H1 but not H2 histamine antagonist receptors mediate anxiety-related behaviors and emotional memory deficit in mice subjected to elevated plus-maze testing

This study investigated the role of H1 and H2 receptors in anxiety and the retrieval of emotional memory using a Trial 1/Trial 2 (T1/T2) protocol in an elevated plus-maze (EPM). Tests were performed on 2 consecutive days, designated T1 and T2. Before T1, the mice received intraperitoneal injections of saline (SAL), 20 mg/kg zolantidine (ZOL, an H2 receptor antagonist), or 8.0 or 16 mg/kg chlorpheniramine (CPA, an H1 receptor antagonist). After 40 min, they were subjected to the EPM test. In T2 (24 h later), each group was subdivided into two additional groups, and the animals from each group were re-injected with SAL or one of the drugs. In T1, the Student t-test showed no difference between the SAL and ZOL or 8 mg/kg CPA groups with respect to the percentages of open arm entries (%OAE) and open arm time (%OAT). However, administration of CPA at the highest dose of 16 mg/kg decreased %OAE and %OAT, but not locomotor activity, indicating anxiogenic-like behavior. Emotional memory, as revealed by a reduction in open arm exploration between the two trials, was observed in all experimental groups, indicating that ZOL and 8 mg/kg CPA did not affect emotional memory, whereas CPA at the highest dose affected acquisition and consolidation, but not retrieval of memory. Taken together, these results suggest that H1 receptor, but not H2, is implicated in anxiety-like behavior and in emotional memory acquisition and consolidation deficits in mice subjected to EPM testing.

New antihistamines: a critical view

OBJETIVO: Avaliar criticamente os mais novos anti-histamínicos anti-H1 e os diferentes termos utilizados para denominá-los, com base na revisão de evidências sobre o papel dos anti-H1 no tratamento das doenças alérgicas. FONTES DOS DADOS: Artigos originais, revisões e consensos indexados nos bancos de dados MEDLINE e PUBMED de 1998 a 2006. Palavra chave: anti-histamínicos. SíNTESE DOS DADOS: Os anti-histamínicos de segunda geração diferenciam-se dos de primeira geração por sua elevada especificidade e afinidade pelos receptores H1 periféricos e pela menor penetração no sistema nervoso central (SNC), com conseqüente redução dos efeitos sedativos. Embora os anti-histamínicos de segunda geração sejam, geralmente, melhor tolerados do que seus predecessores, alguns efeitos adversos, principalmente cardiotoxicidade, surgiram com alguns deles. Nos últimos 20 anos, novos compostos, com diferentes farmacocinéticas, foram sintetizados. A maioria deles manifesta propriedades antiinflamatórias que independem de sua atividade no receptor H1. Aprimoramentos mais recentes, geralmente na forma de metabólitos ativos, levaram ao uso do termo anti-histamínico de terceira geração. Esse termo surgiu espontaneamente, sem uma descrição clara de seu significado e implicações clínicas, criando grande confusão entre os profissionais da saúde. CONCLUSÕES: Com base nas evidências sobre anti-histamínicos anti-H1, nenhum deles pode ser considerado como "anti-histamínico de terceira geração". Para tanto, seria preciso comprovar que a nova classe de anti-histamínicos possui vantagens clínicas distintas sobre os compostos existentes e preenche pelo menos três pré-requisitos: ausência de cardiotoxicidade, de interações medicamentosas e de efeitos sobre o SNC.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a critical evaluation of the more recent H1 antihistamines and the various terms used to describe them, based on a review of evidence on their role in the treatment of allergic disorders. SOURCES: Original articles, reviews and consensus documents published from 1998 to 2006 and indexed in the MEDLINE and PubMed databases. Keyword: antihistamines. SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS: Second-generation antihistamines differ from first-generation ones because of their elevated specificity and affinity for peripheral H1 receptors and because of their lower penetration of the central nervous system (CNS), having fewer sedative effects as a result. Whilst second-generation antihistamines are in general better tolerated than their predecessors, some adverse effects, principally cardiotoxicity, have been observed with some of them. Over the last 20 years, new compounds with different pharmacokinetic properties have been synthesized. The majority of these exhibit anti-inflammatory properties that are independent of their action on the H1 receptor. More recent improvements, generally in the form of active metabolites, led to the use of the term third-generation antihistamines. This term emerged spontaneously, with no clear definition of its meaning or clinical implications, creating great confusion among healthcare professionals. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the evidence on H1 antihistamines, none of them deserve the title"third-generation antihistamine." As the Consensus Group on New Generation Antihistamines concluded, to merit this definition, a new class of antihistamines would have to demonstrate distinct clinical advantages over existing compounds and fulfill at least three prerequisites: they should be free from cardiotoxicity, drug interactions and effects on the CNS.

