Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Int. j. odontostomatol. (Print) ; 1(2): 109-114, Dec. 2007. ilus, tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-533364

RESUMO

Film holder is used for the Intrabuccal Radiographic Technique (Entrance 453, Ministry of Health, Brazil). This procedure seeks radioprotection, lowering technique mistakes. However, patient's collaboration is necessary to adapt the device. The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the effectiveness of HanShin (Japan), Indusbelo and Imagem (Brazil), and Rinn (USA) X-Ray film positioners as: 1) Technical quality and 2) Comfort (adaptation), correlating to patient's cooperation (Discipline of Integrated Clinical Diagnosis -2000 and 2001-FORP/USP). The methodology applied was: 1st) Protocol of Mistake in Radiographic Technique with film holders and 2nd) Interview Questionnaire to obtain information regarding comfort of the film holders (C=Cooperative; LC= Little Cooperative and NC=Non-Cooperative). During clinical activities each student x-rayed three patients (Apparel of X-Rays 70KVp, 10mA, E Film, Radiographic Processing) and in each patient, a film holder brand was used. As a result of 224 patients' studied, 1179 radiographs were obtained, 255 of those presenting "technique mistakes”, according to the brand of the film holder: 16 percent HanShin, 10 percent Indusbelo, 31 percent Rinn, 33 percent Imagem and 33 percent bisecting line technique (without film holder). Regarding comfort the following results were obtained: HanShin C=95 percent, LC=4 percent and NC=1 percent; Indusbelo C=89 percent, LC=6 percentand NC=5 percent; Imagem C=95 percent, LC=3 percent and NC=2 percent and Rinn C=60 percent, LC=25 percent and NC=15 percent. It was concluded that the brands Hanshin, Imagem and Indusbelo are suitable for dental radiographic exam and that the Rinn brand produces more discomfort, because its size dimensions are not ideal for the size and form pattern of the Dental Arch in the population used in this study.


El posicionador porta películas está indicado en la Técnica Radiográfica Intraoral (Resolución 453, Ministerio de la Salud, Brasil). Este procedimiento permite la radio protección, minimizando el error de técnica; sin embargo, es necesaria la colaboración del paciente para la adaptación del dispositivo. El objetivo de esta investigación-enseñanza fue evaluar la efectividad de los posicionadores de marcas HanShin (Japón), Indusbelo, Imagem (Brasil) y Rinn (USA), en relación a: 1) Calidad Técnica y 2) Confort (adaptación) correlacionándolo con la colaboración del paciente (Disciplina de Diagnóstico Clínico Integrado-2000 y 2001-FORP/USP). Como metodología de investigación se utilizaron: 1ª)Protocolo de Errores de Técnica Radiográfica con Posicionador y 2º) Cuestionario de entrevista para la obtención de las informaciones relativas a la comodidad del posicionador (C=Cooperaba; CP=Cooperaba poco y NC=No cooperaba). Durante las actividades clínicas, cada alumno radiografió a tres pacientes (Aparato de Rayos X, 70kvp, 10mA, Film E, Procesamiento Radiográfico Manual) y en cada paciente se utilizó una marca de posicionador. Como resultado de la atención de 224 pacientes, se obtuvieron 1179 radiografías; de ellas, 255 presentaron “errores de técnica”, debido a la marca del posicionador: 16 por ciento HanShin; 10 por ciento Indusbelo; 31 por ciento Rinn; 33 por ciento Imagem, y Técnica da Bissetriz, sin posicionador, 33 por ciento. En relación al confort, se obtuvieron los siguientes resultados: HanShin C=95 por ciento, CP=4 por ciento y NC=1 por ciento; Indusbelo C=89 por ciento, CP=6 por ciento y NC=5 por ciento; Imagem C=95 por ciento, CP=3 por ciento y NC=2 por ciento y Rinn C=60 por ciento, CP=25 por ciento y NC=15 por ciento. Se concluye que las marcas Hanshin, Imagem e Indusbelo son las indicadas para el examen radiográfico odontológico y que la marca Rinn produce más incomodidad.


Assuntos
Humanos , Radiografia Dentária/instrumentação , Estudantes de Odontologia , Filme para Raios X , Coleta de Dados , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Cooperação do Paciente , Radiografia Dentária/psicologia
2.
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent ; 2002 Mar; 20(1): 23-9
Artigo em Inglês | IMSEAR | ID: sea-114597

RESUMO

Different psychosocial variables, such as socioeconomic status, family type and sibling position may be considered to be of great significance as it may influence child behaviour pattern in a dental treatment situation. 143 children in the age group of 3-14 years were selected randomly from the out patient department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental Wing, S. C. B. Medical College, Cuttack with an aim of assessing relationship, if any, between the magnitude of behaviour and the above mentioned psychosocial variables. Behaviour rating was done using Frankl behaviour rating scale. The results of the study reveals no significant relationship between socio economic status, family type and sibling position with child behaviour pattern, but a trend has been observed that children of high socio economic back ground behave more positively, children of a nuclear family exhibit more negative attitude and middle siblings show less negative behaviour than youngest and eldest.


Assuntos
Adolescente , Comportamento do Adolescente , Anestesia Dentária/psicologia , Anestesia Local/psicologia , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Ordem de Nascimento , Criança , Comportamento Infantil , Pré-Escolar , Assistência Odontológica/psicologia , Preparo da Cavidade Dentária/psicologia , Profilaxia Dentária/psicologia , Família , Humanos , Núcleo Familiar , Radiografia Dentária/psicologia , Classe Social
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA