Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Smartphone-based stent tracking application for prevention of forgotten ureteral double-J stents: a prospective study
Ulker, Volkan; Atalay, Hasan Anil; Cakmak, Ozgur; Yucel, Cem; Celik, Orcun; Kozacioglu, Zafer.
  • Ulker, Volkan; Health Sciences University. Tepecik Training and Research Hospital. Department of Urology. Izmir. TR
  • Atalay, Hasan Anil; Health Sciences University. Okmeydani Training and Research Hospital. Department of Urology. Istanbul. TR
  • Cakmak, Ozgur; Health Sciences University. Tepecik Training and Research Hospital. Department of Urology. Izmir. TR
  • Yucel, Cem; Health Sciences University. Tepecik Training and Research Hospital. Department of Urology. Izmir. TR
  • Celik, Orcun; Health Sciences University. Tepecik Training and Research Hospital. Department of Urology. Izmir. TR
  • Kozacioglu, Zafer; Health Sciences University. Tepecik Training and Research Hospital. Department of Urology. Izmir. TR
Int. braz. j. urol ; 45(2): 376-383, Mar.-Apr. 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1002189
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Retained or forgotten ureteral stents (FUS) have a potential to cause significant morbidity as well as medico-legal issues and increased cost. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and usefulness of smartphone-based Ureteral Stent Tracker (UST) application and compare the results with basic appointment card system to prevent FUS, prospectively. Materials and

Methods:

A total of 90 patients who underwent ureteroscopic stone treatment procedure with indwelling DJ stents were equally distributed into two groups. In group-1, patients were followed using UST application. In group-2, only appointment cards were given to the patients. Two groups were compared in terms of stent overdue times and complete lost to follow up rates.

Results:

Forty-four patients in group-1 and 43 patients in group-2 completed the study. Among patients, 22.7% in group-1 and 27.9% in group-2 did not return for the stent removal on the scheduled day. In group-1, these patients were identified using the UST and called for the stent removal on the same day. After 6 weeks of maximal waiting period, mean overdue times in group-1 and group-2 were 3.5 days and 20 days, respectively (p = 0.001). In group-2, 3 patients (6.9%) were lost to follow up, while in group-1, it was none (p = 0.001).

Conclusions:

We found that the patients who were followed by the smartphone-based UST application has less overdue times and lost to follow up cases compared to the basic appointment card system. The UST application easily follows patients with indwelling ureteral stents and can identify patients when overdue.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Stents / Ureteroscopy / Smartphone / Foreign Bodies Type of study: Etiology study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: Turkey Institution/Affiliation country: Health Sciences University/TR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Stents / Ureteroscopy / Smartphone / Foreign Bodies Type of study: Etiology study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: Turkey Institution/Affiliation country: Health Sciences University/TR