ratos. Também estudamos in vitro, a citotoxicidade provocada pelo racemato e S(+)-ibuprofeno em células gástricas. Embora os níveis plasmáticos de S(+)-ibuprofeno tenham aumentado após a administração do racemato, a atividade antiinflamatória avaliada pela formação de exsudato, produção de PGE2 e migração de leucócitos para a bolsa de ar não foram diferentes. As lesões gástricas foram reduzidas após a administração de S(+)-ibuprofeno, apesar da inibição de PGE2 gástrica. In vitro, o composto racêmico foi mais citotóxico que o S(+)-ibuprofeno. Nossos resultados sugerem que o S-enantiômero do ibuprofeno pode ser considerado uma alternativa terapêutica visando a redução dos efeitos colaterais gastrintestinais, visto que a inversão quiral do R(-)- para o S(+)-ibuprofeno não resultou em melhora do efeito antiinflamatório observado.

Comparação de ibuprofeno via oral e indometacina intravenosa no tratamento da persistência do canal arterial em neonatos com extremo baixo peso ao nascer / Comparison of oral ibuprofen and intravenous indomethacin for the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus in extremely low birth weight infants

OBJETIVO: Existem poucos relatórios publicados com relação à eficácia do ibuprofeno via oral no tratamento da persistência do canal arterial (PCA) em neonatos com extremo baixo peso ao nascer (EBPN). Comparamos o ibuprofeno via oral à indometacina intravenosa no que diz respeito à eficácia e segurança no tratamento de PCA em neonatos com peso inferior a 1.000 g ao nascer. MÉTODO: Este foi um estudo retrospectivo em um único centro. Coletamos dados de neonatos com EBPN que tiveram PCA ecocardiograficamente confirmada. Os neonatos foram tratados tanto com indometacina intravenosa quanto com ibuprofeno via oral. A taxa de fechamento do canal, a necessidade de tratamentos adicionais, os efeitos colaterais ou as complicações relacionadas ao medicamento e a mortalidade foram comparados entre os dois grupos de tratamento. RESULTADO: Examinamos 26 neonatos que receberam indometacina e 22 que receberam ibuprofeno. A taxa geral de fechamento do canal foi semelhante nos dois tratamentos: o fechamento do canal ocorreu em 23 dos 26 neonatos (88,5%) no grupo indometacina, e em 18 dos 22 neonatos (81,8%) no grupo ibuprofeno (p = 0,40). A taxa de ligadura cirúrgica (11,5% em comparação a 18,2%; p = 0,40) não diferiu de forma significativa entre os dois grupos de tratamento. Após o tratamento, não foi encontrada nenhuma diferença significativa nas concentrações de creatinina sérica entre os dois grupos. Não houve diferenças significativas com relação a efeitos colaterais ou complicações adicionais. CONCLUSÃO: Em neonatos com EBPN, o ibuprofeno via oral é tão eficaz quanto a indometacina intravenosa no tratamento da PCA. Não há diferenças entre os medicamentos no que diz respeito à segurança. O ibuprofeno via oral poderia ser usado como um agente alternativo no tratamento da PCA em neonatos com EBPN.

OBJECTIVE: There are few published reports concerning the efficacy of oral ibuprofen for the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. Oral ibuprofen was compared to intravenous indomethacin regarding efficacy and safety in the treatment of PDA in infants weighting less than 1,000 g at birth. METHOD: This was a retrospective study in a single center. Data on ELBW infants who had an echocardiographically confirmed PDA were collected. The infants were treated with either intravenous indomethacin or oral ibuprofen. Rate of ductal closure, need for additional treatment, drug-related side effects or complications, and mortality were compared between the two treatment groups. RESULT: 26 infants who received indomethacin and 22 infants who received ibuprofen were studied. The overall rate of ductal closure was similar between the two treatments: it occurred in 23 of 26 infants (88.5%) treated with indomethacin, and in 18 of 22 infants (81.8%) treated with ibuprofen (p = 0.40). The rate of surgical ligation (11.5% versus 18.2%; p = 0.40) did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups. No significant difference was found in post-treatment serum creatinine concentrations between the two groups. There were no significant differences regarding additional side effects or complications. CONCLUSION: In ELBW infants, oral ibuprofen is as efficacious as intravenous indomethacin for the treatment of PDA. There were no differences between the two drugs with respect to safety. Oral ibuprofen could be used as an alternative agent for the treatment of PDA in ELBW infants.

