Medical error: concept, characterization and management / Erro médico: conceito, caracterização e gestão

Abstract The objective of this study is to better understand the tensions involved in the fear of making an error due to the harm and risk this would pose to those involved. This is a qualitative study based on the narratives of the experiences lived by ten acting physicians in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. The concept and characterization of errors were discussed, as well as the fear of making an error, the near misses or error in itself, how to deal with errors and what to do to avoid them. The analysis indicates an excessive pressure in the medical profession for error-free practices, with a well-established physician-patient relationship to facilitate the management of medical errors. The error occurs but the lack of information and discussion often leads to its concealment due to fear of possible judgment by society or peers. The establishment of programs that encourage appropriate medical conduct in the event of an error requires coherent answers for humanization in Brazilian medical science.

Resumo O objetivo deste estudo é compreender as tensões presentes no medo de errar por conta dos riscos e danos que tal erro causaria aos envolvidos. Este é um estudo qualitativo baseado nas narrativas das experiências de 10 médicos atuantes no estado de São Paulo, Brasil. O conceito e a caracterização do erro foram discutidos, bem como o medo de cometê-lo, a proximidade com o erro, como lidar com ele e como evitá-lo. A análise aponta pressões excessivas no tocante a práticas sem erros na profissão médica, considerando a existência de uma relação médico-paciente bem estabelecida de forma a facilitar a gestão de erros médicos. Erros médicos ocorrem, mas a falta de informação e discussão sobre o tema costuma levar ao seu encobrimento, uma vez que médicos temem o possível julgamento feito pela sociedade e por seus pares. O estabelecimento de programas que encorajem a conduta médica apropriada caso um erro ocorra requer respostas coerentes para a humanização da ciência médica no Brasil.

Como discutir sobre não ressuscitação cardiopulmonar na unidade de terapia intensiva? / How to discuss about do-not-resuscitate in the intensive care unit?

RESUMO A melhoria da qualidade da ressuscitação cardiopulmonar vem reduzindo a mortalidade dos indivíduos atendidos em parada cardiorrespiratória. Porém, os sobreviventes apresentam risco elevado de dano cerebral grave em caso de retorno à circulação espontânea. Dados sugerem que paradas cardiorrespiratórias, que ocorram em pacientes criticamente doentes com ritmos cardíacos não chocáveis, apresentem somente 6% de chance de retorno à circulação espontânea e, destes, somente um terço consiga recuperar sua autonomia. Optaríamos, assim, pela realização de um procedimento em que a chance de sobrevida é mínima, e os sobreviventes apresentam risco de aproximadamente 70% de morte hospitalar ou dano cerebral grave e definitivo? Valeria a pena discutir se este paciente é ou não ressuscitável, em caso de parada cardiorrespiratória? Esta discussão traria algum benefício ao paciente e a seus familiares? As discussões avançadas de não ressuscitação se baseiam no princípio ético do respeito pela autonomia do paciente, pois o desejo dos familiares e dos médicos, muitas vezes, não se correlaciona adequadamente aos dos pacientes. Não somente pela ótica da autonomia, as discussões avançadas podem ajudar a equipe médica e assistencial a anteciparem problemas futuros, fazendo-os planejar melhor o cuidado dos enfermos. Ou seja, nossa opinião é a de que discussões sobre ressuscitação ou não dos pacientes criticamente doentes devam ser realizadas em todos os casos internados na unidade de terapia intensiva logo nas primeiras 24 a 48 horas de internação.

Abstract The improvement in cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality has reduced the mortality of individuals treated for cardiac arrest. However, survivors have a high risk of severe brain damage in cases of return of spontaneous circulation. Data suggest that cases of cardiac arrest in critically ill patients with non-shockable rhythms have only a 6% chance of returning of spontaneous circulation, and of these, only one-third recover their autonomy. Should we, therefore, opt for a procedure in which the chance of survival is minimal and the risk of hospital death or severe and definitive brain damage is approximately 70%? Is it worth discussing patient resuscitation in cases of cardiac arrest? Would this discussion bring any benefit to the patients and their family members? Advanced discussions on do-not-resuscitate are based on the ethical principle of respect for patient autonomy, as the wishes of family members and physicians often do not match those of patients. In addition to the issue of autonomy, advanced discussions can help the medical and care team anticipate future problems and, thus, better plan patient care. Our opinion is that discussions regarding the resuscitation of critically ill patients should be performed for all patients within the first 24 to 48 hours after admission to the intensive care unit.

Do-not-resuscitate and treatment limitation decisions - Six years of experience from a Portuguese General Intensive Care Unit

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE Treatment limitation, as well as do-not-resuscitate (DNR) directives, are difficult but important to improve patients' quality of life and minimize dysthanasia. We aimed to study the approach to withholding, withdrawal, and DNR decisions, patients' characteristics, and process documentation in a general Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in Portugal. METHODS A retrospective analysis of data regarding the limitation of treatment decisions collected from previously-designed forms and complemented by medical record consultation. RESULTS A total of 1602 patients were admitted to the ICU between 2011 and 2016. DNR decisions were documented in 127 cases (7.9%). Patients with treatment limitations were older and had higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II. The most frequent diagnosis preceding these decisions was sepsis (52.0%, n = 66); the most common main reason for limiting treatment was a poor prognosis of acute illness. Of the patients to whom a DNR was implemented, 117 (92.1%) died in the ICU (40.1% of the total number of ICU deaths), and hospital mortality was 100%. Participants in these decisions, as well as types of treatment withdrawn and their respective timings, were not registered in medical records. CONCLUSION Treatment limitation and DNR decisions were relatively common, in line with other Southern European studies, but behind Northern European and North American centers. Patients with these limitations were older and more severely ill than patients without such decisions. Documentation of these processes should be clear and detailed, either in specific forms or computerized clinical records; there is room for improvement in this area.

RESUMO OBJETIVO Decisões de limitação terapêutica (DLT) e de não reanimação (DNR) são difíceis, mas importantes, visando melhorar a qualidade de vida dos doentes e minimizar distanásia. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a abordagem das DNR e DLT, as características dos doentes e a documentação dessas decisões numa Unidade de Cuidados Intensivos Polivalente (Ucip) em Portugal. MÉTODOS Análise retrospectiva dos dados referentes a DLT e DNR, recolhidos a partir de formulários previamente elaborados e complementados por consulta de processo clínico. RESULTADOS Um total de 1.602 doentes foi internado na Ucip entre 2011 e 2016. DNR foi documentada em 127 casos (7,9%). Doentes com DLT eram mais velhos e tinham um Simplified Acute Physiology Score II mais elevado. O diagnóstico mais frequente que precedeu essas decisões foi sepse (52,0%, n=66); A razão mais comum para limitar o tratamento foi mau prognóstico da doença aguda. Dos doentes nos quais a DNR foi implementada, 117 (92,1%) morreram na Ucip (40,1% do total de óbitos na Ucip) e a mortalidade hospitalar foi de 100%. Os intervenientes nessas decisões, bem como os tipos de tratamento retirados, não foram rotineiramente registrados. CONCLUSÃO As DLT e DNR foram relativamente comuns, em consonância com outros estudos do sul da Europa, mas atrás dos centros do norte da Europa e da América do Norte. Os doentes com essas limitações eram mais velhos e mais gravemente doentes. A documentação dessas decisões deve ser clara e detalhada, seja em formulários específicos, seja em registros clínicos informatizados. Há espaço para melhorias nessa área.

Efeitos de um programa de cuidados paliativos nas tendências de utilização da unidade de terapia intensiva e ordens de não reanimar durante hospitalizações terminais. Análise de séries temporais interrompidas / Effect of a palliative care program on trends in intensive care unit utilization and do-not-resuscitate orders during terminal hospitalizations. An interrupted time series analysis

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar os efeitos da implantação de um programa de cuidados paliativos no estabelecimento de ordens de não reanimar e na utilização da unidade de terapia intensiva em hospitalizações terminais. Método: Os dados de todos os pacientes que faleceram em um hospital terciário brasileiro, entre maio de 2014 e setembro de 2016, foram coletados de forma retrospectiva. Analisamos a frequência do estabelecimento de ordens de não reanimar e de admissões à unidade de terapia intensiva entre os casos de óbito hospitalar. Utilizou-se análise de séries temporais interrompidas para avaliar as diferenças, em termos de tendências de estabelecimento de ordens de não reanimar e de admissões à unidade de terapia intensiva antes (15 meses) e após (12 meses) a implantação do programa de cuidados paliativos. Resultados: Analisamos um total de 48.372 admissões ao hospital, dentre as quais 1.071 óbitos no hospital. Os óbitos foram precedidos de ordens de não reanimar em 276 (25,8%) casos e ocorreram admissões à unidade de terapia intensiva em 814 (76%) casos. O estabelecimento de ordens de não reanimar aumentou de 125 (20,4%) para 151 (33%) casos, na comparação entre os períodos antes e após a implantação do programa de cuidados paliativos (p < 0,001). Ocorreram admissões à unidade de terapia intensiva em 469 (76,5%) e 345 (75,3%) dos casos, respectivamente, nos períodos pré e após a implantação do programa de cuidados paliativos (p = 0,654). A análise de séries temporais confirmou tendência ao aumento do estabelecimento de ordens de não reanimar de 0,5% por mês antes da implantação para 2,9% ao mês após a implantação (p < 0,001), demonstrando-se tendência à diminuição de utilização da unidade de terapia intensiva, de uma tendência a aumento de 0,6% ao mês, antes da implantação do programa, para diminuição de -0,9% ao mês no período, após a implantação (p = 0,001). Conclusão: A implantação de um programa de cuidados paliativos se associou com tendência ao aumento no estabelecimento de ordens de não reanimar e à diminuição do uso da unidade de terapia intensiva durante hospitalizações terminais.

ABSTRACT Objective: To assess the effect of the implementation of a palliative care program on do-not-resuscitate orders and intensive care unit utilization during terminal hospitalizations. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected for all patients who died in a tertiary hospital in Brazil from May 2014 to September 2016. We analyzed the frequency of do-not-resuscitate orders and intensive care unit admissions among in-hospital deaths. Interrupted time series analyses were used to evaluate differences in trends of do-not-resuscitate orders and intensive care unit admissions before (17 months) and after (12 months) the implementation of a palliative care program. Results: We analyzed 48,372 hospital admissions and 1,071 in-hospital deaths. Deaths were preceded by do-not-resuscitate orders in 276 (25.8%) cases and admissions to the intensive care unit occurred in 814 (76%) cases. Do-not-resuscitate orders increased from 125 (20.4%) to 151 (33%) cases in the pre-implementation and post-implementation periods, respectively (p < 0.001). Intensive care unit admissions occurred in 469 (76.5%) and 345 (75.3%) cases in the pre-implementation and post-implementation periods, respectively (p = 0.654). Interrupted time series analyses confirmed a trend of increased do-not-resuscitate order registrations, from an increase of 0.5% per month pre-implementation to an increase of 2.9% per month post-implementation (p < 0.001), and demonstrated a trend of decreased intensive care unit utilization, from an increase of 0.6% per month pre-implementation to a decrease of -0.9% per month in the post-implementation period (p = 0.001). Conclusion: The implementation of a palliative care program was associated with a trend of increased registration of do-not-resuscitate orders and a trend of decreased intensive care unit utilization during terminal hospitalizations.

