RESUMO
Molecular and morphological methods were evaluated to distinguish between Haemonchus contortus and Haemonchus placei species. A total of 141 H. contortus and 89 H. placei male adult specimens collected from artificially infected lambs were identified individually by PCR analysis, using a species-specific primer pair. These PCR results were used as gold standard for Haemonchus spp. identification. Haemonchus placei presented higher mean spicule and barb lengths than H. contortus (P<0.05). However, some measurements overlapped. For this reason, a discriminate function did not allow the correct identification of 13 H. contortus and one H. placei specimen. The sheath tail length of the third stage larvae (L3), which comprises the distance between the tip of the larval tail and the end of the sheath tail, were measured. Only three of the 485 H. placei larvae (0.619%) had a sheath tail shorter than 85 µm, while only four of the 500 H. contortus larvae (0.8%) presented a sheath tail longer than 85 µm. The results indicated that 6.09% of the male adult specimens would be misclassified based on the discriminate function, while only 0.71% of infective larvae would be misclassified. Therefore, identification of L3 can be used as the first method to indicate the presence of H. placei and/or H. contortus in a population of domestic ruminants.
Métodos moleculares e morfológicos foram avaliados para a identificação de Haemonchus contortus e Haemonchus placei. No total, 141 H. contortus e 89 H. placei machos adultos, obtidos de cordeiros artificialmente infectados, foram identificados individualmente por PCR com o emprego de um par de “primers” espécie-específico. Esses resultados da análise por PCR foram considerados como padrão para a identificação das espécies de Haemonchus. Haemonchus placei apresentou valores médios de espículos e ganchos superiores aos de H. contortus (P<0,05). Entretanto, houve sobreposição de alguns valores. Por essa razão, a função discriminante não permitiu a identificação correta de 13 exemplares de H. contortus e de um, de H. placei. Foi medida a cauda da bainha de larvas infectantes (L3), que compreende a distância entre a ponta da cauda da larva e a ponta da cauda da bainha. Apenas três das 485 L3 de H. placei (0,619%) apresentaram a cauda da bainha com medida inferior a 85 µm e somente em quatro das 500 L3 de H. contortus (0,8%) essa medida foi superior a 85 µm. Os resultados demonstraram que 6,09% dos machos adultos seriam identificados erroneamente com base na função discriminante, enquanto a identificação incorreta de L3 seria de apenas 0,71%. Portanto, a identificação de L3 pode ser utilizada como método inicial para indicar a presença de H. placei e/ou H. contortus em uma população de ruminantes domésticos.
Assuntos
Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aminoaciltransferases , Proteínas de Bactérias , Hexosiltransferases , Peptidil Transferases , Resistência às Penicilinas/genética , Infecções Pneumocócicas/microbiologia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/genética , Alelos , Proteínas de Transporte/genética , Cefotaxima/farmacologia , Cefalosporinas/farmacologia , Doenças Transmissíveis Emergentes/epidemiologia , DNA Bacteriano/análise , Eletroforese em Gel de Campo Pulsado , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Muramilpentapeptídeo Carboxipeptidase/genética , Proteínas de Ligação às Penicilinas , Infecções Pneumocócicas/epidemiologia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/classificação , Streptococcus pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Detection of the mecA gene by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the gold standard for identifying methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). PCR assays, employing MR1-MR2 primers (primer set 1) and MR3-MR4 primers (primer set 2) to generate 154 and 533 bp fragment, respectively, are most widely used for amplification of mecA gene. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the presence of mecA gene in 100 clinical isolates of S. aureus using PCR with the two pairs of primers. The results were compared to the broth dilution MIC method, oxacillin salt screening method (OSS) and oxacillin disk agar diffusion method (ODD). Fifteen of the 100 isolates showed a discrepancy between the mecA primer sets 1 and 2. Three isolates (3%) without the mecA gene showed discrepancies with phenotypic methods. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values for the 154 and 533 bp products of mecA were 79, 85, 83, 81 and 94, 100, 100, 94%, respectively. The results indicated that primer set 2 was more appropriate than primer set 1 for the detection of mecA gene in MRSA. There was a good correlation among the mecA gene detection, ODD and OSS methods. The discrepancy of three isolates between PCR and phenotypic methods should be clarified for other resistant mechanisms.
Assuntos
Proteínas de Bactérias , Proteínas de Transporte/genética , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana/métodos , Primers do DNA/diagnóstico , DNA Bacteriano/análise , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Eletroforese em Gel de Ágar , Hexosiltransferases , Antígenos de Histocompatibilidade Classe I , Humanos , Resistência a Meticilina/genética , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Muramilpentapeptídeo Carboxipeptidase/genética , Proteínas de Ligação às Penicilinas , Peptidil Transferases , Fenótipo , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Tailândia/epidemiologiaRESUMO
The timely detection of blood-borne pathogens is one of the most important functions of the microbiology laboratory. Recently, methicillin-resistant staphylococci have become the most important pathogens seen by the laboratory. The purpose of this study was to evaluate Staphy agar, a novel screening medium, for the detection methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, S. epidermidis, or other coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) from positive blood cultures showing Gram-positive cocci in clusters. Eighty-six blood cultures that yielded Gram-positive cocci in clusters were included in this study. The organisms were finally identified by the Vitek system, and oxacillin resistance was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based mecA gene detection. The identification and oxacillin resistance of all S. aureus strains showed complete agreement with the Vitek and PCR results. The presumptive detection of S. epidermidis and other CNS were consistent with the Vitek system in 94.7%, and the screening of oxacillin resistance was consistent with the result of PCR in 92.1% of 38 strains. The Staphy agar method is reliable and rapid for differentiating Gram-positive cocci in clusters in blood and for determining their methicillin resistance.