Perceptions and Attitudes of Hospital' Prescribers towards Drug Information Sources and Prescribing Practices

Abstract Healthcare professionals use a variety of drug information sources to fulfill their clinical needs and medical practice. The aim of present study was to assess the sources of drug information among hospital' prescribers and evaluate their prescribing behavior in Saudi hospitals. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among randomly selected hospital' prescribers using a self-administered questionnaire. The response rate to the survey was 64.29%, with a ratio of 76.44% male and 23.56% female. The internet 137(60.89%) and textbooks 86(38.22%) were the prevalent sources for drug information used. Up-To-Date 107(47.56%), Medscape 105(46.67%) and FDA 74(32.88%) were the common electronic drug sources used. About 151(67.11%) of hospital' prescribers considered the pharmacist as a reliable drug information source. The most favored drug requests by hospital' prescribers from the pharmacists were drug alternatives 110(48.89%) followed by drug interactions 94(41.78%), side effects 78(34.67%) and indications 60(26.67%). Therapeutic efficacy 168(74.67%) and drug availability 73(32.44%) were the main factors contributed to the selection of drugs. This study shows some differences in hospital prescribers' perceptions of sources of drug information depending upon their background and clinical practice. Therefore, knowing appropriate drug information used by hospital' prescribers is fundamental for drug efficacy and safety in clinical practice.

Renovação de Prescrição Médica na atenção primária: uma análise crítica / Prescription refill in primary health care: a critical analysis

A renovação de receita é uma prática comum nos serviços de atenção básica no Brasil, ainda que pouco discutida. Embora exista um número expressivo de artigos em língua inglesa sobre o assunto, pouco se encontra a respeito na literatura brasileira. A renovação de medicamentos de uso contínuo traz consigo riscos e potenciais danos à saúde do usuário quando praticada sem protocolos bem definidos e sem a correta avaliação clínica das pessoas acompanhadas. Dessa forma, a renovação de receita pode perpetuar o uso de medicações com indicação duvidosa, efeitos colaterais significativos, interações medicamentosas importantes, medicamentos contraindicados e/ou que não são mais necessários. Além disso, pode transmitir a sensação de que a população está sendo bem assistida apenas pelo fato de as pessoas conseguirem receber medicamentos, ainda que sem uma avaliação periódica. Por outro lado, caso realizada de forma ideal, poderia favorecer aumento da adesão ao tratamento, bem como a avaliação de interações medicamentosas, o cumprimento da terapêutica e a necessidade de exames complementares. O presente artigo realizará uma discussão crítica sobre os riscos e benefícios da renovação de receita da maneira como é feita no Brasil, incluindo seus aspectos legais e pontos passíveis de melhorias segundo a literatura internacional. (AU)

Repeat prescribing is a common practice at primary health care in Brazil which is poorly discussed. Despite the large number of articles in English, the Brazilian literature barely discuss this subject. The renewal of continuous-use medication may lead to risks and potential harms to patient health when used without defined protocols or adequate clinical evaluation. This practice may perpetuate the use of medication with arguable indication, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, contraindicated drugs or that are no longer needed. It also may leads to a misperception of being well attended, although it is a mere transcription of medical receipts. However, if performed in an adequate way, it might be associated with increased adherence to treatment. It also might allow assessment of drug interactions, compliance with therapy and checking out the need for complementary tests. This article will critically discuss the risks and benefits of prescription renewal in the way it is done in Brazil, including its legal aspects and possible points for improvement according to the international literature. (AU)

Purchase of prescription and OTC medicines in Slovakia: factors influencing patients' expectations and satisfaction

ABSTRACT Slovakia is a country where the purchase of OTC (over the counter) medicines outside the pharmacy is not allowed by the government. This study aimed at evaluating patients' satisfaction and acceptance of community pharmacists. Customer's behaviour and expectations influencing the purchase of prescription and OTC medicines were analyzed. A structured questionnaire having 15 multiple-choice questions was used to analyze the descriptive parameters. Data collection lasted from January to February 2014. The sample size consisted of 357 high-school educated individuals under 40 years of age. The survey showed that the prescription and OTC medicines were bought equally. The participants reported a 96.0%, 96.3% and 90.2% satisfaction rate with willingness and approach of the community pharmacist, pharmacy services and provision of drug information respectively. As for the OTC medicines, 89.5% people considered the pharmacist an expert: 88.2% purchased medicines with pharmacist's recommendation, 97.8% needed a professional counselling and 97.2% required a pharmacist's guidance. As for the prescription drugs, only 72.1% considered the pharmacist an expert: 96.3% suggested that physician's prescription was significant and 88.3% considered pharmacist's guidance in the process of selection of prescription medicines nonessential. A comprehensible and respectable conversation was highly expected in regards to both the OTC and prescription medicines.