Impact of Biomedical Ethics Awareness and Ethical Values in Nursing Student on Their Attitudes towards DNR / 한국호스피스완화의료학회지

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify how nursing students' awareness of biomedical ethics and ethical values affect their attitudes towards a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order. METHODS: This cross-sectional correlation study was conducted with 275 nursing students enrolled at two universities in North Chungcheong Province and North Gyeongsang Province of South Korea. Data were collected in April 2017 using a self-reported questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson correlation coefficient and stepwise multiple regression with the SPSS/WIN 23.0 program. RESULTS: The students' attitudes towards DNR were positively correlated with attitudes that seek ethical values but negatively correlated with their biomedical ethics awareness. The explained variance for attitudes towards DNR was 20%, which was significant (F=13.01, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that nursing students' biomedical ethics awareness and ethical values were associated with their attitudes towards DNR. Curriculum organization and various educational programs should be developed and applied to help nursing students develop ethical values and awareness of biomedical ethics.

A Retrospective Study on the Decision to Prohibit Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Patients with Premenarcheal Cancer in a University Hospital

OBJECTIVE: Whether to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or do-not-resuscitate (DNR) is not only a medical problem but also a decision that should be made carefully with self-autonomy in accordance with life values. We conducted a retrospective observational study to identify the characteristics of current CPR and DNR at a practical level. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from medical records with regard to the clinical status of DNR decision in 356 patients with cancer who expired between October 2014 and September 2015 in Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital. RESULTS: DNR was decided significantly more frequently in patients with solid cancers than in patients with hematological cancer (87.7% vs. 71.4%, P=0.003). No other significant factor influenced the DNR decision in this study. The main persons who signed the DNR consent form were mostly sons or daughters (60.7%), never the patients themselves. The median time from the DNR order to death was longer in the ward than in the intensive care unit (ICU; 3.0 days vs. 1.0 days). The mean time from the DNR order to death was 6.6 days (median, 2 days). Among the patients with a DNR order, 110 (36.7%) were hospitalized in the ICU and 73 (24.3%) were treated with ventilator support. CONCLUSION: Most patients expired 6.6 days after DNR permission was given and could not decide their treatment plan by themselves. For better end-of-life care, the sensitive DNR decision with consideration of the individualized environment of the patient for life-sustaining treatment should be settled in Korea.

Comparison of Life-Sustaining Treatment in Terminal Cancer Patients between a Cancer and Hospice Unit after Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the differences in the performance of life-sustaining treatment after signing a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order between terminal cancer patients who died in the cancer unit and hospice unit. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 174 patients who died in the cancer unit (CU) and 68 patients who died in the hospice unit (HU) from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 at a hospital specializing in cancer treatment. RESULTS: The rate of life-sustaining treatment administration was lower for patients who died in the HU than that of those who died in the CU. The period until death after signing a DNR order was 7 days for CU patients and 19.5 days for the HU patients. The period from admission to death was also significantly longer in HU patients (32.5 days) than that in CU patients (21.5 days, p < .001). Of the patients who died in the CU, 54% were referred to the HU but did not use the service. Most of the people who signed DNR informed consents were spouses and offspring; only 4.6% of patients signed DNRs. CONCLUSION: It is hard to say that life-sustaining treatment increases the survival period, but it can improve symptom control and quality of life in hospices. Activation of consultation-based hospice is necessary for patients who cannot use the hospice unit. To increase patient's active participation in the life-sustaining treatment decision of terminal cancer patients, it is necessary that an advanced practice nurse specialized in counseling and education is involved in the decision.

Treatment of Patients with Cancer in a Secondary Hospital in Korea / 한국호스피스완화의료학회지

PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate treatment of cancer patients at a secondary hospital. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed with electronic medical records of cancer patients admitted to a secondary hospital from January 1, 2009 through September 31, 2017. RESULTS: A total of 223 patients were studied. Sixty-nine patients were hospitalized for supportive care after receiving a surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy at a tertiary hospital, 58 patients for other supportive care, 53 patients for symptom control, 16 patients with a decision not to take active cancer treatment, and 27 patients for treatment of cancer that was diagnosed during their hospital stay. Among 75 patients who were discharged to other institutions, 50 were transferred to tertiary hospitals, 10 to long-term care hospitals, eight to hospice hospitals, four to nursing homes and two to secondary hospitals. Comorbidities were found in 120 patients (53.8%). For patients who consulted with more than one department, more consultations were for non-cancer diseases than cancer. Seventy-three patients had a do-not-resuscitate order. CONCLUSION: For treatment of cancer patients, it is needed to establish a cooperation system among medical institutions and provide comprehensive management including treatment of comorbidities.

