Perfil de utilização de anestésicos locais de uma cidade brasileira com ênfase em diabéticos / Profile of use of local anesthetics in a Brazilian city with emphasis on diabetics

Objetivo: avaliar o conhecimento de cirurgiões-dentistas que trabalham em consultórios particulares de Palmas, Tocantins, quanto à utilização de anestésicos locais em pacientes portadores de diabetes mellitus. Materiais e método: trata-se de um estudo descritivo qualitativo, aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa da FAMERP de São José do Rio Preto, sob o protocolo 032/2007 e CAAE: 0065.0.000.140-07, respeitando-se a Resolução 466/12, do Conselho Nacional de Saúde. A coleta de dados foi realizada por meio da aplicação de um questionário, utilizando um formulário estruturado. Resultados: de 113 participantes, 47 (41,6%) eram do sexo masculino e 66 (58,4%) do sexo feminino, com idade média de 35 anos. O anestésico mais utilizado pelos cirurgiões-dentistas avaliados foi a lidocaína 2% + adrenalina 1:100.000 (53,1%), o qual também é o mais utilizado para pacientes diabéticos controlados (64,6%). Quanto à variedade de anestésicos, 47,8% dos avaliados relataram possuir somente 3 tipos de anestésicos no consultório e que 83,2% nunca presenciaram nenhum problema decorrente do uso de anestésico. Além disso, 65,5% relataram não participar de cursos para atualização de conhecimentos, sendo que 53,1% mostraram-se insatisfeitos com o ensino de anestesiologia que receberam na graduação. Conclusão: observou-se que os cirurgiões-dentistas do atendimento odontológico particular de Palmas precisam de uma reciclagem profissional, a fim de atualizarem conhecimentos adquiridos na graduação sobre indicação e utilização de anestésicos locais em tratamentos odontológicos de pacientes com necessidades especiais, com ênfase em pacientes portadores de diabetes mellitus.(AU)

Objective: to evaluate the knowledge of dentists who work in private offices in Palmas, Tocantins, regarding the use of local anesthetics in patients with diabetes mellitus. Materials and method: this research is a qualitative descriptive study, approved by the Research Ethics Committee of FAMERP from São José do Rio Preto, under protocol number 032/2007 and CAAE: 0065.0.000.140-07 in compliance with the Resolution 466/12 of the National Health Council. Data collection was performed through the application of a questionnaire, using a structured form. Results: 47 (41.6%) out of 113 participants were male and 66 (58.4%) female, with an average age of 35 years old. The anesthetic most used by the dentists evaluated was lidocaine 2% + adrenaline 1: 100,000 (53.1%) which is also the most used for controlled diabetic patients (64.6%). As for the variety of anesthetics, 47.8% of those evaluated reported having only 3 types of anesthetics in the office and that 83.2% never saw any problems resulting from the use of anesthetics. Furthermore, 65.5% reported not participating in courses to update knowledge and 53.1% were dissatisfied with the teaching of anesthesiology they received during graduation. Conclusion: it was observed that dentists who work in private dental offices in Palmas need a professional retraining in order to update knowledge acquired during graduation on the indication and use of local anesthetics in dental treatments for patients with special needs, with an emphasis on patients with diabetes mellitus.(AU)

Liposomal anesthetic gel for pain control during periodontal therapy in adults: a placebo-controlled RCT

Abstract Periodontal therapy usually requires local anesthesia. If effective, a non-invasive, liposomal anesthetic gel could increase the levels of acceptance of patients in relation to periodontal therapy. Objective: This study investigated the efficacy of liposomal anesthetic gel for pain control during periodontal therapy. Methodology: Forty volunteers with moderate to severe chronic periodontitis were recruited, of which at least three sextants required periodontal therapy. At least one of the selected teeth had one site with a probing depth of ≥4 mm. The volunteers received the following three gels: a placebo, lidocaine/prilocaine (Oraqix®), or a liposomal lidocaine/prilocaine, which were applied to different sextants. Pain frequency was registered during treatment and the volunteers received a digital counter to register any painful or uncomfortable experiences. At the end of each session, the volunteers indicated their pain intensity using rating scales (NRS-101 and VRS-4). The volunteers had their hemodynamic parameters measured by a non-invasive digital monitor. Results: Pain frequency/intensity did not show statistical difference between intervention groups. The tested gels did not interfere with the hemodynamic indices. Dental anxiety, suppuration and probing depth could influence pain during periodontal therapy. Conclusion: Our results suggest limited indications for the use of non-invasive anesthesia when used for scaling and root planing. Intra-pocket anesthetic gel could be a good option for anxious patients, or those who have a fear of needles.

Effects of local anesthetics on wound healing / Efeitos dos anestésicos locais na cicatrização de feridas

Abstract Introduction Local anesthetic infiltration is used widely for post-operative analgesia in many situations. However the effects of local anesthetics on wound healing are not demonstrated clearly. This study planned to evaluate the effects of lidocaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine and levobupivacaine on wound healing, primarily on wound tensile strength and on collagen ultrastructure. Methods This study was conducted on male Sprague Dawley rats. On days 0, 8th, 15th, and 21st, all animals were weighed and received a preincisional subcutaneous infiltration of 3 mL of a solution according the group. Control saline (C), lidocaine (L) 7 mg.kg-1, prilocaine (P) 2 mg.kg-1, bupivacaine (B) 2 mg.kg-1 and levobupivacaine (LVB) 2.5 mg.kg-1. The infiltrations were done at the back region 1.5 cm where incision would be performed at the upper, middle and lower part along the midline, under general anesthesia. Wound tensile strengths were measured after 0.7 cm × 2 cm of cutaneous and subcutaneous tissue samples were obtained vertical to incision from infiltrated regions. Tissue samples were also obtained for electron microscopic examination. Evaluations were on the 8th, 15th and 21st days after infiltration. Results There was no difference between groups in the weights of the rats at the 0th, 8th, 15th and 21st days. The collagen maturation was no statistically different between groups at the 8th and 15th days. The maturation scores of the B and L groups at the 21st day was significantly lower than the Group C (1.40, 1.64 and 3.56; respectively). The wound tensile strength was no statistically different between groups at the 8th and 15th days but at the 21st day the Groups B and LVB had significantly lower value than Group C (5.42, 5.54 and 6.75; respectively). Conclusion Lidocaine and prilocaine do not affect wound healing and, bupivacaine and levobupivacaine affect negatively especially at the late period.

