Primeiros casos de rejeição em transplante penetrante após vacina contra COVID-19 / First cases of penetrating corneal transplant rejection after COVID-19 vaccines

RESUMO Este artigo descreve dois casos de reação imunológica de rejeição de transplante penetrante após a aplicação de dois tipos de vacina contra a COVID-19 - CoronaVac (Sinopharm/Butantan) e MRNA BNT162&2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) - com intervalo de 1 e 10 dias, respectivamente. A rejeição se manifestou com hiperemia, edema corneano e embaçamento da visão, que responderam rapidamente ao uso de corticoide tópico e subconjuntival. Até onde sabemos, este é o primeiro relato de rejeição de transplante penetrante de córnea pós-vacina anti-COVID-19. Recomendamos, presentemente, como prevenção, colírio de prednisolona a 1% 4 dias antes e durante 2 semanas após receber qualquer tipo de vacina para a COVID-19.

ABSTRACT This paper describes two cases of allograft corneal transplant rejection after the application of two types of COVID-19 vaccines - Coronavac (Sinopharm/Butantan) and MRNA BNT162&2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccines - with an interval of 1 to 10 days, respectively. The rejection manifested in the form of corneal edema, hyperemia and blurred vision, which responded rapidly to the use of topical and subconjunctival corticosteroid. As far as we know, this is the first published report of immunological rejection of penetrating corneal transplant after COVID-19 vaccination. As a preventative measure, we now recommend the use of 1% prednisolone eye drop 4 days before and during 2 weeks after having received any type of COVID-19 vaccine.

C-Reactive protein level and left ventricular mass are associated with acute cellular rejection after heart transplant

OBJECTIVES: Acute cellular rejection (ACR) remains a major complication of heart transplant (HT). The gold standard for its diagnosis is endomyocardial biopsy (EMB), whereas the role of non-invasive biomarkers for detecting ACR is unclear. This study aimed to identify non-invasive biomarkers for the diagnosis of ACR in patients undergoing HT and presenting with normal left ventricular function. METHODS: We evaluated patients who underwent HT at a single center between January 2010 and June 2019. Patients were enrolled after HT, and those with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction before EMB were excluded. We included only the results of the first EMB performed at least 30 days after HT (median, 90 days). Troponin, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured and echocardiography was performed up to 7 days before EMB. ACR was defined as International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grade 2R or 3R on EMB. We performed logistic regression analysis to identify the non-invasive predictors of ACR (2R or 3R) and evaluated the accuracy of each using area under the receiver operator characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: We analyzed 72 patients after HT (51.31±13.63 years; 25 [34.7%] women); of them, 9 (12.5%) developed ACR. Based on multivariate logistic regression analysis, we performed forward stepwise selection (entry criteria, p<0.05). The only independent predictors that remained in the model were CRP level and LV mass index. The optimal cut-off point for CRP level was ≥15.9 mg/L (odds ratio [OR], 11.7; p=0.007) and that for LV mass index was ≥111 g/m2 (OR, 13.6; p=0.003). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve derived from this model was 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.99), with sensitivity of 85.7% (95% CI, 42.1%-99.6%), specificity of 78.4% (95% CI, 64.7%-88.7%), positive predictive value of 35.3% (95% CI, 14.3%-61.7%), and negative predictive value of 97.6% (95% CI, 87.1%-99.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing HT, CRP level and LV mass were directly associated with ACR, but troponin and BNP levels were not.

Non-invasive messenger RNA transcriptional evaluation in human kidney allograft dysfunction

The aim of the present study was to evaluate messenger RNA expression in kidney allograft recipients. Forty-four kidney transplant recipients were evaluated up to three months after grafting. After transplantation, peripheral blood samples were drawn sequentially for real-time polymerase chain reaction analyses of perforin and TIM-3 genes. Biopsies were obtained to evaluate acute graft dysfunction and interpreted according to the Banff classification. Eight patients presented episodes of acute rejection. Recipients with rejection had significantly higher levels of TIM-3 mRNA transcripts compared to those without rejection (median gene expression 191.2 and 36.9 mRNA relative units, respectively; P<0.0001). Also, perforin gene expression was higher in patients with rejection (median gene expression 362.0 and 52.8 mRNA relative units; P<0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for the TIM-3 gene was 0.749 (95%CI: 0.670-0.827). Perforin gene mRNA expression provided an AUC of 0.699 (95%CI: 0.599 to 0.799). Overall accuracy of gene expression was 67.9% for the TIM-3 gene and 63.6% for the perforin gene. Combined accuracy was 76.8%. Negative predictive values were 95.3% for the TIM-3 gene, 95.5% for the perforin gene, and 95.4% in the combined analyses. Gene expression was significantly modulated by rejection treatment decreasing 64.1% (TIM-3) and 90.9% (perforin) compared to the median of pre-rejection samples. In conclusion, the longitudinal approach showed that gene profiling evaluation might be useful in ruling out the diagnosis of acute rejection and perhaps evaluating the efficacy of treatment.