End-of-Life Care Practice in Dying Patients with Do-Not-Resuscitate Order: A Single Center Experience / 한국호스피스완화의료학회지

PURPOSE: End-of-life (EoL) decisions are challenging and multifaceted for patients and physicians. This study was aimed to explore how EoL care is practiced for patients with a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed medical records of patients who died after agreeing to a DNR order in 2016 at a university hospital. Characteristics including cause of death, intensity of EoL care, and other factors were reviewed and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Of total 375 patients, 170 patients (45.3%) died with malignancies, and 205 patients (54.6%) with other causes involving the central nervous system (19.2%), pulmonary (14.7%), cardiologic (6.7%) and infectious (6.4%) conditions. Both the cancer and non-cancer patient groups showed a short duration from DNR to death (median 3 days vs 2 days, P=0.629). An intensive care group comprising patients who received one or more intensive treatments such as ventilator (n=205) showed a higher number of non-cancer patients and a shorter duration from DNR to death than a group that withheld treatment before DNR (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: EoL decisions were made very late by both cancer and non-cancer patients. About half of the patients did not have cancer, and two-thirds of them decided DNR during intensive treatment. To make a good EoL decision, a shared decision making with patients should be done at an earlier stage.

Limitación de tratamiento de soporte vital en una Unidad de Cuidado Intensivo pediátrica chilena: 2004-2014 / Limitation of Vital Support in a Chilean Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: 2004-2014

Resumen Objetivo: Describir las frecuencias y características del proceso de Limitación de Tratamiento de So porte Vital (LTSV) en pacientes de la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos (UCI) entre 2004 2014. Pacientes y Método: Estudio retrospectivo, observacional descriptivo a partir de dos registros de la UCI del Hospital Roberto del Río: 1) ficha clínica individual de seguimiento y 2) ficha de registro de indicadores de calidad incluida LTSV, ambos actualizados diariamente al iniciar la visita clínica. Desde estos registros se analizaron los casos con dilemas bioéticos en los que se propuso LTSV du rante su hospitalización en UCI ("LTSV intra-UCI"). Se menciona la población rechazada de ingresar a UCI ("LTSV pre-UCI") y los fallecidos con LTSV en cama básica. Resultados: De 7.821 ingresos a UCI en el 1,51% (118 pacientes) se establece una LTSV: ONI (Orden de No Innovación) en 78,8% de los casos, retiro de medidas terapéuticas en 14,4% y suspensión de ventilación mecánica en 6,8%. En 23,7% el diagnóstico de base fue neurológico u oncológico, para cada uno. La condición fisiopatológica predominante para una LTSV fue neurológica (39%). El tiempo de estadía en UCI triplica el promedio de estada de los egresos totales de UCI, pero es de amplia variabilidad. Conclusiones: Es factible realizar una LTSV en UCI cuando el equipo incorpora esta perspectiva al trabajo diario junto a la familia. Hay una amplia variabilidad individual en las características del proceso de LTSV, propio del ámbito de la ética clínica.

Abstract Objective: Describe the frequency and characteristics of PICU patients who undergo a process of withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment (LTSV), between 2004 y 2014. Patients and Method: A retrospective, observational descriptive study, using two documents for quality assessment in the PICU of Hospital Roberto del Río: 1) daily individual patient tracking log and 2) daily record of quality indicators, including LTSV, both updated daily at the morning visit. All PICU patients with an ethical dilemma during their PICU stay in which a LTSV was proposed were included. We men tion patients rejected for admission in the ICU and those who died in basic units of the hospital with LTSV. Results: In 118 patients of 7821 PICU admissions (1,5%) we determined a LTSV: ONR (Non Resuscitation Order) for all of them, ONI (Non Innovation Order) in 78,8%, withdrawal of some therapeutics in 14,4% and withdrawal of active mechanical ventilation in 6,8%. The basic diagnosis was 23,7% for each neurologic and oncologic diseases. The predominant pathophysiologic condition leading to a LTSV was severe chronic neurologic damage (39%). The length of stay was threefold the mean PICU stay, with a large variability due to expectable individual factors when ethic decisions are involved. Conclusion: LTSV is feasible when the team is involved and this perspective is part of daily clinical analysis. The wide individual variability in the LTSV process is expectable in ethical decisions.

Do not attempt resuscitation orders at the emergency department of a teaching hospital / Ordens de não ressuscitação no serviço de emergência de um hospital universitário

ABSTRACT Objective: To identify factors associated with not attempting resuscitation. Methods: A cross-sectional study conducted at the emergency department of a teaching hospital. The sample consisted of 285 patients; in that, 216 were submitted to cardiopulmonary resuscitation and 69 were not. The data were collected by means of the in-hospital Utstein Style. To compare resuscitation attempts with variables of interest we used the χ2 test, likelihood ratio, Fisher exact test, and analysis of variance (p<0.05). Results: No cardiopulmonary resuscitation was considered unjustifiable in 56.5% of cases; in that, 37.7% did not want resuscitation and 5.8% were found dead. Of all patients, 22.4% had suffered a previous cardiac arrest, 49.1% were independent for Activities of Daily Living, 89.8% had positive past medical/surgical history; 63.8% were conscious, 69.8% were breathing and 74.4% had a pulse upon admission. Most events (76.4%) happened at the hospital, the presumed cause was respiratory failure in 28.7% and, in 48.4%, electric activity without pulse was the initial rhythm. The most frequent cause of death was infection. The factors that influenced non-resuscitation were advanced age, history of neoplasm and the initial arrest rhythm was asystole. Conclusion: Advanced age, past history of neoplasia and asystole as initial rhythm were factors that significantly influenced the non-performance of resuscitation. Greater clarity when making the decision to resuscitate patients can positively affect the quality of life of survivors.

