Manejo de la hipoxia durante ventilación unipulmonar en un paciente con absceso mediastinal y mediastinitis para toracotomía abierta. Reporte de caso / Hypoxia Management during One-Lung Ventilation in a Patient with Mediastinal Abscess and Mediastinitis for Open Thoracotomy. Case Report

Introducción: la mayoría de los pacientes que se someten a cirugía torácica pueden ser clasificados en el grupo de alto riesgo para hipoxia, especialmente cuando se decide por una ventilación unipulmonar, debido al desequilibrio V/Q; por lo tanto, se han desa-rrollado nuevas estrategias ventilatorias y maniobras de rescate para hipoxia. Curso clínico: presentamos una paciente de 85 años de edad sin comorbilidades programada para toracotomía abierta y manejada con ventilación unipulmonar. Durante el mane-jo anestésico, se presenta hipoxia secundaria a desequilibrio V/Q y choque hipovolémi-co hemorrágico, con respuesta positiva a las maniobras de rescate para hipoxia. Con-clusión: es importante prevenir en la medida de lo posible la hipoxia en la ventilación unipulmonar, siguiendo las nuevas estrategias ventilatorias. Sin embargo, cuando se presenta una crisis, no debemos retrasar las maniobras de rescate de forma moderna. (AU)

Introduction: most of the patients undergoing thoracic surgery fit in the high risk group for hypoxia, especially when deciding to use one-lung ventilation due to the V/Q mis-match; therefore, new ventilation strategies and hypoxia rescue manoeuvres have been developed. Clinical course: we present an 85-year old female with no major co-morbidities scheduled for open thoracotomy and managed with one-lung ventilation. During the course of the anaesthetic management, hypoxia presents secondary to V/Q mismatch and haemorrhagic hypovolemic shock, with a positive response to hypoxia rescue manoeuvres. Conclusion: it is important to prevent as much as we can the hy-poxia in a one-lung ventilation following the new ventilation strategies. Although when facing a crisis, proper hypoxia management with a modern approach should not be de-layed. (AU)

Behavior of stroke volume variation in hemodynamic stable patients during thoracic surgery with one-lung ventilation periods / Comportamento da variação do volume sistólico em pacientes hemodinamicamente estáveis durante cirurgia torácica com períodos de ventilação monopulmonar

Abstract Introduction: In last few years, emphasis was placed in goal-directed therapy in order to optimize patient's hemodynamic status and improve their prognosis. Parameters based on the interaction between heart and lungs have been questioned in situations like low tidal volume and open chest surgery. The goal of the study was to analyze the changes that one-lung ventilation can produce over stroke volume variation and to assess the possible impact of airway pressures and lung compliance over stroke volume variation. Methods: Prospective observational study, 112 patients undergoing lung resection surgery with one-lung ventilation periods were included. Intravenous fluid therapy with crystalloids was set at 2 mL.g-1. Hypotension episodes were treated with vasoconstrictive drugs. Two-lung Ventilation was implemented with a TV of 8 mL.g-1 and one-lung ventilation was managed with a TV of 6 mL.g-1. Invasive blood pressure was monitored. We recorded the following cardiorespiratory values: heart rate, mean arterial pressure, cardiac index, stroke volume index, airway peak pressure, airway plateau pressure and static lung compliance at 3 different times during surgery: immediately after lung collapse, 30 min after initiating one-lung ventilation and after restoration of two-lung ventilation. Results: Stroke volume variation values were influenced by lung collapse (before lung collapse 14.6 (DS) vs. OLV 9.9% (DS), p < 0.0001); or after restoring two-lung ventilation (11.01 (DS), p < 0.0001). During two-lung Ventilation there was a significant correlation between airway pressures and stroke volume variation, however this correlation lacks during one-lung ventilation. Conclusion: The decrease of stroke volume variation values during one-lung ventilation with protective ventilatory strategies advices not to use the same threshold values to determine fluid responsiveness.