Sobrevida de pacientes e injerto en niños con trasplante renal: experiencia del Hospital Garrahan en dos períodos / Patient and graft survival in children with a kidney transplant: The experience at Garrahan Hospital over two periods

En adultos y niños con trasplante renal (TxR) la sobrevida de paciente e injerto ha mejorado. En Argentina no existen datos de sobrevida en niños con TxR en diferentes décadas. El objeto de este trabajo fue valorar en niños con TxR sobrevida de paciente e injerto y analizar causas de muerte, perdida de injerto y factores de riesgo de pérdida. Dado que desde el año 2001 se unificaron prácticas de diagnóstico y tratamiento, se compararon dos periodos: 1988-2000 y 2001-2015. Se incluyeron 773 niños. A 1, 3, 5, 7 y 10 años, En TxR de DV (n=327), la sobrevida del paciente fue de 99%, 99%, 98%, 95%, 95% vs 100% y 96%, 96%, 96% y 96% (p=0.74); la del injerto de 97%, 91%, 85%, 78% y 67% vs 95%, 88%, 85%, 81% y 76% (p=0.81). En TxR de DC (n=446) la sobrevida de paciente fue de 97%, 93%, 90%, 89% y 87% en el 1er. periodo vs. 100%, 99% y 98% 98% y 98% en el 2do (p<0.001); la del injerto de 83%, 75%, 68%, 64% y 52% vs. 95%, 87%, 83%, 76% y 61% respectivamente (p<0. 001). El Rechazo Crónico fue la 1er causa de perdida (61% vs 62%); la 2da la muerte del paciente con injerto funcionante. La sepsis bacteriana fue la 1era causa de muerte (56% vs 67%). Ningún niño falleció por neoplasia entre el 2001 y 2015. En DV, fueron predictores de perdida de injerto: DGF (HR: 4.8; p<0.001), edad al TxR > 12 años (HR: 2.7; p=0.002) y RA tardío (HR: 2.1; p=0.009). En DC la necesidad de diálisis en la 1er semana post TxR (DGF): (HR: 4.4; p<0.001), el rechazo agudo (RA) tardío (HR: 3.7; p<0.001), GSFS como causa de IRC (HR: 2.5; p=0.01), y RA temprano (HR: 2.2; p=0.02). Conclusión: En el 2do periodo la sobrevida de paciente e injerto los TxR con DC mejoro, y en los TxR con DV no tuvo cambios. El rechazo crónico continúa siendo la 1era causa de perdida. Ningún paciente tuvo neoplasia (AU)

Patient and graft survival in kidney transplantation (KTx) has improved. In Argentina there are no data comparing transplant outcomes in children over different eras. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient and graft survival in children with KTx and to analyze cause of death, graft loss, and risk factors of graft loss. As diagnostic and treatment practices were unified in 2001, two periods were compared: 1988-2000 and 2001-2015. Overall, 773 children were included. Survival at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 years after a living-related donor (LRD) KTx was 99%, 99%, 98%, 95%, 95% vs 100% y 96%, 96%, 96% and 96% (p=0.74); graft survival was 97%, 91%, 85%, 78% y 67% vs 95%, 88%, 85%, 81%, and 76% (p=0.81). Patient survival after deceased donor (DD) KTx (n=446) was 97%, 93%, 90%, 89%, and 87% in the 1st period vs. 100%, 99% y 98% 98%, and 98% in the 2nd (p<0.001); graft survival was 83%, 75%, 68%, 64%, and 52% vs. 95%, 87%, 83%, 76%, and 61%, respectively (p<0. 001). Chronic rejection was the first cause of graft loss (61% vs 62%); the second was death of the patient with a functioning graft. Bacterial sepsis was the first cause of death (56% vs 67%). None of the patients died because of malignancies between 2001 and 2015. Among LRD transplants predicting factors of graft loss were: DGF (HR: 4.8; p<0.001), age at KTx >12 years (HR: 2.7; p=0.002), and late acute rejection (AR) (HR: 2.1; p=0.009). Among DD need for dialysis in the first week post-KTx (DGF): (HR: 4.4; p<0.001), late AR (HR: 3.7; p<0.001), FSGS-related CFR (HR: 2.5; p=0.01), and early AR (HR: 2.2; p=0.02). Conclusion: In the second period patient and graft survival after DD improved, while that of KTx with LRD remained unchanged. Chronic rejection continues being the first cause of graft loss. None of the patients developed malignancies.

