Long-term efficiency of cataract surgery with hydrophilic acrylic Ioflex intraocular lens

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficiency of long-term cataract surgery using low-cost intraocular lens implantation in community campaigns. METHODS: Fifty-eight randomly selected patients were evaluated four years after phacoemulsification and Ioflex intraocular lens implantation. Causes of low visual acuity related to the intraocular lens were evaluated, and treatment costs were calculated. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 72±10.2 years. Four years after surgery, 25 eyes (43.0%) had decreased visual acuity related to the intraocular lens: posterior capsule opacification was noted in 24 eyes (41.3%), and intraocular lens opacification was noted in one eye (1.7%). The total cost of the post-surgical complication treatments represented 6.3% of the initial budget of the entire surgical patient group. CONCLUSIONS: The efficiency of cataract surgery with low-cost Ioflex intraocular lens implantation was significantly reduced in a long-term follow-up study because postoperative complications related to intraocular lenses emerged at higher rates than when the gold-standard treatment was used.

Análise de custo-efetividade de métodos preventivos para superfície oclusal de acordo com o risco de cárie: resultados de um ensaio clínico controlado / Cost-effectiveness analysis of preventive methods for occlusal surface according to caries risk: results of a controlled clinical trial / Análisis del coste-efectividad de los métodos preventivos para una superficie oclusal según el riesgo de caries: resultados de un ensayo clínico controlado

Este estudo apresenta o resultado de uma avaliação de custo-efetividade conduzida ao longo de um ensaio clínico controlado para avaliar a efetividade do selamento com ionômero de vidro modificado por resina (Vitremer, 3M ESPE) e da aplicação de verniz fluoretado (Duraphat, Col-gate) em superfícies oclusais de primeiros molares permanentes, em crianças de 6 a 8 anos (N = 268), segundo o risco de cárie (alto risco; baixo risco). As crianças foram examinadas semestralmente, ao longo de 24 meses, pelo mesmo dentista calibrado, após alocação em seis grupos: controle alto risco e baixo risco (educação em saúde bucal trimestral); verniz alto risco e baixo risco (educação em saúde bucal trimestral + aplicação semestral de verniz); e selante alto risco e baixo risco (educação em saúde bucal trimestral + única aplicação do selante). A análise mostrou que o selamento de primeiros molares permanentes em crianças de alto risco apresentou razão de C/E de R$ 225,21(US$ 119,80) por superfície oclusal salva, e razão incremental de C/E de R$ 203,71(US$ 108,36) por superfície oclusal adicional salva. Conclui-se que uma única aplicação de selante, em escolares de alto risco, foi a intervenção mais custo-efetiva.

This study presents the results of a cost-effectiveness analysis in a controlled clinical trial on the effectiveness of a modified glass ionomer resin sealant ( Vitremer, 3M ESPE) and the application of fluoride varnish (Duraphat, Colgate) on occlusal surfaces of first permanent molars in children 6-8 years of age (N = 268), according to caries risk (high versus low). Children were examined semiannually by the same calibrated dentist for 24 months after allocation in six groups: high and low risk controls (oral health education every three months); high and low risk with varnish (oral health education every three months + varnish biannually); and high and low risk with sealant (oral health education every three months + a single application of sealant). Economic analysis showed that sealing permanent first molars of high-risk schoolchildren showed a C/E ratio of US$ 119.80 per saved occlusal surface and an incremental C/E ratio of US$ 108.36 per additional saved occlusal surface. The study concluded that sealing permanent first molars of high-risk schoolchildren was the most cost-effective intervention.

En este estudio se presentan los resultados de una evaluación de costo-efectividad (C/E) durante un ensayo clínico controlado para evaluar la efectividad de la obturación con ionómero de vidrio modificado con resina (Vitremer, 3M ESPE) y la aplicación de barniz de flúor (Duraphat, Colgate) en las superficies oclusales de los primeros molares permanentes, para niños de 6-8 años (N = 268) de edad, de acuerdo con el riesgo de caries (alto riesgo-bajo riesgo). Los niños fueron examinados cada seis meses por el mismo dentista calibrado, durante 24 meses, después de haberle sido asignados seis grupos: control alto riesgo y bajo riesgo (educación de salud bucal cada tres meses); barniz alto riesgo y bajo riesgo (educación de salud bucal cada tres meses + barniz semestralmente); obturación alto riesgo y bajo riesgo (educación de salud bucal cada tres meses + una sola aplicación de ionómero de vidrio). El análisis económico mostró que la obturación de los primeros molares permanentes de escolares de alto riesgo presenta una relación C/E de US$ 119.80 de ahorro por superficie oclusal y una ratio C/E incremental de US$ 108.36 de ahorro adicional por superficie oclusal.

eRME - Rapid Maxillary Expansion in the economic way.

Aim and Objectives: Rapid Maxillary Expansion constitutes a routine clinical procedure in orthodontics, involving separation of mid-palatine suture which is usually done with help of the Hyrax screw. However, because of its high cost, the use has been limited, especially in institutions. So, the purpose of this study was to construct an economical device which can expand the maxillary arch in growing patients. Materials and Methods: Six patients having constricted maxilla and posterior skeletal crossbite were randomly selected from the Department of Orthodontics. A unique, easy and simple alternative device for expanding the maxillary arch called economic Rapid Maxillary Expander (eRME) has been fabricated at about one-tenth the cost of the conventional Hyrax. Pre- and post-treatment effects were statistically tested by using paired t-test at 0.05 level of significance. Results and Conclusion: The study results showed an average expansion in canine, premolar and molar regions of 4.4 mm, 6.8 mm and 9.4 mm, respectively, having significant difference pre-and post-treatment. Thus, it shows that maxillary expansion is efficiently possible with the application of this newly constructed device named eRME. This appliance also acts as a fixed retainer to avoid relapse, hence negating the need for a separate retainer.