Effectiveness of harmonic scalpel in patients submitted to total thyroidectomy: systematic review with meta-analysis

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the harmonic scalpel compared to the conventional technique in patients submitted to total thyroidectomy. METHOD: This is a systematic review with inclusion of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared both techniques. An electronic search was carried out in the Medline and Lilacs databases until June 2017. The outcomes analysed were operation time, intraoperative bleeding, surgical morbidity, and costs. RESULTS: Data from 31 primary studies were included. The use of the harmonic scalpel correlates to a shorter operation time (p <0.001) and a lower volume of intraoperative bleeding (p <0.001). There were no differences in the risk of transient (p = 0.53) and permanent (p = 0.70) hypocalcaemia, transient (p = 0.61) and permanent (p = 0.50) dysfunctions of the inferior laryngeal nerve and hematoma (p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: Total thyroidectomy using a harmonic scalpel is effective and safe compared to the conventional technique.

Eficacia, seguridad y eficiencia de las nuevas tecnologías en cirugía tiroidea / Effectiveness, safety and efficiency of new technologies in thyroid surgery

Introduction: Surgery of the thyroid gland is the most performed procedure by the endocrine surgeon. In the last years, new techniques have been incorporated in this procedure. Our objective is to analyse the impact of these techniques in our department. Methods: We performed a retrospective and comparative study among three samples of patients submitted for total thyroidectomy. Group I: Sample of 96 patients operated between 2004 and 2007 performing total thyroidectomy. In this period we didn't use ultrasonic scalpel (US) nor intraoperative neuromonitoring (INM). Group II: Sample of 108 patients operated between 2008 and 2010. In this group we used US for hemostasis. Group III: Sample of 82 patients operated between 2011 and 2012. In this group we used both US and INM. The groups are compared: complications, postoperative stay, surgical time and costs per patient. Results: We analysed the following complications: haemorrhage, postoperative hipocalcemia and recurrent nerve palsy. We didn't find significant differences among the samples of patients but there were a less percentage of recurrent palsy in the third group (4.9 percent vs 12.5 and 11.1 percent). We found significant differences when stay, surgical time and costs were analysed. Conclusion: The use of new techniques in thyroid surgery has supposed an improvement not only in the clinic outcomes but in the surgical time.

Objetivo: La cirugía de la glándula tiroides representa el procedimiento más frecuente que realiza el cirujano endocrino. En los últimos años se han ido incorporando nuevas técnicas aplicadas a este procedimiento. El objetivo de nuestro trabajo es analizar el impacto que dichas técnicas han tenido en nuestro servicio. Material y Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo y comparativo entre tres muestras de pacientes a los que se realizó tiroidectomía total. Grupo I: Muestra de 96 pacientes intervenidos entre 2004 y 2007 a los que se realizó tiroidectomía total. En este período no se utilizó bisturí ultrasónico (BU) ni neuromonitorización intraoperatoria (NMI). Grupo II: Muestra de 108 pacientes intervenidos entre 2008 y 2010. En este grupo se realizó hemostasia con BU. Grupo III: Muestra de 82 pacientes intervenidos entre 2011 y 2012. Se utilizó tanto el BU como la NMI. Se comparan los grupos en cuanto a: complicaciones, estancia postoperatoria, tiempo quirúrgico y coste por paciente. Resultados: Las complicaciones analizadas fueron: hemorragia, hipocalcemia postoperatoria y parálisis del nervio laríngeo recurrente. No encontramos diferencias significativas entre los grupos aunque sí hay una menor tasa de parálisis recurrenciales en el tercer período (4,9 por ciento vs 12,5 y 11,1 por ciento). Hemos obtenido diferencias significativas en estancia, tiempo quirúrgico y coste por paciente. Conclusión: La inclusión de las nuevas técnicas en cirugía tiroidea ha supuesto una mejora en los resultados clínicos así como un ahorro de tiempo de quirófano.

A comparison of root surface instrumentation using manual, ultrasonic and rotary instruments: An in vitro study using scanning electron microscopy.

Background: The commonly accepted idea concerning root planing is that excessive removal of cementum is not necessary for removal of endotoxins. The ideal instrument should enable the removal of all extraneous substances from the root surfaces, without causing any iatrogenic effects. Aim: To compare the remaining calculus, loss of tooth substance, and roughness of root surface after root planing with Gracey curette, ultrasonic instrument (Slimline® insert FSI-SLI-10S), and DesmoClean® rotary bur. Materials and Methods: The efficiency of calculus removal, the amount of lost tooth substance, and root surface roughness resulting from the use of hand curette, ultrasonic instrument, and rotary bur on 36 extracted mandibular incisors were examined by SEM. We used three indices to measure the changes: Remaining calculus index (RCI), Loss of tooth substance index (LTSI), and Roughness loss of tooth substance index (RLTSI). Twelve samples were treated with each instrument. The time required for instrumentation was also noted. Statistical Analysis: Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA was used for multiple group comparisons and the Mann-Whitney test for group-wise comparisons. Analysis was carried out with SPSS® software (version 13). Results and Conclusion: The RCI and LTSI showed nonsignificant differences between the three groups. RLTSI showed a significant difference between Slimline™ and hand curette as well as Slimline™ and Desmo-Clean™. Slimline™ showed the least mean scores for RCI, LTSI, and RLTSI. Thus, even though the difference was not statistically significant, Slimline™ insert was shown to be better than the other methods as assessed by the indices scores and the instrumentation time.