Diagnosis of Rejection by Analyzing Ventricular Late Potentials in Heart Transplant Patients / Diagnóstico de Rejeição por Análise de Potenciais Ventriculares Tardios em Doentes Transplantados ao Coração

Background: Heart transplant rejection originates slow and fragmented conduction. Signal-averaged ECG (SAECG) is a stratification method in the risk of rejection. Objective: To develop a risk score for rejection, using SAECG variables. Methods: We studied 28 transplant patients. First, we divided the sample into two groups based on the occurrence of acute rejection (5 with rejection and 23 without). In a second phase, we divided the sample considering the existence or not of rejection in at least one biopsy performed on the follow-up period (rejection pm1: 18 with rejection and 10 without). Results: On conventional ECG, the presence of fibrosis was the only criterion associated with acute rejection (OR = 19; 95% CI = 1.65-218.47; p = 0.02). Considering the rejection pm1, an association was found with the SAECG variables, mainly with RMS40 (OR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.87-0.99; p = 0.03) and LAS40 (OR = 1.06; 95% IC = 1.01-1.11; p = 0.03). We formulated a risk score including those variables, and evaluated its discriminative performance in our sample. The presence of fibrosis with increasing of LAS40 and decreasing of RMS40 showed a good ability to distinguish between patients with and without rejection (AUC = 0.82; p < 0.01), assuming a cutoff point of sensitivity = 83.3% and specificity = 60%. Conclusion: The SAECG distinguished between patients with and without rejection. The usefulness of the proposed risk score must be demonstrated in larger follow-up studies.

Fundamento: A rejeição do transplante cardíaco origina zonas de condução lenta e fragmentada. O eletrocardiograma de alta resolução (ECGAR) é um método potencial de estratificação de risco da rejeição. Objetivo: Elaborar um escore de risco para rejeição, recorrendo ao ECGAR. Métodos: Estudaram-se 28 pacientes transplantados. Numa primeira fase, baseando-nos no diagnóstico de rejeição aguda, dividimos a amostra em dois grupos (5 pacientes com rejeição, 23 sem rejeição). Numa segunda fase, a divisão da amostra teve em conta o diagnóstico de rejeição em pelo menos uma biopsia realizada durante o seguimento (rejeição pm1) (18 pacientes com rejeição, 10 sem rejeição). Resultados: Para rejeição aguda, a única variável a revelar associação foi fibrose, evidenciando um aumento do risco de rejeição quando presente no ECG (OR = 19; IC 95% = 1,65-218,47; p = 0,02). Para rejeição pm1, constatamos que, para cada diminuição de unidade da RMS40, ocorre aumento de 7% do risco de rejeição (OR = 0,97; IC 95% = 0,87-0,99; p = 0,03) e que o aumento da LAS40 aumenta 1,06 vez o risco de rejeição (OR = 1,06; IC 95% = 1,01-1,11; p = 0,03). Formulamos um escore constituído por essas variáveis e aplicamos aos 28 indivíduos da amostra. A associação de fibrose, valores crescentes da LAS40 e valores decrescentes da RMS40 tem uma boa capacidade para distinguir doentes com e sem rejeição (AUC = 0,82; p < 0,01), assumindo um ponto de corte com sensibilidade = 83,3% e especificidade = 60%. Conclusão: O ECGAR distingue doentes com e sem rejeição. A utilidade do escore proposto deverá ser demonstrada em estudos de seguimento englobando uma amostra de maiores dimensões.

LATE ACUTE REJECTION IN LIVER TRANSPLANT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW / REJEIÇÃO AGUDA TARDIA NO TRANSPLANTE DE FÍGADO: REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA

Introduction:Late acute rejection leads to worse patient and graft survival after liver transplantation.Aim:To analyze the reported results published in recent years by leading transplant centers in evaluating late acute rejection and update the clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment of liver transplantation. Method:Systematic literature review through Medline-PubMed database with headings related to late acute rejection in articles published until November 2013 was done. Were analyzed demographics, immunosuppression, rejection, infection and graft and patient survival rates. Results:Late acute rejection in liver transplantation showed poor results mainly regarding patient and graft survival. Almost all of these cohort studies were retrospective and descriptive. The incidence of late acute rejection varied from 7-40% in these studies. Late acute rejection was one cause for graft loss and resulted in different outcomes with worse patient and graft survival after liver transplant. Late acute rejection has been variably defined and may be a cause of chronic rejection with worse prognosis. Late acute rejection occurs during a period in which the goal is to maintain lower immunosuppression after liver transplantation. Conclusion:The current articles show the importance of late acute rejection. The real benefit is based on early diagnosis and adequate treatment at the onset until late follow up after liver transplantation.

RESUMO Introdução:A rejeição aguda tardia apresenta resultados com pior sobrevida do paciente e do enxerto após o transplante de fígado.Objetivo:Analisar os resultados publicados na literatura nos últimos anos pelos principais centros de transplante sobre o tema rejeição aguda tardia para atualização analisando suas manifestações clínicas, diagnóstico e tratamento. Método:Foi realizado uma revisão sistemática da literatura, utilizando o banco de dados PubMed/Medline com os descritores relacionados à rejeição aguda tardia nos artigos publicados até novembro de 2013. Foram analisados dados demográficos, imunossupressão, rejeição, infecção, bem como as taxas de sobrevida do enxerto e do paciente. Resultados:A rejeição aguda tardia no pós transplante de fígado mostra pior resultado na sobrevida do enxerto e do paciente. A grande maioria dos estudos foram coortes retrospectivas e descritivas. A incidência de rejeição aguda tardia variou de 7-40% a partir destes estudos. A rejeição aguda tardia é uma das causas de perda do enxerto. Rejeição aguda tardia tem sua definição variável definida em relação ao tempo. Sua evolução apresenta resultado diferente em relação à sobrevida do enxerto, podendo evoluir para rejeição crônica, apresentando pior prognóstico. A rejeição aguda tardia está presente no momento em que se tende a manter menor imunossupressão, alguns meses depois transplante. Conclusão:Os artigos atuais mostram a importância da rejeição aguda tardia. O benefício real está no diagnóstico precoce e no tratamento adequado durante o episódio e no seguimento tardio após transplante de fígado.

Accuracy of the Timed Up and Go test for predicting sarcopenia in elderly hospitalized patients

OBJECTIVES: The ability of the Timed Up and Go test to predict sarcopenia has not been evaluated previously. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the Timed Up and Go test for predicting sarcopenia in elderly hospitalized patients. METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzed 68 elderly patients (≥60 years of age) in a private hospital in the city of Salvador-BA, Brazil, between the 1st and 5th day of hospitalization. The predictive variable was the Timed Up and Go test score, and the outcome of interest was the presence of sarcopenia (reduced muscle mass associated with a reduction in handgrip strength and/or weak physical performance in a 6-m gait-speed test). After the descriptive data analyses, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of a test using the predictive variable to predict the presence of sarcopenia were calculated. RESULTS: In total, 68 elderly individuals, with a mean age 70.4±7.7 years, were evaluated. The subjects had a Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 5.35±1.97. Most (64.7%) of the subjects had a clinical admission profile; the main reasons for hospitalization were cardiovascular disorders (22.1%), pneumonia (19.1%) and abdominal disorders (10.2%). The frequency of sarcopenia in the sample was 22.1%, and the mean length of time spent performing the Timed Up and Go test was 10.02±5.38 s. A time longer than or equal to a cutoff of 10.85 s on the Timed Up and Go test predicted sarcopenia with a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 88.7%. The accuracy of this cutoff for the Timed Up and Go test was good (0.80; IC=0.66-0.94; p=0.002). CONCLUSION: The Timed Up and Go test was shown to be a predictor of sarcopenia in elderly hospitalized patients. .

Risk factors in the progression of BK virus-associated nephropathy in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND/AIMS: BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) is an important cause of allograft dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients. It has an unfavorable clinical course, and no definite treatment guidelines have yet been established. Here, we report our center's experience with biopsy-proven BKVAN and investigate factors associated with its progression. METHODS: From January 2004 to April 2013, 25 patients with BKVAN were diagnosed by biopsy at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital. Of the 25 patients, 10 were deceaseddonor transplant recipients and 15 were living-donor transplant recipients. Three of the patients underwent retransplantation. The primary immunosuppressant used was tacrolimus in 17 patients and cyclosporine in eight patients. RESULTS: BKVAN was observed at a mean duration of 22.8 ± 29.1 months after transplantation. The mean serum creatinine level at biopsy was 2.2 ± 0.7 mg/dL. BKVAN occurred with acute rejection in eight patients (28%). Immunosuppression modification was performed in 21 patients (84%). Additionally, leflunomide and intravenous immunoglobulin were administered to 13 patients (52%) and two (8%), respectively. Allograft loss occurred in five patients (27.8%) during the follow- up period at 0.7, 17.1, 21.8, 39.8, and 41.5 months after the BKVAN diagnosis. Advanced stages of BKVAN, increased creatinine levels, and accompanying acute rejection at the time of BKVAN diagnosis increased the risk of allograft failure. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical outcomes in patients with biopsy-proven BKVAN were unfavorable in the present study, especially in patients with advanced-stage BKVAN, poor renal function, and acute allograft rejection.

A 12-Month Single Arm Pilot Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sirolimus in Combination with Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplant Recipients at High Immunologic Risk

The optimal immunosuppressive strategy for renal transplant recipients at high immunologic risk remains a topic of investigation. This prospective single arm pilot study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a combined tacrolimus and sirolimus regimen in recipients at immunological high risk and to compare outcomes with a contemporaneous control group received tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Patients that received a renal allograft between 2010 and 2011 at high risk (defined as panel reactive antibodies > 50%, 4 or more human leukocyte antigen mismatches, or retransplantation) were enrolled. All patients received basiliximab induction and corticosteroids. A total of 28 recipients treated with tacrolimus and sirolimus were enrolled in this study and 69 recipients were retrospectively reviewed as a control group. The sirolimus group showed a higher, but not statistically significant, incidence of biopsy proven acute rejection and a lower glomerular filtration rate than the control group. Furthermore, sirolimus group was associated with significant increases in BKV infection (P = 0.031), dyslipidemia (P = 0.004), and lymphocele (P = 0.020). The study was terminated prematurely due to a high incidence of adverse events. A de novo tacrolimus/sirolimus combination regimen may not be an ideal choice for recipients at high immunological risk.