Resumo Introdução A infiltração de anestésico local é amplamente usada para analgesia pós-operatória em muitas situações. No entanto, os efeitos dos anestésicos locais na cicatrização de feridas não foram demonstrados claramente. Neste estudo planejamos avaliar os efeitos de lidocaína, prilocaína, bupivacaína e levobupivacaína sobre a cicatrização de feridas, principalmente sobre a força tênsil da ferida e a ultraestrutura do colágeno. Métodos Este estudo foi feito em ratos machos da linhagem Sprague Dawley. Nos dias 0, 8, 15 e 21, todos os animais foram pesados e receberam uma infiltração subcutânea pré-incisional de 3 mL de uma solução, de acordo com a designação dos grupos: Grupo C recebeu salina (controle); Grupo L recebeu lidocaína (7 mg.kg-1); Grupo P recebeu prilocaína (2 mg.kg-1); Grupo B recebeu bupivacaína (2 mg.kg-1); Grupo LVB recebeu levobupivacaína (2,5 mg.kg-1). As infiltrações foram feitas na região posterior a 1,5 cm de onde a incisão seria feita na parte superior, média e inferior ao longo da linha média, sob anestesia geral. A força tênsil da ferida foi medida após amostras de 0,7 × 2 cm de tecido cutâneo e subcutâneo serem obtidas das regiões infiltradas, verticalmente à incisão. Amostras de tecido também foram obtidas para exame microscópico eletrônico. As avaliações foram feitas nos dias 8, 15 e 21 após a infiltração. Resultados Não houve diferença entre os grupos em relação ao peso dos ratos nos dias 0, 8, 15 e 21. A maturação do colágeno não foi estatisticamente diferente entre os grupos nos dias 8 e 15. Os escores de maturação dos grupos B e L no dia 21 foram significativamente inferiores aos do Grupo C (1,40, 1,64 e 3,56, respectivamente). A força tênsil da ferida não foi estatisticamente diferente entre os grupos nos dias 8 e 15, mas no dia 21 os grupos B e LVB apresentaram valores significativamente menores que o Grupo C (5,42, 5,54 e 6,75, respectivamente). Conclusão Lidocaína e prilocaína não afetam a cicatrização de feridas, enquanto bupivacaína e levobupivacaína afetam negativamente, especialmente no período tardio.

Comparison of tramadol and lornoxicam in intravenous regional anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial / Comparação de tramadol e lornoxicam em anestesia regional por via intravenosa, um estudo randomizado e controlado

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Tourniquet pain is one of the major obstacles for intravenous regional anesthesia. We aimed to compare tramadol and lornoxicam used in intravenous regional anesthesia as regards their effects on the quality of anesthesia, tourniquet pain and postoperative pain as well. METHODS: After the ethics committee approval 51 patients of ASA physical status I-II aged 18-65 years were enrolled. The patients were divided into three groups. Group P (n = 17) received 3 mg/kg 0.5% prilocaine; group PT (n = 17) 3 mg/kg 0.5% prilocaine + 2 mL (100 mg) tramadol and group PL (n = 17) 3 mg/kg 0.5% prilocaine + 2 mL (8 mg) lornoxicam for intravenous regional anesthesia. Sensory and motor block onset and recovery times were noted, as well as tourniquet pains and postoperative analgesic consumptions. RESULTS: Sensory block onset times in the groups PT and PL were shorter, whereas the corresponding recovery times were longer than those in the group P. Motor block onset times in the groups PT and PL were shorter than that in the group P, whereas recovery time in the group PL was longer than those in the groups P and PT. Tourniquet pain onset time was shortest in the group P and longest in the group PL. There was no difference regarding tourniquet pain among the groups. Group PL displayed the lowest analgesic consumption postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Adding tramadol and lornoxicam to prilocaine for intravenous regional anesthesia produces favorable effects on sensory and motor blockade. Postoperative analgesic consumption can be decreased by adding tramadol and lornoxicam to prilocaine in intravenous regional anesthesia.

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A dor relacionada ao torniquete é um dos maiores obstáculos para a anestesia regional intravenosa (ARIV). Nosso objetivo foi comparar tramadol e lornoxicam usados em ARIV em relação aos seus efeitos sobre a qualidade da anestesia, dor relacionada ao torniquete e dor no pós-operatório. MÉTODOS: Após a aprovação do Comitê de Ética, 51 pacientes com estado físico ASA I-II entre 18-65 anos foram inscritos. Os pacientes foram divididos em três grupos. Grupo P (n = 17) recebeu 3 mg/kg de prilocaína a 0,5%; Grupo PT (n = 17) 3 mg/kg de prilocaína a 0,5% + 2 mL (100 mg) de tramadol e Grupo PL (n = 17) de 3 mg/kg de prilocaína a 0,5% + 2 mL (8 mg) de lornoxicam para ARIV. O início do bloqueio sensorial e motor e os tempos de recuperação foram registrados, bem como a dor relacionada ao torniquete e o consumo de analgésico no pós-operatório. RESULTADOS: Os tempos de início do bloqueio sensorial foram mais curtos nos grupos PT e PL, enquanto que os tempos de recuperação correspondentes foram mais longos do que os do Grupo P. Os tempos de início do bloqueio motor nos grupos PT e PL foram menores do que no Grupo P, enquanto que o tempo de recuperação do grupo PL foi maior do que os dos grupos P e PT. O tempo para início da dor relacionada ao torniquete foi menor no Grupo P e maior no Grupo PL. Não houve diferença em relação à dor relacionada ao torniquete entre os grupos. O Grupo PL apresentou o menor consumo de analgésicos no pós-operatório. CONCLUSÃO: A adição de tramadol e lornoxicam à prilocaína para ARIV produz efeitos favoráveis sobre o bloqueio sensorial e motor. O consumo de analgésicos no pós-operatório pode ser reduzido com a adição de tramadol e lornoxicam à prilocaína em ARIV.

Topical Intrapocket Anesthesia During Scaling and Root Planing: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Although the use of injectable anesthesia prior to subgingival scaling and root planing (SRP) reduces pain, many patients report fear and prolonged numbness of adjacent tissues. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of a eutectic mixture containing 25 mg/g of lidocaine and 25 mg/g of prilocaine, injectable 2% lidocaine, topical 2% benzocaine and a placebo substance on reducing pain during SRP. In this randomized, split-mouth, masked clinical trial, thirty-two patients presenting more than two teeth with probing depth and clinical attachment level ≥5 mm in at least 4 sextants were randomly allocated to four groups: EMLA(r); injectable 2% lidocaine; topical 2% benzocaine and placebo. Pain and discomfort were measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and verbal scale (VS). Repeated-measures analysis of variance and Poisson regression were used for analysis. Patient satisfaction with the anesthesia was determined at the end of each treatment session. VAS and VS scores did not differ between injectable 2% lidocaine and EMLA (p>0.05) and both substances showed significantly better pain control compared to 2% benzocaine and placebo (p<0.05). 93.7% and 81.2% of the individuals were satisfied with the injectable anesthetic and EMLA, respectively (p=0.158). Dissatisfaction with benzocaine and placebo was approximately 10 times greater than injectable anesthesia (p=0.001). In conclusion, EMLA showed an equivalent effect on pain control when compared to the injectable anesthesia and performed better than 2% benzocaine in SRP. Thus, EMLA is a viable anesthetic option during scaling and root planning, despite the frequent need for second application.

Embora a anestesia injetável previamente a raspagem e alisamento subgengival (RASUB) reduza a dor, muitos pacientes relatam medo e amortecimento prolongado dos tecidos adjacentes. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar o efeito de uma mistura eutética contendo 25mg/g de lidocaína e 25 mg/g de prilocaína, lidocaína 2% injetável, benzocaína 2% tópica e um placebo na redução da dor durante a RASUB. Neste ensaio clínico randomizado, cego de boca dividida, trinta e dois pacientes que apresentavam mais que dois dentes com profundidade de sondagem e nível de inserção clínica ≥ 5 mm, em no mínimo 4 sextantes, foram randomicamente alocados em 4 grupos: EMLA(r), lidocaína 2% injetável, benzocaína 2% tópica ou placebo. Dor e desconforto foram mensurados usando uma Escala Visual Analógica (EVA) e Escala Verbal (EV). A satisfação dos pacientes com a anestesia foi determinada ao final de cada consulta. Análise de variância de medidas repetidas e regressão de Poisson foram usadas para análise. Os escores da EVA e EV não demonstraram diferenças estatisticamente significantes entre lidocaína injetável e EMLA(r) (p > 0,05) e ambas as substâncias demonstraram significativamente melhor controle da dor comparadas a benzocaína 2% e placebo (p<0,05). 93,7% e 81,2% dos indivíduos ficaram satisfeitos com o anestésico injetável e EMLA(r), respectivamente (p=0,158). A insatisfação com a benzocaína e placebo foi aproximadamente 10 vezes maior do que com a anestesia injetável (p=0,001). Em conclusão, o EMLA(r) demonstrou um efeito equivalente no controle da dor quando comparado com a anestesia injetável e melhor do que a benzocaína 2% em RASUB. Assim, o EMLA(r) é uma opção anestésica viável durante a raspagem e alisamento radicular, apesar da necessidade frequente de segunda aplicação.

Evaluation of genotoxicity induced by repetitive administration of local anaesthetics: an experimental study in rats / Avaliação da genotoxicidade induzida pela administração repetida de anestésicos locais: um estudo experimental em ratos / Evaluación de la genotoxicidad inducida por la administración repetida de anestésicos locales: un estudio experimental en ratones

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Previous studies regarding the effects of some local anaesthetics have suggested that these agents can cause genetic damage. However, they have not been tested for genotoxicity related to repetitive administration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the genotoxic potential of local anaesthetics upon repetitive administration. METHODS: 80 male Wistar rats were divided into: group A - 16 rats intraperitoneally injected with lidocaine hydrochloride 2%; group B - 16 rats IP injected with mepivacaine 2%; group C - 16 rats intraperitoneally injected with articaine 4%; group D - 16 rats IP injected with prilocaine 3% (6.0 mg/kg); group E - 8 rats subcutaneously injected with a single dose of cyclophosphamide; and group F - 8 rats intraperitoneally injected with saline. Eight rats from groups A to D received a single dose of anaesthetic on Day 1 of the experiment; the remaining rats were dosed once a day for 5 days. RESULTS: The median number of micronuclei in the local anaesthetics groups exposed for 1 or 5 days ranged from 0.00 to 1.00, in the cyclophosphamide-exposed group was 10.00, and the negative control group for 1 and 5 days was 1.00 and 0.00, respectively (p < 0.0001). A significant difference in the number of micronuclei was observed between the cyclophosphamide group and all local anaesthetic groups (p = 0.0001), but not between the negative control group and the local anaesthetic groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: No genotoxicity effect was observed upon repetitive exposure to any of the local anaesthetics evaluated. .

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Estudos anteriores sobre os efeitos de alguns anestésicos locais sugeriram que esses agentes podem causar alterações genéticas. No entanto, esses agentes não são testados para genotoxicidade relacionada à administração repetida. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o potencial genotóxico de anestésicos locais após repetidas administrações. MÉTODOS: 80 ratos Wistar machos foram alocados em: grupo A - 16 ratos receberam injeção por via intraperitoneal (IP) de cloridrato de lidocaína a 2%; grupo B - 16 ratos receberam injeção IP com mepivacaína a 2%; grupo C - 16 ratos receberam injeção IP de articaína a 4%; grupo D - 16 ratos receberam injeção IP de prilocaína a 3% (6 mg kg-1); grupo E - oito ratos receberam injeção subcutânea em dose única de ciclofosfamida; grupo F - oito ratos receberam injeção IP com solução salina. Oito ratos dos grupos de A a D receberam uma dose única de anestésico no Dia 1 da experiência; os ratos restantes foram dosados uma vez por dia durante cinco dias. RESULTADOS: A mediana do número de micronúcleos nos grupos com anestésicos locais expostos por um ou cinco dias variou de 0 a 1; no grupo exposto à ciclofosfamida foi de 10 e no grupo controle negativo no primeiro e quinto dias foi de 1 e 0, respectivamente (p < 0,0001). Uma diferença significativa foi observada no número de micronúcleos entre o grupo ciclofosfamida e todos os grupos com anestésicos locais (p = 0,0001), mas não entre o grupo controle negativo e os grupos com anestésicos locais (p > 0,05). CONCLUSÃO: Nenhum efeito de genotoxicidade foi observado após a exposição repetida a qualquer um dos anestésicos locais avaliados. .

JUSTIFICACIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: Estudios previos sobre los efectos de algunos anestésicos locales han mostrado que esos agentes pueden causar alteraciones genéticas. Sin embargo, esos agentes no son testados para la genotoxicidad relacionada con la administración repetida. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el potencial genotóxico de anestésicos locales después de repetidas administraciones. MÉTODOS: 80 ratones Wistar machos se dividieron en: grupo A: 16 ratones que recibieron inyección por vía intraperitoneal (IP) de clorhidrato de lidocaína al 2%; grupo B: 16 ratones a los que se les administró inyección IP con mepivacaína al 2%; grupo C: 16 ratones que recibieron inyección IP de articaína al 4%; grupo D: 16 ratones a los que se les administró inyección IP de prilocaína al 3% (6 mg/kg); grupo E: 8 ratones que recibieron inyección subcutánea en dosis única de ciclofosfamida; grupo F: 8 ratones que recibieron inyección IP con solución salina. Ocho ratones de los grupos A a D recibieron una dosis única de anestésico el primer día de la experiencia; los ratones restantes se dosificaron una vez por día durante 5 días. RESULTADOS: La mediana del número de micronúcleos en los grupos con anestésicos locales expuestos durante uno o 5 días varió de 0 a 1; en el grupo expuesto a la ciclofosfamida fue de 10 y en el grupo control negativo en el primero y quinto día fue de 1 y 0 respectivamente (p < 0,0001). Se observó una diferencia significativa en el número de micronúcleos entre el grupo ciclofosfamida y todos los grupos con anestésicos locales (p = 0,0001), pero no entre el grupo control negativo y los grupos con anestésicos locales (p > 0,05). CONCLUSIÓN: Ningún efecto de genotoxicidad fue observado después de la exposición repetida a cualquiera de los anestésicos locales evaluados. .

Meatotomy using topical anesthesia: a painless option

Urethral meatotomy is an office procedure often done under local anesthesia with or without penile block or under short general anesthesia. Whatever may be the method, the patient has to bear the pain of injection. To avoid painful injections, in the present study, topical anesthesia in the form of eutectic mixture of prilocaine and lidocaine anesthetics [EMLA/Prilox] has been used to perform such procedures and its effectiveness determined.A total of 48 consecutive patients with meatal stenosis who attended urology outdoor were enrolled in this study. After exclusion, in 32 patients, 3-4 g of Prilox cream was applied over the glans and occlusive covering was maintained for 45 min before the procedure. Meatotomy was done in a standard manner with hemostat application at the stenosed segment for 2-3 min followed by ventral incision at meatus. The patient's pain perception was measured using visual analog score. Out of 32, only one patient that had inappropriate application of cream, had a perception of pain during the procedure. Rest all the patient had no discomfort during the procedure. Mean visual analog score was 1.8 which is not a significant percepted pain level. No patient had any major complication. Use of topical anesthesia in form of Prilox [EMLA] cream for meatotomy is safe and effective method that avoids painful injections and anxiety related to it and should be considered in most of such patients as an alternative of conventional penile blocks or general anesthesia

Ultrasound-guided femoral and sciatic nerve blocks combined with sedoanalgesia versus spinal anesthesia in total knee arthroplasty / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: Although regional anesthesia is the first choice for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), it may not be effective and the risk of complications is greater in patients who are obese or who have spinal deformities. We compared the success of ultrasound-guided femoral and sciatic nerve blocks with sedoanalgesia versus spinal anesthesia in unilateral TKA patients in whom spinal anesthesia was difficult. METHODS: We enrolled 30 patients; 15 for whom spinal anesthesia was expected to be difficult were classified as the block group, and 15 received spinal anesthesia. Regional anesthesia was achieved with bupivacaine 62.5 mg and prilocaine 250 mg to the sciatic nerve, and bupivacaine 37.5 mg and prilocaine 150 mg to the femoral nerve. Bupivacaine 20 mg was administered to induce spinal anesthesia. Hemodynamic parameters, pain and sedation scores, and surgical and patient satisfaction were compared. RESULTS: A sufficient block could not be obtained in three patients in the block group. The arterial pressure was significantly lower in the spinal group (P < 0.001), and the incidence of nausea was higher (P = 0.017) in this group. Saturation and patient satisfaction were lower in the block group (P < 0.028), while the numerical pain score (P < 0.046) and the Ramsay sedation score were higher (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided sciatic and femoral nerve blocks combined with sedoanalgesia were an alternative anesthesia method in selected TKA patients.

A Double-Blind, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Trial of EMLA® Cream (Eutectic Lidocaine/Prilocaine Cream) for Analgesia Prior to Cryotherapy of Plantar Warts in Adults

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>Cryotherapy with liquid nitrogen is an effective, safe and convenient form of treatment for plantar warts. EMLA® cream (eutectic mixture of lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5%) is a topical local anaesthetic agent that has proven to be effective and well tolerated in the relief of pain associated with various minor interventions in numerous clinical settings.</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b>In a single-centre, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled study, 64 subjects were randomised into 2 groups. The subjects had a thick layer of EMLA® cream or placebo cream applied to pared plantar wart(s) and onto the surrounding margin of 1 mm to 2 mm under occlusion for 60 minutes prior to receiving cryotherapy. The pain of cryotherapy was evaluated by the subjects using a self-administered Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) immediately after the cryotherapy.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>There was no statistical difference between the mean VAS score for EMLA® cream (47.0 ± 21.4 mm) and placebo (48.9 ± 22.0 mm). Those with more than 1 wart had a significantly higher VAS score than those with only 1 wart (59.1 ± 21.8 vs. 44.3 ± 20.4, P <0.05) but this did not affect the therapeutic effect of EMLA® cream prior to cryotherapy.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>We conclude that the application of EMLA® cream prior to cryotherapy does not reduce the pain associated with cryotherapy.</p>

Comparison of eutectic mixture of local anesthetics cream with dorsal penile nerve block using lignocaine for circumcision in infants

Circumcision is a commonly performed surgical procedure but choice of anesthesia remained an issue of research and debate. This study was conducted to find out the effectiveness of the eutectic mixture of local anesthetic [EMLA] cream with dorsal penile nerve block [DPNB] using lignocaine, for reduction of pain during circumcision. This was comparative study carried out in Surgical Unit B of National Institute of Child Health Karachi, from May 2008 to October 2008. Patients under six month of age were randomized in to two groups [EMLA and DPNB] of fifty patients each. The effectiveness of pain control was assessed by measuring the baseline heart rate [HR], respiratory rate [RR] and Neonatal infant Pain Scale [NIPS scale] before the start of procedure and measuring of these parameters for each step of circumcision. Independent sample t -test was used to compare means and repeated ANOVA was used to compare means of HR, RR, oxygen [O2] saturations and NIPS. The mean age in both the groups was 2.3 months. There was no statistically significant difference in baseline parameters in both the groups except the respiratory rate, which was significantly raised in DPNB group [33 breaths/min in EMLA and 38 in DPNB P < 0.04]. During circumcision there was significant increase in heart rate in DPNB group, especially in step three and step four [p < 0.04]. Oxygen saturation dropped in both the groups [baseline saturation 98% up to 91% in step 4]. While assessing NIPS scores in both the groups, statistically significant difference was found between NIPS at step two and step four in two groups [p < 0.04]. The overall pain control was equal in both the groups, although NIPS score was higherin DPNB in step two and four of circumcision. There was difference in application and cost. EMLA was easy to apply but has increased cost; while DPNB required expertise

A comparison of the onset time of complete blockade of the sciatic nerve in the application of ropivacaine and its equal volumes mixture with lidocaine: a double-blind randomized study / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the current study is to create a new mixture of local anesthetics-one with a short time of block development and short action term (5 ml of 1% lidocaine solution) and another with a longer time of anesthesia development and a long analgetic effect (5 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine)-for use during surgical operations on extremities. The primary end point was the development of the complete sensory block of the sciatic nerve. METHODS: Sixty blocks of sciatic nerve were used in a double-blind randomized research, under ultrasonic guidance, using an electric stimulator with the peripheral nerves. Sixty patients were divided into 3 equal groups. In the first group, a sciatic nerve block was performed with 5 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine solution (37.5 mg); in the second group, 10 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine solution (75 mg) was used and, in the third group, a mixture of 5 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine (as above) and 5 ml of 1% lidocaine solution (50 mg) was used. The assessment of the time required for developing sensory and motor blocks was carried out from the beginning of local anesthetic solution injection in the fascial sheath of the sciatic nerve. RESULTS: Demographic data of patients were identical in the three sample groups. The time required for achieving a complete motor and sensory block was reduced due to the mix of the 1% lidocaine solution with the 0.75% ropivacaine solution. The time required for achieving a complete sensory block in groups treated with 5 and 10 ml ropivacaine was 45 (40-48) and 30 (28-30) min, respectively, in contrast with 12 (10-13) min when the mixture of anesthetics was applied (P 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: The mixture of 5 ml of 1% lidocaine with 5 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine leads to a reduction in the time required for the development of complete sensory and motor blocks of the sciatic nerve, without reducing postoperative analgesia time.

Raquianestesia com dose baixa da combinação de bupivacaína e fentanil: uma boa alternativa para a cirurgia de ressecção transuretral de próstata em pacientes idosos em regime ambulatorial / Spinal anesthesia with low-dose bupivacaine-fentanyl combination: a good alternative for day case transurethral resection of prostrate surgery in geriatric patients / Raquianestesia con baja dosis de la combinación de bupivacaina y fentanilo: una buena alternativa para la cirugía de resección transuretral de próstata en pacientes ancianos en régimen ambulatorial

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Avaliar a eficácia, a duração do bloqueio, a permanência na sala de recuperação pós-anestesia e os efeitos adversos do uso por via intratecal de doses baixas de bupivacaína em combinação com fentanil e compará-los com a dose convencional de prilocaína e fentanil em cirurgia de ressecção transuretral de próstata em pacientes idosos em regime ambulatorial. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Foram randomicamente designados 60 pacientes para dois grupos: o Grupo B recebeu 4 mg de bupivacaína a 0,5% + 25 µg de fentanil e o Grupo P recebeu 50 mg de prilocaína a 2% + 25 µg de fentanil intratecal. Qualidade e duração dos bloqueios, tempo de permanência na sala de recuperação pós-anestésica e efeitos adversos foram comparados. RESULTADOS: A duração do bloqueio e o tempo de permanência na sala de recuperação pós-anestésica foram menores no Grupo B do que no Grupo P (p < 0,001 para ambos). Hipotensão e bradicardia não foram observadas no Grupo B, que foi significativamente diferente do Grupo P (p = 0,024, p = 0,011, respectivamente). CONCLUSÃO: A administração intratecal de 4 mg de bupivacaína + 25 µg de fentanil forneceu raquianestesia adequada com menos tempo de duração do bloqueio e de permanência na sala de recuperação pós-anestésica com perfil hemodinâmico estável comparado à administração intratecal de 50 mg de prilocaína + 25 µg de fentanil para cirurgia de ressecção transuretral de próstata em pacientes idosos em regime ambulatorial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the effectiveness, block duration, postanesthesia care unit stay and adverse effects of using intrathecal low dose bupivacaine and fentanyl combination and compared with conventional dose prilocaine and fentanyl combination for day case transurethral resection of prostate surgery in geriatric patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients were randomized into two groups with Group B receiving 4 mg bupivacine 0.5% + 25 µg fentanyl and Group P receiving 50 mg prilocaine 2% + 25 µg fentanyl intrathecal. Block quality and duration, postanesthesia care unit stay and adverse effects were compared. RESULTS: Block durations and postanesthesia care unit stay were shorter in Group B than in Group P (p < 0.001 in both). Hypotension and bradycardia were not seen in Group B which was significantly different than in Group P (p = 0.024 and p = 0.011 respectively). CONCLUSION: Intrathecal 4 mg bupivacaine + 25 µg fentanyl provided adequate spinal anesthesia with shorter block duration and postanesthesia care unit stay with stable hemodynamic profile than intrathecal 50 mg prilocaine + 25 µg fentanyl for day case transurethral resection of prostate surgery in geriatric patients.

JUSTIFICATIVA Y OBJETIVOS: Evaluar la eficacia, la duración del bloqueo, la permanencia en la sala de recuperación postanestésica y los efectos adversos del uso por vía intratecal de dosis bajas de bupivacaina en combinación con el Fentanilo, y compararlos con la dosis convencional de prilocaína y Fentanilo en cirugía de resección transuretral de próstata en pacientes ancianos en régimen ambulatorial. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Fueron designados aleatoriamente 60 pacientes para dos grupos: el Grupo B que recibió 4 mg de bupivacaina al 0,5% + 25 µg de Fentanilo y el Grupo P que recibió 50 mg de prilocaína al 2% + 25 µg de Fentanilo intratecal. Se compararon la calidad y la duración de los bloqueos, el tiempo de permanencia en la sala de recuperación postanestésica y los efectos adversos. RESULTADOS: La duración del bloqueo y el tiempo de permanencia en la sala de recuperación postanestesia fueron menores en el Grupo B que en el Grupo P (p < 0,001 para ambos). La hipotensión y la bradicardia no se observaron en el Grupo B, que fue significativamente diferente del Grupo P (p = 0,024, p = 0,011, respectivamente). CONCLUSIONES: La administración intratecal de 4 mg de bupivacaina + 25 µg de Fentanilo produjo una raquianestesia adecuada con menos tiempo de duración del bloqueo y permanencia en la sala de recuperación postanestésica, con el perfil hemodinámico estable que la administración intratecal de 50 mg de prilocaína + 25 µg de Fentanilo para la cirugía de resección transuretral de próstata en pacientes ancianos en régimen ambulatorial.

Estudo da pressão arterial em pacientes submetidos à exodontia de dentes normalmente implantados / Study of blood pressure in patients submitted to extraction of teeth normally implanted

Neste estudo, avaliamos a ação do cloridrato de prilocaína 3% com felipressina sobre a pressão arterial em pacientes submetidos à exodontia de dentes normalmente implantados. Foram excluídos deste estudo pacientes com patologias que apresentavam contraindicações absolutas à realização de cirurgias. Em todas as cirurgias utilizamos como anestésico o cloridrato de prilocaína 3% com felipressina (Citanest 3% com Octapressin®), sendo administrado entre 1-4 tubetes. Na pressão arterial (PA) dos pacientes foram consideradas as fases sistólica e diastólica, as quais foram mensuradas em quatro momentos: 1) inicial; 2) pós-anestesia; 3) transoperatório e 4) pós-cirurgia. Os resultados mostram que houve aumento estatisticamente significante da pressão arterial após a utilização do anestésico local. Porém, a literatura nos mostra que o estresse e a ansiedade são os maiores responsáveis pelo aumento da pressão sistólica e diastólica

In this study, we evaluated the action of prilocaine hydrochloride 3% with felypressin on blood pressure in patients undergoing extraction of teeth typically deployed. Patients with diseases which had absolute contraindications to performing surgery were excluded from this study. All operations used as an anesthetic prilocaine hydrochloride 3% with felypressin (Citanest 3% with Octapressin®), administered between 1-4 tubes. In the blood pressure (BP) of the patients were considered the systolic and diastolic phases, which were measured in four stages: 1) initial; 2) post-anesthesia; 3) trans operative and 4) post- -surgery. The results show that there was a statistically significant increase in blood pressure after the use of local anesthetic, but the literature shows that stress and anxiety are the most responsible for the increase in systolic and diastolic pressure

efficacy and safety of topical EMLA cream application for minor surgery of the adult penis

A variety of surgical procedures of the penis can be performed under local anesthesia. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of EMLA cream anesthetic in such procedures. In total 330 adult patients were subjected to minor penile surgery including: Complete circumcision [73], short frenulum plasty [168], meatotomy [14], fulguration of penile warts [56] and fulguration of urethral [meatal] warts [19]. The level of anesthesia obtained by EMLA cream application along with any adverse effects was recorded. The use of EMLA on mucosal lesions provided excellent level of local anesthesia in almost all patients [245/246, 99.5%]. Anesthesia of skin lesions was in part influenced by the site of application. Circumcision patients showed the lowest efficacy of the EMLA cream as the majority [tilde 80%] required some form of further anesthesia until the completion of the procedure. No significant adverse effects were noted. A transient erythema was present in almost all mucosal applications. The topical anesthetic EMLA cream is a useful, efficient and safe tool for minor surgical procedures of the penis at the office setting, with the exception of circumcision, where an additional type of anesthesia is likely to be necessary. Side effects can be kept to a minimum when the suggested doses are respected [especially at mucosal application] and the time allowed for action is carefully tailored to the site of application and the type of procedure

Efeitos cardiovasculares da anestesia local de prilocaína 3 por cento com felipressina e lidocaína 2 por cento em normotensos / Cardiovascular effects of local anesthetic prilocaine with felypressin 3 per cent and licocaine 2 per cent in normotensive patients

Este estudo avaliou os efeitos cardiovasculares da anestesia via infiltrativa intrabucal de cloridrato de lidocaína a 2 por cento (20mg/mL) e cloridrato de prilocaína a 3 por cento (30 mg/mL) associado ao cloridrato de felipressina (0,03 U.1/mL) em pacientes normotensos. Foram selecionados 20 pacientes que sofreram dois procedimentos básicos de periodontia (RACR) bilateralmente, na região de molares superiores em consultas separadas com intervalo de uma semana. Na etapa de controle clínico foram monitoradas as pressões arterial sistólica (PAS), arterial distólica (PAD), arterial média (PAM) e a frequência cardíaca (FC) Ppor meio dos métodos oscilométrico e fotopletismográfico. Foram administrados dois tubetes na primeira sessão de Xilocaína 2 por cento (Grupo I) e dois tubetes de Citanest 3 por cento na última sessão (Grupo II). Os valores médios avaliados foram as nove etapas: 1) semana anterior (20 minutos); 2) na sala de espera (5 minutos); 3) na cadeira odontológica (5 minutos); 4) segundo minuto durante a primeira anestesia local (AL); 5) quinto minuto após a remoção da agulha; 6) segundo minuto durante a segunda AL; 7) quinto minuto após a remoção da agulha; 8) durante a execução do porcedimento clínico; 0) cinco minutos em repouso. A análise de variância (ANOVA) demonstrou que a lidocaína isolada não diferiu significativamente (p maior que 0,01) com a prilocaína com felipressina em relação à PS, PD, PM e FC, e mesmo entre as etapas clínicas. Para essa dose e via de administração, ambas soluções se mostram seguras clinicamente.

Prilocaína a 3% associada à felipressina na anestesia peribulbar de gatos / Prilocaine 3% associated with felipressin peribulbar anesthesia in cats

O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar os efeitos da prilocaina associada à felipressina na anestesia peribulbar em gatos. Foram utilizados oito gatos adultos, machos e fêmeas, com peso entre 2 e 3 kg. Cada animal recebeu clorpromazina (1,0 mg.kg-1 por via intramuscular) como medicação pré anestésica e propofol (3,0 mg.kg-1 por via intravenoso) para indução anestésica. Foi introduzida uma agulha hipodérmica de 0,38 x 13 mm moldada manualmente até atingir a forma de "L" na porção superior da cavidade orbitária em direção ao fórnice e administrada prilocaína a 3% com vasoconstritor na dose de 5 mg.kg-1. Foi observada proptose após uma média de 2,28 ± 1,52 minutos, e este efeito durou em média 75,22 ± 26,99 minutos. Também ocorreu perda do reflexo corneano após 3,00 ± 1,69 minutos e sua duração foi de 73,75 ± 17,98 minutos em média. A prilocaína 3% com vasoconstritor manteve o globo ocular concêntrico, sem nistagmo e aboliu os reflexos corneanos sem causar efeitos colaterais.