RESUMO Objetivo: Identificar fatores associados à não realização de ressuscitação. Métodos: Estudo transversal realizado no serviço de emergência de um hospital universitário. A amostra foi composta por 285 pacientes, dos quais 216 foram submetidos à ressuscitação cardiopulmonar, e 69 não tiveram esta conduta. Os dados foram coletados por meio do in-hospital Utstein Style. Para comparar as tentativas de ressuscitação e as variáveis de interesse, utilizaram-se o teste do χ2, a razão de verossimilhança, o teste exato de Fisher e a análise de variância (p<0,05). Resultados: A não ressuscitação foi considerada injustificável em 56,5% dos casos, sendo que 37,7% não queriam ressuscitação e 5,8% foram encontrados mortos. Do total de pacientes, 22,4% tiveram parada cardíaca prévia, 49,1% eram independentes para Atividades de Vida Diária, e 89,8% tinham alguma história pregressa; 63,8% estavam conscientes, 69,8% estavam respirando e 74,4% tinham pulso palpável à admissão. A maioria dos eventos (76,4%) ocorreu no hospital, e a causa presumida de parada foi insuficiência respiratória em 28,7% e, em 48,4%, o ritmo inicial foi atividade elétrica sem pulso. A causa mais frequente de morte foi infecção. Os fatores que influenciaram na não realização de ressuscitação foram idade avançada, história de neoplasia e assistolia como ritmo inicial de parada. Conclusão: Idade avançada, história de neoplasia e assistolia como ritmo inicial foram os fatores que influenciaram significativamente na não realização de ressuscitação. Maior clareza na decisão de reanimar pode afetar positivamente a qualidade de vida dos pacientes.

Percepção de pacientes oncológicos sobre terminalidade de vida / Perception of oncology patients on the terminality of life / Percepción de los pacientes oncológicos sobre la terminalidad de la vida

Resumo Objetivou-se analisar, por meio de pesquisa descritiva, a percepção de pacientes oncológicos diante da terminalidade da vida. Aplicou-se questionário para 100 pacientes oncológicos, dos quais 85% desconheciam testamento vital/diretivas antecipadas de vontade, 81% desconheciam cuidados paliativos e 70% desconheciam ordem de não reanimar. Após esclarecimento sobre os termos empregados, 62% concordariam em elaborar testamento vital/diretivas antecipadas de vontade, 82% concordariam em receber cuidados paliativos no domicílio e 64% em ser reanimados em qualquer situação, mas a maioria (73%) discordou da prática de distanásia. Apenas 11% referiram inadequação na forma de comunicação de seu diagnóstico pelo médico. A presença de metástases suscitou reflexão mais ampla sobre terminalidade da vida. Os resultados permitem inferir que é necessário incentivar a discussão sobre terminalidade da vida na população durante a assistência aos pacientes, bem como estimular o debate sobre o assunto durante a formação de profissionais de saúde.

Abstract With the aim of analysing the perception of cancer patients towards the end of life, a questionnaire was applied to 100 oncologic patients, of which 85% were unaware of living will/advance directives, 81% were unaware of the terms palliative care and 70% were unaware of order to not reanimate. After clarifying the meaning of the terms used, 62% agreed to make living will/advance directives, 82% to receive palliative care at home and 64% to be reanimated in any situation, but the majority (73%) disagreed with the practice of futility. Only 11% reported inadequacies in the communication of their diagnosis by the physician. The fact of having metastases elicited a broader reflection on the termination of life. The results allow to infer that it is necessary to encourage the discussion about termination of life to the population during patient care, as well to promote the respective training to health professionals since the undergraduate course.

Resumen Con el fin de analizar la percepción de los pacientes con cáncer frente al final de su vida, a través de una investigación descriptiva, se aplicó un cuestionario a 100 pacientes de cáncer, entre los cuales el 85% desconocía las directivas anticipadas de voluntad, el 81% desconocía los términos de cuidados paliativos y el 70% desconocía la orden de no reanimar. Después de la clarificación del significado de los términos utilizados, el 62% estaba de acuerdo para elaborar su testamento vital/directivas anticipadas de voluntad, el 82% para recibir los cuidados paliativos en el hogar y el 64% para ser restablecido en cualquier situación, pero la mayoría (73%) no estuvo de acuerdo con la distanasia. Tan sólo el 11% consideró inadecuada la comunicación del diagnóstico por el médico. El hecho de portar metástasis amplió la reflexión sobre el final de la vida. Los resultados muestran que es necesario fomentar la discusión del final de la vida en la población durante la atención al paciente, y promover la respectiva formación a los profesionales de la salud desde el pregrado.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in an average brazilian intensive care unit: should we perform less or better?