Possible role of histamine receptors in the central regulation of immune responses.

The present study was designed to delineate the role of H1- and H2-histamine receptors in the neuro-immune regulation in rats. The effects of H1- and H2-receptor antagonists on humoral and cell-mediated immune (HI and CMI) responses were investigated after intraperitoneal (i.p.) and intra-cerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration. HI response was assayed by anti-sheep red blood cell (SRBC) antibody titre in presence and absence of 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME). The CMI responses were evaluated by delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) reaction (in vivo), i.e., measurement of footpad thickness, and lymphokine activity such as leucocyte migration inhibition (LMI) test (in vitro). On i.p. administration, both H1- (pheniramine and astemizole) and H2-receptor antagonists (ranitidine and cimetidine) were observed to produce significant enhancement of anti-SRBC antibody response. However, only H2- and not H1-receptor blockers were observed to stimulate CMI response significantly. When administered by icv route, only H2-receptor antagonists caused a statistically significant increase in both HI and CMI responses, while the H1-receptor blockers failed to modify the same. Thus, H2-receptors appear to play a major role in the histaminergic mechanisms involved in immunomodulation both at the level of immunocompetent cells active in the peripheral tissues as well as through the central nervous system structures involved in the central regulation of neuro-immune interaction.

Participación de receptores histaminérgicos involucrados en la permeabilidad vascular / Participation of histaminergic receptors involved in vascular permeability

La permeabilidad vascular puede ser modificada por la liberación de histamina endógena como resultado de la presencia de ciertos tiobarbitúricos (tiopental) en el organismo. Esta modificación en la permeabilidad es mediada por la activación del receptor histaminérgico H1, pero es incierta la participación del receptor H2. En este trabajo se evalúa la participación de receptores H1 y H2 durante los cambios de permeabilidad vascular inducidos por histamina, a través de la determinación de concentraciones séricas de albúmina, proteínas totales y globulinas, que indirectamente lo indican. Se formaron 5 grupos de organismos; un control y 4 experimentales denominados grupo A, B, C y D. A los organismos del grupo A se les aplicó histamina IV, 10 µg/Kg de peso, y finalmente al grupo D se le inyectó simultáneamente 0.16 mg/Kg de peso; al grupo C se le inyectó ranitidina IV, 0.13 mg/Kg de peso, y finalmente al grupo D se le inyectó simultáneamente 0.16 mg/Kg de peso y 0.13 mg/Kg de peso de astemizol y ranitidina IV, respectivamente. El grupo A mostró un decremento significativo en las concentraciones de albúmina, proteínas totales y globulinas. En los grupos B, C y D se observó una disminución en la concentración de proteínas totales y globulinas, pero no de albúmina. Estos resultados muestran que los receptores H1 y H2 están involucrados en el aumento de permeabilidad vascular a la albúmina, pero tal vez exista un proceso de permeabilidad diferencial en el cual el paso de globulinas desde la luz vascular hasta el intersticio esté regulado por otro mecanismo

Evidence for both H and H2-histamine receptors in rabbit atria.

Spontaneously beating isolated atria of rabbits responded to histamine (0.5-16 micrograms/ml) with positive chrono- and inotropism. However, the inotropic response was greater than chronotropic one. The concentration-response curve of histamine for chronotropic effect was markedly shifted to the right in the presence of 0.5 micrograms/ml metiamide (H2-receptor antagonist), which per se augmented the control contractile amplitude in all the experiments. The rightward shift of chronotropic concentration response curve with mepyramine (H1-antagonist) was, however, moderate. On the contrary, the inotropic concentration response curve of histamine was shifted to much greater extent to right with mepyramine (0.62 micrograms/ml) than with metiamide, thus suggesting a greater share of H1 than H2-receptors in the mediation of positive inotropic effect of histamine. The chronotropic effect appears to be mediated predominently by H2-receptors. Unlike metiamide, mepyramine did not alter the spontaneous frequency or amplitude of contraction. The present study, thus lends support for dual histamine receptors in rabbit atria.