Immunologic and non-immunologic complications of a third kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Patients who undergo repeat kidney transplantations (KTs) are considered at high risk for experiencing immunologic and non-immunologic complications. In this study, we investigated the clinical outcomes, including medical and surgical complications, of patients who underwent a third KT at our center. METHODS: Between March 1969 and December 2012, a total of 2,110 KTs were performed at the Seoul St. Mary's Hospital. Of them, we examined 11 patients who underwent a third KT, and investigated the allograft outcomes and complication rates. RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration after KT was 72.4 ± 78.3 months. The mean age at KT was 38.2 ± 8.0 years, and seven patients (63.6%) were males. Nine patients (81.8%) underwent living-donor KT. A cross-match test yielded positive results in four of the nine patients, and all underwent pretransplant desensitization therapy. After KT, three patients (27.2%) showed delayed graft function. Acute rejection developed in four patients (36.4%), and surgical complications that required surgical correction occurred in three patients. Allograft failure developed due to acute rejection (n = 3) or chronic rejection (n = 1) in four patients. Allograft survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 81.8%, 42.9%, and 42.9%, respectively; however, the allograft survival rate at 5 years was > 80% in patients who underwent KT only after results of the panel reactive antibody test became available. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, a third KT procedure may be acceptable, although aggressive pretransplant immune monitoring and patient selection may be required to reduce the risks of acute rejection and surgical complications.

Comparación de resultados entre el retrasplante y el trasplante renal primario en el Hospital Hermanos Ameijeiras de 1984 a 2012 / Comparison of results between retransplantation and primary kidney transplantation on Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital from 1984 to 2012

Introducción: el retrasplante constituye la mejor opción terapéutica para los enfermos que pierden un primer trasplante renal y vuelven a diálisis, existen disímiles criterios en cuanto a sus resultados al compararlos con los trasplantes renales primarios. Objetivo: analizar el porcentaje de retrasplantes, revisar la supervivencia del injerto y del enfermo, el comportamiento de variables que pueden incidir en los resultados y compararlos con los de los enfermos que reciben un primer trasplante renal. Métodos: se realizó un estudio analítico, descriptivo, retrospectivo, de los trasplante renales realizados en el Hospital Hermanos Ameijeiras desde 1984 hasta diciembre de 2012; quedaron excluidos, los terceros trasplante, dobles (2 riñones a un mismo receptor), combinados (páncreas-riñón e hígado-riñón) y aquellos en los que no fue posible obtener la información requerida para la investigación. Se compararon (entre los grupos retrasplantes y primeros trasplantes) variables de índole general: edad de los receptores y donantes, sexo del receptor, enfermedad que ocasionó la insuficiencia renal, porcentaje de reactividad ante un panel de linfocito (PRA), compatibilidades HLA, tipo de donante (vivo o cadáver), tiempos de isquemia, presencia y duración de necrosis tubular aguda (donante cadáver), rechazo y supervivencia del injerto y el paciente. Resultados: los retrasplantes constituyeron el 5,4 por ciento de la muestra. No existieron diferencias entre edades, sexo, PRA, compatibilidades ni tipo de donante entre los segundos y primeros injertos. Los enfermos que llegaron a la insuficiencia renal por riñones poliquísticos nunca han recibido en nuestro centro un segundo trasplante. Resultó significativamente estadístico el uso de terapia cuádruple secuencial como inmunosupresión de inducción en los retrasplantes (55,9 por ciento vs. 9,7 por ciento de los primarios...

Introduction: retransplant constitutes the best therapeutic choice for patients who lose a first renal transplant and return to dialysis, existing dissimilar criteria as to its results when ranking them with renal primary transplant. Objective: to analyze the percentage of retransplantation, to revise graft and patient survival, to review the behavior of variables that can affect the results and to compare them with patients receiving a first renal transplant. Methods: an analytic, descriptive, retrospective study was accomplished, including all renal transplant performed at the Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital from 1984 to December of 2012. Third transplants, double transplants (two kidneys to the same receptor), combined transplants (pancreas-kidney and liver-kidney) and those where it was not possible to obtain the information required for this research were excluded. Variables of general nature were compared between retransplantation groups and first transplants, such as: age of recipient and donor, sex of the recipient, a disease that caused kidney failure, percentage of reactivity to a lymphocyte panel (PRA), HLA compatibility, donor type (living or dead), ischemia time, presence and duration of acute tubular necrosis (dead donor), rejection and graft and patient survival. Results:rRetransplant constituted only 5.4 percent of the sample (34 patients). There were no differences in age, sex, PRA, donor type or compatibilities between the second and first grafts. Patients who reached the renal failure due to polycystic kidneys have never had a second transplant in our institution. The use of sequential quadruple therapy as induction immunosuppression, retransplantation (55.9 percent vs. 9.7 percent of primary) was statistically significant...