Abstract Introduction: Few data can be found about cardiac arrest in the intensive care unit outside reference centers in third world countries. Objective: To study epidemiology and prognostic factors associated with cardiac arrest in the intensive care unit (ICU) in an average Brazilian center. Methods: Between June 2011 and July 2014, 302 cases of cardiac arrest in the intensive care unit were prospectively evaluated in 273 patients (age: 68.9 ± 15 years) admitted in three mixed units. Data regarding cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation were collected in an "Utstein style" form and epidemiologic data was prospectively obtained. Factors associated with do not resuscitate orders, return of spontaneous circulation and survival were studied using binary logistic regression. Statistical package software used was SPSS 19.0 (IBM Inc., USA). Results: Among 302 cardiac arrests, 230 (76.3%) had their initial rhythm recorded and 141 (61.3%) was in asystole, 62 (27%) in pulseless electric activity (PEA) and 27 had a shockable rhythm (11.7%). In 109 (36.1%) cases, cardiac arrest had a suspected reversible cause. Most frequent suspected cardiac arrest causes were hypotension (n=98; 32.5%), multiple (19.2%) and hypoxemia (17.5%). Sixty (19.9%) cardiac arrests had do not resuscitate orders. Prior left ventricle dysfunction was the only predictor of do not resuscitate order (OR: 3.1 [CI=1.03-9.4]; P=0.04). Among patients that received cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 59 (24.4%) achieved return of spontaneous circulation and 12 survived to discharge (5.6%). Initial shockable rhythm was the only return of spontaneous circulation predictor (OR: 24.9 (2.4-257); P=0.007) and survival (OR: 4.6 (1.4-15); P=0.01). Conclusion: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation rate was high considering ICU patients, so was mortality. Prior left ventricular dysfunction was a predictor of do not resuscitate order. Initial shockable rhythm was a predictor of return of spontaneous circulation and survival.

Ordem de não reanimar sob a perspectiva depacientes oncológicos e seus familiares / Do not resuscitate orders from the perspective of oncology patients and their relatives

O presente estudo objetivou verificar a perspectiva dos pacientes oncológicos e familiares em relação à Ordem deNão Reanimar (ONR). Foram entrevistados 104 pacientes oncológicos e 100 familiares que frequentavam o serviço deoncologia do Hospital Universitário Santa Terezinha, Joaçaba, Santa Catarina, Brasil, no ano de 2014. Os termos ONReram desconhecidos por 81,73% dos pacientes e por 82% dos familiares. Após esclarecimento do significado, 65,4%dos pacientes e 67% dos familiares mostraram-se favoráveis à ONR em caso de parada cardiorrespiratória de pacienteem fase final de doença terminal. A decisão compartilhada entre pacientes, familiares e médico obteve a preferência de58,65% dos pacientes e de 73% dos familiares, por iniciativa do médico que acompanha o tratamento, segundo 60,58%dos pacientes e 72% dos familiares. A realização de sua própria ONR foi considerada importante por 63,47% dospacientes e 68,63% dos familiares e a implantação da Ordem de não reanimar no Brasil por 75% dos pacientes e 74%dos familiares. Concluiu-se que a maioria dos pacientes e familiares desconhecia os termos ordem de não reanimar, masera favorável à implantação do procedimento no Brasil, à realização pessoal por meio de decisão compartilhada e quea abordagem ocorresse durante as consultas médicas. Os resultados deste estudo permitem inferir a necessidade de seampliar a discussão sobre a Ordem de Não Reanimar, no âmbito ético e social, com a finalidade de se emitir orientaçõespara assegurar a autonomia dos pacientes que se encontram na terminalidade da vida

This study aims to determine the perspective of oncological patients and their families in relation to the Do Not ResuscitateOrder (DNR). A questionnaire was applied to 104 oncological patients and 100 relatives, who were attended to by theoncology service of Hospital Universitário Santa Terezinha, Joaçaba, Santa Catarina, Brazil in 2014. The term DNR wasunknown by 81.73% of the patients and by 82% of the relatives. After clarifying its meaning, 65.4% of patients and 67%of the relatives were favorable towards DNR in the event of cardiorespiratory failure of the patient, in the final phase ofthe terminal disease. A shared decision between the patients, their relatives, and the doctor was preferred by 58.65%of patients and 73% of the relatives; a decision prompted by the initiative of the doctor accompanying the treatmentwas preferred by 60.58% of the patients and 72% of the relatives. The execution of the DNR by the patient him/herselfwas considered important by 63.47% of the patients and 68.63% of the relatives, and the introduction of the DNR inBrazil was considered important by 75% of the patients and 74% of the relatives. It is concluded that the majority ofthe patients and relatives did not know the term "Do Not Resuscitate Order", but were favorable to the introduction ofthe procedure in Brazil, the personal realization through the shared decision, and that the approach would occur duringmedical visits. The results of this study enable us to infer the need to broaden the discussion on DNR, in the ethical socialscope, in order to issue guidance to ensure the autonomy of patients who are in the terminal phases of life

Indicaciones restrictivas y anestesia / Restrictive indications and anesthesia

Anesthesiologists may deal with ethical dilemmas when looking after Not To Be Resuscitated (NTBR) patients. Sometimes the latters are scheduled to undergo surgical procedures that are palliative in nature. With the advent of the cardio pulmonary resuscitation in the 1960s, new problems arose, such as long resuscitations, quality of life impairment and unnecessary protracted agony. Besides the fear to death and suffering, resuscitation’s dread appeared. In the beginning, the decisión to reject the resuscitation was the physician’s responsability. The development of the Patient Self-Determination Act (PSDA) transfered to the patient or to his/her legal surrogates the right to decide about his/her medical treatment, specially at the end of life. This article revised the evolution that allowed to exercise the patient autonomy, as well as the best way to proceed when anesthesia and surgery are necessary to care for a patient with a Do Not Resuscitate Order.