Relación de los niveles plasmáticos de proteína C reactiva con infección y edema en la cirugía de los terceros molares retenidos / Relation between CRP levels as indicator of postoperative infection and edema after third molar impacted surgery

La proteína C reactiva (CRP) por sus siglas en inglés) es una proteína de fase aguda que se utiliza para el seguimiento de enfermedades inflamatorias tales como artritis reumatoidea, lupus eritematoso o vasculitis y procesos infecciosos tales como sepsis y septicemia; así como también, para evaluar la eficacia de las drogas antiinflamatorias y antimicrobianas indicadas en el tratamiento de estas patologías. Igualmente se ha asociado a daño tisular en diversas especialidades quirúrgicas. El objetivo de este estudio fue relacionar los niveles plasmáticos de CRP con la infección y el edema posterior a la cirugía de los terceros molares. A tal efecto se evaluaron 60 pacientes, distribuidos en 3 grupos A, B y C bajo antibioticoterapia profiláctica con Clindamicina (A: dosis única de 600 mg, B: 300 mg c/6h por 5 días y C: Placebo) y terapia analgésica y antiinflamatoria (Ibuprofeno 400mg c/6h por 3 días). A quienes se tomaron muestras de sangre antes y a las 72 horas de la odontectomía de los terceros molares y fotografías digitales para calcular el área de inflamación. No se demostró la relación de los niveles de CRP con infección ya que ningún paciente presentó proceso infeccioso pero si se demostró la relación cualitativa (sensibilidad) de CRP y cuantitativa mediante correlación de Spearman (p<0,05) ya que mientras mayor fue el área de la inflamación, mayores fueron los niveles plasmáticos de CRP

The C reactive protein (CRP) is an unspecific acute phase reaction used for the follow-up of such inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, or vasculitis and such infectious processes like sepsis; as well as also, to evaluate the efficiency of the anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial drugs indicated in the treatment of this pathologies. Equally it has associated to tissue damage in diverse surgical specialties. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relation between CRP levels as indicator of postoperative infection and edema after third molar surgery. We evaluated 60 patients distributed in three groups A, B and C under antibiotic prophylaxis with Clindamycin (A: single dosis 600 mgs, B: 300 mgs each 6/h by 5 days and C: placebo) and analgesic and anti-inflammatory therapy with Ibuprofen 400 mg. each 6/h by 3 days. Who were taken blood samples to measure the CRP before and 72 hours after surgery and digital photographs to calculate the edema area. We did not demonstrated relation between CRP and infection because no one patient was infected in any group but we demonstrated (By Searman (p<0,05) the value of CRP as indicator of edema in the third molar surgery

Uso alternado de antipiréticos para tratamento da febre em crianças: revisão sistemática de ensaios clínicos randomizados / Alternating antipyretics in the treatment of fever in children: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials

OBJETIVO: Sumarizar as evidências existentes sobre a eficácia da terapia alternada com antipiréticos no manejo da febre em crianças comparada com monoterapia. FONTES DE DADOS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, LILACS, SciELO, IBECS, Web of Science, Clinical Trials, Google Scholar e referências dos artigos encontrados. Foram incluídos na revisão ensaios clínicos randomizados, publicados até dezembro de 2011, em que um dos braços fosse terapia alternada com antipiréticos para tratamento de febre em crianças menores de 12 anos, atendidas em nível ambulatorial. A seleção e extração dos dados foram realizadas independentemente por dois revisores. A qualidade dos estudos foi avaliada de acordo com os itens do CONSORT. SÍNTESE DOS DADOS: Os estudos selecionados apresentaram grande heterogeneidade em relação aos participantes, temperatura para diagnóstico de febre, intervenções (doses e intervalos entre doses) e desfechos avaliados. Os grupos de tratamento variaram de 38 a 464 crianças. Os estudos compararam paracetamol e ibuprofeno alternados com paracetamol e/ou ibuprofeno. Em apenas um estudo foram utilizadas doses diferentes de 15 mg/kg para paracetamol e 10 mg/kg para ibuprofeno, mas os intervalos entre doses variaram consideravelmente. Em nenhum estudo foi avaliado o uso alternado com dipirona ou ácido acetilsalicílico. De modo geral, os artigos apontaram para uma tendência a menor média de temperatura nos grupos de terapia alternada. Poucos efeitos adversos foram relatados. CONCLUSÃO: Embora haja uma tendência na redução das médias de temperatura com antipiréticos alternados em relação aos antipiréticos isolados, não existe evidência suficiente para afirmar que essa prática é mais eficaz que a monoterapia.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the existing evidence on the efficacy of therapy with alternating antipyretics compared to monotherapy in the management of fever in children. SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, LILACS, SciELO, IBECS, Web of Science, Clinical Trials, Google Scholar and references of the articles found. The review included randomized clinical trials published until December 2011, in which one of the arms was the alternating antipyretics therapy to treat fever in children younger than 12 years, treated on an outpatient basis. Data selection and extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. The quality of the studies was assessed according to CONSORT items. SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS: The selected studies showed great heterogeneity of participants, temperature for fever diagnosis, interventions (dose and dosing intervals) and assessed outcomes. The treatment groups ranged from 38 to 464 children. The studies compared paracetamol and ibuprofen alternated with paracetamol and/or ibuprofen. Only one study used different doses from the 15 mg/kg for paracetamol and 10 mg/kg for ibuprofen, but the dosing intervals varied considerably. The alternate use with dipyrone or acetylsalicylic acid was not assessed by any of the studies. Overall, the articles pointed to a tendency of lower mean temperatures in groups with alternating therapy. Few adverse effects were reported. CONCLUSION: Although there was a tendency towards the reduction of mean temperatures with alternating antipyretics compared to the use of one antipyretic alone, there is not enough evidence to say that alternating antipyretic therapy is more effective than monotherapy.

Comportamento dos antitérmicos ibuprofeno e dipirona em crianças febris / Antipyretic effect of ibuprofen and dipyrone in febrile children