In vitro proliferation and differentiation of hepatic oval cells and their potential capacity for intrahepatic transplantation

Hepatic oval cells (HOCs) are recognized as facultative liver progenitor cells that play a role in liver regeneration after acute liver injury. Here, we investigated the in vitro proliferation and differentiation characteristics of HOCs in order to explore their potential capacity for intrahepatic transplantation. Clusters or scattered HOCs were detected in the portal area and interlobular bile duct in the liver of rats subjected to the modified 2-acetylaminofluorene and partial hepatectomy method. Isolated HOCs were positive for c-kit and CD90 staining (99.8% and 88.8%, respectively), and negative for CD34 staining (3.6%) as shown by immunostaining and flow cytometric analysis. In addition, HOCs could be differentiated into hepatocytes and bile duct epithelial cells after leukemia inhibitory factor deprivation. A two-cuff technique was used for orthotopic liver transplantation, and HOCs were subsequently transplanted into recipients. Biochemical indicators of liver function were assessed 4 weeks after transplantation. HOC transplantation significantly prolonged the median survival time and improved the liver function of rats receiving HOCs compared to controls (P=0.003, Student t-test). Administration of HOCs to rats also receiving liver transplantation significantly reduced acute allograft rejection compared to control liver transplant rats 3 weeks following transplantation (rejection activity index score: control=6.3±0.9; HOC=3.5±1.5; P=0.005). These results indicate that HOCs may be useful in therapeutic liver regeneration after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Impact of Combined Acute Rejection on BK Virus-Associated Nephropathy in Kidney Transplantation

BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) is one of the major causes of allograft dysfunction in kidney transplant (KT) patients. We compared BKVAN combined with acute rejection (BKVAN/AR) with BKVAN alone in KT patients. We retrospectively analyzed biopsy-proven BKVAN in KT patients from 2000 to 2011 at Seoul National University Hospital. Among 414 biopsies from 951 patients, biopsy-proven BKVAN was found in 14 patients. Nine patients had BKVAN alone, while 5 patients had both BKVAN and acute cellular rejection. BKVAN in the BKVAN alone group was detected later than in BKVAN/AR group (21.77 vs 6.39 months after transplantation, P=0.03). Serum creatinine at diagnosis was similar (2.09 vs 2.00 mg/dL). Histological grade was more advanced in the BKVAN/AR group (P=0.034). Serum load of BKV, dose of immunosuppressants, and tacrolimus level showed a higher tendency in the BKVAN alone group; however it was not statistically significant. After anti-rejection therapy, immunosuppression was reduced in the BKVAN/AR group. Renal functional deterioration over 1 yr after BKVAN diagnosis was similar between the two groups (P=0.665). These findings suggest that the prognosis of BKVAN/AR after anti-rejection therapy followed by anti-BKV therapy might be similar to that of BKVAN alone after anti-BKV therapy.

Transplante cardíaco no tratamento da insuficiência cardíaca refratária. Análise crítica do seus resultados / Heart transplantation in the treatment of end-stage heart failure. Critical of its results

O transplante cardíaco, quando bem indicado, é o melhor tratamento nas insuficiências cardíacas refratárias de diferentes etiologias. É importante levar em conta considerações sobre o receptor, o doador e cuidados perioperatórios que vão certamente influenciar o prognóstico. Na seleção dos receptores são avaliados os diversos sistemas orgânicos que possam implicar em complicações no pós-operatório e determinar um prognóstico ruim na evolução. Existem diversas diretrizes e protocolos disponíveis para orientação em diferentes aspectos e diferentes escores para avaliação e determinação do prognóstico do paciente com insuficiência cardíaca avançada, sendo os mais conhecidos: o The Seattle Heart Failure Model e o Heart Failure Survival Score (HFSS). Quanto à técnica operatória, a tendência atual é pela técnica bicaval, que parece oferecer menos alterações de ritmo e menos insuficiência valvares se comparado à técnica biatrial: no entanto, os benefícios na sobrevida ainda são contraditórios. Convém lembrar que o coração transplantado é desnervado e isso tem implicações clínicas. Quanto à imunossupressão, existem diferentes protocolos, porém os diferentes grupos têm usado mais comumente o Esquema Tríplice, com corticóides, ciclosporina (ou tracolimo) e micofenolato sódico. Nos pacientes que apresentavam miocardiopatia Chagásica existem vantagens do uso da azatioprina substituindo o micofenolato. O padrão ouro para o diagnóstico das rejeições celulares, ainda que invasivo, é a biópsia endomiocárdica. Em razão da imunossupressão , deve-se ficar atento à suscetibilidade às complicações infecciosas (bacterianas, virais, fúngicas ou protozoários), este é um problema permanente. A recidiva de Doença de Chagas não é incomum. Dentre as complicações mais tardias, vamos observar que grande parte delas estrá relacionada a efeitos colaterias das drogas imunodepressoras ou a rejeição...

