Teledermatology protocol for screening of Skin Cancer

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine refers to the use of technology as improvement of healthcare delivery to places where distance becomes an obstacle. Its use represents a great potential for dermatology, a specialty whose visual analysis phase is essential in diagnosis. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the compatibility index of skin cancer diagnoses between primary care and teledermatology, and to validate a protocol for standardization of digital imaging to obtain the reports in teledermatology. METHODS: An observational cross-sectional study developed through the census of 333 examination requests, received between January/2012 and July/2012, in the Center for Telemedicine and Telehealth of SES-SC. We used a protocol for photographic lesion standardization, consisting of three steps (panoramic photo, close-up with ruler and dermoscopy). After collection, the data were sent to a virtual site on the Internet, and recorded with the use of an electronic health record containing the images, the skin phototype and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: The level of compatibility between the diagnosis of skin cancer in Santa Catarina's primary care and the diagnosis proposed by teledermatology was 19.02%. Proportionally, it was 21.21% for BCC, 44.44% for SCC and 6.98% for MM. The protocol was statistically significant (p <0.05), with an OR of 38.77. CONCLUSION: The rate of diagnostic compatibility of skin cancer was low and the use of the protocol optimized the chance of validating requests for examination. .

Improving diabetic retinopathy screening in Africa: patient satisfaction with teleophthalmology versus ophthalmologist-based screening

To assess patient preference for diabetic retinopathy [DR] screening with teleophthalmology or face-to-face ophthalmologist evaluation in Nairobi, Kenya. Fifty seven diabetic patients from a one-stop multidisciplinary diabetic clinic [consisting of a diabetologist, nurse educator, foot specialist, nutritionist, ophthalmologist, and neurologist] in Nairobi, Kenya were included if they had undergone both a teleophthalmology [stereoscopic digital retinal photographs graded by an ophthalmologist remotely] and a traditional clinical screening exam [face to face examination]. A structured questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale was developed in both English and Swahili. The questionnaire was administered over the telephone. Ten questions were used to compare patient experience and preferences between teleophthalmology and a traditional clinical examination for DR. A mean score >3.25 on the Likert scale was considered favourable. Successfully telephone contact was possible for 26 [58% male, 42% females] of the 57 patients. The mean ages of the male and female patients were 52.4 and 46.5 years respectively. Patients were satisfied with their teleophthalmology examination [mean 4.15 +/- 0.97]. Patients preferred the teleophthalmology option for future screenings [mean 3.42 +/- 1.52]. This preference was driven primarily by convenience, reduced examination time, and being able to visualize their own retina. In this study, diabetic patients preferred a teleophthalmology based screening over a traditional ophthalmologist-based screening. The use of teleophthalmology in Africa warrants further study and has the potential to become the screening model of choice. Cost effectiveness in comparison to an ophthalmologist-based screening also requires evaluation

Reprodutibilidade do diagnóstico histopatológico de dermatoses por fotomicrografias digitais versus microscopia óptica convencional / Reproducibility of histopathologic diagnosis of skin diseases by digital photomicrographs versus conventional optical microscopy

FUNDAMENTOS: A telepatologia é considerada boa alternativa para consultas de segunda opinião. Sua implementação é desejável, mas estudos que confirmem sua aplicação prática são necessários. OBJETIVOS: Analisar a concordância entre os diagnósticos histopatológicos de dermatoses feitos com base em microfotografias digitais em comparação com a microscopia convencional. MÉTODOS: As lâminas de 135 pacientes foram avaliadas por dois consultores por meio de microscópio. Após quatro semanas, os mesmos consultores avaliaram 1.738 microfotografias digitais obtidas dessas lâminas. Estimou-se a taxa geral de concordância intraobservadores e interobservadores e obteve-se o índice Kappa com a categorização das dermatoses: dermatoses neoplásicas, dermatoses infectocontagiosas e não infectocontagiosas. RESULTADOS: A concordância do Consultor 1, que analisou lâminas ao microscópio versus imagens, foi de 88,1 por cento (IC 95 por cento = 81,5 por cento - 93,1 por cento). O Consultor 2 obteve concordância de 80,7 por cento (IC 95 por cento = 73,1 por cento - 87 por cento). A concordância interconsultores ao microscópio foi de 81,5 por cento (IC 95 por cento = 73,9 por cento - 87,6 por cento). A mesma análise por meio de microfotografias mostrou concordância de 85,9 por cento (IC 95 por cento = 78,9 por cento - 91,3 por cento). O índice Kappa, que avalia as dermatoses categorizadas, foi de 98,6 por cento para o Consultor 1, de 93,1 por cento para o Consultor 2, de 95,8 por cento para interconsulta por imagens e de 95,9 por cento para interconsultas ao microscópio óptico. Todos esses valores são considerados ótimos. CONCLUSÃO: A avaliação das microfotografias apresentou ótimo nível de reprodutibilidade quando comparada à microscopia tradicional, sendo uma opção viável para consultas de segunda opinião em dermatopatologia.