Resumo Introdução: Nos últimos anos, a importância da terapia alvo-dirigida foi enfatizada para aprimorar o estado hemodinâmico do paciente e melhorar seu prognóstico. Os parâmetros baseados na interação entre o coração e os pulmões foram questionados em situações como baixo volume corrente e cirurgia aberta do tórax. O objetivo do estudo foi analisar as alterações que a ventilação monopulmonar pode produzir na variação do volume sistólico e avaliar o possível impacto das pressões da via aérea e da complacência pulmonar sobre a variação do volume sistólico. Métodos: Estudo observacional prospectivo, no qual 112 pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de ressecção pulmonar com períodos de ventilação monopulmonar foram incluídos. A terapia de fluídos intravenosos com cristaloides foi ajustada a 2 mL.kg-1.h-1. Os episódios de hipotensão foram tratados com vasoconstritores. A ventilação dos dois pulmões (VDP) foi implantada com volume corrente de 8 mL.kg-1 e a ventilação monopulmonar foi controlada com volume corrente de 6 mL.kg-1. Foi monitorada a pressão arterial invasiva. Registramos os seguintes valores cardiorrespiratórios: frequência cardíaca, pressão arterial média, índice cardíaco, índice de volume sistólico, pressão de pico das vias aéreas, pressão de platô das vias aéreas e complacência pulmonar estática em três tempos durante a cirurgia: imediatamente após o colapso do pulmão, 30 minutos após o início da ventilação monopulmonar e após a restauração da ventilação dos dois pulmões. Resultados: Os valores de variação do volume sistólico foram influenciados pelo colapso pulmonar (antes do colapso pulmonar 14,6 [DS] vs. ventilação monopulmonar 9,9% [DS], p < 0,0001), ou após o restabelecimento da ventilação dos dois pulmões (11,01 [DS], p < 0,0001). Durante a ventilação dos dois pulmões houve uma correlação significativa entre as pressões das vias aéreas e a variação do volume sistólico, porém, essa correlação não existe durante a ventilação monopulmonar. Conclusão: A diminuição dos valores da variação do volume sistólico durante a ventilação monopulmonar com estratégias ventilatórias protetoras sugere não usar os mesmos valores de limiar para determinar a responsividade aos fluídos.

Selective lobar blockade with a Coopdech blocker combined with a double-lumen endotracheal tube for lung metastases resection by laser / Bloqueio lobar seletivo com um bloqueador Coopdech combinado com um tubo endotraqueal de duplo lúmen para ressecção de metástases pulmonares com laser

Abstract In recent years, laser resection of lung metastases has been established as the standard procedure worldwide. To avoid airway fire, it is necessary to collapse the surgical lung. The selective lobar bronchial blockade is a technique that allows one-lung ventilation while the operated lobe is collapsed in patients with previous pulmonary resection requiring subsequent resection or with limited pulmonary reserve. We report a clinical case about our experience of a selective lobar bronchial blockade technique with a bronchial blocker (Coopdech endobronchial blocker) that was employed successfully with a double-lumen endotracheal tube in a patient with previous contralateral pulmonary resection who was scheduled for atypical resections of pulmonary metastases by laser. We selectively blocked the right intermediate bronchus for management of hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation. This technique provided adequate ventilation and oxygenation during surgery, avoiding the need of two-lung ventilation during lung metastases resection by laser. Conclusion: This case shows that if a properly positioned double-lumen tube was already in place and the patient does not tolerate one-lung ventilation because of hypoxemia, it would be possible to provide selective lobar blockade by placing a bronchial blocker through the lumen of the double-lumen tube, avoiding the use of continuous positive airway pressure during laser surgery. This technique does not disturb the operative field or interrupt the operative procedure during resection by laser, which would occur during two-lung ventilation or used of continuous positive airway pressure.

Resumo Nos últimos anos, a ressecção de metástases pulmonares com o uso de laser foi estabelecida como o procedimento padrão em todo o mundo. Para evitar queimadura das vias aéreas, o colapso cirúrgico do pulmão é necessário. O bloqueio brônquico seletivo é uma técnica que permite a ventilação de um lobo, enquanto o lobo operado é colapsado nos pacientes com ressecção pulmonar anterior que requerem ressecção subsequente ou que possuem reserva pulmonar limitada. Relatamos um caso clínico de nossa experiência com a técnica de bloqueio brônquico seletivo com bloqueador brônquico (bloqueador endobrônquico Coopdech), usado com sucesso com um tubo endotraqueal de duplo lúmen em um paciente com ressecção pulmonar contralateral prévia, agendado para ressecção atípica de metástases pulmonares com o uso de laser. Seletivamente bloqueamos o brônquio intermediário direito para o controle de hipoxemia durante a ventilação monopulmonar. Essa técnica proporcionou ventilação e oxigenação adequadas durante a cirurgia, evitando a necessidade de ventilar os dois pulmões durante a ressecção de metástases pulmonares com o uso de laser. Conclusão: Este caso mostra que, se um tubo de duplo lume estiver corretamente posicionado e o paciente não tolerar a ventilação monopulmonar devido à hipoxemia, seria possível fornecer bloqueio lobar seletivo com a colocação de um bloqueador brônquico através do lume do tubo de duplo lume, evitando o uso de pressão positiva contínua de vias aéreas (PPCVA) durante a cirurgia a laser. Essa técnica não interfere no campo operatório ou interrompe o procedimento durante a ressecção por laser, que poderia ocorrer durante a ventilação dos dois pulmões ou uso de PPCVA.

Comparison of Arndt-endobronchial blocker plus laryngeal mask airway with left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tube in one-lung ventilation in thoracic surgery in the morbidly obese

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and performance of Arndt-endobronchial blocker (Arndt) combined with laryngeal mask airway (LMA) compared with left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tube (L-DLT) in morbidly obese patients in one-lung ventilation (OLV). In a prospective, randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial, 80 morbidly obese patients (ASA I-III, aged 20-70) undergoing general anesthesia for elective thoracic surgeries were randomly allocated into groups Arndt (n=40) and L-DLT (n=40). In group Arndt, a LMA™ Proseal was placed followed by an Arndt-endobronchial blocker. In group L-DLT, patients were intubated with a left-sided double-lumen endotracheal tube. Primary endpoints were the airway establishment, ease of insertion, oxygenation, lung collapse and surgical field exposure. Results showed similar ease of airway establishment and tube/device insertion between the two groups. Oxygen arterial pressure (PaO2) of patients in the Arndt group was significantly higher than L-DLT (154±46 vs 105±52 mmHg; P<0.05). Quality of lung collapse and surgical field exposure in the Arndt group was significantly better than L-DLT (effective rate 100 vs 90%; P<0.05). Duration of surgery and anesthesia were significantly shorter in the Arndt group (2.4±1.7 vs 3.1±1.8 and 2.8±1.9 vs 3.8±1.8 h, respectively; P<0.05). Incidence of hoarseness of voice and incidence and severity of throat pain at the post-anesthesia care unit and 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery were significantly lower in the Arndt group (P<0.05). Findings suggested that Arndt-endobronchial blocker combined with LMA can serve as a promising alternative for morbidly obese patients in OLV in thoracic surgery.

[RETRACTED ARTICLE] Comparison of Arndt-endobronchial blocker plus laryngeal mask airway with left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tube in one-lung ventilation in thoracic surgery in the morbidly obese

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and performance of Arndt-endobronchial blocker (Arndt) combined with laryngeal mask airway (LMA) compared with left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tube (L-DLT) in morbidly obese patients in one-lung ventilation (OLV). In a prospective, randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial, 80 morbidly obese patients (ASA I-III, aged 20-70) undergoing general anesthesia for elective thoracic surgeries were randomly allocated into groups Arndt (n=40) and L-DLT (n=40). In group Arndt, a LMA™ Proseal was placed followed by an Arndt-endobronchial blocker. In group L-DLT, patients were intubated with a left-sided double-lumen endotracheal tube. Primary endpoints were the airway establishment, ease of insertion, oxygenation, lung collapse and surgical field exposure. Results showed similar ease of airway establishment and tube/device insertion between the two groups. Oxygen arterial pressure (PaO2) of patients in the Arndt group was significantly higher than L-DLT (154±46 vs 105±52 mmHg; P<0.05). Quality of lung collapse and surgical field exposure in the Arndt group was significantly better than L-DLT (effective rate 100 vs 90%; P<0.05). Duration of surgery and anesthesia were significantly shorter in the Arndt group (2.4±1.7 vs 3.1±1.8 and 2.8±1.9 vs 3.8±1.8 h, respectively; P<0.05). Incidence of hoarseness of voice and incidence and severity of throat pain at the post-anesthesia care unit and 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery were significantly lower in the Arndt group (P<0.05). Findings suggested that Arndt-endobronchial blocker combined with LMA can serve as a promising alternative for morbidly obese patients in OLV in thoracic surgery.

Anesthetic issues for robotic cardiac surgery.

As innovative technology continues to be developed and is implemented into the realm of cardiac surgery, surgical teams, cardiothoracic anesthesiologists, and health centers are constantly looking for methods to improve patient outcomes and satisfaction. One of the more recent developments in cardiac surgical practice is minimally invasive robotic surgery. Its use has been documented in numerous publications, and its use has proliferated significantly over the past 15 years. The anesthesiology team must continue to develop and perfect special techniques to manage these patients perioperatively including lung isolation techniques and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). This review article of recent scientific data and personal experience serves to explain some of the challenges, which the anesthetic team must manage, including patient and procedural factors, complications from one‑lung ventilation (OLV) including hypoxia and hypercapnia, capnothorax, percutaneous cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass, TEE guidance, as well as methods of intraoperative monitoring and analgesia. As existing minimally invasive techniques are perfected, and newer innovations are demonstrated, it is imperative that the cardiothoracic anesthesiologist must improve and maintain skills to guide these patients safely through the robotic procedure.