Cardiac transplantation, when property indicated, is the best treatment in refractory heart failure of different etiologies. It is important to take into account considerations of the receiver, the donor and perioperative care that will influence the prognosis. In selecting recepients are evaluated various organ systems that result in postoperative complications and a poor prognosis in determining evolution. There are various guidelines and protocols available for guidance in different aspects , and there are different scores for evaluating and determining the prognosis of patients with advanced heart failure, the most popular: The Seattle Heart Failure Model, and the Heart Failure Survival Score (HFSS). Regarding the surgical technique is the current trend by Bicaval Technique that seems to offer less valve insufficiencies and less disturbances of rhythm compared to the Standard Tecnique, however the benefits on survival are still contradictory. Remember that the transplantated heart is denervated and this has clinical implications. As for immunosuppresive protocols are different, but different groups have used most commonly Scheme Triple with corticosteroids, cyclosporine (or tacrolimus) and mycophenolate sodium. In patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy there are advantages of using azathioprine, mycophenolate replacing. The gold standard for diagnosis of cellular rejection, although invasive, is endomyocardial biopsy. Because of immunossuppression, should be attentive to susceptibilty to infectious complications (bacterial, viral, fungal and protozoal), this is an ongoing problem. Recurrence of Chagas disease is not uncommon. Among the long-term compliocations, we observer that most of them will be related to side effects of immunosuppressive drugs or rejection. So it is common the hypertension, renal impairment to varying degrees, hyperlipidemia and diabetes...

A novel noninvasive method to detect rejection after heart transplantation

Prompt and accurate detection of rejection prior to pathological changes after organ transplantation is vital for monitoring rejections. Although biopsy remains the current gold standard for rejection diagnosis, it is an invasive method and cannot be repeated daily. Thus, noninvasive monitoring methods are needed. In this study, by introducing an IL-2 neutralizing monoclonal antibody (IL-2 N-mAb) and immunosuppressants into the culture with the presence of specific stimulators and activated lymphocytes, an activated lymphocyte-specific assay (ALSA) system was established to detect the specific activated lymphocytes. This assay demonstrated that the suppression in the ALSA test was closely related to the existence of specific activated lymphocytes. The ALSA test was applied to 47 heart graft recipients and the proliferation of activated lymphocytes from all rejection recipients proven by endomyocardial biopsies was found to be inhibited by spleen cells from the corresponding donors, suggesting that this suppression could reflect the existence of activated lymphocytes against donor antigens, and thus the rejection of a heart graft. The sensitivity of the ALSA test in these 47 heart graft recipients was 100%; however, the specificity was only 37.5%. It was also demonstrated that IL-2 N-mAb was indispensible, and the proper culture time courses and concentrations of stimulators were essential for the ALSA test. This preliminary study with 47 grafts revealed that the ALSA test was a promising noninvasive tool, which could be used in vitro to assist with the diagnosis of rejection post-heart transplantation.

Cytomegalovirus Induced Interstitial Nephritis and Ureteral Stenosis in Renal Transplant Recipient

No abstract available.

Impacto da função retardada do enxerto pancreático no transplante simultâneo pâncreas-rim / Impact of delayed pancreatic graft function in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

OBJETIVO: O transplante pâncreas-rim é efetivo para pacientes com doença renal crônica terminal e diabetes mellitus insulino-dependente. A função retardada do enxerto pancreático é condição frequente exercendo impacto significativo nos resultados em curto prazo dos transplantes pâncreas-rim. O objetivo foi analisar o impacto da função retardada do enxerto pancreático no transplante pâncreas-rim. MÉTODOS: Análise retrospectiva de 180 receptores de transplante pâncreas-rim, incluindo dados demográficos dos doadores e dos receptores, a reatividade contra painel, a incidência de rejeição aguda e as sobrevidas do paciente e dos enxertos pancreático e renal. RESULTADOS: A incidência de função retardada do enxerto pancreático foi 11 por cento. A idade do receptor superior a 45 anos apresentou associação com o risco de desenvolvimento de função retardada do enxerto pancreático (Razão de chances 2,26; p < 0,05). Os pacientes com função retardada do enxerto pancreático apresentaram maior incidência de rejeição aguda renal (47 versus 24 por cento; p < 0,05), glicemia de jejum alterada (25 versus 5 por cento; p < 0,05) e média de hemoglobina glicada (5,8 versus 5,4 por cento; p < 0,05) ao final do primeiro ano de acompanhamento em relação aos pacientes sem função retardada do enxerto pancreático. Não houve diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre os grupos de pacientes com e sem função retardada do enxerto pancreático quanto à sobrevida do paciente (95 versus 88,7 por cento; p = 0,38), do enxerto pancreático (90 versus 85,6 por cento; p = 0,59) e do enxerto renal (90 versus 87,2 por cento; p = 0,70), respectivamente, nesse mesmo período. CONCLUSÃO: A função retardada do enxerto pancreático não exerceu impacto significativo nos resultados em curto prazo dos transplantes pâncreas-rim desta casuística...