BACKGROUND: Telepathology is considered a good alternative for a second opinion consultation. Its implementation is desirable, but studies to confirm its practical application are required. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reproducibility of histopathologic diagnoses of skin diseases obtained through digital photomicrographs compared with conventional microscopy. METHODS: We evaluated the surgical specimens of 135 patients using an optical microscope. After 4 weeks, the same consultants independently evaluated a total of 1,738 digital photomicrographs obtained from the histopathological slides. We estimated the overall rate of intra and interobserver agreement, and the Kappa coefficient was obtained with the categorization of the skin diseases: neoplastic skin diseases, infectious-contagious skin diseases and non-infectious-contagious skin diseases. RESULTS: Consultant 1 obtained an agreement of 88.1 percent (95 percent CI = 81.5 percent - 93.1 percent) between conventional microscopy and images. Consultant 2 obtained an agreement of 80.7 percent (95 percent CI = 73.1 percent - 87 percent). The interobserver agreement for the microscopy analysis was 81.5 percent (95 percent CI = 73.9 percent - 87.6 percent). The same analysis using microphotography showed an agreement of 85.9 percent (95 percent CI = 78.9 percent - 91.3 percent). The Kappa coefficient, which evaluated the categorized skin diseases, was 98.6 percent for Consultant 1, 93.1 percent for Consultant 2, 95.8 percent for interconsultant analyses of images and 95.9 percent for interconsultant analyses using conventional optical microscopy. All of these values are considered optimal. CONCLUSION: The evaluation of microphotographs shows a good level of reproducibility when compared to traditional microscopy and, therefore, is a viable option for a second opinion consultation in dermatopathology.

Teleoftalmologia como auxílio diagnóstico nas doenças infecciosas e inflamatórias oculares / Teleophthalmology as an auxiliary approach for the diagnosis of infectious and inflammatory ocular diseases: evaluation of an asynchronous method of consultation

OBJETIVOS: Avaliar a eficácia da teleoftalmologia como auxílio diagnóstico nas doenças infecciosas e inflamatórias oculares, assim como avaliar os principais fatores limitantes para a realização e conclusão de consultoria em oftalmologia. MÉTODOS: Duzentas e trinta e três fotos (retinografias e/ou exames de biomicroscopia), em diapositivos 35-mm de 87 pacientes, foram digitalizadas e armazenadas em CD-ROM, para posterior análise, em monitor de computador, por dois consultores especialistas em uveítes, que responderam formulário e questionário indicando o diagnóstico provável, tratamento e/ou conduta e as dificuldades encontradas para a conclusão da consultoria. Teste estatístico Kappa foi utilizado para avaliação da concordância entre os observadores. Valores de Kappa acima de 0,7 indicam concordância excelente; valores entre 0,4 e 0,7 indicam concordância moderada/boa e valores menores que 0,4 indicam concordância ruim. RESULTADOS: A concordância diagnóstica observada na consultoria, em relação ao padrão ouro, foi de 73,5 por cento para ambos os consultores. Sugestão de tratamento e/ou conduta não foi possível em 8 por cento dos casos para o consultor A, e em 10,4 por cento para o consultor B. A falta de dados clínicos (Kappa: 0,8) e a má qualidade das imagens (Kappa: 0,74) foram os motivos com maior concordância em relação às dificuldades para conclusão da consultoria. CONCLUSÃO: A teleoftalmologia por meio de consultoria por método assíncrono foi eficaz para o diagnóstico de doenças infecciosas e inflamatórias oculares. A falta de dados clínicos detalhados e a má qualidade das imagens foram os principais fatores limitantes para a conclusão da consultoria.