Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the Genetic Screening Processor for the Performance of Newborn Screening Tests
Castro, Simone Martins de; Filippon, Letícia; Souza, André C.; Weber, Raquel.
  • Castro, Simone Martins de; Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas. Reference Laboratory in Newborn Screening. Porto Alegre. BR
  • Filippon, Letícia; Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas. Reference Laboratory in Newborn Screening. Porto Alegre. BR
  • Souza, André C.; Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas. Reference Laboratory in Newborn Screening. Porto Alegre. BR
  • Weber, Raquel; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. School of Pharmacy. Porto Alegre. BR
J. inborn errors metab. screen ; 4: e160013, 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1090900
ABSTRACT
Abstract The collection of dried blood spots (DBSs) on filter paper has been a powerful tool in newborn screening (NBS) programs and in other fields. However, filter paper has been associated with some level of imprecision due to the filter paper matrix effect. In order to minimize measurement variations, these interferences should be evaluated by NBS assays. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of genetic screening processor (GSP) equipment in comparison with a widely used AutoDELFIA and to discuss the limitations and advantages of this new technology in NBS. We evaluated the performance of 3 NBS assays in DBS using GSP in comparison with AutoDELFIA. To determine the inaccuracy and the intra-assay precision, a comparative study and a replication experiment were performed. In the comparative study, human thyroid-stimulating hormone (hTSH) assay showed the highest correlation coefficient, followed by 17α-OH-progesterone and immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) assays. The results of the present study suggest that the GSP equipment and kits are suitable for implementation and have acceptable performance for NBS routine. Genetic screening processor assay tends to underestimate hTSH and IRT concentrations in the clinically relevant range when compared to AutoDELFIA assays. More studies are necessary to reevaluate cutoff values. Furthermore, the equipment has advantages when compared with AutoDELFIA, such as methodology with more specificity, reduction in the processing time, and randomized routine. This helps promoting faster dynamic technical processes and faster report generation.


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Diagnostic study / Screening study Language: English Journal: J. inborn errors metab. screen Journal subject: Medicina Cl¡nica / Patologia Year: 2016 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas/BR / Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Diagnostic study / Screening study Language: English Journal: J. inborn errors metab. screen Journal subject: Medicina Cl¡nica / Patologia Year: 2016 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas/BR / Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul/BR