Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predicting urine output after kidney transplantation: development and internal validation of a nomogram for clinical use
Dias Filho, Aderivaldo Cabral; Alves, João Ricardo; Cruz, Pedro Rincon Cintra da; Santana, Viviane Brandão Bandeira de Mello; Riccetto, Cassio Luis Zanettini.
  • Dias Filho, Aderivaldo Cabral; Instituto Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal. Unidade de Urologia e Transplante Renal. Brasília. BR
  • Alves, João Ricardo; Instituto Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal. Unidade de Urologia e Transplante Renal. Brasília. BR
  • Cruz, Pedro Rincon Cintra da; Instituto Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal. Unidade de Urologia e Transplante Renal. Brasília. BR
  • Santana, Viviane Brandão Bandeira de Mello; Instituto Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal. Unidade de Nefrologia e Transplante Renal. Brasília. BR
  • Riccetto, Cassio Luis Zanettini; Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Faculdade de Ciências Médicas. Divisão de Urologia. Campinas. BR
Int. braz. j. urol ; 45(3): 588-604, May-June 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1012327
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

To analyze pre-transplantation and early postoperative factors affecting post-transplantation urine output and develop a predictive nomogram. Patients and

Methods:

Retrospective analysis of non-preemptive first transplanted adult patients between 2001-2016. The outcomes were hourly diuresis in mL/Kg in the 1st (UO1) and 8th (UO8) postoperative days (POD). Predictors for both UO1 and UO8 were cold ischemia time (CIT), patient and donor age and sex, HLA I and II compatibility, pre-transplantation duration of renal replacement therapy (RRT), cause of ESRD (ESRD) and immunosuppressive regimen. UO8 predictors also included UO1, 1st/0th POD plasma creatinine concentration ratio (Cr1/0), and occurrence of acute cellular rejection (AR). Multivariable linear regression was employed to produce nomograms for UO1 and UO8.

Results:

Four hundred and seventy-three patients were included, mostly deceased donor kidneys' recipients (361, 70.4%). CIT inversely correlated with UO1 and UO8 (Spearman's p=-0.43 and −0.37). CR1/0 inversely correlated with UO8 (p=-0.47). On multivariable analysis UO1 was mainly influenced by CIT, with additional influences of donor age and sex, HLA II matching and ESRD. UO1 was the strongest predictor of UO8, with significant influences of AR and ESRD.

Conclusions:

The predominant influence of CIT on UO1 rapidly wanes and is replaced by indicators of functional recovery (mainly UO1) and allograft's immunologic acceptance (AR absence). Mean absolute errors for nomograms were 0.08 mL/Kg h (UO1) and 0.05 mL/Kg h (UO8).
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Kidney Transplantation / Nomograms / Diuresis Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Instituto Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal/BR / Universidade Estadual de Campinas/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Kidney Transplantation / Nomograms / Diuresis Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Instituto Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal/BR / Universidade Estadual de Campinas/BR