El anestesiólogo puede enfrentar dilemas éticos cuando debe anestesiar pacientes con indicaciones restrictivas (Límite del Esfuerzo Terapéutico, Orden de No Reanimar). Estos pacientes con frecuencia son sometidos a intervenciones destinadas a mejorar su calidad de vida, o para el control de síntomas, a pesar de tener un mal pronóstico evolutivo, y/o deterioro de su condición física. A mediados de la década de 1960, con la RCP (Reanimación Cardiopulmonar) aparecieron nuevos problemas, como reanimaciones reiteradas, deterioro de la calidad de vida, y prolongación de la agonía. Entonces, al miedo a la muerte y al sufrimiento, se sumó el miedo a la reanimación. Inicialmente, el médico responsable del paciente era el único habilitado para rechazar estas medidas de reanimación (NTBR, “not to be resuscitated”), con el subsiguiente debate bioético. Mas tarde, el desarrollo del principio de autonomía, transfirió al paciente y a su entorno más cercano el derecho a tomar decisiones informadas sobre su propio tratamiento médico1. Este artículo revisa los antecedentes relevantes que han permitido el traspaso del poder de decisión a los pacientes, así como la mejor forma de proceder ante la necesidad de administrarles anestesia cuando hay indicaciones restrictivas.

Changes of Nursing Activities on Patients with DNR Orders / 한국호스피스완화의료학회지

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to identify the changes to nursing activities of nurses on patients with DNR (Do-Not-Resuscitate) order and factors associated to the changes. METHODS: Data were collected using a structured questionnaire for 173 nurses at general hospitals. Logistic regression analysis was performed on the data using SAS 9.4. RESULTS: With 39 nursing activities, an average of 60.4 (34.9%) nurses reported an increase in the activities, 102.4 (59.2%) no change and 10.1 (5.9%) a drop. The activity increase was the greatest in the social area, and the physical area was where the activities decreased the most. The activity increase was associated knowledge competency (9 items), attitudes (2 items), practical competency (4 items) and work load (14 items were). CONCLUSION: To offer systematical care for DNR patients, it is necessary to expand nurses' knowledge through end-of-life education and adjust their workload and provide a support system at the department level.

Changes in Life-sustaining Treatment in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients after Signing a Do-Not-Resuscitate Order / 한국호스피스완화의료학회지

PURPOSE: This study investigated changes in life-sustaining treatments in terminally ill cancer patients after consenting to a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order. METHODS: Electronic medical records were reviewed to select terminally ill cancer patients who were treated at the oncology unit of the Asan Medical Center, a tertiary hospital in South Korea and died between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013. RESULTS: The median (range) age of the 200 patients was 59 (22~89) years, and 62% (124 persons) were male. Among all patients, 83.5% were aware of their medical condition, and 47.0% of the patients had their DNR order signed by their spouses. The median of the patients' hospital stay was 15 days, and time from admission to DNR decision was 10 days. After signing a DNR order, 35.7~100% of the life-sustaining treatments that had been provided at the time of the DNR decision making were administered. The most commonly discontinued interventions were transfusion (13.5%), blood test (11.5%) and parenteral nutrition (8.5%). CONCLUSION: It is necessary to define the scope of life-sustaining treatments for DNR patients. Treatment guidelines should be established as well to secure terminal patients' death with dignity after their consent to a DNR order, thereby avoiding meaningless life-sustaining treatments and allowing administration of active terminal care interventions.

The Association between End-of-Life Care and the Time Interval between Provision of a Do-Not-Resuscitate Consent and Death in Cancer Patients in Korea / Journal of the Korean Cancer Association, 대한암학회지

PURPOSE: We explored the relationship between the use of each medical intervention and the length of time between do-not-resuscitate (DNR) consent and death in Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 295 terminal cancer patients participated in this retrospective study. Invasive interventions (e.g., cardiopulmonary resuscitation, intubation, and hemodialysis), less invasive interventions (e.g., transfusion, antibiotic use, inotropic use, and laboratory tests), and the time interval between the DNR order and death were evaluated. The subjects were divided into three groups based on the amount of time between DNR consent and death (G1, time interval ≤ 1 day; G2, time interval > 1 day to ≤ 3 days; and G3, time interval > 3 days). RESULTS: In general, there were fewer transfusions and laboratory tests near death. Invasive interventions tended to be implemented only in the G1 group. There was also less inotrope use and fewer laboratory tests in the G3 group than G1 and G2. Moreover, the G3 group received fewer less invasive interventions than those in G1 (odds ratio [OR], 0.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03 to 0.84; 3 days before death, and OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.59; the day before death). The frequency of less invasive interventions both 1 and 3 days before death was significantly lower for the G3 group than the G1 (p ≤ 0.001) and G2 group compared to G1 (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Earlier attainment of DNR permission was associated with reduced use of medical intervention. Thus, physicians should discuss death with terminal cancer patients at the earliest practical time to prevent unnecessary and uncomfortable procedures and reduce health care costs.

