Evaluation of subjective scale in allergen nasal provocation test / 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志

Objective:To compare the clinical value of visual analogue scale （VAS）, Lebel scale and total nasal symptom scores （TNSS） in evaluating nasal allergen provocation test （NAPT）. Methods:A total of 151 patients suspected of allergic rhinitis admitted to the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery of our hospital from April 2020 to September 2020 were included, of which 76 were positive for house dust mites and 75 were negative for allergens. Nasal airway resistance（NAR） was measured by active anterior nasal manometry. Nasal symptoms were evaluated by VAS, Lebel and TNSS. House dust mite allergen was used for NAPT by spray method. An increase≥40% in NAR was used as the gold standard for objective evaluation of NAPT. ROC curves of VAS, Lebel and TNSS were drawn to compare the evaluation effectiveness of different subjective evaluation methods, and the optimal critical point of each ROC curve was obtained. Results:With NAR increased by ≥40% as the gold standard, the area under ROC curve of VAS was 0.884, and the sensitivity and specificity were 97.75% and 80.65%, respectively. The area under ROC curve of Lebel was 0.773, and the sensitivity and specificity were 68.54% and 75.81%, respectively. The area under ROC curve of TNSS was 0.792, and the sensitivity and specificity were 68.54% and 79.03%, respectively. There was no significant difference between Lebel and TNSS（P>0.05）. The VAS differed significantly from Lebel and TNSS（P<0.05）. The Kappa values of VAS, Lebel, TNSS and NAR were 0.803, 0.432 and 0.459, respectively. Conclusion:The VAS, Lebel, TNSS subjective scale and NAR are consistent in evaluating the efficacy of NAPT, with the VAS assessment showing highest consistency with NAR. As objective assessment instruments are not widely used in China, subjective assessment method could be adopted to evaluate the efficacy of NAPT in clinical practice, and VAS scale is recommended as a priority.

Avaliações objetiva e subjetiva da obstrução nasal em crianças e adolescentes com rinite alérgica / Objective and subjective assessments of nasal obstruction in children and adolescents with allergic rhinitis

OBJETIVO: Relacionar a avaliação objetiva da obstrução nasal por rinometria acústica (volume dos cinco primeiros centímetros da cavidade nasal) e rinomanometria anterior ativa (resistência nasal total) com a avaliação subjetiva (escore de obstrução). MÉTODO: Participaram do estudo 30 pacientes (7 a 18 anos) com rinite alérgica persistente e 30 controles. O escore foi referido para cavidade nasal total e narinas em separado. As três variáveis foram mensuradas nos momentos basal e após indução de obstrução nasal. RESULTADOS: Houve correlações significantes e negativas entre resistência e volume nasal em todos os grupos e situações de avaliação, exceto para narina mais obstruída, grupo controle, pós-obstrução. Para a cavidade nasal total, não houve correlação significante entre as variáveis objetivas e subjetiva, exceto entre escore e volume na cavidade nasal total no grupo controle pós-obstrução. Na narina mais obstruída, houve correlação significante e negativa para escore e resistência e significante e positiva para escore e volume nasal no grupo total, momento basal. Não houve diferença nítida nos coeficientes de correlação entre pacientes e controles, e estes não se alteraram após a indução de obstrução nasal. CONCLUSÕES: Avaliação objetiva da obstrução nasal não apresentou correlação significativa com a avaliação subjetiva na cavidade nasal total, mas sim na avaliação unilateral. Houve correlação entre avaliações objetivas. Rinite alérgica ou obstrução nasal aguda não interferiram na correlação entre as avaliações objetiva e subjetiva da obstrução nasal. Sugere-se utilidade no acréscimo de métodos objetivos para avaliação da obstrução nasal em pesquisas e, na sua impossibilidade, avaliação das narinas em separado.

OBJECTIVE: To correlate objective assessment of nasal obstruction, as measured by acoustic rhinometry (volume of the first 5 cm of the nasal cavity) and active anterior rhinomanometry (total nasal airway resistance), with its subjective evaluation (obstruction scores). METHOD: Thirty patients, aged 7 to 18 years, with persistent allergic rhinitis and thirty controls were enrolled. The obstruction score was reported for the whole nasal cavity and for each nostril separately. The three variables were measured at baseline and after induction of nasal obstruction. RESULTS: There were significant and negative correlations between resistance and nasal volume in all groups and scenarios, except for the most obstructed nostril, in the control group, post-obstruction. For the whole nasal cavity, there was no significant correlation between objective and subjective variables except between score and total nasal cavity volume in the control group, post-obstruction. Regarding the most obstructed nostril, we found a significant negative correlation between score and resistance and a significant positive correlation between score and volume for the total group at baseline. There were no clear differences in the correlation coefficients found in patients and controls. The correlation coefficients did not change after induction of nasal obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Objective assessment of nasal obstruction did not correlate significantly with subjective evaluation for the nasal cavity as a whole, but there was a correlation for unilateral assessments. There was correlation between the objective evaluations. Allergic rhinitis and acute induction of nasal obstruction did not affect the correlation between objective and subjective assessments of nasal obstruction. Addition of an objective method for evaluation of nasal obstruction could be useful in the research setting; if no such method can be used, each nostril should be evaluated separately.

Rinometria acústica e testes de provocação nasal / Acoustic rhinometry and nasal provocation tests

A rinometria acústica é uma técnica que possibilita a avaliação da geometria nasal pela emissão e captação ondas sonoras na entrada da cavidade nasal, com a mensuração de seu volume em diferentes pontos. A rinometria acústica não depende da cooperação do paciente e consiste em método confiável e reprodutível para a análise do volume nasal de crianças e de adultos.Os testes de provocação nasal (TPN) são bioensaios que tentam reproduzir ou simular diferentes agravos sofridos pela mucosa nasal, em condições padronizadas e reprodutíveis. Os TPN consistem, basicamente, na instilação de concentrações crescentes de agentes capazes de induzir resposta local com o desencadeamento de sintomas (espirros, coriza e prurido) e alterações no fluxo aéreo nasal. TPN são considerados como importante ferramenta para estudo da fisiopatologia de rinopatias crônicas, como a rinite alérgica. Além disso, os TPN também podem ser empregados no seguimento temporal da gravidade da doença e na avaliação de resposta a diversos tratamentos e intervenções. Medidas objetivas devem ser empregadas no seu monitoramento e a rinometria acústica, por suas características, representa uma promissora opção.

Evaluation of threshold criteria for the nasal histamine challenge test in perennial allergic rhinitis.

Nasal reactivity to histamine was determined in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis and in control subjects. A histamine titration method delivered by a metered dose pump was used. Stuffiness, itching, and the number of sneezes were recorded, nasal secretions measured, and nasal airway resistance was recorded by active anterior rhinomanometry. Increased nasal reactivity to histamine was observed among rhinitic patients and inversely correlated with the severity of nasal symptoms. A 3-fold increase of post-saline nasal airway resistance (NAR) best differentiated the nasal responses to histamine in rhinitic patients from those in control subjects. A histamine dose of < or = 2.5 microg provoked a 3-fold increase in NAR, strongly suggesting moderate or severe symptomatic rhinitis in most cases. Nasal provocation techniques might be a useful tool for objectively assessing disease severity and response to treatment in perennial allergic rhinitis.