Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A continuous fall of PSA use for prostate cancer screening among Brazilian doctors since 2001. Good or bad notice?
Araújo, Fernando Antônio Glasner da Rocha; Sumita, Nairo Massakazu; Barroso J, Ubirajara de Oliveira.
  • Araújo, Fernando Antônio Glasner da Rocha; Universidade Federal da Bahia. Faculdade de Medicina da. Departamento de Medicina. Salvador. BR
  • Sumita, Nairo Massakazu; Divisão de Química Clínica. Fleury Medicina e Saúde. São Paulo. BR
  • Barroso J, Ubirajara de Oliveira; Universidade Federal da Bahia. Faculdade de Medicina da. Departamento de Cirurgia Especial. Salvador. BR
Int. braz. j. urol ; 45(3): 478-485, May-June 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1012323
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

To evaluate the trend of use of Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) for screening of prostate cancer (PC) among Brazilian doctors, from the beginning of its regular availability in clinical laboratories. Material and

Methods:

A serial cross-sectional study was performed using data obtained from a large database between 1997 and 2016. The general PSA screening trend during this period, adjusted for the total number of exams performed in men, was analyzed. Time-series analysis was performed through observation of the general regression curve using the generalized least squares method, and the impact of the recommendations was assessed with autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models.

Results:

During the period studied 2,521,383 PSA determinations were done. The age of the participants ranged from 21 to 111 years, with an average of 56.7 ± 22.7 years. The relative number of PSA tests/100.000 exams in males showed a constant reduction since 2001, and this trend was more evident in the group aged 55-69 years. Although statistically significant, the impact of reduced PSA screening after the 2012 USPSTF publication was clinically irrelevant.

Conclusions:

Our results indicated a continuous reduction in the use of PSA screening over time, regardless of the publication of recommendations or clinical guidelines. The fact that this trend was more pronounced among those with a greater benefit potential (55-69 years), relative to groups with a greater damage potential due to overdiagnosis and overtreatment (aged >74 years and <40 years), is a matter of concern. Follow-up studies of these trends are advisable.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Prostatic Neoplasms / Prostate-Specific Antigen / Early Detection of Cancer Type of study: Diagnostic study / Practice guideline / Observational study / Prevalence study / Prognostic study / Risk factors / Screening study Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: South America / Brazil Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Divisão de Química Clínica/BR / Universidade Federal da Bahia/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Prostatic Neoplasms / Prostate-Specific Antigen / Early Detection of Cancer Type of study: Diagnostic study / Practice guideline / Observational study / Prevalence study / Prognostic study / Risk factors / Screening study Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: South America / Brazil Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Divisão de Química Clínica/BR / Universidade Federal da Bahia/BR