Ordem de não reanimar pacientes em fase terminal sob a perspectiva de médicos / Terminally ill patients' do not resuscitate orders from the doctors' perspective / La orden de no reanimar a los pacientes en fase terminal bajo la perspectiva de los médicos

Ordem de não reanimar consiste na manifestação expressa da recusa de reanimação cardiopulmonar por paciente com doença avançada em progressão. Objetivou-se descrever a atitude dos médicos em relação à ordem de não reanimar e à necessidade de sua normatização. Foi aplicado questionário a 80 médicos inscritos na delegacia do Conselho Regional de Medicina de Joaçaba/SC, Brasil. Verificou-se que 90% dos participantes conheciam o significado dessa ordem, 86,2% concordavam em acatá-la, 91,2% consideravam importante seu registro em prontuário e 92,5% consideravam oportuna a emissão de normatização a respeito. Concluiu-se que a maioria dos médicos tinha conhecimento sobre Ordem de Não Reanimar, concordava em respeitá-la, valorizava seu registro em prontuário e desejava a normatização por parte dos órgãos competentes.

The do-not-resuscitate order is the explicit statement by patients with advanced disease in progression refusing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This study aimed to describe the attitude of physicians in relation to the this order and the need for its regulation. A questionnaire was applied to 80 physicians in the medical bureau of the Regional Council of Medicine of Joacaba/SC, Brazil. It was found that 90% of the respondents knew the meaning of do-not-resuscitate, 86.2% agreed to respect it, 91.2% considered it important to be registered in medical records and 92.5% understood as opportune the issuance of a regulation in this regard. It was concluded that most doctors knew about the do-not-resuscitate order, agreed to respect it, valued its registration in medical records and wanted its regulation by the relevant bodies.

La orden de no reanimar es la manifestación expresa de rechazo de la reanimación cardiopulmonar por parte de pacientes portadores de una enfermedad avanzada en progresión. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo describir la actitud de los médicos con respecto a esta orden y la necesidad de su regulación. Se aplicó un cuestionario a 80 médicos (50% del total) inscriptos en el distrito del Consejo Regional de Medicina de Joaçaba, Santa Catarina, Brasil. Se encontró que el 90% de los encuestados conocían el significado de esta orden, el 86,2% estaban de acuerdo en cumplirla, el 91,2% consideraban importante el registro en el historial médico y el 92,5% juzgaban oportuna la existencia de una regulación al respecto. Se concluyó que la mayoría de los médicos tenía conocimiento de la orden de no reanimar, estaba de acuerdo en respetarla, valoraba su registro en el historial médico y deseaba su regulación por parte de las instituciones competentes.

Limitação de Suporte Avançado de Vida em pacientes admitidos em unidade de terapia intensiva com cuidados paliativos integrados / Limitation to Advanced Life Support in patients admitted to intensive care unit with integrated palliative care

RESUMO Objetivo: Estimar a incidência de limitação de Suporte Avançado de Vida em pacientes graves internados em unidade de terapia intensiva com cuidados paliativos integrados. Métodos: Estudo de coorte retrospectivo, no qual foram incluídos os pacientes inseridos no programa de cuidados paliativos da unidade de terapia intensiva do Hospital Paulistano, maiores de 18 anos de idade, no período de 1º de maio de 2011 a 31 de janeiro de 2014. As limitações de Suporte Avançado de Vida analisadas foram: ordem para não ressuscitar, ventilação mecânica, hemodiálise e droga vasoativa. Para as variáveis quantitativas, foram calculadas medidas de tendência central. O teste qui quadrado foi utilizado para comparar características dos pacientes com ou sem limitação de Suporte Avançado de Vida e teste de Wilcoxon, para comparar o tempo de internação após Suporte Avançado de Vida. Para significância estatística, consideraram-se o intervalo de confiança e p ≤ 0,05. Resultados: Foram internados na unidade de terapia intensiva 3.487 pacientes, sendo 342 inseridos no programa de cuidados paliativos. Observou-se que, após entrada no programa de cuidados paliativos, demorou uma mediana de 2 (1 - 4) dias para o óbito na unidade de terapia intensiva e 4 (2 - 11) dias para óbito hospitalar. Boa parte das limitações de Suporte Avançado de Vida (42,7%) aconteceu no primeiro dia de internação. A ressuscitação cardiopulmonar (96,8%) e o suporte ventilatório (73,6%) foram as limitações mais adotadas. Conclusão: Foi relevante a contribuição dos cuidados paliativos integrados à unidade de terapia intensiva para a prática da ortotanásia, ou seja, o não prolongamento da vida de um paciente terminal por meios artificiais.

ABSTRACT Objective: To estimate the incidence of limitations to Advanced Life Support in critically ill patients admitted to an intensive care unit with integrated palliative care. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients in the palliative care program of the intensive care unit of Hospital Paulistano over 18 years of age from May 1, 2011, to January 31, 2014. The limitations to Advanced Life Support that were analyzed included do-not-resuscitate orders, mechanical ventilation, dialysis and vasoactive drugs. Central tendency measures were calculated for quantitative variables. The chi-squared test was used to compare the characteristics of patients with or without limits to Advanced Life Support, and the Wilcoxon test was used to compare length of stay after Advanced Life Support. Confidence intervals reflecting p ≤ 0.05 were considered for statistical significance. Results: A total of 3,487 patients were admitted to the intensive care unit, of whom 342 were included in the palliative care program. It was observed that after entering the palliative care program, it took a median of 2 (1 - 4) days for death to occur in the intensive care unit and 4 (2 - 11) days for hospital death to occur. Many of the limitations to Advanced Life Support (42.7%) took place on the first day of hospitalization. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (96.8%) and ventilatory support (73.6%) were the most adopted limitations. Conclusion: The contribution of palliative care integrated into the intensive care unit was important for the practice of orthothanasia, i.e., the non-extension of the life of a critically ill patient by artificial means.