Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
EMHJ-Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2002; 8 (1): 55-63
em Inglês | IMEMR | ID: emr-158040

RESUMO

To determine the cost-effectiveness of seven contraceptive methods from the providers' perspective, the cost per adjusted couple-years of protection [ACYP] was calculated for each method based on region-specific conversion factors. More than 74,800 ACYPs were provided during March 1999 to February 2000. Intrauterine devices and implants offered the highest and lowest ACYP respectively. Condom was the single most expensive contraceptive method. Vasectomy was the most cost-effective method and implant provided the highest cost per ACYP


Assuntos
Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Preservativos/economia , Anticoncepcionais Orais/economia , Implantes de Medicamento/economia , Serviços de Planejamento Familiar/economia , Dispositivos Intrauterinos/economia , Esterilização Tubária/economia , Vasectomia/economia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA