Use of different primer directed sequence amplification by polymerase chain reaction for identification of Pneumocystis jirovecii in clinical samples.

BACKGROUND: Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP), caused by opportunistic agent Pneumocystis jirovecii (formerly, Pneumocystis carinii is one of the most serious respiratory infection in immunocompromised patients. AIM: The present study was conducted to compare polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays targetting three different genes of Pneumocystis to study their application in its diagnosis. METHODS: One hundred and eighty (n = 180) clinical samples from 145 immunocompromised patients with clinical suspicion of PCP and 35 samples from control group of 30 immunocompetent individuals with respiratory infections other than PCP were prospectively examined for the presence of Pneumocystis jirovecii (P. jirovecii). All the samples were subjected to microscopic examination, one single [major surface glycoprotein, (MSG)] and two nested [mitochondrial large subunit ribosomal ribonucelic acid, (mtLSU rRNA) and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region], polymerase chain reaction assays. RESULTS: Microscopic examination was positive in only six (n = 6) patients, whereas single round MSG PCR detected P. jirovecii deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in 16 cases. When the clinical samples were tested by mtLSU rRNA and ITS nested PCR assays, it was possible to detect seven additional cases of PCP, making it to a total of 23 cases. None of the clinical specimens in control group (n = 30) were positive by any of the above-mentioned techniques. Amongst the 81 bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples tested, 16 were positive by MSG PCR, while 20 were positive by both nested, i.e., mtLSU rRNA and ITS PCR assays. Similarly, out of 50 sputum samples, only three were positive by MSG, seven by mtLSU rRNA and six by ITS nested PCR assays. CONCLUSION: It has been observed that MSG is relatively more sensitive when single round PCR assay is used for detection of human Pneumocystosis compared to the first (single) rounds of either ITS or mtLSU rRNA nested PCRs. However, the two nested PCRs using ITS and mtLSU rRNA have been found to be more sensitive. On comparison of two nested PCR assays, the results have been more or less comparable.

Evaluation of different primers for detecting mecA gene by PCR in comparison with phenotypic methods for discrimination of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Detection of the mecA gene by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the gold standard for identifying methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). PCR assays, employing MR1-MR2 primers (primer set 1) and MR3-MR4 primers (primer set 2) to generate 154 and 533 bp fragment, respectively, are most widely used for amplification of mecA gene. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the presence of mecA gene in 100 clinical isolates of S. aureus using PCR with the two pairs of primers. The results were compared to the broth dilution MIC method, oxacillin salt screening method (OSS) and oxacillin disk agar diffusion method (ODD). Fifteen of the 100 isolates showed a discrepancy between the mecA primer sets 1 and 2. Three isolates (3%) without the mecA gene showed discrepancies with phenotypic methods. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values for the 154 and 533 bp products of mecA were 79, 85, 83, 81 and 94, 100, 100, 94%, respectively. The results indicated that primer set 2 was more appropriate than primer set 1 for the detection of mecA gene in MRSA. There was a good correlation among the mecA gene detection, ODD and OSS methods. The discrepancy of three isolates between PCR and phenotypic methods should be clarified for other resistant mechanisms.

Primers for Salmonella serovar detection by polymerase chain reaction.

Salmonella serovar detection was studied by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The primers were designed from Salmonella specific clone, A18:2 which was previously constructed and studied for genus specificity through colony hybridization. The primers were subsequently tested for specificity and sensitivity and showed that they amplified DNA fragment of all Salmonellae tested but did not amplify all isolates of non-Salmonellae tested. The amplified fragment was confirmed and increased sensitivity by nested PCR. Salmonella isolates amplified by the primers in the first round PCR were all positive in the second round. The sensitivity in the first and second round were 7 pg and 80 fg, respectively. The result indicated that the primers can be used as molecular tool for future field survey of Salmonella both in food and in clinical specimens.