Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Anthropometric and somatotype characteristics of women with breast cancer / Características antropométricas y somatotipos de mujeres con cáncer de mama
Udicki, Mirjana; Adamovic, Dragan; Srdic-Galic, Biljana; Pavlica, Tatjana; Radovanovic, Zoran.
  • Udicki, Mirjana; University of Novi Sad. Faculty of Medicine. Department of Anatomy. Novi Sad. RS
  • Adamovic, Dragan; University of Novi Sad. Faculty of Medicine. Department of Anatomy. Novi Sad. RS
  • Srdic-Galic, Biljana; University of Novi Sad. Faculty of Medicine. Department of Anatomy. Novi Sad. RS
  • Pavlica, Tatjana; University of Novi Sad. Faculty of Sciences. Department of Biology and Ecology. Novi Sad. RS
  • Radovanovic, Zoran; University of Novi Sad. Faculty of Medicine. Novi Sad. RS
Int. j. morphol ; 38(2): 448-457, abr. 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1056461
ABSTRACT
Inconsistent data are available on the relation between breast cancer, adiposity, body size and somatotype. The aim of our study was to compare anthropometric characteristics, body composition and somatotype between breast cancer patients and healthy controls. Study group consisted of 106 breast cancer patients while control group consisted of 100 healthy women who underwent 29 anthropometric measurements. Women with breast cancer expressed more male anthropometric features like higher stature (160.75±6.91 vs. 158.17±4.89 cm, p=0.020), shorter trunk (sitting height in premenopausal 84.94±5.07 vs. 88.50±3.84 cm, p=0.001 and postmenopausal women 81.96±6.08 vs. 85.19±3.36 cm, p=0.001), narrower hips (29.20±3.78 vs. 32.24±1.78 cm, p=0.000), higher biepicondylar diameter of humerus (premenopausal 6.64±0.71 vs. 6.31±0.42 cm, p=0.012; postmenopausal 6.95±0.63 vs. 6.54±0.49 cm, p=0.000), larger upper- and forearm as well as upper thigh circumferences followed by lower biceps and higher thigh skinfold thicknesses. They also had significantly lower endomorphy (premenopausal 5.84±1.78 vs. 6.55±0.96, p=0.027; postmenopausal 6.89±1.52 vs. 7.37±0.86, p=0.035) and significantly higher ectomorphy (premenopausal 2.05±1.30 vs. 1.41±0.99, p=0.018; postmenopausal 1.06±0.90 vs. 0.68±0.56, p=0.007), as well as higher mesomorphy only in postmenopausal women (6.10±2.04 vs. 5.37±1.34, p=0.022). Most represented somatotype among breast cancer patients was endomorph-mesomorph while the most healthy controls were mesomorphic endomorph. Android body type increases the risk of development of breast cancer. Indicators of skeletal dimensions, muscle volume and peripheral adiposity had better predictive value over markers of central and overall adiposity.
RESUMEN
La información en la literatura es variable sobre la relación entre el cáncer de mama, la adiposidad, el tamaño corporal y somatotipo de las mujeres. El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar las características antropométricas, la composición corporal y el somatotipo entre pacientes con cáncer de mama y controles sanos. El grupo de estudio consistió en 106 pacientes con cáncer de mama y el grupo de control de 100 mujeres sanas que se sometieron a 29 mediciones antropométricas. Las mujeres con cáncer de mama tenían mayor cantidad características antropométricas masculinas, tal como una estatura más alta (160.75±6.91 vs. 158.17±4.89 cm, p = 0.020), tronco más corto (altura sentada en premenopáusica 84.94±5.07 vs. 88.50±3.84 cm, p = 0.001 y mujeres posmenopáusicas 81.96±6.08 vs. 85.19±3.36 cm, p = 0.001), caderas más estrechas (29.20±3.78 vs. 32.24±1.78 cm, p = 0.000), mayor diámetro biepicondilar del húmero (premenopáusico 6.64±0.71 vs. 6.31 ±0.42 cm, p = 0.012; posmenopáusica 6.95±0.63 vs. 6.54±0.49 cm, p = 0.000), mayor circunferencia del antebrazo y la parte superior del muslo, bíceps inferiores y mayor grosor del pliegue de la piel del muslo. Además se observó una endomorfia significativamente menor (premenopáusica 5.84±1.78 vs. 6.55±0.96, p = 0.027; posmenopáusica 6.89±1.52 vs. 7.37±0.86, p = 0.035) y una ectomorfia significativamente más alta (premenopáusica 2.05±1.30 vs. 1.41 .990.99, p = 0.018; posmenopáusica 1.06±0.90 vs. 0.68±0.56, p = 0.007), así como una mayor mesomorfia solo en mujeres posmenopáusicas (6.10±2.04 vs. 5.37±1.34, p = 0.022). El somatotipo más representado entre las pacientes con cáncer de mama fue el endomorfomesomorfo, mientras que los controles más sanos fueron el mesomórfico endomorfo. Las características del cuerpo tipo androide aumenta el riesgo de desarrollar cáncer de mama. Los indicadores de dimensiones esqueléticas, volumen muscular y adiposidad periférica tuvieron un mejor valor predictivo sobre los marcadores de adiposidad central y general.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Somatotypes / Breast Neoplasms / Anthropometry Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans Language: English Journal: Int. j. morphol Journal subject: Anatomy Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Tunisia Institution/Affiliation country: University of Novi Sad/RS

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Somatotypes / Breast Neoplasms / Anthropometry Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans Language: English Journal: Int. j. morphol Journal subject: Anatomy Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Tunisia Institution/Affiliation country: University of Novi Sad/RS