OBJECTIVE: Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation is an effective treatment for patients with type 1 diabetes melli>tus and end-stage chronic kidney disease. Delayed pancreatic graft function is a common and multifactor condition with significant impact in short-term outcome of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantations. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of pancreatic delayed pancreatic graft function on simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. METHODS: Donor and recipient's demographic data, percentage of panel reactivity, acute rejection incidence, and patient and grafts survivals were retrospectively analyzed in 180 SPKT performed between 2002 and 2007. RESULTS: The incidence of pancreatic delayed pancreatic graft function was 11 percent. Donors older than 45 years had significant risk of pancreatic delayed pancreatic graft function (OR 2.26; p < 0,05). Patients with pancreatic delayed pancreatic graft function had higher rates of acute renal rejection (47 versus 24 percent; p < 0.05), altered fasting plasma glucose (25 versus 5 percent; p < 0.05) and mean glycated hemoglobin (5.8 versus 5.4 percent; p < 0.05), than patients without pancreatic delayed pancreatic graft function at the end of the first year of follow up. There were no significant differences between patients with and without pancreatic delayed pancreatic graft function regarding patient survival (95 versus 88.7 percent; p = 0.38), pancreatic graft survival (90 versus 85.6 percent; p = 0.59) and renal graft survival (90 versus 87.2 percent; p = 0.70), respectively at the sample period of time. CONCLUSION: Pancreatic delayed pancreatic graft function had no significant impact in the short-term outcome of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantations. Although delayed pancreatic graft function had no impact on 1-year pancreas graft survival, it contributed to early pancreas graft dysfunction, as assessed by enhanced insulin and oral anti-diabetic drugs requirements.

Citocinas e quimiocinas no transplante renal / Cytokines and chemokines in renal transplantation

O transplante renal é a melhor modalidade de terapia renal substitutiva até o momento. Infelizmente a sobrevida do enxerto é interrompida pelos episódios de rejeição aguda ou mesmo de fibrose intersticial atrofia tubular. A dosagem de quimiocinas e citrocinas urinárias como ferramenta alternativa para o diagnóstico dessas complicações tem sido relatada nos últimos anos. Estas substâncias estão sabidamente relacionadas com os mecanismos imunoinflamatórios do transplante renal podendo ser detectadas no tecido renal no plasma e na urina de pacientes transplantados. Drogas anti-inflamatórias inibidores do sistema renina angiotensina e alguns antagonistas de receptores de citocinas ainda utilizados em nível experimental podem interferir com a expressão desses mediadores do sistema imune e por conseguinte alterar a evolução do transplante renal. Neste sentido pretende-se neste artigo fazer uma revisão dos estudos sobre a mensuração de citocinas quimiocinas e dos seus receptores na urina no plasma e no tecido renal de pacientes transplantados no intuito de avaliar uma possível associação entre os níveis desses mediadores e as complicações do transplante renal e sobrevida do enxerto.

Renal transplantation is the best modality of renal replacement therapy so far. Unfortunately, graft survival is interrupted by episodes of acute rejection or tubular atrophy of interstitial fibrosis. The measurement of urinary chemokines and citrocinas as an alternative tool for the diagnosis of these complications have been reported in recent years. These substances are known to be related to immunoinflammatory mechanisms of renal transplantation can be detected in renal tissue in plasma and urine of transplant patients. Anti-inflammatory drugs inhibiting the renin angiotensin receptor antagonists and some cytokines also used on an experimental level can interfere with the expression of these mediators of the immune system and thus alter the course of renal transplantation. In this sense we intend to make this article a review of studies on the measurement of cytokines chemokines and their receptors in the plasma and urine in the renal tissue of patients transplanted in order to evaluate a possible association between the levels of these mediators and the complications of the transplant and renal graft survival.

Proximal tubular dysfunction as an indicator of chronic graft dysfunction

New strategies are being devised to limit the impact of renal sclerosis on graft function. Individualization of immunosuppression, specifically the interruption of calcineurin-inhibitors has been tried in order to promote better graft survival once chronic graft dysfunction has been established. However, the long-term impact of these approaches is still not totally clear. Nevertheless, patients at higher risk for tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis (TA/IF) development should be carefully monitored for tubular function as well as glomerular performance. Since tubular-interstitial impairment is an early event in TA/IF pathogenesis and associated with graft function, it seems reasonable that strategies directed at assessing tubular structural integrity and function would yield important functional and prognostic data. The measurement of small proteins in urine such as α-1-microglobulin, N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase, alpha/pi S-glutathione transferases, β-2 microglobulin, and retinol binding protein is associated with proximal tubular cell dysfunction. Therefore, its straightforward assessment could provide a powerful tool in patient monitoring and ongoing clinical assessment of graft function, ultimately helping to facilitate longer patient and graft survival associated with good graft function.