OBJETIVO: Analisar o comportamento da temperatura em crianças febris medicadas com dose oral única do ibuprofeno (10 mg/kg), dose recomendada para febre alta, comparado à dipirona (15 mg/kg), dose preconizada pelo fabricante, após 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 e 8 horas da medicação antitérmica. MÉTODOS: Ensaio clínico, aberto e randomizado (1:1), em crianças de ambos os sexos, com doenças febris, com idade entre 6 meses e 8 anos, temperatura axilar basal entre 38,0 e 40,3 °C, e divididas em dois grupos: febre alta (> 39,1 °C) e febre baixa (38,0 a 39,1 °C). A análise do comportamento baseou-se nos critérios de descontinuidade, segurança, resposta ao tratamento, tolerabilidade e eficácia terapêutica. RESULTADOS: Das 80 crianças, 31 permaneceram afebris ao longo de 8 horas (38,8 por cento), 100,0 por cento obtiveram decréscimo da temperatura com ambas as medicações nas 2 primeiras horas. No grupo de febre alta, 11 crianças medicadas com ibuprofeno foram mantidas até a 5ª hora (100,0 por cento), e 11 com dipirona até a 3ª hora (100,0 por cento). A eficácia antipirética na febre alta foi estatisticamente significante a favor do ibuprofeno na 3ª e na 4ª hora, e, na febre baixa, na 3ª hora após a medicação. CONCLUSÕES: Este estudo demonstrou que, em dose oral única, o ibuprofeno proporciona atividade antipirética mais acentuada do que a dipirona, principalmente na febre alta. Ambas as medicações foram bem toleradas e seguras em curto prazo.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate temperature changes in febrile children that received a single oral dose of ibuprofen (10 mg/kg), the dose recommended for high fever, or dipyrone (15 mg/kg), the dose recommended by the manufacturer, at 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 hours after administration. METHODS: This open-label randomized (1:1) controlled clinical tried enrolled 80 febrile boys and girls aged 6 months to 8 years with baseline axillary temperatures of 38.0 to 40.3 °C. The children were divided into two groups: high fever (> 39.1 °C) and low-grade fever (38.0 to 39.1 °C). The antipyretic effect was analyzed according to discontinuity, safety, response to treatment, tolerability and therapeutic efficacy. RESULTS: Of the 80 children, 31 remained febrile during the 8 hours (38.8 percent), but 100 percent had a temperature decrease in the first 2 hours after the administration of either medication. In the high fever group, the temperature fell in 11 children treated with ibuprofen up to the 5th hour (100.00 percent) and in the 11 that received dipyrone, up to the third hour (100.00 percent). The difference in antipyretic efficacy of ibuprofen in the high fever group was statistically significant in the 3rd and 4th hours, and in the low-grade fever group, in the 3rd hour after medication. CONCLUSIONS: A single oral dose of ibuprofen has a greater antipyretic efficacy than dipyrone, particularly when the fever is high. Both drugs were well tolerated and safe in the short term.

L'association paracetamol+ibuprofene est-elle preferable au paracetamol seul ou a l'ibuprofene seul pour le traitement de la fievre chez les enfants?

Il apparait de plus en plus sur le marche burkinabe des medicaments; des associations de substances d'indication similaire; et dont l'interet therapeutique reste a demontrer. Ces associations contribuent-elles a un usage rationnel des medicaments? Faut-il continuer a homologuer ces associations ? Nous presentons ici les resultats d'une etude sur l'association paracetamol+ibuprofene dans la fievre chez les enfants

Effect of oral ibuprofen on patent ductus arteriosus in premature newborns

Patent ductus arteriosus [PDA], a common finding among premature infants, is conventionally treated by intravenous indomethacin. Intravenous ibuprofen was recently shown to be as effective and to have fewer adverse reactions in preterm infants. If equally effective, then oral ibuprofen for PDA closure would have several important advantages over the intravenous route. This study was designed to determine whether oral ibuprofen treatment is efficacious and safe in closure of a PDA in premature infants. Thirty-three premature group I [study group] were treated with ibuprofen 10 mg/kg administered through a feeding tube. Thirty-three premature group II [control group] receive placebo the two imaging procedures were again performed 24h after each ibuprofen dose. When the PDA was still hemodynamically significant, as demonstrated by echocardiography, and there was no evidence of deterioration in brain ultrasonography, a second dose of ibuprofen 5mg/ kg [placebo for control] was administered. A third equivalent dose was given after another 24 h if necessary. Cranial ultrasound was repeated 1 week after the last ibuprofen dose and again before discharge from the ward. Hematochemical analysis was performed daily in the unit during the first days of life. In the study group the rate of PDA closure was 93.9% [31 of 33 case] while in the control group of the rate of PDA closure was 30.3% [10 of 33 cases] with significant difference in between. There was no reopening of the ductus after closure had been achieved. No infant required surgical ligation of the ductus in study group while in the control group 24.2% [8 of 33 cases] were required surgical ligation [Table 2]. Twenty- one newborns were treated with 1 dose of ibuprofen, 9 were treated with 2 doses, and the remaining 3 were treated with 3 doses. Oral ibuprofen is an effective and safe alternative to intravenous ibuprofen for PDA closure in premature infants