Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Surgical treatment for renal masses in the elderly: analysis of oncological, surgical and functional outcomes
Poletajew, Slawomir; Zapała, Piotr; Kopczyński, Bartlomiej; Białek, Lukasz; Bender, Sylwia; Mutrynowski, Tomasz; Nowak, Mateusz; Mróz, Julia; Pędzisz, Grzegorz; Dybowski, Bartosz; Radziszewski, Piotr.
  • Poletajew, Slawomir; Medical University of Warsaw. Department of Urology. Warsaw. PL
  • Zapała, Piotr; Medical University of Warsaw. Department of Urology. Warsaw. PL
  • Kopczyński, Bartlomiej; Medical University of Warsaw. Department of Urology. Warsaw. PL
  • Białek, Lukasz; Medical University of Warsaw. Department of Urology. Warsaw. PL
  • Bender, Sylwia; Medical University of Warsaw. Department of Urology. Warsaw. PL
  • Mutrynowski, Tomasz; Medical University of Warsaw. Department of Urology. Warsaw. PL
  • Nowak, Mateusz; Medical University of Warsaw. Department of Urology. Warsaw. PL
  • Mróz, Julia; Medical University of Warsaw. Department of Urology. Warsaw. PL
  • Pędzisz, Grzegorz; Medical University of Warsaw. Department of Urology. Warsaw. PL
  • Dybowski, Bartosz; Medical University of Warsaw. Department of Urology. Warsaw. PL
  • Radziszewski, Piotr; Medical University of Warsaw. Department of Urology. Warsaw. PL
Int. braz. j. urol ; 45(3): 531-540, May-June 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1012328
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Radical treatment in elderly patients with renal tumor remains debatable due to uncertainties regarding the risk of surgical complications, risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and survival benefit. The aim of the study was to assess outcomes of radical treatment for renal cancer in elderly patients. Materials and

Methods:

This retrospective analysis enrolled 507 consecutive patients treated with partial or radical nephrectomy due to renal mass. Patients with upfront metastatic disease (n=46) and patients lost to follow-up (n=110) were excluded from the analysis. Surgical, functional (screen for ESRD development) and survival outcomes were analyzed in patients aged >75 years in comparison to younger individuals.

Results:

The analyzed group included 55 elderly patients and 296 younger controls. Within the cohort a total of 148 and 203 patients underwent radical and partial nephrectomies respectively. The rate of surgical complications, including grade ≥3 Clavien- Dindo complications, did not differ between groups (3.6% vs. 4.4%, p=0.63). Median length of hospital stay was equal in both groups (7 days). During a follow-up (median 51.9 months, no difference between groups), ESRD occurred in 3.4% of controls and was not reported in elderly group (p=0.37). Younger patients demonstrated a statistically significant advantage in both overall survival and cancer-specific survival over elderly patients (OS 94.6% vs. 87% p=0.036, CSS 97.3% vs. 89.1% p=0.0008).

Conclusions:

Surgical treatment in elderly patients with renal tumor is as safe as in younger individuals and does not increase the risk of ESRD. However, cancer specific survival among these patients remains shorter than in younger patients.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Carcinoma, Renal Cell / Kidney Neoplasms / Nephrectomy Type of study: Etiology study / Observational study / Risk factors Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: Poland Institution/Affiliation country: Medical University of Warsaw/PL

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Carcinoma, Renal Cell / Kidney Neoplasms / Nephrectomy Type of study: Etiology study / Observational study / Risk factors Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: Poland Institution/Affiliation country: Medical University of Warsaw/PL