RESUMO
Rupture of the ventricular septum with the appearance of an interventricular communication is an infrequent and life-threatening mechanical complication after acute myocardial infarction. The advent of coronary reperfusion therapies has reduced the incidence of this complication, but mortality remains high. The clinical presentation varies from mild compromise with exertional dyspnea to severe compromise with cardiogenic shock. In this pathology, early diagnosis is fundamental and surgical repair is the treatment of choice. In this article we report an interesting clinical case about a 77-year-old woman who was belatedly referred to our hospital and diagnosed with postinfarction rupture of the ventricular septum with an unfortunately fatal evolution. Relevance of this case lies in its atypical clinical presentation which led to a delay in diagnosis and a missed opportunity for early reperfusion therapy. An updated literature review about rupture of the ventricular septum complicating acute myocardial infarction was carried out.
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Ruptura do Septo Ventricular/fisiopatologia , Ruptura do Septo Ventricular/epidemiologia , Choque Cardiogênico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Ecocardiografia , Fatores de Risco , Ruptura do Septo Ventricular/diagnóstico , Ruptura do Septo Ventricular/terapia , Infarto do Miocárdio/complicaçõesRESUMO
Objetivo: Conocer las características, estrategia de tratamiento y mortalidad en pacientes con infarto agudo al miocardio y ruptura del septum interventricular posinfarto. Métodos: Se incluyeron 40 pacientes atendidos en un periodo de ocho años por infarto agudo al miocardio complicado con ruptura del septum interventricular posinfarto. Se utilizó ecocardiograma para confirmar la ruptura del septum interventricular posinfarto. Se evaluaron las características clínicas, el tipo de tratamiento y la mortalidad hospitalaria. Las variables se compararon con prueba U de Mann-Withney o prueba exacta de Fisher. Resultados: Edad 64 años (56 a 73), 67% hombres, 53% diabetes, 43% hipertensión, 40% tabaquismo. Los tratamientos fueron: conservador 45%, quirúrgico 38% o dispositivo Amplatzer 17%. La mortalidad general fue de 65%, con manejo conservador 54%, con cirugía 35% y con Amplatzer 12% (p = 0.02), y estuvo asociada a menor tiempo entre infarto agudo al miocardio y ruptura del septum interventricular posinfarto (p <0.001) y menor tiempo entre ruptura del septum interventricular posinfarto y tratamiento de cierre (p <0.001). Todos los pacientes con Killip Kimbal III o IV murieron. Conclusiones: Hasta el momento no existe una estrategia de manejo en la ruptura del septum interventricular posinfarto que demuestre ventajas sobre las demás. El único marcador de buen pronóstico podría ser el mayor tiempo entre la ruptura y el tratamiento de cierre. Es probable que la indicación de manejo de las guías internacionales no aplique para todos los pacientes y estos deban estratificarse de acuerdo a su estado hemodinámico.
Objective: To identify the characteristics, management strategy and mortality of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and rupture of ventricular septum (RVS). Methods: The study included 40 patients admitted during a period of 8 years, due to AMI complicated with RVS. RVS was confirmed by echocardiogram. The clinical characteristics, type of treatment and hospital mortality were evaluated. Variables were compared by Mann-Withney U tests or Fisher exact test. Results: Patients were 64 years old (56 - 73), 67% men, 53% diabetes mellitus, 43% hypertension, 40% smokers. Treatments were medical (45%), surgical (38%) or Amplatzer (17%). Overall mortality was 65%, in conservative group was 45%, in surgery group 38%, and Amplatzer group 17% (p = 0.02), it was associated to shorter time between AMI and RVS (p <0.001) and shorter time between and treatment (p <0.001). All patients with Killipp Kimbal III or IV died. Conclusions: Currently there is no management strategy in RSV with demonstrated advantage over other strategies. The only marker with good prognosis could be a long time between rupture and treatment. It is likely that the indication of management of International guidelines does not apply to all patients and these should be stratified according to their hemodynamic status.