The purpose of this study was to verify the effects of prilocaine 3% associated to felypressin for peribulbar anesthesia in cats. Eight adult cats, male and female, weighing between 2 and 3 kg, received chlorpromazine (1.0 mg.kg-1, intramuscular) and propofol (3.0 mg.kg-1, intravenously). While, prilocaine at 3% (5.0 mg.kg-1) was administered by using an L-shape hypodermic needle (0.38 x 13 mm), which was introduced in the upper portion of the orbital cavity towards the fornix. The onset of proptosis was observed in 2.28 ± 1.52 minutes and lasted 75.22 ± 26.99 minutes. The loss of the corneal reflex occurred after 3.00 ± 1.69 minutes and lasted 73.75 ± 17.98 minutes. It can be concluded that 3% prilocaine with felypressin solution induces centralization of the eyeball without nistagmus and abolition the corneal reflexes without causing any collateral effects in cats.

Effects of EMLA Cream in Intradermal Skin Test of Ampicillin Sodium Antibiotics / 기본간호학회지

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify the effects of EMLA cream (eutectic mixture of local anesthetics, lidocaine and prilocaine) on pain during ampicillin sodium intradermal (ID) skin test, and also to assess skin reaction after the skin test. METHODS: Forty-three nurse-volunteers had skin tests with 0.01ml-0.05ml ampicillin sodium antibiotics. Skin tests were done on each forearm to compare the pain level of the skin test site after application of EMLA cream with the pain level when no EMLA cream was applied. EMLA cream was applied at the ID skin test site with an occlusive dressing for one hour. Pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale and pain sensation using the short form McGill Pain Questionnaire. The transverse diameter of the wheal and redness was read right after and at 15 minutes after the skin test. The results were compared using independent t-tests. RESULTS: Pain score and sensation with EMLA cream treatment were significantly lower than when EMLA cream was not applied. There was no difference in skin reactions; reading of the skin test was not affected by EMLA cream. CONCLUSIONS: EMLA cream was found to be an effective local anesthetic to relieve the pain of clients having ampicillin sodium antibiotics ID skin tests.

Effects of Local Anesthetic Cream on Pain Relief in Newborns During Venipuncture

PURPOSE: Newborns routinely experience pain associated with invasive procedures such as blood sampling, venipuncture, heelstick, or venous cannulation. This study was done to provide data for a nursing intervention to alleviate newborn pain clinically by investigating the effect of local anesthetic cream during venipuncture. METHODS: Participants were 70 newborns hospitalized in the nursery. Informed Consent was obtained from parents of the newborns. Venipuncture for regular blood sampling was carried out for a test on 2 groups; the experimental, placebo group. The neonatal infant pain scale (NIPS), and duration of crying were measured to assess pain reaction. All neonatal behaviors were recorded on videotape. RESULTS: There were significant differences in pain behavior during venipuncture (t=-4.752, p<.001), immediately after sampling (t=-5.591, p<.001), 3 minutes after puncture (t=-2.469, p=.017), and in duration of crying (t=-3.005, p=.004). CONCLUSION: Results show that local administration of EMLA cream before venipuncture causes a reduction in neonatal pain response, indicating that the EMLA cream has the effect of pain relief.

Effects of Topical Anesthetics to Reduce Pain in Preterm Infants During Percutaneous Cental Venous Catheterization (PCVC) / 대한주산의학회잡지

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to prove the effects of topical anesthetics (EMLA) to control pain in preterm infants during invasive procedure (percutaneous central venous catheterization, PCVC). METHODS: A total of 18 preterm infants of birth weight <2,000 g and gestational age <36 weeks born at EulJi University Hospital, at Daejeon in 2010 were randomly included in this study. EMLA was applied in nine preterm infants 40 minutes before starting PCVC and placebo was applied in another nine preterm infants. Based on PIPP (preterm infant pain profile), we evaluated their heart rate, oxygen saturation before, 15 seconds during and 30 seconds after procedure. Behavioral responses were also recorded for 2 minutes after procedure. RESULTS: Experimental group showed significantly less behavioral response during procedure (P=0.005) and 2 min after procedure (P=0.001). Also, experimental group showed less increase in heart rate (P=0.033) and reduction of behavioral state (P=0.017). CONCLUSION: Despite limitation of small size in this study, experimental group showed lower pain score compared with placebo control group during catheterization. In neonatal care unit (NICU), we recommend the use of topical anesthetics such as EMLA to control pain during invasive procedures.

Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthesia Cream Can Reduce Both the Radial Pain and Sympathetic Response During Transradial Coronary Angiography

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: adial artery spasm is one of the most common complications of transradial coronary angiography (TRA): the radial artery is prone to cathecholamine-induced contraction and radial pain during TRA could increase the sympathetic tone. The object of this study was to evaluate whether the eutectic mixture of local anesthesia (EMLA) cream, in addition to lidocaine infiltration, could reduce the sympathetic response by reducing radial pain during TRA. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Seventy-six patients were randomized 1 : 1 to either EMLA or control groups. Radial pain was measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the verbal rating scale (VRS-4). Sympathetic response, including systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), pulse rate (PR), stroke volume (SV) and total peripheral resistance (TPR), was measured by photoplethysmography. RESULTS: Radial pain measured during lidocaine infiltration was significantly lower in the EMLA group (VAS: 3.1 vs. 4.0, p=0.04; VRS-4: 2.0 vs. 2.2, p=0.03) and the sympathetic response was significantly blunted in the EMLA group from baseline to lidocaine infiltration (DeltaSBP, mm Hg: 5 vs. 13, p<0.01; DeltaDBP, mm Hg: 2 vs. 7, p=0.03; DeltaPR, beat/min: 2 vs. 8, p<0.01, DeltaSV, mL: 3 vs. 21, p<0.01; DeltaTPR, mm Hg . L/min: 1.0 vs. 5.9, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing TRA, the EMLA cream, in addition to lidocaine infiltration, effectively reduces the radial pain and thereby the sympathetic response, during lidocaine infiltration.