Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An augmented patient-specific approach to administration of contrast agent for CT renal angiography
Saade, Charbel; Hamieh, Nadine; Deeb, Ibrahim Al-Sheikh; Haddad, Maurice; Abi-Ghanem, Alain S; Ghieh, Diamond; El-Merhi, Fadi.
  • Saade, Charbel; American University of Beirut. Department of Radiology. Beirut. LB
  • Hamieh, Nadine; American University of Beirut. Department of Radiology. Beirut. LB
  • Deeb, Ibrahim Al-Sheikh; American University of Beirut. Department of Radiology. Beirut. LB
  • Haddad, Maurice; American University of Beirut. Department of Radiology. Beirut. LB
  • Abi-Ghanem, Alain S; American University of Beirut. Department of Radiology. Beirut. LB
  • Ghieh, Diamond; American University of Beirut. Department of Radiology. Beirut. LB
  • El-Merhi, Fadi; American University of Beirut. Department of Radiology. Beirut. LB
Int. braz. j. urol ; 45(5): 1022-1032, Sept.-Dec. 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1040074
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Purpose This hybrid retrospective and prospective study performed on 200 consecutive patients undergoing renal CTA, investigates the opacification of renal vasculature, radiation dose, and reader confidence. Materials and Methods 100 patients were assigned retrospectively to protocol A and the other 100 were allocated prospectively to protocol B. Both protocols implemented a contrast material and saline flow rate of 4.5 mL/sec. Protocol A utilized a 100 mL of low-osmolar nonionic IV contrast material (Ioversol 350 mg I/mL) while protocol B employed a patient-tailored contrast media formula using iso-osmolar non-ionic (Iodixanol 320 mg I/mL). Results Arterial opacification in the abdominal aorta and in the bilateral main proximal renal arteries demonstrated no statistical significance (p>0.05). Only the main distal renal artery of the left kidney in protocol B was statistically significant (p<0.046). In the venous circulation, the IVC demonstrated a significant reduction in opacification in protocol B (59.39 HU ± 19.39) compared to A (87.74 HU ± 34.06) (p<0.001). Mean CNR for protocol A (22.68 HU ± 13.72) was significantly higher than that of protocol B (14.75 HU ± 5.76 p< 0.0001). Effective dose was significantly reduced in protocol B (2.46 ± 0.74 mSv) compared to A (3.07 ± 0.68 mSv) (p<0.001). Mean contrast media volume was reduced in protocol B (44.56 ± 14.32 mL) with lower iodine concentration. ROC analysis demonstrated significantly higher area under the ROC curve for protocol B (p< 0.0001), with inter-reader agreement increasing from moderate to excellent in renal arterial visualization. Conclusion Employing a patient-tailored contrast media injection protocol shows a significant refinement in the visualization of renal vasculature and reader confidence during renal CTA.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Renal Artery / Contrast Media / Computed Tomography Angiography / Kidney Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: Lebanon Institution/Affiliation country: American University of Beirut/LB

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Renal Artery / Contrast Media / Computed Tomography Angiography / Kidney Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: Lebanon Institution/Affiliation country: American University of Beirut/LB